► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Somalia’

Somalia, It Is Yesterday Once More Part II.

by Flyovercountry ( 108 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, History, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Koran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Politics at February 25th, 2011 - 11:30 am

The great thing about history is that it often provides a blue print for previous courses of action which have been successful.  I have heard many times during my life that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.  What I haven’t heard is the corollary, which is just as true.  Those who do not learn from history and do not follow a course of action which has proved successful, are very probably doomed to failure.  It may interest everyone to know that Islamic terrorists performing acts of piracy on the high seas is nothing new.  It was the very first crisis faced by our nation in 1789.  It was resolved in 1801, immediately after Thomas Jefferson became President. 

For a couple of centuries prior to America becoming a nation, Islamic extremists read their Quran and discovered that Allah wanted them to convert, kill, or enslave every non Muslim on Earth.  There is a possible temporary respite for the rest of us, it is called a Jizya.  The Jizya is a temporary solution which allows a non Muslim to pay a Ransom to the Muslim in charge so that he can turn his conquesting attention elsewhere.  It basically allows you to barter to be the last one conquered.  The Islamic extremists living in the Barbary Coast were exacting the Jizya from every European nation sailing anywhere their ships could reach.  Most countries were willing to pay this.  As the first President of the United States, George Washington dispatched his Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson to England to meet with the Ambassador from the Barbary Coast.  When asked what gave these pirates the right to infringe upon the American ships this abridgement of our right to sail freely upon the high seas, Jefferson was told that the Quran gave them that right.  Jefferson purchased a Quran and read it on the voyage home.  Upon his arrival home, he wrote a very impassioned letter to George Washington and Chief Justice John Jay.  This letter made it quite clear that these people would not be able to be dealt with diplomatically, (insightful realization from the chief U.S. diplomat,) and in his opinion, the Jizya should not be paid, and we should fight the Muslims.  President Washington decided to pay the Jizya, which at first seemed reasonable, because our nation was brand new, and it had been working for the nations of Europe for centuries.  this went on for 12 years, with one caveat.  The Barbary Pirates saw fit to increase the Jizya.  Without warning, when the tax increased, more hostages would be taken and news of the increased ransom would be sent to the non Muslim world.  In January of 1801, Thomas Jefferson was inaugurated the third President of the United States of America.  Immediately after his inauguration, the Marine Corps and Navy were born.  An invasion of the Barbary Coast was ordered by Jefferson within a week of his assuming the Presidency.  The war, America’s first lasted several years, but it also ended terrorist acts against the western world until 1904 when Islamic extremists killed the U.S. ambassador to Morocco and held his family for ransom.  President Ted Roosevelt answered again with decisive military force, and it again was a long time before we heard from the Islamic extremists. 

Read more about this history here.

Two years ago, in the first months of his Presidency I gave Obama kudos, (one of three times to date,) for allowing a Navy Seal Team to take decisive action against Somali Pirates.  He managed to not get in the way of a good decision.  What I fault him for is his complete lack of follow up.  Since that time, over 660 Americans have been taken hostage, a Jizya demanded, and 4 Americans killed by Islamic extremists operating from Somalia.  Our President’s answer?  No one in our Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, or Department of State are allowed to notice the obvious connection of Islamic terrorism to Islam.  Our President’s current foreign policy consists of an odd blend of appeasement of aggressive and openly hostile enemies coupled with an array of insults and diplomatic betrayal of our allies.  About the Jizya, Barak Obama has paid over $10 Million.  Is this what he meant by being smarter with our foreign policy.  He has eschewed the very successful lesson taught to us by one of our founding fathers.  Which is apropos, since he holds our Constitution in contempt, as evidenced by his being the only U.S. President to be slapped with an contempt order.  Whatever his reasons for choosing this asinine course, which history has shown will only beget more kidnappings and piracy, is not important to me.  what is important to me is that at our earliest possible opportunity we correct the mistake made in November of 2008 by electing a President who is clearly not up to the task of being President.  (Personally, I believe him to not be up to any productive task.)  The question is, how much more of this will Americans suffer until January of 2013.

