► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Financial Crisis’

Economic Cracks in China?

by coldwarrior ( 210 Comments › )
Filed under China, Economy at December 1st, 2010 - 2:00 pm

This Fund Manager is putting his money where his mouth is, again;

Hedge fund manager Mark Hart bets on China as the next ‘enormous credit bubble’ to burst

Mark Hart, an American hedge fund manager who has made millions predicting the crises in US sub-prime market and European debt, has launched a fund to bet on the imminent implosion of China.

Mr Hart, who runs Corriente Advisors from Fort Worth Texas, has told potential investors in a presentation that China is in the “late stages of an enormous credit bubble”.

When this bursts, the financier said he expects an “economic fall-out” that will be as “extraordinary as China’s economic out-performance over the last decade”.

“Complacency among market participants regarding China is eerily similar to the complacency exhibited prior to the United States sub-prime crisis and European sovereign debt crisis.”

Well, he has a great track record…and it’s a million dollars to get into the fund…so waht data is he basing this bet on? From the article:

In the presentation, which amounts to a devastating attack on the prevailing belief that China is an engine for growth, the financier argues that “inappropriately low interest rates and an artificially suppressed exchange rate” have created dangerous bubbles in sectors including:

Raw materials: Corriente says China has consumed just 65pc of the cement it has produced in the past five years, after exports. The country is currently outputting more steel than the next seven largest producers combined – it now has 200m tons of excess capacity, more that the EU and Japan’s total production so far this year.

Property construction: Corriente reckons there is currently an excess of 3.3bn square meters of floor space in the country – yet 200m square metres of new space is being constructed each year.

Property prices: The average price-to-rent ratio of China’s eight key cities is 39.4 times – this figure was 22.8 times in America just before its housing crisis. Corriente argues: “Lacking alternative investment options, Chinese corporates, households and government entities have invested excess liquidity in the property markets, driving home prices to unsustainable levels.” The result is that the property is out of reach for the majority of ordinary Chinese.

Banking: As with the credit crisis in the West, the banks’ exposure to the infrastructure credit bubbles isn’t obvious because the debt is held in Local Investment Companies – shell entities which borrow from Chinese banks and invest in fixed assets.

Mr Hart reckons that “bad loans will equal 98pc of total bank equity if LIC owned, non-cashflow producing assets are recognized as non-performing.

As a final blow, Mr Hart says that the market belief that the Chinese government has “ample resources” to bail out its banks is flawed.

Corriente’s analysis of the ratio of China government debt to GDP comes out at 107pc – five times higher than official published numbers. The hedge fund says this number uses “conservative assumptions” and the real figure could be as high as 200pc.

The result is that, rather than being the “key engine for global growth”, China is an “enormous tail-risk.”

He is so convinced by his arguments that he has warned investors that the fund, called the China Opportunity Master Fund, is prepared to “burn” 20pc of their cash each year until his theories are proved.

Well, Mr Hart is calling the Chinese a pack of liars more or less. I can’t say that i disagree with him on this topic. If his debt/GDP analysis is correct, the Chinese are not only in really big trouble, they would also then be rather hypocritical in bashing the US for the same thing…debt. The above factors will be well worth watching as the Chinese economy unwinds.

The Germans get it right

by Mojambo ( 140 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Germany, Progressives at July 5th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Ralph Peters points out the obvious  but it is worth the repetition. The Germans understand the way to handle money a lot better then the welfare Southern Europeans (like Greece) and the Obama Administration does.  A  prescription for individual  economic health – live below your means, pay your bills on time, use debit instead of credit cards if possible, and save even when it hurts. If you can afford a $400,000 house, buy a $350,000 house, if you can afford a  $100 ticket for Broadway, buy a $75 ticket.  That bailout of Greece might bring down the Merkel government which is unfortunate because Angela Merkel is more pro American then Barack Obama, and the  Germans miss the always robust Deutsche Mark. Deficit spending in order to come out of a recession  is insane.

by Ralph Peters

Germany’s governing coalition is on the verge of collapse, but the country isn’t. Berlin’s the one major capital likely to survive the global economic plague in strapping health.

