► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Debt’

Economic Cracks in China?

by coldwarrior ( 210 Comments › )
Filed under China, Economy at December 1st, 2010 - 2:00 pm

This Fund Manager is putting his money where his mouth is, again;

Hedge fund manager Mark Hart bets on China as the next ‘enormous credit bubble’ to burst

Mark Hart, an American hedge fund manager who has made millions predicting the crises in US sub-prime market and European debt, has launched a fund to bet on the imminent implosion of China.

Mr Hart, who runs Corriente Advisors from Fort Worth Texas, has told potential investors in a presentation that China is in the “late stages of an enormous credit bubble”.

When this bursts, the financier said he expects an “economic fall-out” that will be as “extraordinary as China’s economic out-performance over the last decade”.

“Complacency among market participants regarding China is eerily similar to the complacency exhibited prior to the United States sub-prime crisis and European sovereign debt crisis.”

Well, he has a great track record…and it’s a million dollars to get into the fund…so waht data is he basing this bet on? From the article:

In the presentation, which amounts to a devastating attack on the prevailing belief that China is an engine for growth, the financier argues that “inappropriately low interest rates and an artificially suppressed exchange rate” have created dangerous bubbles in sectors including:

Raw materials: Corriente says China has consumed just 65pc of the cement it has produced in the past five years, after exports. The country is currently outputting more steel than the next seven largest producers combined – it now has 200m tons of excess capacity, more that the EU and Japan’s total production so far this year.

Property construction: Corriente reckons there is currently an excess of 3.3bn square meters of floor space in the country – yet 200m square metres of new space is being constructed each year.

Property prices: The average price-to-rent ratio of China’s eight key cities is 39.4 times – this figure was 22.8 times in America just before its housing crisis. Corriente argues: “Lacking alternative investment options, Chinese corporates, households and government entities have invested excess liquidity in the property markets, driving home prices to unsustainable levels.” The result is that the property is out of reach for the majority of ordinary Chinese.

Banking: As with the credit crisis in the West, the banks’ exposure to the infrastructure credit bubbles isn’t obvious because the debt is held in Local Investment Companies – shell entities which borrow from Chinese banks and invest in fixed assets.

Mr Hart reckons that “bad loans will equal 98pc of total bank equity if LIC owned, non-cashflow producing assets are recognized as non-performing.

As a final blow, Mr Hart says that the market belief that the Chinese government has “ample resources” to bail out its banks is flawed.

Corriente’s analysis of the ratio of China government debt to GDP comes out at 107pc – five times higher than official published numbers. The hedge fund says this number uses “conservative assumptions” and the real figure could be as high as 200pc.

The result is that, rather than being the “key engine for global growth”, China is an “enormous tail-risk.”

He is so convinced by his arguments that he has warned investors that the fund, called the China Opportunity Master Fund, is prepared to “burn” 20pc of their cash each year until his theories are proved.

Well, Mr Hart is calling the Chinese a pack of liars more or less. I can’t say that i disagree with him on this topic. If his debt/GDP analysis is correct, the Chinese are not only in really big trouble, they would also then be rather hypocritical in bashing the US for the same thing…debt. The above factors will be well worth watching as the Chinese economy unwinds.

Republicans plan Budget Cuts

by Phantom Ace ( 187 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2010, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party at October 27th, 2010 - 11:30 am

The Republican Party is now claiming that should they get a House majority, they will implement budget cuts. I hope they carry through with this and don’t cower out. Let’s not forget the GOP had total control of the US government from 2003-2007 and they governed like fiscal Socialists. In fact the Democrats ran to their right on fiscal issues in 2006 and won Congress as result. Once in power, they governed like fiscal Marxists and drove up the deficit to 1.2 Trillion and the debt by 5 trillion. Now Chris Cristie like budget cutting is needed and this is what the GOP is promising.

U.S. House Republicans plan to try to slash $100 billion from the federal budget as early as January if they wrest power from Democrats in this year’s midterm elections, setting up possible early showdowns with President Barack Obama on taxes and spending.

A Republican House takeover would thrust new committee heads, such as Representative Dave Camp on the Ways and Means panel, into the spotlight within weeks — or days — of seizing their gavels in early January. They would confront quick political tests that could alienate independent voters and Tea Party activists alike, analysts said.

Read the rest: Republicans Plan Budget Cuts as Early Act If They Take Power

I want to believe the Republicans but with their current Progressive leadership under Boehner (R-Oh), I have my doubts. Hopefully the rumors of Eric Cantor challenging Boehnerfor House Speaker is true. Paul Ryan and Cantor are the real deal Conservatives. As shown in the health care summit, they can run circles around Obama. They also know how to explain to the American public the sacrifices that will be needed to regain economic prosperity. A Cantor-Ryan leadership duo would be able to blunt the media’s attacks on budget cuts. The GOP needs good spokesman and they fit the bill.

