► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Jihad’

What To Do about Enemy Propaganda at VMI

by 1389AD ( 18 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Dhimmitude, History, Islam, Islamic Finance, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Military, Multiculturalism, Muslim Brotherhood, Political Correctness, Saudi Arabia, Sharia (Islamic Law), Spain, Tranzis at February 12th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Christine Brim at Big Peace has done us a great service in exposing who is behind the Muslim propaganda film, “Out of Cordoba,” which is to be shown at the upcoming propaganda-fest at Virginia Military Institute that “commemorates” (actually celebrates) the brutal Muslim conquest and occupation of Spain in 711 AD.

She poses a question that American citizens, voters, and taxpayers should also be asking: Why is a school that is partly funded by taxpayers’ money, and that exists for the purpose of preparing students for leadership in the US military, accepting bribes from our Muslim adversaries to set up events and programs that mislead its students?

VMI conference to Show Saudi-funded ‘Out of Cordoba’

Posted by Christine Brim Feb 8th 2011 at 11:06 am

[…]
Out of Cordoba,” (2008) was directed by Jacob Bender, self-described as “one of the initiators of interfaith dialogue with the American Muslim community. He has spoken dozens of times at mosques and at large gatherings of Muslims in the United States, particularly at the conventions of the Islamic Society of North America, the largest Muslim organization in the US.” He neglects to mention that ISNA was also named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism finance trial.

With “Out of Cordoba,” VMI cadets and faculty will view Muslim Brotherhood propaganda of the “Alliance of Civilizations” variety, “about Jews, Muslims, and Christians struggling for coexistence and against the hijacking of their respective religions by extremists.” It presents a false narrative of history, from which it draws false conclusions for the present.

The documentary’s Advisory board includes the usual Shariah apologists Karen Armstrong and John L. Esposito, but also: Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf of the Ground Zero Mosque, Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi, Fiqh Council of North America, and Dr. Sayyid Muhammed Syeed, Islamic Society of North America.

The Funders for the film include the Alwaleed bin Talal Foundation (Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is an investor in News Corporation and gives in the tens of millions to Harvard, Georgetown and others to start Shariah academic programs), the Muslim Brotherhood-associated International Institute of Islamic Thought, the Islamic Society of North America (unindicted co-conspirator) and the Alavi Foundation (FBI began to seize their assets in 2009, and the former president was sentenced in 2010 to prison).

The reviews are most revealing

The question is whether General Peay of Virginia Military Institute thought that this documentary’s endorsements, funding and advice from the likes of the OIC, the MAS, the IIIT, ISNA and the Alwaleed bin Talal Foundation were actually a reason to add it to the evening’s entertainment. Is this his concept of educational leadership in training the next generation of America’s military? He is using U.S. taxpayer money in the grant, and Virginia taxpayer money in state funds (VMI is a public college).

VMI has an honor code: “A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, nor tolerate those who do.” The “East meets West” conference violates that code.

It is a lie.

Read the rest and view the trailer for ‘Out of Cordoba’.

“Out of Cordoba” is not the only enemy propaganda film to be shown at this “commemoration.” Oh, and by the way, please note the PBS connection to the film ‘Cities of Light’. As I have pointed out before (see NPR Sorry About WHAT? LOL…), it is long past time to pull NPR, PBS, the CPB, and the NEA off the public teat.

VMI Conference Shows ‘Cities of Light’ to Glamorize Jihad Conquest of Spain

Posted by Christine Brim Feb 9th 2011 at 9:39 am

Previously, Patrick Poole reported on an upcoming conference at the Virginia Military Institute celebrating the Islamic invasion and brutal 781-year occupation of Spain entitled “711-2011: East meets West“, and then on the cover-up when they changed “celebrated” to “commemoration.” Then we followed the money trail behind the Virginia Military Institute’s “East Meets West” conference, leading to the real administrators of the conference grant – advisory committees from the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Jordan. And we exposed the “Out of Cordoba” film to be shown at the conference, backed by the usual Saudi money as well as Muslim Brotherhood-associated funders like the Holy Land Foundation terrorism finance trial’s unindicted co-conspirator, the Islamic Society of North America, and the International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Now let’s look at the second movie to be shown at the conference – “Cities of Light,” a “renactment” of the debunked myths underlying this thoroughly discredited Virginia Military Institute conference.

…“Cities of Light” (2007) is a reflexively anti-Christian “re-enactment documentary.” This is “history” as a Sword-and-Sorcery-and-Shariah, made-for-TV movie.

