► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Apartheid’

Charles defends John Kerry calling Israel a Apartheid State

by Phantom Ace ( 181 Comments › )
Filed under Israel, John Kerry, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives at April 29th, 2014 - 7:00 am

It was only a matter of time before Charles threw Israel under the bus. The washed up guitarist and failed blogger has  tried everything to win the love of Progressives. Instead they ridicule him and ignore the 61 year old Hipster. In a desperate attempt to gain acceptance, Charles defends John Kerry’s apartheid comments on Israel. He takes a swipe at Ted Cruz for defending Israel against the charge of apartheid.

Israel-Apartheid

Israel-Apartheid2Israel-Apartheid3 Israel-Apartheid4

Charles defends Kerry’s anti-Israel comments by citing 2 Leftist Israeli politicians who have a history of appeasement. He is trying everything he can to get in the good graces of the left. Like all his endeavors, his latest gimmick of defending Kerry’s Apartheid comments will end in failure.

Essential VDH: The Progressive Apartheid State

by Phantom Ace ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Communism, Fascism, Multiculturalism, Nazism, Progressives, Tranzis at July 9th, 2013 - 7:00 am

The Progressive movement claims it is inclusive and fighting for the rights of all Americans. In reality it is a Neo-Feudal movement that is creating a racial hierarchy in America. Contrary to what some Conservatives claim, it will not be whites at the bottom. Conservative Whites and Southern Whites will be at the bottom, but Progressive and Hipster Whites will be at the top of this racial pyramid. Underneath Progressive Whites are Asians, then Blacks and Hispanics.

Depending on the issue, Progressives use minorities to get a rise out of Conservatives. Led by false flag operatives like transvestite coke-head and former paramour to Bill Maher; Ann Coulter, too many on the Right fall for the bait and espouse hostile rhetoric. This has been a very successful tactic and one that blinds the Right from what is really going on. America is rapidly becoming an Apartheid state, where different races and ethnicity will be pout in a caste system and will be kept there.

Victor David Hanson sees through this Progressive Apartheid state and tries to educate the Right on what is really going on.

One of the strangest things about the modern progression in liberal thought is its increasing comfort with elitism and high style. Over the last 30 years, the enjoyment of refined tastes, both material and psychological, has become a hallmark of liberalism — hand in glove with the art of professional altruism, so necessary to the guilt-free enjoyment of the good life. Take most any contemporary issue, and the theme of elite progressivism predominates.

Higher education? A visitor from Mars would note that the current system of universities and colleges is designed to promote the interests of an elite at the expense of the middle and lower-middle classes.

[….]

The beneficiaries of the system win exemption from criticism through loud support of the current progressive agenda, as if they were officers with swagger sticks in the culture wars who must have their own perks if they are to properly lead the less-well-informed troops out of the trenches.

Take illegal immigration. On the facts, it is elitist to the core. Big business, flush with cash, nevertheless wants continued access to cheap labor, and so favors amnesties for millions who arrived without English, education, or legality. On the other end of the scale, Jorge Hernandez, making $9 an hour mowing lawns, is not enthusiastic about an open border, which undercuts his meager bargaining power with his employer.

[….]

Or take the green industry. At about the same time that statisticians readjusted the first-quarter GDP growth markedly downward — to a 1.8 percent annual rate, from the previously reported 2.4 percent — President Obama announced sweeping new regulations to curtail carbon emissions that will hamper the coal industry, further slow the economy — and delight his elite green base. Al Gore thought the speech historic. And why would he not? Gore has made hundreds of millions of dollars in the Marcus Licinius Crassus style of hyping a disaster and then profiting from its remedy.

[….]

Take gun control. What caused the latest round of furor over the Second Amendment was not gun-related deaths per se. In fact, they have been declining overall in the United States for some time.

[….]

Obama knew well that the liberal elites were outraged that savage violence had hit the suburbs; he knew too that there was nothing he could do to stop it that was acceptable to those elites, while there were lots of cultural targets that would at least allow the elites to vent.

[….]

Modern liberalism, among other things, is a psychological state, in which very-well-off Americans find ways through their income and privilege to be exempt from the ramifications of their own ideologies, while adopting causes and pets that exempt them from guilt over their own status and limitless opportunities. Judging by their concrete actions, they are indifferent to the poor whom they romanticize at a safe distance. In short, voting for larger government and subsidies is seen as a necessary cost of being a reactionary, liberal elite.

Sadly, Victor Davis Hanson is one of the few on the Right that understands what is going on here. The Progressive elite are creating an apartheid caste system where people will be limited in society to certain roles assigned to them. While other on the Right egged on by false flag operatives engage in hyperbole and give the Left ammo, Professor Hanson logically dissects the problem.

