► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Chris Christie’

When offered the chance to be magnanimous, don’t be a smart-ass

by Mojambo ( 140 Comments › )
Filed under George W. Bush at October 15th, 2013 - 7:00 am

I give the fat man credit, he handled his opponent beautifully in the debate.

by Eric Fettmann

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie did what’s being called a reverse Rick Lazio last week in his first debate with his Democratic opponent, state Sen. Barbara Buono.

In fact, it’s more accurate to call it a George W. Bush moment.

Moderator Kristine Johnson of WCBS asked both candidates to say one nice thing nice about the other. Buono snapped sarcastically: “Well, he’s good on late-night TV; he’s not so good in New Jersey.”

Her supporters greeted the line with “whoos” and howls of laughter and applause. As Buono stood at the podium with a self-satisfied grin on her face, they probably expected Christie to respond with one of those trademark tirades he often reserves for his most in-your-face hecklers.

But the governor had a surprise in store: “She’s obviously a good and caring mother and someone who cares deeply about public service in this state, ’cause she’s dedicated a lot of her life to it,” he said. “And while we have policy disagreements, Kristine, I would never denigrate her service.”

Added Christie: “We need more people who care about our communities to stand up and do the job she’s done over the last 20 years.” As the audience replied with sustained applause and cheering, the smile slowly — but very surely — vanished from Buono’s face.

She’d just learned a basic lesson in political debating: When offered the chance to be magnanimous, don’t be a smart-ass.

Lazio learned that lesson in 2000, when his campaign for the US Senate from New York imploded when he charged across the debate stage, thrust a document containing a pledge not to raise any more soft money in Hillary Clinton’s face and demanded she sign it. Voters (unfairly) believed he came off as a bully.

Christie may have had Lazio’s unfortunate experience in mind. Or he may have recalled events six years earlier, when a political novice named George W. Bush took on Ann Richards, the Texas governor — who remains so popular, even after her death, that she was the subject of a recent one-woman show on Broadway.

Richards was known for her barbed wit; she’d famously skewered Bush’s father at the 1988 Democratic convention, declaring that he’d been “born with a silver foot in his mouth.” In 1994, she applied that sharp tongue to the younger Bush, referring to him in one speech as “some jerk.” As they prepared backstage before their lone debate, Richards came over and said, “Are you ready for this, boy? This is going to be rough on you.”

Which is what everyone was expecting. But Bush refused to take the bait.  [……..]

Throughout the debate, the more Richards tried to goad him, the more deferential and respectful Bush became, always calling her “governor.” He was gracious, in sharp contrast to his opponent, even as he pressed home his message. The comparison wasn’t lost on the voters, and Bush ended up defeating a Democratic icon.

As UC-Berkeley linguist George Lakoff told The Atlantic’s James Fallows back in 2004, “Debates are not about scoring points. They are about emotional identification.”

In New Jersey, of course, Christie has been more of an Ann Richards than a George W. Bush. But with re-election seemingly assured — the latest Quinnipiac Poll has him 29 points ahead — and his eyes on 2016, it’s been a gentler Christie on the campaign trail. [………]

That’s just one of many balancing acts Christie will have to perform if he has any hopes for the GOP presidential nomination. The party’s increasingly dominant Tea Party faction has no tolerance for a candidate who walked the post-Sandy beaches with President Obama and is actively trying to distance himself from congressional Republicans. And despite the fiscal strides New Jersey’s made under Christie, other GOP governors have more demonstrable records of success.

Not that he’ll want to become too much of a pussycat — that Garden State swagger and in-your-face attitude, after all, is a major reason for his enormous popularity, [……..]

Still, Chris Christie has shown that it may no longer be that easy to goad him into a hot-tempered outburst, much as Ann Richards discovered about George W. Bush. And you remember where he wound up.

Read the rest –  Christie’s debated comeback is his Bush moment

Clash of Clowns: Chris Christie vs. Meghan McCain

by Phantom Ace ( 93 Comments › )
Filed under Republican Party, The Political Right at September 26th, 2013 - 4:00 pm

2 of the most despicable people in the GOP are Chris Christie and Meghan McCain. Both are beloved by Progressive becasue of how they treat those on the Right. Both are attention whores and believe they are the center of the universe. Therefore, the clash between the 2 does not shock me at all as egotists tend to turn on each other.