Here’s the spin from their website

Well, actually, the time of tolerance as they describe it never existed, debunked repeatedly by such highly-regarded scholars as Mark Cohen in Under Crescent and Cross, Bernard Lewis in The Jews of Islam, Ibn Warraq and Andrew Bostom in The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism, and Bat Ye’or in The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians Under Islam. Instead, the conquered Iberian cities knew centuries of savage warfare and genocide, guerrilla resistance movements, the civilian Cordoba martyrdom protests for freedom of speech and religion, and ruinous taxation from the jizyah tax on non-Muslims, a tax paid by the vast majority of the people for the luxury of the few elites – that “Golden Age” luxury so celebrated in the film.

In fact, ROTC students at Virginia Military Institute could greatly benefit from the study of the full range of documented history from the Shariah Iberian occupation a thousand years ago. The enforcement of Shariah law centuries ago in Spain is a direct parallel to the threat of institutionalized Shariah that Egypt and other countries face today from the Muslim Brotherhood. The persecution of non-muslims a thousand years ago during the Shariah totalitarian occupation is a direct parallel to today’s persecution of non-muslims in Shariah-adherent nations worldwide.

Even stronger parallels echo grimly across the centuries. The infiltration, intimidation and simple bribery of Christian and Jewish dhimmi elites a thousand years ago is starkly similar to the same tactics used on today’s government officials and media. And if VMI students and faculty want to understand the dynamics of popular insurrections against occupying powers, they will find instructive examples in the popular resistance movements against centuries of Shariah totalitarian rule in the Iberian peninsula – for example, the well-documented history…of the Martyrs movement in Cordoba in the 850’s.
[…]
Now, a preview of the movie: VMI students watching “Cities of Light” at the conference will hear that Tariq ibn Ziyad – the first raider into the Iberian peninsula – “emerges as a Folk Hero, leading his people to a New Land” (that’s a video segment from the film). And they’ll see crusaders chasing after little children (more video), as “the time of tolerance was lost forever.” It was produced with support from PBS; consider sending a link to your local Tea Party group, for suggestions for budget cuts.

Worst of all: the organizers of this conference, still scheduled for March 23-25 at the VMI Center for Leadership and Ethics, may impose the political correctness that pervades our military forces and intelligence community. The Virginia Military Institute cadets and faculty will have to sit silent and to submit to this disinformation – because to question this propaganda is, in Shariah terms, to “insult Islam,” or in U.S. government bureaucratic terms, to “violate diversity guidelines.”

Are there no VMI alumni or donors or board members who can intervene? Are there no Virginia state officials – VMI is a public college – who have standing to stop this travesty? Are there no VMI faculty who can assert VMI’s once-respected standards of intellectual honesty and academic rigor and stop this debacle?

And who else is paying for this conference? See this VMI publication (search on the term “March 23″): “The conference is funded in part from a grant VMI received in 2008 from the U.S. Department of Defense…”

Who are the other funders?

Read it all.


But wait, there’s MORE…

Says wtd at Vlad Tepes Blog:

On February 03, 2011 Chris Hurst for WDBJ7 reports:
Local professor weighs in on more protests in Egypt –
Visiting professor, Heba El-Shazli is a native Egyptian and teaches at VMI

which led me to further explore the faculty listing at VMI.

Scan the list of faculty in the “Modern Cultures and Languages”
here: . . .(just a few of the more ‘modern’ identities listed) . . .:
Khadija Bentouhami, Ms. – Instructor in Modern Languages & Cultures
Heba F. El-Shazli, Ms. – Visiting Professor of Modern Languages
Ivelise Faundez-Reitsma, Doctor – Instructor of Modern Languages & Cultures
Abdeljalil Naoui-Khir, Doctor – Associate Professor of Modern Languages & Cultures
Mohamed Taifi, Doctor – Professor of Modern Languages & Cultures
Soufia Ezzaki, Ms. – Arabic Tutor in Modern Languages

Ronald Reagan (peace be upon him) may have featured as a “Brother Rat” at VMI but the current, more – how did they phrase it? – “modern” rats are of a different brotherhood.


Feet to the fire

Rodan and I have blogged about this issue recently in these articles:

We suggested that you contact the superintendent of VMI:

Gen. J.H. Binford Peay III

Office Contact:
Lori Parrent, Secretary to Gen. Peay
Ph: (540) 464-7311
Fax: (540) 464-7660

201 Smith Hall
Virginia Military Institute
Lexington, VA 24450

Email the Office

We also suggested that everyone who will be anywhere near Virginia Military Academy on March 23-25, 2011, should protest this event in person.