In an interesting note, the Democratic party in Minnesota is running out right anti-Catholic ads. Since Catholic bashing and attacks on the church is accepted in America, no one has called them on it!

A  Democrat Party supporting independent non profit group has sent out perhaps THE most anti-Catholic political advertisement I’ve ever seen. Sometimes there’s a little subtlety to anti-Catholic political rhetoric but not this time. This is in your face anti-Catholicism. A postcard was sent out to voters with a photo shopped picture of a Catholic priest wearing a campaign button saying: “Ignore the Poor.”

[…..]

One of the more worrisome things about this is that this group must believe that there’s enough of an anti-Catholic vote that this would pay dividends. Could that be true?

Yes it will pay dividends since thanks to revisionist history, the media and entertainment industry, Catholic bashing is one of this nation’s favorite past times. As Stalin once said “How many divisions the Pope has?’ Very true words because if there was a Nuclear armed Catholic super power or Catholic terrorism, there would be more respect for the Church and its members. That is the truth, see the way Islam is treated in American society compared to Catholicism.

Progressive Fiscal Irresponsibility

by Phantom Ace ( 149 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis at April 19th, 2010 - 8:30 am

The Progressive regime of Barack Hussein Obama is on track to have a deficit of 1.5 trillion. In his first 2 years he has added 3 Trillion to our debt. Obama has not proposed any way out of this fiscal mess we are in. He is gathering a deficit reduction committee than will in all likely-hood recommend a VAT. Make no mistake about it, Obama used the economic crisis as a pretext for massive spending. He knows full well tax rates need to be raised to cover this new spending and that has been the plan all along.


(Picture Hat Tip: The People’s Cube)

We are going to pile up another $3 trillion in national debt in just the first two years of the Obama administration. If the annual deficit should sink below $1.5 trillion, it will be called fiscal sobriety.

Why, when we owe $12 trillion, would the Obama administration set out budgets that will ensure our collective debt climbs to $20 trillion? Why are we borrowing more money, when Medicare, Social Security, the Postal Service, Amtrak, etc. are all insolvent as it is?

What is the logic behind something so clearly unhinged?

Read the rest: How Could We Be So Stupid? Let Us Count the Ways

Victor David Hanson as a historian knows something is not right here. It’s insane to spend at the levels Obama is, economic crisis or not. What caused the crisis was Americans over leveraged on debt. Why go into more debt as a nation? It’s all a pretext to expand governmnet and make people dependent on it. It’s a plan to create a Totalitarian Progressive Neo-Feudal system.

(Hat Tip: Pajamas Media)

The Stimulus Failure

by Phantom Ace ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Progressives at January 12th, 2010 - 7:15 am

The so called Stimulus Plan implemented by the regime of Barack Hussein Obama, was to supposed to kick off the greatest economic boom ever. They claimed it would add millions of new jobs and restore prosperity. Reality has stated otherwise as the effects have been minimal. Obama claimed 95% of workers got a tax break. As if $500 a year extra will help anyone?  This amount comes out to about $10 a week, it’s a joke. The kicker is that this extra money must be declared as income. The Cash for clunkers money is also taxable as well. This spending plan was just adding debt to the Nation to reward Progressive organizations. It was not an Economic plan at all.

Assuming that Barack Obama holds another White House press conference—his last was back in July—here’s a question worth asking: If the stimulus is truly the success you and your team claim, why are you so reluctant to use the word?

 

It’s a timely question, with Congress returning to Washington this week after a year of record spending. Right now the spotlight is on the effort by the Democratic leadership to ram through a health-care bill—any health-care bill—in time for the president to declare victory in his State of the Union. But a second stimulus may not be far behind, with the House having already passed a version before members left for Christmas.

The House approved its $154 billion second stimulus package in its last vote of 2009, little more than a week after a policy address Mr. Obama delivered at the Brookings Institution. In that Dec. 8 speech, he reviewed the progress of the earlier stimulus—the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009—and used the occasion to call for additional congressional spending. The headlines rightly described what he was proposing as a “second stimulus.”

Read the rest.

So Obama hopes to create jobs by borrowing more money. Clearly, Mr. Hussein is economically ignorant by his actions. The more the Government borrows, the less capital available for the private market. If there is no capital available in the market, no job creation or investments. The Government is like a vacuum, it’s sucking up what is needed to create jobs. Clearly Obama wants a governmnet run economic system. His 3rd World Ideology is showing by his actions.

Barack Hussein Obama is once again a proven liar. The so called Stimulus has only made things worse. It was put an ankle bracelet around the American economy. By borrowing more money, The Progressive Regime of Barack Hussein Obama is making sure we stay in economic hard times. Maybe that’s their plan all along. The Cloward-Piven Strategy calls for overwhelming the system to collapse it. So far, they are succeeding with this increase debt burden.