► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Sarah Palin’

The Architect of Defeat aka ‘Pig Vomit’ snaps back at Sarah Palin

by Mojambo ( 3 Comments › )
Filed under Headlines at March 18th, 2013 - 11:47 am

Although not a huge Palin fan, Karl Rove is a miscreant.

by Ashley Killough

(CNN) – Karl Rove wasted no time in hitting back at Sarah Palin after she criticized him for getting involved in Republican primaries last year.

[……]

During her speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday, Palin chided Washington establishment attempts to shape the last election, especially in congressional races. While she didn’t mention his name, the former Alaska governor seemed to be aiming at Rove, the former top political adviser to George W. Bush who was dubbed the “architect” of the former president’s campaigns.

Rove now runs American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS, two independent groups that spent money for conservative candidates in last year’s contests, as well as in the 2010 mid-terms. While candidates that Crossroads supported two years ago saw success, most of them failed to win their contests last year.

“If these experts who keep losing elections and keep getting rehired and raking in millions, if they feel that strongly about who gets to run in this party, then they should buck up or stay in the truck. Buck up and run,” Palin said. “The architects can head on back.”

Rove is now starting another organization, the Conservative Victory Project, that’s designed to help find candidates who can easily win Republican primaries. Palin joined tea party activists in blasting the new move, saying it’s simply a way to push out more conservative voices.

Palin herself was active in backing the more conservative candidates in several Republican primaries last year. Many of her preferred candidates went on to win, including Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and Sen. Deb Fischer of Nebraska.

[……..].

Asked to respond to her remarks, Rove said Sunday that the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee had little room to talk.

“Well, first of all, I live in Texas, and I don’t live in Washington,” Rove said on Fox, where Palin once served as a paid contributor.

“Second of all, look, Sarah Palin should be agreeing with this. She didn’t support Todd Akin, and when he said the reprehensible things he said, she wisely came out and said he ought to get out of the race.”

He was referring to Akin’s controversial statement about rape that ultimately derailed the Missouri congressman’s campaign for the U.S. Senate – a seat he was favored to win. [……]Akin made the comments soon after he became the Republican nominee in the race. Palin had backed Republican Sarah Steelman for the nomination.

Rove said he also had to set the record straight on two other points of contention.

“First of all, raking in millions – I’m a volunteer. I don’t take a dime from my work with American Crossroads. I even pay my own travel expenses, out of my own pocket. I thought Sarah Palin was about encouraging volunteer, grass-roots activity. I’m a volunteer,” he said.

“Second of all, look. I appreciate her encouragement that I ought to go home to Texas and run for office. I would be enthused if I ran for office to have her support. I will say this, though: I don’t think I’m a particularly good candidate. Sort of a balding, fat guy. And second of all, I’d say if I did run for office and win, I would serve out my term. I wouldn’t leave office midterm,” he said, taking a swipe at Palin’s decision to resign from her governorship in 2009.

Read the rest – Karl Rove snaps back at Sarah Palin

So long Paulbots and the Palin obsessed, take your toys and go home

by Flyovercountry ( 252 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Republican Party at August 29th, 2012 - 7:00 pm

What is the definition of much ado about nothing?  Every four years, during the nominating conventions of both major parties, the rules are changed last minute to avoid turbulence once the nominee has become apparent.  In plain speak, When it became obvious that Mitt Romney would be the GOP standard bearer this time around, the Republican Party did its usual job of eliminating floor fights so that a small group made up largely of non party members would not be able to sabotage the effort of using the convention as a spring board towards getting Mitt Romney elected President.

It wasn’t just the Paulbots this year, there were other groups as well.  After a long process in which Republicans in every state cast ballots that overwhelmingly stated that they wanted Mitt Romney to represent their party in the fight to remove Barack Obama from the office of the Presidency, a small group of narcissists took it upon themselves to attempt to replace those results with something that they wanted instead.  Make no mistake about it, this was never about including conservative values into the meaningless party platform, (meaningless in that Mitt Romney will be running on his message regardless of the party platform.)  This was about removing Mitt Romney from the ballot completely and replacing him with a candidate that a very small minority wished to see run instead.  Just like every other nominating convention in American History, once the will of the party establishment became clear, the rules were changed last minute to shut down the agitation of the fringe.