Contact your elected officials!

Contacting VMI does not go far enough. The root of the problem is that VMI has already accepted funding from jihadi sources. This means that taxpayers’ funds intended for the formation of future US military officers at VMI have already been commingled with funds that our adversaries have contributed for the purpose of spreading enemy propaganda.

We must demand that VMI stop using jihadi funds for any purpose, and immediately discontinue participation in any project that uses funding from Muslim sources. We must disentangle not only VMI, but all other academic institutions and “think tanks” that accept government money at any level, from accepting funds from our foreign Muslim adversaries or from any organization with jihadi ties.

Yes, that means it’s time to dismantle the Pentagon’s Project GO (for “Global Officers”) that has contributed $665,000 to the evidently misnamed VMI Center for Leadership and Ethics, which is sponsoring this “commemoration.” (More about Project GO here.) It is also time to investigate where the VMI Center for Leadership and Ethics got the rest of its 200 million dollars of funding.

American citizens and voters should be asking their US Senators and Representatives why their tax money is being used for such a dishonorable purpose. Virginia residents should also contact their state legislators to ask the same thing. Call, write, or visit your elected officials and demand an investigation!


Also published on 1389 Blog.


Connecting The Dots: Google, Obama, Egypt, and the Muslim Brotherhood

by 1389AD ( 130 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Breaking News, Censorship, Egypt, Jihad, Koran, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Muslim Brotherhood at February 8th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

I have already blogged about some of the ties between the Obama administration and the anti-Mubarak uprising in Egypt (see Obama Supports Islamist Takeover Of Egypt). The Muslim Brotherhood is waiting to take over the government in Egypt as soon as the opportunity presents itself. (See Egypt: “Populist Revolt” or Muslim Brotherhood?.)

The Jawa Report has figured out that Google has a connection with Obama, the anti-Mubarak uprising in Egypt, and the Muslim Brotherhood.

That is no surprise. I have discussed issues with Google Blogger here and here. Suffice it to say that Google Blogger has repeatedly deleted or restricted access to legitimate counterjihad blogs. In addition, despite the notable successes of the SMACKDOWN Corps, Google’s YouTube continues to be a favorite spot for hosting jihadi videos.

From The Jawa Report:

February 07, 2011

Connecting the dots: Googles former Google CEO Eric Schmidt Obi Ones Tech Czar

In 2008 Schmidt stated he would not serve as technology czar in Barack Obama’s administration if he was asked.

In 2009 Obi One names him as one of the tech czars

In Jan 2010 Schmidt resigns as CEO of Google. He will still continue “as the executive chairman of the company and act as an advisor to co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin”

In 2010 State Dept lifts ban & issues visa to Tariq Ramadan Tariq Ramadan’s grandfather founded the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt

In Jan 2010 Googles ME exec Wael Ghonim went missing in Egypt. He was detained by Egypt gov and was released today

More than a week after his mysterious disappearance in Egypt, Google executive and political activist Wael Ghonim has been released from government detention on Monday, the State Department told the Wall Street Journal[…]

It remains unclear what role, if any, Ghonim played in organizing the Jan. 25 protest movement itself, the largest Egypt has seen in more than 30 years. However, he played a prominent role in online activism in the months ahead of the historic protests.

Last year, Ghonim was one of four administrators running the first of the major Facebook pages that became a virtual headquarters for the protest movement, according to a collaborator in the political opposition, and also according to an Internet activist familiar with the situation. Mr. Ghonim also set up the official campaign website for opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei and volunteered as a tech consultant for other opposition groups, according to Ziad Al-Alimi, a senior aide to Mr. ElBaradei.

Mohamed ElBaradei has Muslim Brotherhoods support.

Obama stated in his interview with O’Reilly ‘some factions strains of the MB ideology are against the US:

“The Muslim Brotherhood is one faction in Egypt. They don’t have majority support in Egypt, but they are well organized and there are “strains of their ideology that are against the U.S., there’s no doubt about it,”

MB is against the US, democracy and all things Western. They want the Islamic Caliphate to rule the world and make no bones about it on their website.

“Allah is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”

Read it all.


Originally published on 1389 Blog.


