► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Global Warming’

How Do I Know That Our Side Is Winning The Warming/Not Warming Debate?

by Flyovercountry ( 72 Comments › )
Filed under Environmentalism, Politics at August 21st, 2011 - 12:00 pm


This afternoon Urban Infidel will host a special edition of The Urban Infidel Show! Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff will be her guest LIVE today at 3:00 PM EASTERN US time.




Do you remember the other day, when I made fun of the Left’s favorite economist, Paul Krugman, for suggesting in a serious manner that we should get ready for space aliens as a means to solve our economic problems? If you do not, please play the video in order to refresh your memory.

After the video, I suggest reading the posting by Allahpundit at HotAir.

It may not rank as the most compelling reason to curb greenhouse gases, but reducing our emissions might just save humanity from a pre-emptive alien attack, scientists claim…
The authors warn that extraterrestrials may be wary of civilisations that expand very rapidly, as these may be prone to destroy other life as they grow, just as humans have pushed species to extinction on Earth. In the most extreme scenario, aliens might choose to destroy humanity to protect other civilisations.
“A preemptive strike would be particularly likely in the early phases of our expansion because a civilisation may become increasingly difficult to destroy as it continues to expand. Humanity may just now be entering the period in which its rapid civilisational expansion could be detected by an ETI because our expansion is changing the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere, via greenhouse gas emissions,” the report states.
“Green” aliens might object to the environmental damage humans have caused on Earth and wipe us out to save the planet. “These scenarios give us reason to limit our growth and reduce our impact on global ecosystems. It would be particularly important for us to limit our emissions of greenhouse gases, since atmospheric composition can be observed from other planets,” the authors write.

As noted by the author in his posting, this silliness was not authored by Nasa, but by a Nasa affiliated, “scientist.”  So, this is what the global warming side is left with now.  Space aliens are coming to kill us because I did not buy a Chevy Volt.  Is this theme going to be played out in the upcoming Presidential election?  I hope so.  I can’t wait for Barack Obama to run ads showing Space Aliens upset with Steel Plants in America sitting idle, because they might one day again be used to create Sulfur Dioxide, and of course that useless bye product, steel.  Will we see commercials with an alien shedding a single tear down his cheek as someone drives a Hummer to work in a coal burning electric power plant?

I guess for me, what gets me most about this kind of crap is that it actually finds traction as serious argumentation.  It is hard to hold a national debate with someone who posits this type of idiocy in a serious manner.  About a decade ago, when watching court T.V., the people pontificating about the O.J. trial floated as a joke that Judge Ito might as well allow the space aliens did this defense.  It is somewhat disconcerting to me to know that this is no longer considered a joke, but a serious argument.  This is indeed a great day for America my friends.

In the spirit of liberal debate tactics, here is a list of 5 questions, just as valid about our impending alien invasion.

1)  What if the aliens are coming here to buy our muscle cars, like Corvettes, and Mustangs?
2)  What if the aliens in fact breathe Carbon Dioxide and view our efforts to limit this gas in our atmosphere as a rude gesture?
3)  Does the fact that the aliens are coming to kill us over green house gasses mean that they were O.K. with nuclear detonation?
4)  If the aliens had the technology to travel here from their own planet, and they considered Carbon Dioxide to be worthy of destroying us over, why don’t they just sell us their planet sized atmospheric Carbon Dioxide air scrubbers, (Lithium Hydroxide), which we ourselves invented for use on the various space craft we have sent to the moon and lower Earth orbit?
5) If they are coming to kill us for this, why be so shy about it for the century or so we’ve had an industrial capability?  Why not show up when the very first internal combustion engine was fired up and warn us of the galactic no-no?

The truly scary part for me is this.  About half of our country agrees with these imbeciles.

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.



This afternoon Urban Infidel will host a special edition of The Urban Infidel Show! Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff will be her guest LIVE today at 3:00 PM EASTERN US time.



Ancient Aliens: NASA linked Scientist claims Global Warming may lead to Alien Invasion

by Phantom Ace ( 184 Comments › )
Filed under Environmentalism, Open thread at August 19th, 2011 - 5:00 pm

The Global Warming propaganda loves to paint a dark image of our future. They claim Ice Caps will melt, Polar Bears will die and Billions will die. The AGW cultists have taken it to a new level with their hysteria. The latest hysterical claim is that increasing green house emissions may lead to an Alien invasion!

It may not rank as the most compelling reason to curb greenhouse gases, but reducing our emissions might just save humanity from a pre-emptive alien attack, scientists claim.

Watching from afar, extraterrestrial beings might view changes in Earth’s atmosphere as symptomatic of a civilisation growing out of control – and take drastic action to keep us from becoming a more serious threat, the researchers explain.

