► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Archive for July, 2011

American Blacks Are Not Responsible For Barack Obama

by Mojambo ( 81 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Political Correctness, Progressives at July 21st, 2011 - 5:00 pm

The article points out that Barack Obama has very little in common culturally with American blacks and is a product of white American culture. Obama has been throughout his life promoted, benefited, and  given a pass by guilt ridden White liberals snd I am glad that the author points out that it was the Republican Party lead by the odious Richard Nixon which came up with the “affirmative action” plan (“The Philadelphia Plan”) that riles up so many conservatives. American blacks may be “responsible” for Barack Obama only because they voted 95% for him, but they automatically vote 95% for Democrats – and that is the problem! That is why people such as Allen West, Tim Scott, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams and Clarence Thomas are so threatening to the white liberal establishment as well as the race hucksters such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.  Someone who has the audacity to think for himself is a heretic to the plantation mentality. As a commenter wrote “Sadly, a vast majority of Blacks in America have exchanged the real shackles of slavery for the mental shackles of slavery offered to them by the Democrat Party.”

by J.R. Dunn

I’m responding to a number of comments that in large part have gone unseen because they were intercepted before they ever went up.  Racists are always attempting to hitch a ride on legitimate sites, and AT is unfortunately no exception.  Anyone operating in the millennial media world must be careful, particularly a center-right website dealing forthrightly with sensitive topics as we do here.  There is nothing more common than fanatics of various stripes stepping over the line in the guise of “telling it straight.”  And there is no topic where this is seen more often than race.

The argument here appears to be that, Obama being black, he acts as a natural representative of black Americans as a whole, that his faults are their faults, and that the entire Obama administration represents yet another instance of the unworthiness and inferiority of blacks.

[…….]

First the contention that Obama is a “representative” American black.  AT readers will be well aware that I don’t believe that Obama is representative of much of anything at all, that he is sui generis to an extent that he might as well have walked off a starship from the planet Zong.  I haven’t shifted in that opinion one iota.

First, let’s consider how we define American blacks.  This is an exercise that is generally overlooked, surprisingly so considering how much debate has occurred on the topic.  As a people, American blacks are West Africans who were taken as part of the slave trade, and unwillingly brought to America where they suffered an undeniable ordeal lasting centuries.  Once here, they developed a culture sharing both African and Southern aspects, a unique combination of Scots-Irish and West African traits, particularly marked by an intense form of Christianity.  After enduring almost a century of legal segregation after their liberation as a result of the Civil War, they have for fifty years been entering the mainstream of American society, with not unexpected snags and delays.  They lag to a slight extent economically and scholastically, as might be expected considering their historical background.  (I’m well aware that there plenty of exceptions to these statements, but we don’t construct arguments out of exceptions.)

And Obama?  Here we have man with a white American mother and an East African father.  No connection to West Africa whatsoever.  He spent his early years in Hawaii, one of the most racially diverse areas in the United States.  He was raised in large part by his white grandparents.  He spent several years in Indonesia as the stepson of an Indonesian Muslim.  After returning to the U.S. he attended some of the country’s leading universities including Columbia and Harvard.  (At some point here, possibly at Columbia, which is set cheek-by-jowl with Harlem, he laid eyes on his first black slum.)  Virtually his entire professional life has been spent among white elites.

[….]

He has nothing in common with American blacks.  He shares neither their legacy nor their experience.  His posture as representative of black America is a pose, one of the many that comprise the persona of Barack Obama.  A charade, as we have been reminded of recently by no less an authority than Cornel West.  Unlike Colin Powell, Condaleezza Rice, and Clarence Thomas, raised respectively in Harlem, Alabama, and the Carolina Gullah region, Obama is in no way a product of American black culture.  American blacks have no responsibility for him, and cannot be held to blame for his excesses.

If anything, Obama is a product of white American culture, by means of affirmative action.  Obama is to some extent the stereotype result of affirmative action, the black kid made good who is continually trotted out to justify these obnoxious programs.  (Recall Patrick Chavis, the black doctor who took Allan Bakke’s place in medical school, and was presented as a towering success and proof positive of the value of set-aside programs until it was discovered that women were dying in his liposuction clinic.)

[…..]

Affirmative action is not a black innovation at all.  It was first instituted as policy by President Richard Nixon in the form of the “Philadelphia Plan,” evidently as an effort to mollify liberals.  (We all know how that worked out.)  So affirmative action is not only a white atrocity; it is a Republican atrocity, part of the long litany of crimes committed by RINOS in the name of proving that they’re not right-wing trogs.

The liberals latched onto affirmative action for their own purposes.  As with forced busing, it was utilized as a method of putting the screws to working-class whites to assure that they got with the program.  As has been pointed out repeatedly by Shelby Steele, Thomas Sowell, and Walter Williams among many others, any benefit that accrues to blacks is totally accidental.

[…..]

What affirmative action does is provide an easy leg up for those sly individuals who can figure out how to game the system.  We have all become acquainted with the master gamesman over the past few years.  Obama has successfully gamed Occidental, Columbia, Harvard, the U of Chicago, the Cook County political machine, the Annenberg Foundation, the U.S. Congress, the Nobel committee, and the American voter.

These are not black organizations.  The system that put Obama into office is a system constructed by white liberals for white liberal purposes.

[…..]

Obama has been a disappointment to American blacks along with everyone else.  (Proportionally more blacks than whites are suffering unemployment due to the Obama recession, for one thing.)  Obama has served as a wakeup call to black America.  It’s more than possible that Obama, by his very nature, will expose the phoniness of the liberal racial system.  We must not let the racist remnant wreck this opportunity.

