► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Big Oil’

When Democrats Lie To Us, They Call It Messaging, As In Blaming Big Oil

by Flyovercountry ( 107 Comments › )
Filed under Environmentalism, government, Media, Politics, Progressives at April 28th, 2011 - 4:30 pm

Filling up my gas tank now costs roughly three times what it did when President Obama was inaugurated. We were all treated to endless stories in 2008 how President Bush was responsible for gas prices. Now that a Democrat is in the White House, It is somebody else’s fault. “Big Oil,” gets the blame this time, those evil greedy business owners who work to bring a product to market which enables our entire economy to function. Question number one: What will we do when we successfully destroy every oil company in existence? The batteries on those hybrid cars are good for an average 25 miles per full charge, depending on where in our country you actually live. That electricity used was probably produced by burning fossil fuels anyhow, as very little of it comes from the green energy fairy.

So, Barak Obama, a man who among his campaign promises while running for President was that Gasoline would eventually hit $4.00 per gallon, thereby making his alternative green energy pill easier for Americans to swallow has set up a commission to investigate why Gas Prices have hit $4.00 per gallon. Steven Chu, his Dept. of Energy Secretary, a man who stated during the campaign of 2008 that he personally wanted to see gas prices hit $8.00 per gallon has vowed to hold those evil Big Oil CEO’s accountable. Please God, let those CEO’s grow a pair for a change and start really telling the truth while they are hauled in front of the inquisitors this time around. What won’t be investigated by the President’s commission or Chu’s charade, I bet this won’t.

Why a three inch lizard is more responsible for your pain at the pump than all of those big bad oil companies put together.

Last December, the Fish and Wildlife Service announced that the lizard, a three-inch-long reptile native to the American Southwest, “faces immediate and significant threats due to oil and gas activities and herbicide treatments” and initiated the process to get it listed under the Endangered Species Act.
In 2002, the Center for Biological Diversity first petitioned to have the lizard, originally considered a subspecies of the common sagebrush lizard, listed as endangered. The Bush administration delayed consideration for six years. Last year, the Obama administration put it back on the fast track.

As director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Steven Chu, Obama’s secretary of energy, expressed a fondness for high European gas prices as a means of reducing consumption of fossil fuels. In a September 2008 newspaper interview, he said: “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.” Gas prices in Europe then averaged about $8 a gallon.

As gas prices here soar toward $5 a gallon, Chu’s friends at the Interior Department may help him and President Obama get the rest of the way toward their goal. If the dunes sagebrush lizard, now considered a separate species, is granted endangered status, oil and gas production in the Permian Basin in New Mexico and Texas may have to be shut down.

The Department of Energy says the Permian Basin has a quarter of the nation’s proven reserves and 20% of the nation’s daily production comes from there. It has a quarter of the nation’s active oil and gas wells and is home to 21% of the rigs actively drilling in the U.S.

Gulf oil production is expected to be down 20% in 2011, meaning the loss of 375,000 jobs. But that’s a drop in the barrel compared with the loss of production and jobs if America’s biggest oilfield is shut down to make a lizard’s life more comfortable.

The truth is, that since the Department of Energy was created for the express purpose of easing our dependence on foreign oil, it has exclusively worked to end our domestic production. The messaging has been that greedy Oil Industry Executives are somehow robbing us blind by having the temerity to make a profit, like any other business which operates in our country. One of the single most comical aspects of my existence is meeting the endless supply of people who are convinced that their own profession is the sole noble profession which actually deserves to be compensated. Talk of capping executive salary and state sponsored jealousy are nothing but the deflection of corrupt politicians who use their messaging to keep us from scrutinizing them. If an Oil Executive makes an obscene amount of money, it is because they have provided an obscene value to their fellow Americans. That is how our economic system works. If you do not believe me, try living your life for one week without using any oil at all. See how that works out for you.

Question number two:  Who’s business is it what a CEO is compensated or how large his bonus may be?  It does not help me in the slightest that a cap may be placed on someone else’s salary.  If I make a CEO’s life miserable, it will put not one extra steak on my supper plate.  As a matter of fact, it will have the opposite effect.  This is due to something called the Laffer Curve.  In economic terms it boils down to the concept that a rising tide raises all ships.  When you penalize CEO’s, they will be disincented to risk their hard earned capital, thus hiring less people, and it will in fact harm us all.

Don’t fall for the messaging this time around.  We don’t need repackaged verbal crap from our national leaders, we need leadership from them.  When a Democrat states that they lost due to poor messaging, what that really means is that not enough people believed the lies.

