► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Islamo-Imperialism’

Canada rejecting Islamic Cultural Imperialism

by Phantom Ace ( 71 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Progressives at April 8th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Canada was under Progressive control for nearly 14 years until 2006. That election brought Stephen Harper into power. Since then, Canada has gone against its former Tranzi Progressive foreign policy. Canada is clearly in the anti-Islamic Imperialist camp by supporting Israel and India. The change is also occurring on a cultural level. Under the Leftist regime, the Islamic colonization of Canada increased dramatically. From a population of 253,265 in 1991 on the eve of the Progressive takeover, it is now at 800,000 or 2.5% of the population. With this increase numbers, the Imperialist are attempting to impose cultural supremacy. However, Canadians are fighting back and want the Niqab banned!

Introduced last week, Bill 94 is the first legislation in North America to place a de facto ban on any religious face coverings in any government building—including within the walls of every government-subsidized high school, CEGEP and university in Quebec.

 Quebecers have risen in support of the bill, and in a rare show of national unity rivalling even that seen during the recent Olympics, the rest of the country is largely behind them, according to a recent Angus Reid poll, which found that 95 per cent of Quebecers, and three out of four of non-Quebecers, approved of Bill 94. The issue has brought together the governing Conservatives and the Liberals, both of which were quick to endorse the bill, while even the Bloc Québécois (no friend of the current Quebec government) agreed with certain aspects of the law, albeit tepidly. Even certain Muslim groups praised Bill 94 as an example of moderation.

“Two words: uncovered face,” said Quebec Premier Jean Charest last week, after tabling Bill 94. “The principle is clear.” His national assembly colleagues were even more unequivocal. Cabinet minister Christine St-Pierre called religious face coverings “ambulatory prisons,” while Parti Québécois immigration critic Louise Beaudoin said any religious head coverings, not just the niqab or the more restrictive burka, are examples of “submission of women, of regression, and a subjugation of all our freedoms.” Bill 94, Beaudoin says, is “anemic.” Translation: the bill doesn’t go nearly far enough.

Read the rest: About Face

I salute my Canadian brothers in their resistance to this cultural Imperialism. This should give Americans hope that Progressive domination doesn’t always lead towards national suicide. Hopefully America will follow Canada’s lead and resist Islamic Cultural Imperialism.

Denver Shoe Bomb attempt was a joke

by Phantom Ace ( 81 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Progressives, Tranzis at April 8th, 2010 - 5:00 am

Unreal. A Qatari diplomat went to the bathroom on a flight and smoke was seen coming out. The Air Marshals went and confronted the man. He then said he was lighting his shoes on fire. He was arrested and they are now claiming he was joking.

FBI agents say no explosives were found in the shoes of a Qatar diplomat who was subdued by federal air marshals on a United flight to Denver Wednesday night after allegedly telling the marshals, “I’m lighting my shoes on fire.”

Authorities say the diplomat was wrestled to the ground and two F-16 fighter jets were dispatched to accompany the 757 on the final 40 minutes of its flight to Denver. Flight 663 originated from Washington Reagan airport.

Read the rest:  FBI: No Explosives Found on United Jet in Denver

If this is Islamic humor, then I don’t find it funny. My gut tells me there’s more to this.

Moscow fears tide of Black Widows

by Mojambo ( 122 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Russia, Terrorism at March 31st, 2010 - 11:00 am

Well color me shocked, I thought that Islam meant “peace”. Seriously though, I could not fault the Russkies if they now decided to treate Chechen women as enemy combatants to be dealt summarily with if caught. You think that the FSB (the successor to the KGB)  will be doing any profiling? Yes Islamic terrorists (now there is a redundancy) need to be treated like rats. The French used to luanch “ratissages” (rat hunts) in the casbahs of Algiers (which made the Israeli offensives against Hamas seem like girl scout cookie selling  campaigns)  and Oran and they were ruthlessly effective until De Gaulle decided to break his promises to the pieds noirs – but I digress.

by Tony Halpin

Russian security services were hunting for more “Black Widows” yesterday amid fears that the women who blew themselves up in the Moscow Metro were part of a 30-strong suicide squad trained by a Chechen terrorist leader.

Agents from the Federal Security Service (FSB) believe that the women were avenging the death of Said Buryatsky, the leading ideologue of the Islamist rebels in the North Caucasus, who was killed this month in Ingushetia. They were trying to establish whether the attack was a one-off response to his death or the start of a suicide bombing campaign that he had prepared before the FSB tracked him down.

Moscow observed a day of mourning as a woman who died in hospital became the bombers’ 39th victim. Police circulated grisly photographs of the facial remains of the Black Widows in an attempt to identify the women who blew themselves up on trains at Lubyanka station, next to the FSB’s headquarters, and at Park Kultury.

Vladimir Putin, the Prime Minister, urged security chiefs to drag out “from the bottom of the sewers” those who had planned the bombings, in language that recalled his 1999 pledge to pursue terrorists and “waste them in the outhouse”. He said: “It’s a matter of honour for law enforcement bodies to scrape them from the bottom of the sewers and into the daylight.”

[…]

Ramzan Kadyrov, Chechnya’s Kremlin-backed President, offered a characteristic response in the newspaper Izvestia, writing: “We believe that terrorists must be hunted down; they must be poisoned like rats.”

Read the rest here: Moscow fears tide of Black Widows

Obama: Passover Wrap Up, “Next Year In Jerusalem ,” Deemed “Provocative”

by snork ( 110 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Humor, Judaism, Open thread, Religion at March 28th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

This is a spoof. This is only a spoof. From this blog, a satirical take on the traditional end of the Passover Seder, which for centuries has been: “next year in Jerusalem”:

Shana Habbab (AP White House Correspondent)

(AP) — An unidentified Israeli official has confirmed that private discussions between President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu included an urgent request from the President that the traditional closing refrain “next year in Jerusalem” be deleted during the upcoming Passover holiday, calling the ancient passage provocative and unhelpful for the future of peace talks. Calling it “an easy fix,” Obama strongly urged the Jewish People to replace it with “next year in peace” or “next year in Tel Aviv,” leaving the exact wording to final status talks between Israelis and Palestinians. Netanyahu is said to have balked at the request, indicating that the refrain dates back well before the UN Partition of 1947 and well before the U.S. Declaration of Independence, for that matter. The Prime Minister reportedly attempted to defuse the situation by offering to remove it from the conclusion of the lesser-known Yom Kippur service, and suggesting the phrase was defunct anyway since Jews have controlled all of Jerusalem since 1967. However, a visibly irritated President Obama flatly rejected the compromise, adding it was another indication the “stiff-necked” Prime Minister did not appear “serious about peace.”

Shortly after the meeting, both sides issued a terse statement saying that no agreement had been reached on the matter.

Yyyyyyyeah.