► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘stupidity’

Science explains why so many otherwise rational people oppose vaccines

by 1389AD ( 145 Comments › )
Filed under Medicine at February 22nd, 2015 - 7:00 am

The Science of Anti-Vaccination

Published on Feb 19, 2015 by scishow
Fewer children in the United States are getting vaccinated. That’s bad news for those kids, and also for public health in general. Often, the response is to argue and debate and get angry at people who are we see as making terrible, irrational decisions. Instead of doing that, let’s use science to understand why this is happening in the first place.

Hosted by: Hank Green
———-
Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishow

Or help support us by subscribing to our page on Subbable: https://subbable.com/scishow
———-
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow
Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com
Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow

Sources:
Meta-Analysis of the Safety of Vaccines: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/2/325
The Internet and the Psychology of Vaccination Decisions: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19849
Naturalness Bias: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18319507
Omission Bias and Vaccines: http://mdm.sagepub.com/content/14/2/118
Difficulty in changing minds once they’re made: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2014/02/25/peds.2013-2365
Onset Patterns of Autism: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2857525/
Bad is Stronger than Good – Negativity Bias: http://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf
Parental Vaccine Decision Making: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24011751
Read more about Risk Perception: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_perception
And Explanatory Style: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explanatory_style
http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/autism/detail_autism.htm

Also see:

 

The top 10 dumbest Obama Regime quotes of 2011

by Phantom Ace ( 118 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Humor, Progressives at December 27th, 2011 - 8:30 am

The Regime of the False Messiah is, in fact, one of the biggest failures in American history so they resort to demagoguery and division. It’s a failed regime that is only propped up by the most formidable political machine in American history and a cult of personality that is perpetuated by an adoring media. Some of the statements from the regime have been down right stupid. Here are the Top 10 dumbest statements from 2011.

As 2011 draws to a close, it’s worth looking back at some of the year’s most foolish comments from inside the Obama administration. If Academy Awards were handed out for political folly, the Obama team would be sweeping the board come Oscar time. It hasn’t been an easy task narrowing the list down to a mere ten – it could easily have been a top 20 or 30. The list has a strong foreign policy bias (not least as this is a British-based blog): I’ve omitted many candidates on the domestic front that would certainly qualify for inclusion. But here goes:

1. Barack Obama calls himself the fourth best president in US history

2. Joe Biden compares the Tea Party to terrorists

3. Barack Obama calls France America’s strongest ally

4. Joe Biden on the Taliban: “not our enemy”

5. White House adviser touts Obama’s “leading from behind”

6. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper calls the Muslim Brotherhood “secular”

7. The US Ambassador to Belgium blames Israel for some forms of anti-Semitism

8. Hillary Clinton calls the Mubarak regime “stable”

9. Hillary Clinton refers to Syrian dictator Assad as a “reformer”

10. Barack Obama refers to the “English Embassy” in Tehran

Unreal.

Any other Administration would be crucified for any one these statements, but when you have the media and a cult like following, you can practically get away with anything. Clearly Obama, Biden and other regime members are really stupid!

(Hat Tip: Speranza)

“Days of Rage” / “Occupy America” Protestors: Posers and Useful Idiots

by 1389AD ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under Communism, Liberal Fascism, Media, Progressives at October 7th, 2011 - 8:30 am

Faux protester Robert Stephens hamming it up for the media
Faux protester Robert Stephens hamming it up for the media

In response to Nation of Change

(see [link] and [link])

I saw one kid being interviewed who said he wanted to bring down capitalism. When asked, “replaced with what?” the kid had a blank look on his face.

This is the kind of anarchy the world saw in 1917, with the Bolsheviks, that brought on over 65 years of pure misery for the Russian people. Will we be next?

It was Lenin who called idiots like this, “Useful idiots.”

Sparta

Typical! Yes, such a poor kid!

I saw this on Glenn Beck’s free newsletter:

The Best Progressive Fail You’ve Ever Seen

In part:

The iconic protester of the Days of Rage protests so far has clearly been the dopey kid who got on his knees in the middle of the street and screamed at the bank for ‘taking’ his parents home. Only one problem – they aren’t taking his home. And his parents both hold Master’s degrees. And the $500,000 home has only $60,000 left on it. And the kid is in an exclusive law school. Where is the oppression exactly?

Clicked on the link:

Liberal Protestor Chokes on Silver Spoon in (False) Protest

Robert Stephens graduated from Carleton College (average cost: $42,942/year) in 2010 and now studies law at The George Washington University Law School (average cost: $70,449/year). His father has a Ph.D. and two master’s degrees; his mother also has a master’s degree. Only in America could a kid have been blessed with so much… and only in America could he still claim to be a victim. America’s capitalist society has apparently leveled a grave injustice against his family and Robert will not stand for it.