On a side note, and because this part of our history needs to be told.  Much is made about the Quran purchased by Thomas Jefferson.  To bad our political correctness will not allow for most of it to be truthful.  Congressman Keith Ellison (D) Minnesota used it to be sworn into office.  Both President Bush and President Obama used it for Dinners commemorating Muslim Holidays in the White House.  It has been heralded as symbol of Jefferson’s admiration for the Muslim people and of their contributions to the world blah blah blah.  The fact is that Thomas Jefferson read the Quran so that he could learn about his enemy in a war he realized he would have to fight, (which happened 12 years after he suggested it.)  James Madison, Jefferson’s Secretary of State, wrote a foreword in that very Quran after he read it.  In that forward Madison wrote that Islam would be the gravest threat to the sovereignty of the United States in the future.  Prophetic words indeed.

Crossposted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

UPDATE: Correction, the Jizya is $10 Million per ship. We have paid upwards of $600 Million so far.

Hat tip Van Riper. (Go Acacia)

UPDATE II: Our refusal to listen to what they themselves say will be our undoing.

My favorite quote occurs at 7:43. “Life and property of the Kuffar have no sanctity.” Realize, as Jefferson did 210 years ago, there is no negotiation or diplomatic solution possible with people who feel they are bound by their Deity to destroy you.

Hat Tip Philip_Daniel for the UPDATE.

This is 2011! Why do we still have pirates?

by 1389AD ( 287 Comments › )
Filed under Africa, Barack Obama, Crime, History, Islamic Terrorism, Military, Transportation, United Nations at February 24th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Pirate flag of Jack Rackham
Piracy should be a thing of the past.

Fox News: Four Americans Killed on Yacht Hijacked by Somali Pirates

(h/t: Bagua)

Four Americans aboard a yacht hijacked by Somali pirates were gunned down by their captors Tuesday.

U.S. forces responded to gunfire aboard the yacht Quest at approximately 1 a.m. Tuesday, but discovered all four hostages had been shot by their captors. Despite attempts to save their lives, all four hostages died of their wounds.

“We express our deepest condolences for the innocent lives callously lost aboard the Quest,” said Gen. James N. Mattis, U.S. Central Command Commander in a news release.

Two pirates died during the confrontation and U.S. forces found the remains of two other pirates already dead aboard the vessel. Thirteen pirates were captured and detained, along with two already in custody. A total of 19 pirates were involved in the hijacking.

The remains of the four Americans were taken aboard the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, as were the 15 pirates in custody. There is no word yet on where the pirates will be taken for trial. They could go to Kenya or they could come back to the U.S. There is a precedent for both.

Read it all.

Pirates belong in the history books or the movies, not in real life. The United States has adequate naval firepower to put an end to piracy in international waters. The US Constitution empowers the US Senate and House of Representatives to do what is needed to get rid of this scourge.

Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution empowers Congress

…To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;…

Obama failed to take any action until it was too late. Yoo-hoo, Obama and the US Senate and House: You can’t pussyfoot around with pirates. It’s YOUR DUTY to defend the US against foreign enemies. In case you haven’t noticed, pirates are foreign enemies, they have attacked us, and it’s your duty to do something about it, without delay. You have to clean pirates out of the sea lanes, you have to sink all their boats and ships, and you have to take out the villages and settlements where they are based. The Senate needs to enact a specific declaration of war against these pirates and the House needs to vote funding to back it up.

None of this “nation-building” – just clean them out once and for all. If you fail to do that, piracy will rapidly grow out of control and maritime transport will become more and more dangerous and expensive. Allowing this piracy to continue will cost us, and the rest of the world, very heavily in the long run.

Says Iron Fist on a recent thread on Blogmocracy:

mawskrat wrote:

well at least Obama approved action if the Navy thought the hostages were in danger.

I call bull**** on that. The hostages were in danger from the minute the Somali animals took them prisoner. They should have threatened to bomb the pirates’ village flat if any of the hostages were harmed. Now they should follow up on that. Kill the village. Everyone in it. Flatten it with fuel-air explosives. Sink any vessels that try and make port there afterwords.

One of the problems that is hamstringing the US and other nations in dealing with pirates is the UN. That organization serves only to protect and foster evildoers all over the world; it’s long past time to get the US out of the UN and vice versa, but that is an argument for another day. The problem is that current maritime law as defined by the UN makes no provision for dealing with pirates.

DNA India: Why we still have pirates in the 21st century

Gwynne Dyer / Sunday, October 10, 2010 22:14 IST
[…]
How can it have come to pass that we have a major pirate problem in the 21st century? They sorted that out in the early 18th century. Why has it got unsorted again?

