First time visitor? Learn more.

President Obama Meets With Abu Mazen

by WrathofG-d ( 104 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-Jihad, Barack Obama, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Invasion, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Judaism, Palestinians, Religion, Terrorism, United Nations, World at May 28th, 2009 - 12:49 pm

Today, President Barack Obama met with Phakestinian “President”, and leader of Fatah terrorist organization, Abu Mazen (now being called Mahmoud Abbas).  The numerous reports around the globe are stating that Abu Mazen/Mahmoud Abbas will be discussing with Obama how they can work together to “stop all Jewish ‘settlement’ growth” in Judea, and Samaria, and force Israel to accept a “Palestinian” state within their borders despite any legitimate security concerns that they might have.

Following are numerous news reports that do just that:  Al-Bawaba, Christian Science Monitor, ABC, Allheadlinenews, AP, Ynet, Politico.  There are many more.

The main issue that the U.S. now seems to be concentrating on is Jewish “settlements” as being the core stumbling block in our eternal quest for Jewish-Islamic Middle East peace.  This claim is ridiculous, as the building of homes is not nearly as much as an international concern (or it should be) as the murder of innocent civilians.

The concentration on “settlements” however is not new -it has been the Arab talking-point from before the modern state of Israel was founded.  It was originally a complaint about Jewish settlement in pre-1948 that the Arabs used as an excuse to murder Jews, then after 1948 it was Jewish settlement in general (the Creation of Israel).  This caused many conflicts, much violence, and ultimately the 1967 Six Day War.  Only thereafter did the Arab complaint regarding “Jewish settlement” come to refer to post-1967 Jewish communities in Judea, and Samaria. (as a starting point to getting back to fighting about the “settlement” pre 1948)

Accordingly, it seems that the U.S. has now bought into the Arab campaign to end Jewish “settlement”, and thus work for the destruction of Israel in general (whether the U.S. is aware of it or not).  The concern is not the health, or safety of innocent civilians (Israeli or Arab) through the ending of terrorism, but now a campaign against Jewish ‘settlement’ and specifically growth.  With zero emphasis on whether or not this tact is even going to end the conflict, or save lives.

In fact, as is evidenced by the articles above, the U.S. has actually taken a policy against Jewish “natural growth”.  But hey, why not concentrate on the building of homes by Jews among Islamists as the core reason there is no peace – we saw how much peace was achieved from ethnically cleansing Gaza of all Jews, and Jewish settlement.
“natural growth” of ‘settlements”

Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, and the rest of the Obama Administration are leading the charge against what they are calling “natural growth” of Jewish neighborhoods in post 1967 Israel.  But what does “natural growth” mean?  In short, natural grown is the normal expansion of communities due to natural events such as marriage, and child birth.  Therefore, the U.S. is taking a policy against marriage, and child birth for Jews living in Judea, and Samaria.

Could you imagine if this demand was made on Muslims in pre-1967 Israel? (or anywhere else in the World for that matter?)

You can read all about this issue on Israel Matsav, Israel National News, and many other sources.  Thus, I am going to concentrate on a group more vilified in the world by the MSM, EU, U.S., and UN than anyone else – Jewish Residents of Judea & Samaria.  Who really are these “settlers”, what do these “evil” “settlements” look like, what is this illegal “outpost” or “settlement”?

One of the most spoken/complained about “settlements” is Hebron.  Also for reference, here are a few pictures of those “evil” “settlers” – the ’cause of all the strife in the middle east’, and who now no longer have a right to procreate.

Jewish "settlers" celebrate yom yerushalayim 2006

Jewish settlers in the West Bank: "We expect these people to obey the law."

(More info to follow within the comments. Expect continuous updates as time permits.)

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us