In a rare moment of sanity, Meghan McCain calls out Chris Christie for caring about himself and not his Party. She is right and a perfect example of that was what he did in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. With a week to go in the election and the polls showing Obama and Romney tied, Christie embraced Obama with a photo op and stuck the knife in Romney’s back. This ended any momentum Romney had and gave Obama the advantage he needed to win the election.

Chris Christie did not take too kindly to Meghan McCain’s very rare astute observation and goes ballistic on her in typical fake Guido style.

Tuesday, the younger McCain told CNN’s Piers Morgan that she was “over” Christie’s presumed 2016 candidacy. Current polls put Christie at the head of a crowded field of potential 2016 Republican contenders.

“I’m kind of done with Chris Christie right now,” McCain said.

She referred to Christie’s 2012 GOP convention speech that barely mentioned nominee Mitt Romney. “There’s some level of self-promotion that you have to do, but I would like the next leader of the Republican Party, the next nominee to maybe be a little more interested in helping the country than just their platform.”

For his part, Christie, who is currently running for reelection, was dismissive of McCain’s comments.

“Are we really going to be responding to Meghan McCain?” Christie said, referring to the entire episode as “sophomoric.”

Christie said that he would take a call or criticism from McCain’s father. But Meghan McCain holds no office and doesn’t live in New Jersey.

“Meghan McCain has no standing to be criticizing me,” Christie said.

“I’m not going to respond to somebody just because of their last name.”

I am no fan of Meghan McCain, but I agree with her criticism of  Chris Christie. He is out for himself and a backstabbing scumbag who helped re-elect Obama with his photo-ops. Chris Christie in his dismissive tone of her shows how much of a thin skinned low life he is.

John McCain should be standing up for his daughter against the Jersey Bully. But he is to busy going after Ted Cruz. Nice priorities you have there Senator.

 

Chris Christie calls sports writer an idiot and a dope

by Phantom Ace ( 73 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2016, Progressives, Republican Party, Tranzis at September 9th, 2013 - 12:00 pm

NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi

Not only is Chris Christie a despicable 2 face serpent, but he is a know it all. On NY area Sports station WFAN, Chris Christie attacks NY Daily News sports writer Manish Mehta criticizing NY Jets coach, Rex Ryan. The NJ Jets coach is a big mouth jerk like Christ Christie. It’s no coincidence they are both personal friends, hence what promoted the Obese Snake’s harsh attack on Mehta.

Like peanut butter and jelly, these fat men stick together.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie unleashed a bizarre defense of Rex Ryan, calling a Daily News reporter who dared to question the Jets coach an “idiot” and a “dope.”

Christie, who was co-hosting WFAN’s “Boomer & Carton” morning radio show Monday, slammed beat writer Manish Mehta for pressing Ryan on whether rookie quarterback Geno Smith still had a chance at the starting job after his dismal performance against the Giants on Saturday night.

“Idiot. The guy’s a complete idiot,” the portly governor said of Mehta. “Self-consumed, underpaid, reporter … the only way he’s empowered is because we’re spending all this time talking about Manish Mehta this morning … who, by the way, I couldn’t pick out of a lineup and no Jets fan gives a damn about Manish Mehta …”The unprovoked attack continued.

“We shouldn’t be giving this dope, you know, the amount of airtime we’ve given him already,” Christie said.

Keep it classy there Chris Christie!

Palooka Of The Month: August’s Winner, Chris Christie

by Flyovercountry ( 86 Comments › )
Filed under Progressives, Republican Party at August 27th, 2013 - 12:00 pm

Really, were this award around a little longer, Christie would have won it for his bromance announcing photo op of a hug, gifted to the Bamster just days before the Presidential Election. New York was just as devastated by that Hurricane, and yet all of the New York Democrat Politicos running things there told Barack that he was not welcome in their state. So, with that one action, Governor Christie not only proved that he was perfectly comfortable kissing the canvas, he let us all know that those kisses would be of the wet french variety. What hurt about that particular dive most of all, and the list of things that peeved us is long indeed, was that at one time, most of the nation’s conservatives still had youtube videos of Chris Christie standing up and leading the fight against the run amok union leadership with tough as nails sound bytes fresh on their minds.

