► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Vladimir Putin’

More MANLY Than The Empty Chair™

by Deplorable Macker Comments Off on More MANLY Than The Empty Chair™
Filed under Climate, Headlines, Russia, Science at September 6th, 2012 - 9:42 am

Look! Up in the sky! Is it a bird? Is it a plane?
Actually…YES! And the only person who could pull this off is none other than the President of Russia, who by his varied outdoor appearances makes himself known to all as more MANLY than The Empty Chair™!

(AP) VLADIVOSTOK, Russia — President Vladimir Putin has piloted a motorized hang glider to lead a flock of young Siberian white cranes in flight.
Dressed in a white costume meant to imitate an adult crane, Putin took part in a project to teach the endangered birds who were raised in captivity to follow the aircraft on their migration to Central Asia.

Perhaps Pooty could issue a Friendly Challenge to the GOP Candidate, since the world knows the Demo☭rat Candidate is not up to it?

Putin’s visit to Israel

by Phantom Ace ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Headlines, Israel, Muslim Brotherhood, Russia at June 25th, 2012 - 8:08 pm

Vladimir Putin had a warm visit to Israel today. He was at the inauguration of as memorial to Red Army soldiers who fought the Nazis in WWII. He then met PM Netanyhu where they discussed  regional issues and economic cooperation.

President Vladimir Putin expressed his reservations over the prospect of a military strike in Iran, urging Israel Monday to learn from negative US experience in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Putin’s comments were made in a meeting with Shimon Peres in Jerusalem, after Israel’s president asked the visiting leader to speak out on the Iran issue.

[….]

“Iraq has a pro-Iranian regime after everything that has happened there. These things should be thought out ahead of time before doing something one will regret later,” he said. “One should not act prematurely.”

[….]

Earlier in the evening, Putin said that his country “has a national interest in guaranteeing peace and tranquility for Israel.”

The Russian president noted that the former Soviet Union supported the State of Israel’s establishment, adding that his talks earlier Monday with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were constructive and pertained to the need to boost strategic ties between the two countries.

[….]

“My visit here reinforced the assumption that we have friendly relations, and these are not just friendly relations,” Putin said. “This is a solid basis for building dialogue and partnership.”

Both Israel and Russia have a common enemy: The Muslim Brotherhood. Its a shame the president of Russia has visited Israel before the US President has.

Putin Wins

by coldwarrior ( 13 Comments › )
Filed under Elections, Politics, Russia, Special Report, World at March 4th, 2012 - 6:32 pm

Tearful Putin Declares Victory at Rally

05 March 2012

 

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin declaring victory late Sunday before thousands of supporters on Manezh Square as President Dmitry Medvedev applauds.

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin declaring victory late Sunday before thousands of supporters on Manezh Square as President Dmitry Medvedev applauds.

Vladimir Putin reclaimed the presidency Sunday in a landslide victory, winning more than 61 percent of the vote, according to early results. But widespread allegations of fraud suggested that the prime minister faces a difficult comeback to the Kremlin.

“I promised you we would win. We have won. Glory to Russia,” Putin told thousands of supporters in a tearful address on Manezh Square late Sunday. “We won in an open and fair struggle.”

Voter turnout was at 58 percent as of 7 p.m., according to the Central Elections Commission. Notably, the highest turnout was reported in Chechnya at 94 percent.

Communist Party boss Gennady Zyuganov came second with 17.8 percent, followed by Liberal Democratic Party leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky with 8 percent. Billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov scored 7.5 percent, while Sergei Mironov of A Just Russia finished last with a disappointing 3.67 percent.

Sunday’s results showed a marked decrease for Putin from the 71 percent he took in 2004, when he won his second term in office. The turnout then was 64.3 percent. But it was significantly higher than the 49 percent his United Russia party collected in the State Duma election in December.

Putin, dressed in a long black coat, voted at the Academy of Sciences in Moscow, accompanied by his wife Lyudmila, who has not been seen publicly in almost 18 months. At December’s Duma elections Putin had voted alone.

“I had a full night’s sleep, did some sports and then came here,” Putin told reporters in televised comments. He also dropped his ballot paper and had to pick it up before placing it into an automatic voting machine.