It was the Democrats who supported slavery, the Democrats who established segregation, the Democrats who have excused racism at every turn and in every form.  That’s their record, and it can’t be denied.  It’s best we leave it to them.

Read the rest – American Blacks cannot be blamed for Barack Obama

If Your Country Were On The Verge Of Financial Armageddon, What Would You Do?

by Flyovercountry ( 230 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Progressives, Regulation at July 21st, 2011 - 2:00 pm

I know I would be working feverishly to find solutions to the financial crisis.  In crisis mode, stopping the absolutely free flow of red ink would be amongst the top of things on my to do list.  For our President though, no  way no how he is about to consider trite little things like NOT SPENDING MORE MONEY.  Apparently, our President feels that we need a new Federal Agency, The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.  This was undoubtedly hidden into one of the newly passed insane omnibus laws passed and signed prior to the restraining order employed by the American People in November of 2010.  The purpose of the new agency, well, the best explanation I’ve heard so far is that this agency will read the fine print for us poor shlubs not capable of reading at a high school level and protect us from unscrupulous businesses who have the temerity to produce written contracts for us to sign prior to doing business, and then do exactly as they disclosed that they would.  Putting aside for the moment the absolute folly of introducing a brand new bureaucracy at a time when we can not afford the ones already in place, I find it somewhat insulting that the President and his minions have determined that I am just plainly too stupid to read a contract all by myself.  This agency also fails to actually address the true cause of the financial meltdown, which for those of you not paying attention were two criminal money laundering scam masquerading as a government backed private entity called Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac coupled with a Law entitled the Community Reinvestment Act.  The entire enterprise were enabled and protected by Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, and Ted Kennedy.  So, who has been the last person tapped to run this agency, why it was Richard Cordray of course.  Richard was fired by the State of Ohio recently for being one of those sue happy Attorney Generals who felt that suing private businesses for having the misfortune of actually conducting business in the wrong state rather than enforcing the current laws of the state.  To explain this further, because it is that important that everyone understand who is about to head our newest consumer protection Democrat Party shakedown scam I will explain what it is that Ohioans did not like about Richard Cordray.  When he came across a company that for whatever reason he did not like, we’ll call them XYZ inc.  If he was unable to come up with an actual law that XYZ inc. was actually violating, he would file a law suit in civil court.  Since Governors get blamed for unemployment and companies leaving town, and not Attorney Generals, well who cares about consequences anyhow?  The reason President Obama had such a hard time describing what the newest agency would be up to is that so much of its language states that its purview and authority will be up to the discretion of the director.  Lucky us.

Exit Question: Are we actually broke, or do we have the money to do this?

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

George P. Bush: Do not count my father Jeb out as future presidential contender

by Mojambo ( 12 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, George W. Bush, Headlines, Republican Party at July 21st, 2011 - 1:56 pm

Yeah right – that’s  what the country wants, another Bush in the White House because the first two worked out so beautifully. The first one was a lying, one term failed president and the second one barely won in 2000 and 2004 and was so ineffectual he paved the way for Barack Obama.  Dream on! Not only no, but HELL NO! This is not a monarchy as a commenter wrote.

by Jamie Weinstein

George P. Bush told The Daily Caller on Wednesday that although he wishes his father, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, would enter the 2012 race for the White House, he doesn’t count him out as a future presidential contender.

“I think that time will only continue to benefit not only my uncle’s record [former President George W. Bush], but my dad’s opportunity to run for higher office,” the younger Bush said, while answering whether the notion of “Bush fatigue” has weighed heavily on his father’s electoral considerations. “Make no mistake about it, I think a lot of people sorely miss and would relish some sort of return of that type of approach to leading our country.”

“It’s not do or die in this cycle by any means,” Bush added. “My dad’s a young guy.”

Bush did suggest, however, that the immediate perception of his uncle after he left the White House may have hindered his father’s short-term electoral options.

“For better or for worse, they share the same name, they share the same blood, and kinship, and therefore it’s just difficult,” he said.

George P. Bush himself is widely seen as the heir to his family’s vaunted political legacy. He told TheDC that, having recently returned to Texas from a tour of Afghanistan as an intelligence officer in the Navy Reserves, he is focused first on building his family and his career in real estate.

[……]

 

Read the rest George P. Bush Don’t count out father Jeb as future presidential contender

 

Gang of 6 plan is really 3 Trillion in new taxes!

by Phantom Ace ( 3 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Headlines, Progressives, Republican Party at July 21st, 2011 - 1:35 pm

When the gang of 6’s plan was revealed, I was in a wait and see mode. Well that’s over now. Clearly this plan is nothing more than a stealth tax increase. Originally it was stated that 1 Trillion in new revenue would be raised by closing loopholes, not raising rates. Well it turns out, the plan really raises taxes by 3 Trillion!

According to the outline, the $1.5 trillion in “tax relief” is how the Congressional Budget Office would score the plan.

But what the gang conveniently leaves out is that the CBO’s forecast has $4.6 trillion in tax hikes already baked into it. That’s because the CBO baseline assumes all the Bush tax cuts get repealed, that every other temporary tax cut is left to expire, and that the alternative minimum tax continues to entrap millions more middle-class families each year.

Once you take that into account, the $1.5 trillion in “tax relief” turns instead into a $3.1 trillion tax increase over the next decade. (It’s anyone’s guess where the gang got its $1 trillion tax hike figure.)

Like all bipartisan plans, it’s really a way for the Progressives to get the GOP to surrender. This plan is useless and will not reduce the debt or deficits. Does anyone really believe that even having an additional 3 Trillion in revenue will reduce anything? They will piss that money away. This gang of 6 plan is a scam.