There has been, for as long as I have been active in politics anyhow, a separation between the Republican Party Establishment and a large portion of its voting base.  At the same time though, it is called the party establishment for a reason.  That reason is that more often than not, they are going to get their people nominated, and more often than not, opposition groups will not be successful at this.  Before anyone accuses me of being a Romney shill, bear in mind that I voted for Newt Gingrich during the primaries, and indeed wrote an impassioned plea for others to do the same, as the previous link indicates.  After the dust settled, Mitt was left standing, and other candidates had fallen short.  That does not mean anything beyond this, Mitt Romney garnered more votes amongst the party faithful than others in the field, or not in the field.  He won this opportunity to represent the Republican Party, and any attempt to replace him with candidates who failed in spectacular fashion to garner similar support is beyond selfish, it is down right narcissistic.

The claim that a convention where delegates are replaced despite the express will of those who voted is somehow more open than a convention which manages to follow the overwhelmingly expressed will of those who took the time and energy to actually make their wishes known is beyond asinine.  After getting into spats over the past few weeks with Sarah Palin Stalkers who wanted to have the convention nominate her rather than Romney, despite the fact that she never bothered to campaign, debate, deliver her message, develop specific policies or theories, I pointed out that the effort to do this was at best moronic.  I was pointed to a website that told of the sure to succeed grass roots effort that included bill boards in four whole cities and a form letter asking the elected delegates to voluntarily forfeit their positions in favor of Palin Delegates.  Ignoring completely that Sarah Palin had not even once asked for this support, the draft Sarah movement sulked like spoiled children when their efforts failed to even register as a blip on the radar screen of possible outcomes.

Side Note to Sarah Palin:  You may wish to seek several hundred personal protection orders as this group of dolts is showing real signs of unhealthy obsession.  

I’ve mentioned Paul and Palin so far, because their supporters seem to be making up this year’s contingency of annoying side show distractions.  Usually, I wouldn’t be worried about it, but the stakes are bigger now than they have been for a long while.  Only the very survival of our nation as a free society with any semblance of limitations upon a federal behemoth lies in the balance.  To the Paulbats, you were never Republicans in the first place.  The vast majority of your contingency was always populated with left leaning social Democrats, albeit those with at least some semblance of economic literacy.  To the Palin supporters, your gal did not run, debate, declare herself a candidate, and as such had no chance of winning.  I did not consider Sarah, because she never asked me for my consideration, and that’s important to me.  Throwing a tantrum and demanding that we place your candidates at the top of the ticket despite the fact that they did not win anything does not endear your cause to me, and I suspect to very many people at all.  If you wish to take you toys and go home, I don’t want you in my party anyhow.  We are better off with those who are willing to work for America first for the good of our country, and willing to set aside their selfish desires once those desires were defeated at the ballot box.

I was all in favor of the candidates, all of them, continuing to fight on, right up until the convention but that time is now past.  Your candidate lost, and trying to inflict them upon a party that has clearly and overwhelmingly expressed a desire for another will only help Barack Obama.  Get a grip, deal with it, or go and form a third party.  In either case, leave me out of it, I mostly find your protestations of self righteous indignation to be simply crap.

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Liberal surprise: They can’t do to Ryan what they did to Palin

by Mojambo ( 472 Comments › )
Filed under Conservatism, Elections 2012, Mitt Romney, Politics, Republican Party, The Political Right at August 15th, 2012 - 2:00 pm

It helps when the guy at the top of the ticket does not tolerate his staff sabotaging his running mate. Romney and Ryan are serious men – Obama and Biden are buffoons. I like the fact that Paul Ryan will go into enemy territory and not only parry the attacks but will counter attack as well.

by Jonathan Tobin

The liberal assault on Paul Ryan has commenced. But the first round of attacks can’t provide much solace to Democrats, who assume they will be able to demonize the Republican vice presidential candidate with ease. The first 48 hours of Ryan’s candidacy has already seen a deluge of abuse from the mainstream media editorial pages and columnists. If all you read is the opinion pages of the New York Times, which trotted out its second editorial rant against Ryan in two days, then you probably think that political strategist turned pundit Robert Shrum’s boast in the Daily Beast that by the time the Obama campaign is through with him, Ryan will be as toxic as Sarah Palin. Liberals like Robert Reich, who took to the Huffington Post to howl that Ryan’s ideas are “social Darwinism” or former Times editor Bill Keller who damned the prospective next GOP administration as a compendium of every wicked conservative idea ever conceived, clearly believe all they need to do is to just call Ryan and to a lesser extent Romney, every name they can think of.

But the problem with this effort to Palin-ize Ryan is that the first returns show it probably won’t work.

