► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Racism’

Take Action: Tell Obama That U.S. Support Of Antisemitic Durban II Conference Is Wrong!

by WrathofG-d ( 50 Comments › )
Filed under Hate Speech, Islamists, Judaism at February 23rd, 2009 - 12:31 pm

Demonstrators At "Durban I"



The Obama Administration has decided that the U.S. will participate in the United Nations’ Durban Review Conference, commonly called “Durban II”.  Insofar that “Durban I” was nothing more than an open forum for blatant Antisemitism, and Racism, U.S. participation in “Durban II” must be strongly opposed.

President Obama’s decision to send a U.S. delegation to the planning sessions for Durban II is an extremely disturbing change in American foreign policy regarding Israel. Like the original Durban conference in 2001, the upcoming conference is based on a document which is specifically anti-Israel. In speaking about racism, xenophobia, and discrimination, the  ‘Durban Declaration and Program of Action’ which lays the framework for Durban II, names only Israel as an offender against human rights. The preparatory committee for Durban II is being chaired by Libya, with Iran and Cuba as vice-chairs. Durban II is based on a document that falsely targets the democratic State of Israel without mentioning real instances of human rights abuses in the dictatorships of Asia, Africa or the Middle East.

It is not possible for U.S. participation in this conference to mitigate the anti-Israel hatred the conference is designed to produce. So far, the U.S. delegation to the planning sessions has remained silent while additional anti-Israel language was added to the conference document. When the Palestinian delegation offered language that called for international protection of the Palestinian people (ostensibly against Israeli racism) and for implementation – as an international legal obligation – of the biased and ungrounded advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice against Israel’s security fence, the U.S. delegation reportedly raised no objection, allowing the language to go through to the final conference without debate.

It is worth remembering that in 2001, when the U.S. withdrew from the first Durban conference, Secretary of State Colin Powell expressed clearly the nature of the conference and why it was unthinkable for the U.S. to participate: ”I know that you do not combat racism by conferences that produce declarations containing hateful language, some of which is a throwback to the days of ‘Zionism equals racism;’ or supports the idea that we have made too much of the Holocaust; or suggests that apartheid exists in Israel; or that singles out only one country in the world-Israel-for censure and abuse.”

The U.S. showed moral clarity and stood by our ally Israel by boycotting the 2001 conference when it became clear that Durban I had degenerated into a hate-fest against Israel, Jews, and the West. This second conference will be no different. Britain, Italy and other countries are watching closely how the U.S. responds. The United States should join Israel and Canada in refusing to participate in the Durban II conference this coming April.

(Thank You Republican Jewish Coalition)

___________________________________________________

The following is a flier that was handed out during a NGO forum at “Durban I”.

durban-1-handout1

 

More disgusting photos and video from “Durban I”.

___________________________________________________

DON’T JUST SIT THERE…..DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT

Contact the White House and your representatives in the U.S. House and Senate to demand that the U.S. withdraw from participation in the Durban II conference.


Associated Press Hits Bottom, Digs

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Associated Press Hits Bottom, Digs
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008 at October 5th, 2008 - 11:33 am

The Associated Press article on Sarah Palin’s comments about William Ayers is a Category 7 jaw-dropper. Apparently, now even criticizing Obama’s associations with white violent radicals is racist: Analysis: Palin’s words carry racial tinge.

Palin’s words avoid repulsing voters with overt racism. But is there another subtext for creating the false image of a black presidential nominee “palling around” with terrorists while assuring a predominantly white audience that he doesn’t see their America?

Her reference to Obama’s relationship with William Ayers, a member of the Vietnam-era Weather Underground, was exaggerated at best if not outright false. No evidence shows they were “pals” or even close when they worked on community boards years ago and Ayers hosted a political event for Obama early in his career.

Obama, who was a child when the Weathermen were planting bombs, has denounced Ayers’ radical views and actions. …

In a post-Sept. 11 America, terrorists are envisioned as dark-skinned radical Muslims, not the homegrown anarchists of Ayers’ day 40 years ago. With Obama a relative unknown when he began his campaign, the Internet hummed with false e-mails about ties to radical Islam of a foreign-born candidate.

Whether intended or not by the McCain campaign, portraying Obama as “not like us” is another potential appeal to racism. It suggests that the Hawaiian-born Christian is, at heart, un-American.

This really is the election in which the mainstream media have thrown all their claims to impartiality right into the sewer. It’s sickening to see.

(Hat tip:Chas)

Colbert King Plays the White Supremacist Card

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Colbert King Plays the White Supremacist Card
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008 at August 17th, 2008 - 3:24 pm

The Washington Post’s Colbert King compares Clinton strategist Mark Penn to white supremacists, frantic to prevent Barack Obama from being elected: Memo From a Poison Penn.

Say you find yourself seated on the train behind two white supremacists who are beside themselves over the possibility that Barack Obama could become America’s first black president.

They are so fired up, they fail to notice you.

The men are discussing the urgent need to derail Obama’s candidacy.

The obvious strategist of the two says that Obama’s defeat can be brought about by hitting him hard, where it hurts the most.

We’ve got to launch an attack, he declares, on Obama’s “lack of American roots.” Paint him as a guy with an exotic background who’s present in mainstream society but isn’t really a part of it.

He asserts, with a snicker, that Obama has “a very strong weakness.” We’ll drive home the argument, he says, that Obama’s “roots to basic American values and culture are at best limited.”

Just one problem with King’s overheated scenario; the real white supremacists are very much in favor of Barack Obama.

So you think the chorus of white hate groups is seething with rage that Barack Obama could become president? Think again.

Members of the knuckle-dragging set are taking a rosier view, judging by their Internet posts. They say the possibility of a biracial president is helping their recruitment efforts.

“It will be a beautiful day when the masses look at the paper and truly realize they have lost their own country,” according to one of the postings spotted by Mark Potok, who monitors hate groups at the Southern Poverty Law Center. “White people aren’t going to do a thing until their toys are taken away from them,” says another. “So things have to be worse for things to be better.”

So much for the question of whether Obama will be able to reach beyond his core liberal constituency.

Even former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke has taken time from his international network of Holocaust-deniers to blog: “Obama is a visual aid for white Americans who just don’t get it yet that we have lost control of our country, and unless we get it back we are heading for complete annihilation as a people.”

(Hat Tip: Charles the Cult Leader)

Charles allows anti-Hispanic post at LGF but bans anti-Muslim post

by Phantom Ace Comments Off on Charles allows anti-Hispanic post at LGF but bans anti-Muslim post
Filed under LGF at August 15th, 2008 - 4:07 pm

Charles who claims he’s anti-Jihadists gets mad when people make anti-Muslim comments. However he’s cool with anti-Hispanic comments like this one below.

#210 SFGoth 8/15/08 3:42:41 pm 0

re: #205 sattv4u2

as she says, so what

US demographics have always been in flux. At 1st, the “majority” were English descendents. Then, as time went on, it became more Eoro-centric (Germans, Italians, etc matched numbers). True, they were all still caucasion, but again what changed?

The key will be assimilation, not numbers. Will Hispanics for the most part do what my Italian grandmother did (assimilate to America in society, yet keep her Italian heritage alive at home). African Americans, even with some cultural divides aren’t any different than me.
So again ,, I agree with her ,, SO WHAT!

She’s wrong. Prior immigrants HAD to assimilate to succeed. Now, there’s huge pressure not to and we mollycoddle immigrants with all kinds of assistance – $ and stuff in their own languages. It’s a straw man argument.

#217 buzzsawmonkey 8/15/08 3:46:50 pm 2