In the past, I’ve written mercilessly about German strategic freeloading, but it’s time to give Herr Meier (the German Joe-Sixpack) his due: His attitudes toward spending and saving are admirable.

Germany isn’t without problems. Its eastern states still haven’t recovered from the triumphs of “real existing socialism.” Its banks are dangerously exposed to southern European debt. Some German multinationals, such as Siemens, may have over-extended themselves. Mid-sized companies — the backbone of the German economy — aren’t investing. And there’s still no entrepreneurial startup culture.

Yet Germany books far more credits than debits. As much of Europe stumbles into negative growth, the German economy’s expected to expand at 2.1 percent this year. That isn’t dramatic, but it’s solid. And the battered Euro makes German exports more attractive (although every export ultimately needs an importer).

With 82 million people and the world’s fourth-largest GDP, Germany remains the world’s No. 2 exporter in terms of value (behind only the US and ahead of China). Economically, it punches above its demographic weight.

President Obama insists that only added deficit spending can ease the consequences of our previous economic irresponsibility, but no serious German political leader’s buying into his call to throw more money away. Instead, Germany’s leaders are playing a strong defense, cutting social benefits and imposing targeted tax increases.

And, unlike the bankrupt Greeks or ailing Spaniards, Germans haven’t taken to the streets to demand an uninterrupted free lunch.

Those austerity measures play only a minor role in the crisis within Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government. The real trigger was the government’s decision to underwrite the Greek bailout (with loans that are never going to be paid back — it’s mathematically impossible).

Germany already was the biggest contributor to the European Union — to the tune of 21 percent of the EU’s budget. The money flowed south, and Germans got little more in return than the assurance that they’re good Europeans.

But when it came to subsidizing retirement at 50 for Greek civil servants — while the German retirement age was rising to 67 — Herr Meier had had enough. Two-thirds of Germans opposed the bailout. Vacations in Greece and Spain had exposed them sufficiently to the south European work ethic.

They also understood that their 30 billion Euro contribution would only be a downpayment, as Europe’s southern welfare states buckled under their debt loads, one after the other.

But German politicians are captives of a dated Europa-uber-alles outlook. They rammed the aid package through. In thanks, the Greeks cursed German greed and promptly launched another wave of strikes.

Read the rest – Where the Germans get it right

Obama’s Creeping Government Control: Credit Cards

by WrathofG-d ( 288 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Politics, Socialism at May 24th, 2009 - 4:09 pm

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3006/2366638601_815b52ed9e_o.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last Wednesday, President Obama once again abused the power of Government to dictate to private individuals on how they can do business.  This time it was to credit card companies.

Unsurprising, the main stream media is hailing this horrible infringement on an individual’s liberty as a huge reform to protect the consumer.

_______________________________

Banks say the changes may cut the flow of credit to consumers because it will make it more difficult for issuers to set rates based on the risk their customers pose.

“With this bill we are putting in place some common sense reforms designed to protect consumers,” Obama said at a signing ceremony at the White House.

“We’re not going to be giving people a free pass and we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe. But we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives,” he said.

Enactment marks the crest of a backlash against the card industry after years of rate and fee hikes and aggressive marketing programs that have angered consumers, analysts said.

The law largely codifies a set of rules issued by the Federal Reserve last year and puts them into effect in February 2010, five months sooner than the Fed had planned.

It also represents the first major financial regulation reform completed by Obama as he tackles a rewrite of the rules of banking and the markets to better protect consumers and investors, and prevent another credit crisis.