Why Arabs Lose (Conventional) Wars

by 1389AD ( 224 Comments › )
Filed under Egypt, History, Islam, Israel, Jihad, Military, Terrorism at February 1st, 2011 - 11:30 am

Arab armies – and more to the point, Muslim Arab armies – lose modern wars because their war-making ability is compromised, both by Islamic doctrine and thought patterns, and by their ancient Arab tribal culture, which Islam tends to freeze into place.

But we must never allow their lack of prowess at conventional warfare to lull us into a false sense of security. Muslim Arabs are only too well aware of their incapacity to win modern conventional wars. Instead, for the most part, they go with stealth jihad – which means da’wa, corruption of Western academia, news media, and politicians, buying influence with petrodollars, litigation jihad, and mass immigration into non-Muslim countries and territories wherever possible. When and where Muslim Arabs think it will help their cause, they opt for “asymmetrical” rather than conventional warfare – meaning various forms of terrorism and/or guerrilla warfare.

This article is not new; it was first printed in “Middle East Quarterly” Dec. 1999, Vol. 6, No. 2. That said, I would doubt that the social and cultural factors have changed all that much since it was written.

American Diplomacy: Why Arabs Lose Wars

(h/t: mawskrat).

By Norvell B. De Atkine

The author, a retired U.S. Army colonel, draws upon many years of firsthand observation of Arabs in training to reach conclusions about the ways in which they go into combat. His findings derive from personal experience with Arab military establishments in the capacity of U.S. military attache and security assistance officer, observer officer with the British-officered Trucial Oman Scouts (the security force in the emirates prior to the establishment of the UAE), as well as some thirty years of study of the Middle East.~ Ed.

Why Arabs Lose Wars

ARABIC-SPEAKING ARMIES have been generally ineffective in the modern era. Egyptian regular forces did poorly against Yemeni irregulars in the 1960s. Syrians could only impose their will in Lebanon during the mid-1970s by the use of overwhelming weaponry and numbers. Iraqis showed ineptness against an Iranian military ripped apart by revolutionary turmoil in the 1980s and could not win a three-decades-long war against the Kurds. The Arab military performance on both sides of the 1990 Kuwait war was mediocre. And the Arabs have done poorly in nearly all the military confrontations with Israel. Why this unimpressive record? There are many factors — economic, ideological, technical — but perhaps the most important has to do with culture and certain societal attributes which inhibit Arabs from producing an effective military force.

False starts

Including culture in strategic assessments has a poor legacy, for it has often been spun from an ugly brew of ignorance, wishful thinking, and mythology. Thus, the U.S. Army in the 1930s evaluated the Japanese national character as lacking originality and drew the unwarranted conclusion that that country would be permanently disadvantaged in technology. Hitler dismissed the United States as a mongrel society and consequently underestimated the impact of America’s entry into the war. American strategists assumed that the pain threshold of the North Vietnamese approximated our own and that the air bombardment of the North would bring it to its knees. Three days of aerial attacks were thought to be all the Serbs could withstand; in fact, seventy-eight days were needed.
As these examples suggest, when culture is considered in calculating the relative strengths and weaknesses of opposing forces, it tends to lead to wild distortions, especially when it is a matter of understanding why states unprepared for war enter into combat flushed with confidence. The temptation is to impute cultural attributes to the enemy state that negate its superior numbers or weaponry. Or the opposite: to view the potential enemy through the prism of one’s own cultural norms.

It is particularly dangerous to make facile assumptions about abilities in warfare based on past performance, for societies evolve and so does the military subculture with it. The dismal French performance in the 1870 Franco-Prussian war led the German high command to an overly optimistic assessment prior to World War I. Then tenacity and courage of French soldiers in World War I lead everyone from Winston Churchill to the German high command vastly to overestimate the French army’s fighting abilities. Israeli generals underestimated the Egyptian army of 1973 based on Egypt’s hapless performance in the 1967 war.

Culture is difficult to pin down. It is not synonymous with an individual’s race nor ethnic identity. The history of warfare makes a mockery of attempts to assign rigid cultural attributes to individuals — as the military histories of the Ottoman and Roman empires illustrate. In both cases it was training, discipline, esprit, and élan which made the difference, not the individual soldiers’ origin. The highly disciplined and effective Roman legions, for example, recruited from throughout the Roman Empire, and the elite Ottoman Janissaries (slave soldiers) were Christians forcibly recruited as boys from the Balkans.