This highly speculative scenario is one of several described by a Nasa-affiliated scientist and colleagues at Pennsylvania State University that, while considered unlikely, they say could play out were humans and alien life to make contact at some point in the future.

Shawn Domagal-Goldmanof Nasa’s Planetary Science Division and his colleagues compiled a list of plausible outcomes that could unfold in the aftermath of a close encounter, to help humanity “prepare for actual contact”.

Read the rest: Aliens may destroy humanity to protect other civilisations, say scientists

As someone who does believe there’s life on other worlds, this is hysterical charge. If Aliens invaded us it wouldn’t be over Global Warming, it would be to exploit Earth’s resources. I personally do believe in the Ancient Alien theory, that beings from the sky called the Anunnaki or The Nephilim intervened in humans early history.What these being were is in dispute. They are either fallen angels or actual human like aliens. If let’s say there was an intervention in early human history, this debunks the the hysteria from NASA. There was no factories hence not much in the way of human made green house gas? Yet, these being still came to Earth.

NASA should focus on space exploration. We should be colonizing space and exploiting outerworld resources. Humanity as a species is one asteroid away from extinction. We need to get off the planet so we can survive as a species.

Part of the reason we are not in Space is becaue of Islam, the Progressives and Globalist “Conservatives”. That however is another story!

The truth is out there!

Update: Over at the Blog we love to hate, there’s a new take on the Ancient Alien theory. It’s now racist to imply that Non Earth beings helped man develop civilization. The reason is because the areas of the world where civilizations arise, the people are “Brown”

Wow, so suggesting that possibility that Aliens helped ancient man develop civilizations is now racist?  The Left’s racial obsession never ceases to amaze me.

This is a Happy Hour Drinking Thread!

Billions will Die: The Rick Perry Edition

by Daedalus ( 167 Comments › )
Filed under Blogwars, Diary of Daedalus, Elections 2012, Environmentalism, Humor, LGF, Liberal Fascism, Open thread, Progressives, Republican Party at August 17th, 2011 - 8:00 pm

Charles did a thread today attacking Rick Perry for calling global warming a money making scheme. I then asked a question earlier today at Dairy of Daedalus about whether the Elusive Quixote would make an appearance today.

I wonder if the Elusive Quixote will make an appearance claiming that Billions will die?

Well my question was answered! The very rarely sighted and elusive LudwigVanQuixote showed up. As usual, he claimed that Republicans are evil and will be responsible for the deaths of billions.

So everyone who doesn’t believe in AGW is a religious fanatic! This coming from a man who claims to be Biblical expert on a rabbinical level.

The Elusive one then gets asked where he’s been.

I highly doubt he was in a lab helping with optics. It’s more likely he hasn’t been on LGF because the true master of the blog, failed porn actress Iceweasal, is out to get him banned. The Elusive Quixote returned to the Republican hating thread, knowing he can blend in and not be targeted.

The Jazz Guitarist was clearly influenced by the Elusive Quixote’s presence and goes off on a Billions will die rant!

Charles Johnson made Ludwig proud with his hyperbolic rhetoric! Not to be outdone, the Elusive one goes on a rant of his own!

Charles loves to complain about what he deems the hate coming from the Right. If he wants to find vitriol and bigotry all he has to do is read his own blog.

The Elusive Quixote has not been spotted since that last comment I posted above. He is rarely seen or heard nowadays. He’s on Iceweasal’s hit list, thus making him an endangered species over at LGF. It would be a shame if this voice of humorous insanity is silenced!

( This is an Open Thread)

Christopher Monckton Trounces Richard Denniss in Climate Debate

by 1389AD ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Australia, Climate, Energy, Environmentalism, Regulation, Special Report at July 23rd, 2011 - 7:07 pm

National Press Club Debate Christopher Monckton v Richard Denniss 2011 Address

(h/t: Andrew Bolt)

From the YouTube description:

IN FULL (HD) | National Press Club Debate Address Christopher Monckton v Richard Denniss 2011 Australia ABC 19/July/2011

Lord Christopher Monckton is Chief Policy Advisor to the Science and Public Policy Institute. He was Special Advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher from 1982 to 1986.

Dr Richard Denniss is the Australia Institute’s Executive Director. He is an economist with a particular interest in the role of regulation

New my website http://wakeup2thelies.com
Subscribe to my Youtube channel http://bit.ly/mz6xrF
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/#!/wakeup2thelies
Follow me on face book http://on.fb.me/jlU314

According to Andrew Bolt:

The National Press Club debate’s results:

  • Lord Monckton – 10
  • Former Greens adviser Richard Denniss – 1
  • Journalists – 0.

(Thanks to reader Adam.)

UPDATE

Note that Denniss’s entire argument was to follow the “consensus”. There was no attempt at all to explain the evidence contradicting this manufactured consensus.