Blame international law. When they were codifying the law of the sea back in the 1970s, the world had no pirate problem worth talking about. So they dropped the rule of “universal jurisdiction” that had been the key to suppressing piracy in the bad old days. “Universal jurisdiction”meant that every navy could arrest suspected pirates of any nationality and try them under its own national laws, since pirates had been defined as “the enemies of all mankind.” That’s how piracy was wiped out in the first place.

But when they were writing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the 1970s, there were no pirates anymore, so they dropped the rule of “universal jurisdiction” in favour of a legal regime more attuned to modern notions of human rights and national sovereignty. What has replaced those old rules, in practice, is a legal quagmire where you can never be sure who has legal jurisdiction. So the navies (which could easily suppress the piracy if they were free to act) refrain from using force, and are reluctant even to arrest people at sea who are quite obviously pirates.

To extinguish piracy again, we need a modernised version of the old rules. That requires prompt action to create a comprehensive international agreement that gets around the Law of the Sea.

There is one other issue, of course. If we use serious force against the pirates, they will threaten to use force against their captives. Some of them might be killed. But since there will never be a time when there are no captives in the hands of the Somali pirates until and unless we crack down hard, that is a risk that we just have to take.

Read it all.

A better idea: Ignore the UN entirely and go after the pirates. If anybody complains, ignore them also.

We dealt with jihadi pirates two centuries ago, during the Thomas Jefferson administration. We can do it again.


Originally published on 1389 Blog.


Somalian Spoken Here…Who knew?

by coldwarrior ( 155 Comments › )
Filed under Islam, Islamic Invasion, Somalia at December 8th, 2010 - 11:30 am

I was going to the bank machine near the Humane  Society to pay for Phoebedog and I came across this screen at a branch of the Huntington Bank…While this isn’t my bank, it was worth the fee to use the machine, and well worth the language option at the bottom left. A quick perusal of Huntington Bank’s website reveals nothing about Somali’s or any business they have in the metro Pittsburgh area that warrants a Somali language tag.  Any Huntington customers know anything about this?

I understand the need for the Spanish language option here, but Somali??? We are a hell of a lot closer to Quebec than Minneapolis, the nearest place that the Somali’s have infiltrated and set up camp. Would it not make more sense to have a French language option? I can tell you, i have yet to see a person from that area of Africa that covers Somalia and Ethiopia around here…Yet, I have run into a few French Canadians.

I wonder if Huntington Bank knows something I dont?

C’est un mystère?

People aren’t paying attention

by Kafir ( 121 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Koran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Polls, Terrorism at September 21st, 2010 - 8:30 am

Seized Somali media network ‘must serve Islam’

Somali militants who have seized a radio and TV station say it will now broadcast only Islamic messages.

Hassan Dahir Aweys, who leads the Hizbul Islam group, said he wanted the broadcasts to serve Islam.

[…]

Iran court sentences journalist charged with ‘warring against God’ to 6 years

A judge from Branch 26 of the Revolutionary Court of Iran on Sept. 18 sentenced Shiva Nazar Ahari, a journalist arrested following the 2009 presidential election, to six years in prison. Ahari was sentenced to three-and-half-years for warring against God, known in Islamic law as moharebeh, two years for conspiracy to commit a crime and six months for propaganda against the government. In addition to the jail sentence, Ahari was also ordered to pay a $400 fine or face 74 lashes. Ahari’s conviction on the charge of moharebeh could have resulted in the death penalty. Her lawyer has stated that he will appeal the sentence.

PIPES: ‘Rushdie Rules’ reach Florida Obama endorses privileged status for Islam

The Obama administration has joined this ignominious list. Its pressure on Mr. Jones further eroded freedom of speech about Islam and implicitly established Islam’s privileged status in the United States, whereby Muslims may insult others but not be insulted. This moves the country toward dhimmitude, a condition whereby non-Muslims acknowledge the superiority of Islam. Finally, Mr. Obama, in effect, enforced Islamic law, a precedent that could lead to other forms of compulsory Shariah compliance.

Meanwhile…
Poll: Narrow majority unfavorable toward Islam

A narrow majority of Americans hold a generally unfavorable opinion of Islam, and 45 per cent feel Islam is a religion that encourages violence, according to a new national Angus Reid Poll.

The poll found that just 24 percent of Americans agree that Islam “is a peaceful religion” with 30 percent unsure.

By contrast, only one American in 10 believes that either Christianity or Judaism “encourages violence”: 80 percent agree that Christianity “is a peaceful religion” with 59 percent holding the same view of Judaism.

Only 45%? The rest aren’t paying attention.