Crossposted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Green Technology, Unicorns, and Adult Memories.

by Flyovercountry ( 74 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Environmentalism, Misery Index, Progressives, Technology at April 26th, 2011 - 6:30 pm

Gas right now, for those of us in flyovercountry is, for all intents and purposes $4 per gallon. The general belief is that it will soon be $5. This really should not shock anyone, as one of Barak Obama’s campaign promises to the SEIU, Acorn, AFSCME, and the coalition of the smug, (the ecofascists,) was that he would do exactly that to gas prices. You may not have known this, as our alphabet media sources made the decision for us all that this part of Obama’s message was not really all that important for us to know. Now that gas prices are that high, and it is clear that America is feeling the pain, Obama has taken to the airways to fix blame, anybody but him. Oil company executives are getting the blame this time around. He is talking about record profits, and the supposed subsidies that they receive. Let me disabuse you of this nonsense first.

The Oil companies have not reported their earnings yet for this quarter. How on Earth can Obama, or any politician for that matter know what the profits are, let alone whether they are at record levels. Dissemination of that particular information, of any publicly traded company, prior to being released to the general public as a whole is in fact against the law. So, if President Obama is privy to that knowledge and has made the decision to announce that prior than the boards of those companies, he has violated the insider trading laws and should be impeached for such.

Next, how did profit become a dirty word in America? In a free market system, such as ours used to be, and I hope will be again, profit and loss are equally important. When a company reports a profit, it is a measure not only of how wealthy the shareholders have become, but also of the value they have provided for the community at large. Oil companies produce a product. That product has proven to be so useful to the rest of us, that its usage has become literally a part of every aspect of our society. Oil companies did not trick us into making this situation, we found these uses for ourselves. Now that we are able to use it for making every aspect of our daily lives more convenient and comfortable, many have come to believe that it should be a basic right, akin to a free press and the right to bear arms. That oil company profits are big, is an indication that they have done a good job in supplying us with their valuable product with not a single interruption of supply, and in a manner which has also been convenient.

Subsidies, this is a specious argument at best. The fact is that oil is a product that has become so popular, the government has not only seen fit to tax the income of companies who produce it, but also levy an invisible extra tax at each location where it is dispensed. Not only the federal government is in on this, state and local governments have figured it out as well. The net flow of cash between oil companies and the various government entities are flowing more to the government than the other way around, I can assure you. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t believe the government should be subsidizing any business, but claiming that allowing Oil companies to take tax deductions is a subsidy is just plain dishonest. Most especially since they are actually paying a tax beyond their share of corporate taxation rates.

While green technologies are not like unicorns in the sense that they really don’t exist, they are every bit as useful right now. That does not mean that we should shut down all research and development of Solar, Wind, Hydro Electric, Nuclear, etc. On the contrary, keep going. But shutting down Oil and saying we will use a form of energy which honestly will not be able to do the job necessary is just plain stupidity. Edicting that in 10 years time, we will be operating our nation on 20% green sources can only have a limited amount of effects, not one of them good. We will be forced to cut our overall energy usage, which will create a real hardship for many Americans, the poorest among us will be hit the hardest. These technologies have been around for a very long time, and have not been developed to date not because of a lack of government intervention, but because that even with the full weight of the government behind them and against oil, oil is still more efficient, and in fact a vastly superior product.

So, besides demonizing big oil, or the patsy of the month, what else is President Obama and his team of academicians doing to help out?

Here is what the Obama Administration is really doing to help Americans with their pain at the pump.

Shell Oil Company has announced it must scrap efforts to drill for oil this summer in the Arctic Ocean off the northern coast of Alaska. The decision comes following a ruling by the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board to withhold critical air permits. The move has angered some in Congress and triggered a flurry of legislation aimed at stripping the EPA of its oil drilling oversight.
Shell has spent five years and nearly $4 billion dollars on plans to explore for oil in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. The leases alone cost $2.2 billion. Shell Vice President Pete Slaiby says obtaining similar air permits for a drilling operation in the Gulf of Mexico would take about 45 days. He’s especially frustrated over the appeal board’s suggestion that the Arctic drill would somehow be hazardous for the people who live in the area. “We think the issues were really not major,” Slaiby said, “and clearly not impactful
The closest village to where Shell proposed to drill is Kaktovik, Alaska. It is one of the most remote places in the United States. According to the latest census, the population is 245 and nearly all of the residents are Alaska natives. The village, which is 1 square mile, sits right along the shores of the Beaufort Sea, 70 miles away from the proposed off-shore drill site.
The EPA’s appeals board ruled that Shell had not taken into consideration emissions from an ice-breaking vessel when calculating overall greenhouse gas emissions from the project. Environmental groups were thrilled by the ruling.

Barak Obama is banking on the fact that for the most part, our media are not only biased, but willing to lie to us as well. Why shouldn’t he? They were very willing to do just that throughout the 2008 campaign and the first 29 months of his Presidency. An example of one network not in his pocket, and they are continuously vilified for it. All we relly need to combat the goofy arguments of the left are the glimmerings of an adult memory.

Crossposted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.