{The Rest of The Article From Yahoo News}

_______________________________

AOL adds the following:

The White House staged a signing ceremony in the Rose Garden, an indication of the legislation’s importance to Obama. Though opposed by many financial companies, the bill cleared Congress with broad support.
Obama made clear that he didn’t champion the changes with the intention of helping those who buy more than they can afford through “reckless spending or wishful thinking.”
“Some get in over their heads by not using their heads,” the president said. “I want to be clear: We do not excuse or condone folks who’ve acted irresponsibly.”
And yet, he said, for many of the millions of Americans who use credit cards and carry a balance, trying to get out of debt has been made difficult and bewildering by their credit card companies.
Obama said many “got trapped” because of the downturn in the economy that has turned family budgets on their heads. But, he said, “part of it is the practices of the credit card companies.”
He criticized policies that allowed for confusing fine print; the sudden appearance of unexplained fees on bills; unannounced shifts in payment deadlines, interest charges or rate increases even when payments aren’t late; and payments directed to balances with the lowest interest rates rather than the highest.
“We’re here to put a change to all that,” Obama said.
“So we’re not going to give people a free pass, and we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe,” Obama said. “But we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives.”
Obama decried the “uneasy, unstable dependence” that a minority of card users have on credit.
_______________________________
Credit card contracts can be confusing, and paying off debt is exceptionally difficult.  However, Government intervention isn’t the answer.  Despite the tone of President Obama’s comments, no one forced any of these consumers to get credit cards (especially if they didn’t understand their contract), or live beyond their means.
 
Additionally no one got “trapped”.  Every credit card was sold to an individual over the age of eighteen, and thus only to adults.  If they are wise enough at eighteen to get an abortion (although they don’t need to be 18 to do that),  join the U.S. armed forces, and VOTE then they are wise enough to decide what sort of deal to make with a private credit card company, or not to make one at all.
 
This is just another example of an Administration with a nanny-state mentality, overreaching with the powers of the Federal Government to gain control of another industry and eliminate any sort of individual responsibility.  The Government will be making this decision for you now.
 
Although every individual instance might not by itself  be a tragedy, this is all part of a larger trend.  This constant slide away from personal liberty should be cause for alarm; not praise.  Although it might seem like a helpful intervention now, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and the path to political slavery with precedent created for the “common good”.
 
What is the list of Government controlled private industries at this point?  It is great to see that this Administration isn’t wasting this “good [financial] crisis”. (sarc!)
click for info regarding the transaction of digital money to cryptocurrency.

Obama celebrates spending binge with cocktails and wagyu steak

by bar ( 6 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama at January 31st, 2009 - 11:36 am

By Michelle Malkin • January 29, 2009 06:28 AM
Can the Obama administration be anymore tone deaf? After pushing his $1.1 trillion Generational Theft Act of 2009 through the House last night, the White House apparently decided to throw itself a swank cocktail party. According to ABC’s Jake Tapper, the menu included alcoholic beverages (vodka martinis are an Obama favorite, reportedly) and wagyu steak.
Yeah, “wagyu steak.” $100 per serving delicacy. I had to look it up, too.

Wagyu beef is also known as Kobe beef. Originally from Japan there is also American Wagyu.
Lobel’s of New York sells American Wagyu bone-in-ribeyes for $72.00 bucks a pound.
A Kobe ribeye from Japan runs $150.00 a pound.

Personally I don’t care for Wagyu beef, perhaps my palette is not refined enough.

I prefer a bone-in ribeye from Vons rubbed with olive oil, salt and pepper then grilled over a wood fire and I can save $60.00 bucks.

________________________________

(Hat Tip; Arwyn) Obama: Heat as I say, Not as I Do

A piece in yesterday’s New York Times featured a photo of an Oval Office meeting last week during which President Obama had removed his suit jacket. And while the Times was quick to point out how this break with centuries old tradition was a sign of a “more informal culture” under this new administration, they neglected to mention the glaring hypocrisy of the action.
You see, the reason the president — and others — were jacketless was simple: “Mr. Obama, who hates the cold, had cranked up the thermostat.”
After all, it’s freezing cold out there, and as White House senior advisor David Axelrod reminded us, “He’s from Hawaii, O.K,” adding that “He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in there.”

Now The One said this last May:

“We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times… and then just expect that other countries are going to say ‘OK.’ … That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen.”

I guess that is a royal “we” and he is right, we cant but he can.
I also agree with him that its not leadership.
And if he is from Hawaii, then why am I the one eating fried Spam?