The prime minister left just minutes before three activists from the Ukrainian women’s group Femen ran topless into the polling station attempting to steal the ballot box. They were dragged away by security as they screamed “Putin is a thief!” One had “Stealing for Putin” painted across her bare chest.

Signs of Violations

Reports of violations spread throughout the day, aided by social networks and by almost 200,000 web cameras, which were installed in pairs at most of the country’s 90,000 ballot stations.

Putin’s supporters rejected the charges as politically motivated.

“This is the cleanest election in Russia’s entire history,” Putin’s campaign chief Stanislav Govorukhin told reporters at United Russia’s headquarters. “The violations our rivals and the opponents of our president will now speak of are laughable.”

But already late Saturday, when the cameras started transmission, bloggers discovered ballots lying in transparent ballot boxes in the Chelyabinsk region before voting had begun.

At a voting station in rural Dagestan, web cameras showed a man stuffing a voting machine with multiple ballots.

The Central Elections Commission promptly said the result in the village of Tarumovka was invalid, Interfax reported.

Many reports alleged that scores of people had been bused to multiple polling stations in a practice know as “carousel voting” — echoing similar accusations from the disputed December State Duma vote.

A reporter for The Moscow Times witnessed participants of a group of such voters appearing to be bused to several voting stations in the city’s northwestern Kurkino district.

In Balashikha, seven kilometers east of Moscow, police detained a young man caught throwing a heap of ballots into the box at Polling Station No. 25.

Communist commission member Vladimir Prokopenko showed a Moscow Times reporter a video he recorded of the incident and said a second offender managed to flee.

Prokopenko said the commission chairwoman refused to sign a complaint by him. The chairwoman also refused to seal the ballot box, as required by law, and berated observers for directing voters to another secured box, he said.

She then expelled Prokopenko on the grounds that he took photos and videos of the voting. The Moscow Times reporter was also forced out.

At Polling Station No. 64 in the city center, angry observers said dubiously large groups of voters appeared in the morning who were not on voting lists and didn’t seem to live in the area.

Alexander Gordon, host of a popular political talk show on state-controlled Channel One, said outside a polling station where there were allegations of fraud that he thought the vote was fair.

“What makes these elections special is that there is a large number of people who are interested in showing that they are unfair,” he said.

But opposition activists said the vote seemed even less fair than the Duma elections that triggered mass protests.

Leading opposition figure Alexei Navalny said his Rosvybory project had collected reports of more than 6,000 violations by the early afternoon.

website that collects information about violations said Sunday evening that it had received more than 4,500 reports so far.

The Golos election watchdog’s site said it had more than 2,600 reports.

Making Their Voices Heard

Crowds of pro-Putin supporters began gathering outside the Kremlin in the hours before exit poll results were announced. Tens of thousands, many waving Russian flags and blue badges reading “V,” crowded onto Manezh Square and Lubyanskaya Ploshchad to show support for Putin — and to head off opposition protests planned for Monday.

Putin later appeared to the Manezh crowd with President Dmitry Medvedev at his side. Their appearance was reminiscent of the duo’s surprise appearance at a pro-Kremlin youth rock concert on Red Square on the night of Medvedev’s election in 2008.

A worker from a power station in the peat-rich town of Shatura told a Moscow Times reporter on Manezh Square that he and his co-workers had been promised double pay for one shift and an extra vacation day if they showed up for the rally.

The crowd came after large groups hustled in and out of the polling stations starting bright and early in Moscow and beyond.

At Polling Stations No. 267 and 168 at the Degunino Children-Youth Center in northern Moscow, a crowd of around 100 voters of all ages was spotted at 11:30 a.m., a higher number than usually seen at national elections.

Natalya, in her late 20s, who did not give her last name, said she would vote for nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky because she felt he told the truth.

“He might start World War III, but at least he tells it like it is,” she said. “When I listen to him — he’s a good orator — I find myself nodding in agreement.”

She added, though, that she felt there really was no one to vote for.

Many supporters of Vladimir Putin said he won their vote because they felt he promised greater “stability” and “peace” or because “there is no one better than him.”