One piece of evidence is the full length front-page profile of Ryan published in today’s Times. The story it tells of a small town boy whose intellectual prowess is matched only by his work ethic is not one that easily lends itself to the “extremist” narrative that the paper’s editorial page has been screaming about since Saturday. But the authors do their best to skew the portrait with language that doesn’t belong on the news pages of a reputable newspaper.

Part of the problem is that the Times can’t seem to find anyone who knows the likable congressman to dish any non-existent dirt on him. For example, in describing Ryan as an ambitious and accomplished teenager with numerous activities to his credit, the Times stoops to describe him as a “politically astute suck up.” No, that’s not a quote from some teenage rival but an editorial comment inserted into the article by the authors without quotes or even an attempt to attribute this opinion to anyone who knew him.

[………]

Reality again collided with ideology last night on “60 Minutes.” The CBS program got the first post-announcement interview with Romney and Ryan last night, and there’s little doubt that liberals tuning into the program were hoping the Ryan roll-out would conjure up memories of how Sarah Palin was felled in her first network interviews after John McCain tapped her to be his vice presidential nominee. But Bob Schieffer never laid a glove on either Romney or Ryan. Much of the interview was softball material, but even when Schieffer attempted to attack the duo on the Ryan budget plan or entitlement reform, they easily turned away the assault and honed in on the president’s failings and the need to have the country face up to the tough issue of entitlement reform. Just as important, unlike Katie Couric’s confidence that she could embarrass Palin in 2008, Schieffer knew better than to try to tangle with the formidable Ryan.

[……..]

Moreover, unlike Palin, Ryan is clearly ready to not merely hold his own on the enemy turf of the mainstream media but, as President Obama learned to his sorrow, is able to go on the offensive and challenge liberal orthodoxies without appearing like the snarling cartoon character that Democrats hope to paint to the public.

As I wrote earlier, it is an open question as to whether the American public will be willing to choose Ryan’s ideas about reforming our out-of-control tax and spend cycle over Democrat demagoguery intended to defend the status quo. But whatever the outcome of the election, the liberal boasts about turning Ryan into another Palin will fail miserably.

Read the rest – Liberal surprise: Ryan can’t be Palinized

Palin endorses Ted Cruz, while Huckabee endorses Establishment pick!

by Phantom Ace ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Conservatism, Elections 2012, Headlines, Progressives, Republican Party, Theocratic Progressives at May 10th, 2012 - 10:12 pm

The battle of Indian ended in massive defeat for the Establishment. Now the battle of Texas has become. tea Party Economic Conservative Ted Cruz is battling The Establishment candidate David Dewhurst. Progressive Big Government Republican Mike Huackbee has endorsed  Dewhurts.

This morning, Governor Mike Huckabee announced his support of David Dewhurst, calling him a “strong fiscal conservative, with a record to show for it,” and saying “Huck PAC and I are pleased to endorse Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst for U.S. Senate from Texas.”

“He’s been an ardent supporter of legislation to create new jobs and improve the economy of Texas,” said Governor Huckabee. “Lt. Governor Dewhurst helped pass the largest tax cut in state history, not to mention he’s balanced every budget since taking office. As a result, Texas’ economy has grown faster than the national economy and more Texans are employed than at any other time in our state’s history.”

Sarah Palin has come out in support of Ted Cruz.

AUSTIN—Just four days before the start of early voting in the Texas Senate primary, the Ted Cruz campaign announced the endorsement of Governor Sarah Palin and her husband Todd Palin.

In response to a letter from Ted Cruz, Governor Sarah Palin wrote: “We’re proud to join conservatives in Texas and throughout the nation in supporting your campaign to become the next Senator from the Lone Star State.”

“Your conservative principles, passionate defense of our Constitution and our free market system come at a time when these cornerstones of our freedom and prosperity are under attack,” Governor Palin added. “Our shared goal isn’t just to change the majority in control of the Senate, but to assure principled conservatives like you are there to fight for us.”

Ted Cruz responded, “Governor Palin has been an inspiration to conservatives across Texas and across the Nation. She is principled and passionate and never afraid to speak truth to establishment power. I am humbled and honored to have Governor Palin’s support as we fight to restore fiscal sanity to the circus that is Washington. With Governor Palin’s support, and the support of tens of thousands of conservatives from all across Texas, we will turn our country around, rein in out-of-control spending and debt in Washington, and restore the Constitution.”

I hope Ted Cruz pulls it and the establishments suffers another defeat. Ted Cruz is a viable conservative for the general election and would win handily in November.