First time visitor? Learn more.

Obama to Push Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament

by Iron Fist ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under Headlines at February 15th, 2012 - 5:53 am

Link

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration is weighing options for sharp new cuts to the U.S. nuclear force, including a reduction of up to 80 percent in the number of deployed weapons, The Associated Press has learned.

Even the most modest option now under consideration would be an historic and politically bold disarmament step in a presidential election year, although the plan is in line with President Barack Obama’s 2009 pledge to pursue the elimination of nuclear weapons.

No final decision has been made, but the administration is considering at least three options for lower total numbers of deployed strategic nuclear weapons cutting to around 1,000 to 1,100, 700 to 800, or 300 to 400, according to a former government official and a congressional staffer. Both spoke on condition of anonymity in order to reveal internal administration deliberations.

The potential cuts would be from a current treaty limit of 1,550 deployed strategic warheads.

This is insane, unless you go with my theory that Obama wants to destroy America as a World Power. Then it makes sense. This would potentially reduce our stockpiles to levels on par with Britain and France (and Israel, for that matter). This would be a low enough level for a determined Enemy to be able to reach parity fairly quickly once stocks of fissionables were available and the technical hurdles were overcome (read Iran). Obama is the most dangerous President the United States has ever had. It will take us decades to recover from his first term. If he is given a Second Term, we may never recover.

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us