US H.R. 2587: Pushback Against Job-Killing NLRB

US H.R. 2587: Pushback Against Job-Killing NLRB

by 1389AD ( 15 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Regulation, Republican Party, Special Report, unemployment at July 26th, 2011 - 2:30 pm

From Rep. Allen West’s weekly email update

Upcoming Week
…
– Protecting Jobs from Government – The House is scheduled to consider H.R. 2587, the Protecting Jobs from Government Interference Act. The bill would prohibit the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) from ordering an employer to restore or reinstate any work or employee, or from requiring investment in a particular plant or facility. The bill is in response to a complaint filed in April of this year by the NLRB against the Boeing Company for its decision to locate a production facility in South Carolina, a “right-to-work” state. The NLRB is seeking to force the company to keep its production in Washington, where the workforce is unionized. Regarding the bill, House Education and Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (R-MN) said “Republicans refuse to allow federal bureaucrats to reverse the business decisions of employers. The Protecting Jobs from Government Interference Act takes a critical step to provide employers with the certainty they need to put Americans back to work, right here at home.”

Click HERE to sign up for Allen West’s email.

Tags: Allen West, H.R. 2587, NLRB

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 26th, 2011 at 2:30 pm and is filed under Economy, Regulation, Republican Party, Special Report, unemployment. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top