“I voted for Putin because I value stability — that is the most important factor for me,” said Yelena Romanova, who brought her two teenage children to give them a lesson in participatory democracy.

“I didn’t pay much attention to the protests of the past few months. I think people who really understand the situation and want to live here in Russia want Putin,” she said.

While dismissive of Communist Party head Gennady Zyuganov and Zhirinovsky, she said billionaire metals tycoon Mikhail Prokhorov tempted her.

“By the next election in six years, the people may be tired of Putin. Then I think Prokhorov might have a chance,” she said.

Outside Polling Station No. 65, an elderly woman in a fur coat said she voted for the most intelligent candidate.

“You know him, the one who dislikes the Americans,” she said, refusing to elaborate or give her name.

But some had very special reasons to vote for Putin.

“I don’t let down my own”, army sergeant Sergei Putin said outside Polling Station No. 64, adding that he was no relation of the prime minister.

Others said the protests following December’s elections had driven them to turn their backs on Putin.

“I voted for Zyuganov, even though I am not a Communist supporter, but that could force a second round. I understand that we might rock the boat, but with all respect to Putin, I think we should live by the law,” said Gleb, a 36-year-old lawyer, as he walked out of a polling station in northern Moscow.

Alexei Firsanov, a pensioner who described himself as a retired human rights activist and a former supporter of Yabloko leader Grigory Yavlinsky, who was barred from the ballot, said he voted for Prokhorov this time around because “he’s a new face.”

Firsanov described Putin in unflattering terms, but called anyone who voted for Zyuganov in the hope of forcing a second round “crazy.”

A mobile voting unit went from apartment to apartment to collect ballots from the elderly or disabled. Many said they voted for Putin, but expressed puzzlement at the list of candidates for municipal elections that were also part of Sunday’s vote.

“Roshchin, that’s a nice name!” said Yelena Kvasnetskaya, 87, as she voted for somebody she admitted she had never heard of. “May God give Putin health. And may there be no bloodshed!”

Police presence in the capital was heavy. Hundreds of police trucks were parked in downtown Moscow. Earlier last week, the police announced that more than 6,000 policemen would be brought in from nearby regions for Monday’s opposition demonstration.

Meanwhile, about 200 municipal buses from different places around Russia were seen lined up along the embarkment of Moscow River nearby the Kremlin. The presence of such buses was leapt upon by the opposition as proof of carousel voting.

But Putin supporters said they were used to bringing thousands of people to Moscow to rally in his support.

Putin is in Serious Trouble

by coldwarrior ( 103 Comments › )
Filed under Elections, Politics, Russia at December 22nd, 2011 - 8:30 am

Putin has miscalculated, perhaps for the first time in his life. He tried to blame the 50 thousand Russians in the street protesting HIM! This would have been unheard of just a few months ago. No, Vlad, they are protesting YOU because of all of the fraud in this last Duma election. You may control some of the press but, you do not control the internet; big mistake. The bloggers in Russia took on Putin and his cronies and now him and his party are scrambling to win the elections in March. There is a very real chance that Putin may not win.

Understand this, though. without the Putin, Russia is not as far along as it is now. Yes, there is Crony Capitalism, a political driven, old boy, power grabbing, and corrupting form of mercantilism. This took the place of the horribly mismanaged, and mafia producing, shift from a controlled economy to capitalism in the 1990’s. This failure PRODUCED both the need for and the popularity of Putin. That said, there is little reason to continue this style of capitalism. He has a real chance to take a large step and reform even more, give Russia more freedom, open the markets even more. Reform the system.

The People have spoken, they are demoralized by waiting for what they wanted 20 years ago, a free market, free society, and free ideas; they may not wait any longer; the Crony Capitalist System has to go. Putin has delivered them half way there. He has a chance to redeem himself. The ball is in his court.

From the Moscow Times:

Putin 2.0 Could Be More Autocratic Than 1.0
12 December 2011
By Lilia Shevtsova

The Putin era is ending, but the authorities are doing everything possible to make it a dramatic finale.