Stephens — who identifies his personal political philosophy as Bolivian socialism — made a trip to New York City this weekend to participate in the “Days of Rage” march on Wall Street. He was arrested Saturday when he refused police requests to get up and out of the way of traffic in the street.

In his emotional “rage,” Stephens told the sympathetic Socialist/Marxist/Anarchist crowd how an eeeeeevil Wall Street bank had taken his parents’ home away from them…

Read the rest of the article and watch the video here.

Also see:

Glenn Beck – Extremely Dangerous People in Wall Street Movement

(h/t: Trevor Loudon and Noisy Room)

Uploaded by lawjared on Oct 4, 2011

The radical leftists chanting their anti-American slogans on Wall Street are the epitome of Lenin’s ‘useful idiots.’ They’re idiotic not only because many of them have no idea of what they’re doing, but because they’re contributing to their own destruction. The father of lies certainly sees them as useful idiots. Satan is laughing with delight that they are so incredibly stupid that they’re helping him destroy America, the greatest national stumbling block to his rule over the entire earth…


Does Sturgeon’s Law Apply To People? I’d Say So!

by 1389AD ( 54 Comments › )
Filed under Food and Drink, Humor, India, Open thread, Turkey at July 12th, 2011 - 5:00 pm

Atlantic Sturgeon: Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus

No, I am not claiming that anybody is required by law to supply me with caviar. (Don’t I wish!) We’re not talking about that type of sturgeon at all.

Instead, we’re talking about a rule of thumb, to wit…

Sturgeon’s Law

Sturgeon’s Revelation, commonly referred to as Sturgeon’s Law, is an adage derived from quotations by Theodore Sturgeon, an American science fiction author. While Sturgeon coined another adage that he termed “Sturgeon’s Law”, it is his “Revelation” that is usually referred to by that term. Commonly cited as “ninety percent of everything is crud” or “ninety percent of everything is crap”, the phrase was derived from Sturgeon’s observation that while science fiction was often derided for its low quality by critics, it could be noted that the majority of examples of works in other fields could equally be seen to be of low quality and that science fiction was thus no different in that regard to other art…

More here.

Theodore Sturgeon knew a thing or two about identifying crud:

Theodore Sturgeon vividly recalled being in the same room with L. Ron Hubbard, when Hubbard became testy with someone there and retorted, “Y’know, we’re all wasting our time writing this hack science fiction! You wanta make real money, you gotta start a religion!” Reportedly Sturgeon also told this story to others.

I just now happened upon a blog called India Uncut by the libertarian blogger, columnist, and poker player, Amit Varma. Among other thought-provoking essays, including a fine paean to the blogosphere, I found this:

Does Sturgeon’s Law Apply To Human Beings?

Sturgeon’s Law states that “ninety percent of everything is crud”. This is certainly true in many fields, and I myself have invoked it in the context of blogging, but today I’m wondering, is this true also of human beings? Are 90% of us stupid? Like, really stupid? Consider this news story by Reuters in Istanbul:

Turkish police donned white coats and stethoscopes (stethoscope review) to disguise themselves as doctors, then knocked on people’s doors to see how easily they would fall for a confidence scam.

The undercover police officers told residents of the southeastern city of Gaziantep they were screening for high blood pressure and handed out pills, according to Turkish media.

They were alarmed when residents at 86 out of 100 households visited on Tuesday swallowed the pills immediately.

Apparently this was the actual modus operandi of a gang that got people to pop sedatives and then robbed them. But this isn’t all.

Officers in Adana in southern Turkey last week called at houses, announcing through the intercom: “I am a burglar, please open the door.”

Police said they were stunned at the number of people who opened the door, the Radikal daily newspaper reported.

Read the rest; it’s funny.

I can imagine what some of you are thinking:

“1389’s nom de guerre recalls a date in history when the Serbs fought the Ottoman Turks to a standstill. Old 1389 is just taking another cheap shot at the Turks by showing how stupid they can be.”

Guilty as charged. But then, considering that everybody, including the Turks, takes cheap shots at the Serbs, I claim the right to take them at everybody else.

And I do mean everybody. If you think you’re so much smarter than those human fish who eagerly took the bait in Amit Varma’s article, then take a long and careful look at Wikipedia’s List of cognitive biases. See how many of them apply to you!

Yeah, I thought so. Welcome to my world!