Will Victor David Hanson’s analogy of the Progressive end game, change anything? Sadly I doubt it since too many Conservative suffer from tunnel vision and listen to the rhetoric of false flaggers whose real agenda is to discredit the Right and enable the Progressive Apartheid State.

The Progressive movement is transforming this once great nation into the very entity the founding fathers rejected, a Feudal Society!

 

 

The UN’s “Palestine”: The Real Apartheid State

by WrathofG-d ( 127 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Fatah, Gaza, Hamas, Hezballah, Islamists, Israel, Judaism, Middle East, Palestinians, Religion, Terrorism, United Nations, World at March 2nd, 2010 - 8:30 am

It is long overdue that those who support Israel begin to go on the offensive against the enemies of Israel, here and abroad, and make them spend all their time and money defending their existence.

Luckily for the Pro-Israel crowd this can be done with simple facts and the truth.  What better time to start this campaign then now?

The “Palestine” envisaged by the UN is an apartheid state in the making…

And since its inception in 1994, the newly constituted Palestinian Authority, created by the PLO, has prepared the rudiments of a Palestinian State, modeled  on the rules of Apartheid and institutionalized discrimination:

1. The right of Palestinian Arab refugees and their descendents to return to Arab villages lost in 1948 will be protected by the new Palestinian state.

2. While 20% of Israel’s citizens are Arabs, not one Jew will be allowed to live in a Palestinian State

3. Anyone who sells land to a Jew will be liable to the death penalty in the Palestinian State

4. Those who murder Jews are honored on all official Palestinian media outlets.

5. Palestinian Authority maps prepared for the Palestinian State depict all of Palestine under Palestinian rule

6. PA maps of Jerusalem for the Palestinian State once again delete the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem

7. Recent PA documents claim all of Jerusalem for the future Palestinian State.

8. The right of Jewish access to Jewish holy places is to be denied in the new Palestinian State.

9. The Draft Palestinian State Constitution denies juridical status to any religion except for Islam.

10. No system which protects  human rights or civil liberties will exist in a Palestinian State

{READ THE REST}

Print; distribute; copy, paste & mass e-mail; wheat-paste, post to Anti-Israel websites, mention everywhere the topic comes up or is appropriate….

When Will Our Luminaries Stop Making Excuses For Terrorism?

by WrathofG-d ( 13 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Terrorism at February 3rd, 2009 - 2:44 pm

This week, President Obama decided to drop the “war on terror” idiom (as it could offend Muslims), and instead refer to our post 9/11 experience as an “ongoing struggle against extremism”.  His desire to ignore and rationalize the reality of the threat that the Western World  faces is unfortunately common.

In an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal, Judea Pearl, father of murdered journalist Daniel Pearl, discusses what he sees as an acceptance and normalization of Terrorism.

___________________________________________________________________________

Daniel Pearl after being abducted by Islamists.Daniel Pearl and the Normalization of Evil

By Judea Pearl

“…

But somehow, barbarism, often cloaked in the language of “resistance,” has gained acceptance in the most elite circles of our society. The words “war on terror” cannot be uttered today without fear of offense. Civilized society, so it seems, is so numbed by violence that it has lost its gift to be disgusted by evil.

I believe it all started with well-meaning analysts, who in their zeal to find creative solutions to terror decided that terror is not a real enemy, but a tactic. Thus the basic engine that propels acts of terrorism — the ideological license to elevate one’s grievances above the norms of civilized society — was wished away in favor of seemingly more manageable “tactical” considerations.

This mentality of surrender then worked its way through politicians like the former mayor of London, Ken Livingstone. In July 2005 he told Sky News that suicide bombing is almost man’s second nature. “In an unfair balance, that’s what people use,” explained Mr. Livingstone.

But the clearest endorsement of terror as a legitimate instrument of political bargaining came from former President Jimmy Carter. In his book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid,” Mr. Carter appeals to the sponsors of suicide bombing. “It is imperative that the general Arab community and all significant Palestinian groups make it clear that they will end the suicide bombings and other acts of terrorism when international laws and the ultimate goals of the Road-map for Peace are accepted by Israel.” Acts of terror, according to Mr. Carter, are no longer taboo, but effective tools for terrorists to address perceived injustices.

Mr. Carter’s logic has become the dominant paradigm in rationalizing terror. When asked what Israel should do to stop Hamas’s rockets aimed at innocent civilians, the Syrian first lady, Asma Al-Assad, did not hesitate for a moment in her response: “They should end the occupation.” In other words, terror must earn a dividend before it is stopped.

The media have played a major role in handing terrorism this victory of acceptability. Qatari-based Al Jazeera television, for example, is still providing Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi hours of free air time each week to spew his hateful interpretation of the Koran, authorize suicide bombing, and call for jihad against Jews and Americans.

…”

{The Rest of The Article}

___________________________________________________________________________