► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Ron Radosh’

The first family of Britsh theater leftists

by Mojambo ( 126 Comments › )
Filed under Politics at May 6th, 2010 - 3:00 pm

The other day Lynn Redgrave (67 years old) succumbed to breast  cancer. Unlike her notorious older sister Vanessa and her recently deceased Trotskyite brother Corin, she never showed Marxist tendencies and by all accounts was a classy lady who loved both her adopted home  America and her native Britain.  Vanessa’s daughter Natasha Richardson who tragically died in a skiing accident last year also seemed to be a decent normal person. As this article shows, the less said about the rest of the bizarre Redgrave family, the better.  Talent does not necessarily mean brains.

Note – as a commenter writes –  “Corin and Vanessa Redgrave were not born in squalid poverty. They are another harsh reminder that the truly poor and dispossessed rarely engage in radical politics. Nope, that dubious honor usually goes to the sons and daughters of fairly affluent parents.”

by Ron Radosh

There is no better précis of how the Left thinks about the world, and acts on it, than the British journalist Nick Cohen’s article appearing in the new issue of Standpoint. Cohen writes a candid appraisal of what left-wing politics did to the mind and life of the late actor Corin Redgrave, brother  of the more famous Vanessa, who like her brother, is a lifetime member of a small fanatic Trotskyist sect, the Workers Revolutionary Party, led by a man named Gerry Healy. The group was so fanatic that it accused Trotsky’s American followers of having been responsible for his murder in Mexico, ignoring all the evidence that it was an NKVD operation orchestrated by Joseph Stalin.

As  Cohen notes, all the Redgraves are good actors. Vanessa could, while she denounced Israel and praised Palestinian terrorists, at the same time appear on American television as a Jewish concentration camp victim in a Holocaust drama. I used to say, when people asked for my position on the blacklist of the 1950s, that I despise Vanessa Redgrave’s politics, but would go at a minute’s notice to see her perform in a Broadway play.  I praised her acting ability, and her prowess as an actor did not make me pay an ounce of attention to her political harangues.

This, of course, is not how the British media (so similar to the American media in this regard) dealt with her brother’s politics after his recent death. All the usual sources praised Redgrave as a man who fought “injustice and oppression,” and who tried “to make a better world.” That is certainly the case, if by a better world one means the regimented police states so favored by Marxist-Leninist regimes, to which Redgrave devoted his life.

As Cohen reveals, the truth is that both Vanessa and Corin “spent their adult lives serving a repellent totalitarian party led by a rapist and a friend not of ‘human rights’ and ‘justice’, as Radio 4 pretended, but of dictatorship and terror.” Cohen paints a picture of the paranoia that surrounded the Trotskyist party’s headquarters in Clapham, and the leader’s admonition that all members “had to cut off all ties with everyone except the chosen few.”

Read the rest here: The Truth about the Redgraves and the ’60s Left: Kudos to journalist Nick Cohen

Obama Administration to Jewish Groups: Shutup You Mouth

by snork ( 112 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Free Speech, Israel, Media, Middle East, Politics at April 24th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Barely under the radar, there’s a story about two prominent Jewish groups who both ran full-page ads in major newspapers, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal. Ron Radosh has the summary here.

As readers of The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journalknow,  last week Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel and World Jewish Congress head Ronald S. Lauder purchased full page ads challenging President Obama’s policies on the Middle East and Israel.

Lauder’s ad appeared on April 15th. “We are concerned,” Lauder began, “about the nuclear ambitions of an Iranian regime that brags about its genocidal intentions against Israel. We are concerned that the Jewish state is being isolated and delegitimized.”

[snip]

One day later, Wiesel issued a statement to the press assuring them that his ad was not coordinated with Lauder’s WJC statement.  Wiesel said that Jerusalem must remain the spiritual capital of the world’s Jews, and should serve as a symbol of faith and hope – not as a symbol of sorrow and bitterness. He wrote: “Jerusalem is the heart of our heart and the soul of our soul.” Jerusalem, Wiesel said, “is above politics…It is mentioned more than 600 times in Scripture – and not a single time in the Quran… Its presence in Jewish history is overwhelming.”

He links this Haaretz article, which contains this gem:

United States administration officials have voiced harsh criticism over advertisements in favor of Israel’s position on Jerusalem that appeared in the U.S. press with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s encouragement.

“All these advertisements are not a wise move,” one senior American official told Haaretz.

Admittedly, this is a bit sketchy, but Haaretz is not exactly a right-wing paper, and this probably didn’t seem out of line by Israeli standards. But Radosh asks a question as an American:

Am I incorrect to think that this little item, buried at the end of a story in the Israeli paper Haaretz, is more than unusual? American citizens, a category that include both Lauder and Wiesel, have the right to speak out, and to exercise their First Amendment rights to disagree with administration policy, and even to spend their own money to advertise their views. What right does any unnamed official- one must ask whom they are- have to publicly chastise them and release a statement to that effect in Israel and to the world press?

Indeed. This administration seems to be saying that free speech is unwise, if it goes against the government grain. It’s not just you, Ron. This is unusual, and it should be sounding alarm bells. They weren’t outing any national secrets. They were simply voicing dissent.

But I guess that was the highest form of patriotism in 2008. This is the age of Obama.