Now we have something new. Now we get a Chris Christie setting up his national organization and fundraising effort, obviously on a trajectory in which he’ll be running for President in 2016, tell the Conservative base of his supposed party to sit down and shut up. It’s the old, “we can’t win unless we totally capitulate on our small government values,” meme that we love so much. This meme comes in the form of a shot leveled directly at Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

What the heck, this strategy has proven itself so successful in the past, why not give it just one more chance? I mean, what have we got to lose, besides all of our basic freedoms? As I alluded to before, it’s not just that Christie has chosen to dive all of a sudden that has us all upset, it’s that he had gone to great lengths to prove to us that he could win, and then decided to plant his face into the muslin floor. For the better part of two years, we had, at long last, a Republican who was willing to stand up and make the case for what we believed in, as small government conservatives. In a world where such signs, however fleeting, of political courage were so scarce, Chris Christie became the overnight sensation of almost every righty blog. His youtube clips went viral, and such snippets became the stuff of legend, referred to as Chris Christie porn.

Sure, there was the odd warning from those who were familiar with the North Eastern brand of Republican Politics, telling us that the big government version of Chris Christie would one day shine through, but heck, unquenched thirst for those who’ve been wandering in the desert since 1994 is like that. It has been that long since anyone, (Newt Gingrich was the last,) has been willing to state the case for smaller government, and do so without apology. Having someone finally willing to stand up and make an argument, and to do so cogently, without reservation, and with passion, gave us the hope we needed to believe that returning us to a representative republic in which individual liberty would once again be immune to the tyranny of a majority willing to grant itself lordship over our lives was now possible. So, when Chris Christie gave us some rather overt signals that he in fact would be brandishing the Democrat Lite brand of Republican positions hence forth, that fall was even greater.

His win this month is for his war on Conservatism, or as he labels it, “the dangerous streak of Libertarianism found in both parties.” He has singled out Rand Paul and Ted Cruz as the symbols of his bane, but really it is you and I, the voting base of the Republican Party. Once again, we are told that our votes are necessary, but America would be better off if our voices simply remained silent.

Something else needs to be mentioned here in regards to the sickening man crush Chris Christie seems to have on Barack Obama, and that is this. Don’t try to convince me with specious arguments, they only serve to piss me off. Yes, many of the Obama programs are continuations of Bush programs, but that does not make them equal by any stretch of the imagination. While it is true that Fast and Furious was based upon an operation known as Wide Receiver, their applications were wholly different. Wide Receiver saw a hand full of weapons with LoJack Technology being sold to unsuspecting criminals, so that their eventual encampments could be raided with the aid of the Mexican authorities. Fast and Furious saw massive amounts of high powered weaponry gifted to those same drug cartels so that the ensuing violence could be blamed on our Second Amendment. Similarly, the Patriot Act under President Bush using the lowered standard for wire tapping warrants saw our security services picking individuals upon whom to spy, and acted appropriately. That same program under Obama saw the government collecting meta data on every breathing man, woman, and child, in our nation today. Just to put the cherry on top of how completely ineffective this practice is in terms of preventing terrorism, our nation failed to prevent the activities of two teen aged snots who were specifically pointed out to us by a foreign government who had seen fit to warn us not once, twice, nor even thrice, but four times.

(Scary thought: What that meta data will be useful for however is this. One day, we’ll call it 15 years from now, when you need a bypass operation let’s say, The death panel overlord, working with the full authority of an operational and weaponized Affordable Care Act, will use that meta data to ascertain your eating and living habits gleaned from your grocery store, drug store, debit card, purchases over the past 15 years to determine just how deserving you are of any treatment. When that happens, think of Chris Christie. How about this? When you campaign for a candidate not approved of by the state, or an issue that is against the desires of those in charge, that meta data can be combed for a whole bevy of transgressions which will be used to blackmail you into compliance. When that happens, think of Chris Christie.)

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.