The role of culture

These problems notwithstanding, culture does need to be taken into account. Indeed, awareness of prior mistakes should make it possible to assess the role of cultural factors in warfare. John Keegan, the eminent historian of warfare, argues that culture is a prime determinant of the nature of warfare. In contrast to the usual manner of European warfare, which he terms “face to face,” Keegan depicts the early Arab armies in the Islamic era as masters of evasion, delay, and indirection. Examining Arab warfare in this century leads to the conclusion that the Arabs remain more successful in insurgent, or political, warfare — what T. E. Lawrence termed “winning wars without battles.” Even the much-lauded Egyptian crossing of the Suez in 1973 at its core entailed a masterful deception plan. It may well be that these seemingly permanent attributes result from a culture that engenders subtlety, indirection, and dissimulation in personal relationships.

Along these lines, Kenneth Pollock concludes his exhaustive study of Arab military effectiveness by noting that “certain patterns of behavior fostered by the dominant Arab culture were the most important factors contributing to the limited military effectiveness of Arab armies and air forces from 1945 to 1991.” These attributes included over-centralization, discouraging initiative, lack of flexibility, manipulation of information, and the discouragement of leadership at the junior officer level. The barrage of criticism leveled at Samuel Huntington’s notion of a “clash of civilizations” in no way lessens the vital point he made — that however much the grouping of peoples by religion and culture rather than political or economic divisions offends academics who propound a world defined by class, race, and gender, it is a reality, one not diminished by modern communications.

But how does one integrate the study of culture into military training? At present, it has hardly any role. Paul M. Belbutowski, a scholar and former member of the U.S. Delta Force, succinctly stated a deficiency in our own military education system: “Culture, comprised of all that is vague and intangible, is not generally integrated into strategic planning except at the most superficial level.” And yet it is precisely “all that is vague and intangible” that defines low-intensity conflicts. The Vietnamese communists did not fight the war the United States had trained for, nor did the Chechens and Afghans fight the war the Russians prepared for. This entails far more than simply retooling weaponry and retraining soldiers. It requires an understanding of the cultural mythology, history, attitude toward time, etc.; and it demands a more substantial investment in time and money than a bureaucratic organization is likely to authorize.
Mindful of walking through a minefield of past errors and present cultural sensibilities, I offer some assessments of the role of culture in the military training of Arabic-speaking officers. I confine myself principally to training for two reasons:

• First, I observed much training but only one combat campaign (the Jordanian Army against the Palestine Liberation Organization in 1970).

• Secondly, armies fight as they train. Troops are conditioned by peacetime habits, policies, and procedures; they do not undergo a sudden metamorphosis that transforms civilians in uniform into warriors. General George Patton was fond of relating the story about Julius Caesar, who “in the winter time. . . so trained his legions in all that became soldiers and so habituated them to the proper performance of their duties, that when in the spring he committed them to battle against the Gauls, it was not necessary to give them orders, for they knew what to do and how to do it.”

Information as power

In every society information is a means of making a living or wielding power, but Arabs husband information and hold it especially tightly. U.S. trainers have often been surprised over the years by the fact that information provided to key personnel does not get much further than them. Having learned to perform some complicated procedure, an Arab technician knows that he is invaluable so long as he is the only one in a unit to have that knowledge; once he dispenses it to others he no longer is the only font of knowledge and his power dissipates. This explains the commonplace hoarding of manuals, books, training pamphlets, and other training or logistics literature.[…]
Norvell 'Tex' de Atkine
Norvell “Tex” de Atkine served eight years in Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt (in addition to extensive combat service in Vietnam). A West Pointer, he holds a graduate degree in Arab studies from the American University of Beirut. Currently he teaches at the JFK Special Warfare School at Ft. Bragg, North Carolina. See also his “The Political-Military Officer: Soldier Scholar or Cocktail Commando?” in American Diplomacy Vol. IV, No. 1 (Winter 1999)

Read it all!

Part 1
Part 2


Video: Jihad Against Australia

by 1389AD ( 158 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Australia, History, Holocaust, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, World War II at January 10th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Originally published at Gates of Vienna.

Reprinted with permission.

This is what you might call a Counterjihad video for beginners. It’s a short introductory film about jihad, designed for an Australian audience, and does a good job of laying out the basics.

The beginning of it is “old material” as far as regular Gates of Vienna readers are concerned. But watch it through to the grueling audio segment from a call-in radio show near the end — Australian readers may want to send this to their friends who don’t “get it” yet.

WARNING: some of the images use in this video — particularly those from the Bali bombing — are graphic, and may be disturbing for sensitive people:

Mahdur ad-adamm, Jihad in Australia

Hat tip: Nilk.