The fallout from the widely discredited State Duma elections is a sign that a fundamentally new situation is unfolding in the country. Society has awoken, and it is demonstrating its frustration with the authorities’ relentless hold on power. The “Putin contract” — an agreement whereby voters put up with the abuses of a corrupt regime in return for stability — is falling apart. The most dynamic segments of society — Internet-savvy, educated young Russians, the intelligentsia, the middle class and residents of major cities — are stepping up to the fore. By voting against United Russia, they tried to use peaceful, democratic methods to protest Putin and his government.

What was the result? Some observers made optimistic but baseless claims that United Russia’s poor showing in the elections and its need to work more closely with the other three parties in the Duma will be a boost for Russia’s democracy. In reality, the elections brought little if any change. United Russia manipulated the results to win a simple majority in the Duma so that it could continue rubber-stamping legislation handed down by the Kremlin.

The only way that A Just Russia can meet the expectations of the many protest voters who supported it would be to openly speak out against the Putin regime. But A Just Russia has already demonstrated that it is ready to play the Kremlin chess game.

Russia will face a new trial when Putin attempts to prolong his rule in the March presidential election. It will be important for Putin to win during the first round of voting. Otherwise, he risks losing his ability to control his own team along with the country. Since Putin has little chance of winning in the first round of a competitive and truly fair election, the Kremlin is looking for ways to ensure victory for the leader of a party that a significant percentage — perhaps the majority — of voters rejected in the Duma elections.

What must Putin do to win at least a third of the vote in March without having to resort to mass falsification? As the Kremlin’s soft approach to Saturday’s rally on Bolotnaya Ploshchad demonstrates, it decided to imitate dialogue with the people, pretending that it was listening to their demands. But if Putin held truly free Duma elections, it would have jeopardized his victory in the March election. Moreover, dumping United Russia in favor of the All-Russia People’s Front can save Putin only if he sacrifices his bureaucracy, turning it into a scapegoat for the country’s ills. But the bureaucracy is Putin’s key basis of support, and he can hardly afford to demonize it.

There is only one thing left to try: create a state of emergency in Russia that would either force people to vote for him as the lesser of two evils. This would make it a lot easier to manipulate the election results. Or Putin will have to cancel the election entirely. The Kremlin team must be desperately searching for a pretext that would leave Russian voters with no option but to agree to another six years of Putin’s rule. And they will not let any moral considerations stand in their way. After all, Putin’s team has every intention of remaining in power as well.

The way the authorities conducted the Duma elections was essentially a trial run for those in March. It is clear that the presidential campaign will be even dirtier. This will be the next step toward delegitimizing the government and discrediting elections themselves as a democratic mechanism for ensuring the transition of authority. Unfortunately, Russian society will be left with only one way to accomplish that transition — by taking to the streets in protest. This method for getting rid of leaders who have outworn their welcome has always been fraught with unpredictable consequences — especially in Russia. But the Kremlin is not leaving the people any other choice.

How will the authorities respond? One place to look is the 33 percent increase in funds for siloviki agencies over the next two years and a simultaneous 10 percent decrease in spending for the economy, education and health care. That should silence everyone who claim that we may see a new “Putin 2.0” after his re-election in 2012, one dedicated to reforms and liberalization. The only change we are likely to see from Putin, however, is a shift in a more authoritarian direction.

Putin is not extending his rule to implement reforms that would only undermine his influence and authority. He is returning to the Kremlin to preserve the status quo. But he has no way to accomplish that except through outright intimidation, as evidenced by the excessive use of force in detaining and beating back protestors on Dec. 5 and 6. The authorities are trying to scare the people. But now they are dealing with a new post-Soviet generation that grew up without a deeply ingrained fear of their leaders or an instinctive impulse to obey them.

This suggests that a confrontation between the ruling authorities and the people might be nearly impossible to avoid. Can the pragmatists within the government unite in time to avoid this confrontation? Or are they already too late?

Nobody should be misled by the relative calm despite the protests and broader discontent with the ruling regime. Nobody should be misled by the Kremlin decision not to provoke the protesters. The authorities have already lost Moscow and St. Petersburg, the two cities from which epic changes have always begun in Russia. Once 500,000 people take to the streets, the floodgates of change will finally be flung wide open.