► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘John McCain’

Republican Party must Admit They were Wrong

by Phantom Ace ( 206 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Election 2008, Elections, Elections 2010, George W. Bush, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party at January 8th, 2010 - 12:30 pm

I have often criticize the Republican Party for being too Progressive. During the Bush Years, they became the Democratic Party of the Woodrow Wilson Era. Deficit Spending, Out of touch with Economic reality, Hypocrisy on Social Issues and Wars for Muslim Democracy. They moved away from the Raegan philosophy of Free Markets, Individual responsibility, Personal freedom and Defending America’s interest. In other words they screwed up big time. Voters punished them in 2006 and 2008 and rejected the Progressive based Compassionate Conservatism. They voted in Real Progressives and are now regretting it. The Republicans have an opportunity to come back, but many including myself don’t trust them.

Jonah Goldberg who besides Glenn Beck has helped influence my political thinking has some great advise for the Republican Party.

This is one of those rare moments when the conventional wisdom in Washington is right. The Democrats are poised to have a bad year; the only argument is over how bad it will be. And that question rests on whether or not the Republican party crafts an agenda voters will support.

So far the GOP has shrewdly been the “party of no.” Since I disagree with so much of the Obama-Pelosi-Reid agenda, I happen to think that “no” is the correct position on the merits. But that’s not the point. Saying “no” has worked because that’s what most Americans say, too.

The trick for the GOP is to figure out what it will say yes to. Republicans are a bit like the Democrats in 2006 and 2008. Americans were sick of Bush and the Republicans back then, so they threw their support behind the Democrats by default. The Democrats over-read this support as a sweeping mandate for their agenda.

Read the Rest.

Jonah hits a home run with his article, The GOP can’t just be the Party of no, it must stand for something. The solution is not Reagan 1980 or Gingrich 1994, instead he makes a great point, look to Domino’s Pizza!

I’d look to Domino’s in 2010.

You may have seen the commercials or the YouTube video touting the iconic pizza-delivery chain’s reinvention. But if you haven’t, Domino’s new campaign can be summed up easily enough: “We blew it.”

The Republicans should come clean and apologize to Americans for not keeping to their philosophy when they ruled Washington. Americans love honesty and would respect it if the GOP came clean with their mistakes. Jonah further points out, Compassionate Conservatism must be publicly rejected.

As a conservative who cares more about policies than partisan success, I would hate to see the GOP abandon conservative policies in order to be more popular. That would be like Domino’s listening to critics and then deciding to get into the Chinese-food business. Indeed, by my lights, that’s what George W. Bush tried to do with his “compassionate conservatism.” He surrendered to liberal arguments about the role, size, and scope of government on too many fronts. In effect, he said you can have your pizza and Kung Pao chicken all in the same dish. That’s not a good meal, it’s a bad mess.

Amen to Jonah for saying what I have been writing on this blog. The Compassionate Conservative Gang with their Hypocritical Social agenda, Big Government spending and Wars for Muslim democracy were pied pipers who lead the Right to near death. Barack Hussein Obama and his Totalitarian Progressive agenda has given us a chance to resurrect. By admitting past mistakes and promising to stay true to a Libertarian-Conservative philosophy, the American public will gain respect and vote the Progressives out. Just saying No is not enough, The GOP just needs to promise they will stay true to their ideas this time.

Jonah Goldberg is an Intellectual genius and I really respect his analysis!

McCain exposes “The One’s” hypocrisy.

by bar ( 19 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy at March 3rd, 2009 - 11:54 pm

410 billion dollar bill

So we have 1,123 pages accompanied by 1,844 pages of statement of managers for a grand total of 2,967 pages of legislation which includes over 9,000 pork items.

That is not Kosher.

Hope and Change, Dhimmicrat style?

Is this the transparent type of government that Obama spoke of?

The reason I didn’t vote for John McCain…

by savage ( 45 Comments › )
Filed under Uncategorized at November 21st, 2008 - 6:56 pm

Right here…

My dad was a carrier man, served as a communications officer on the Kitty Hawk and the Coral Sea as well as the Constellation. He knew a few men who served on the Forrestal. He always told me you never ever wetstart a jet on the flight deck of a ship, never. 134 crewmen died as a result of this hotshot who was evacuated from the Forrestal for his own safety. Lots of men wanted his head right there and then.

There are other reasons. Who decided to put John McCain as the Republican candidate for the President of the United States anyways? McCain is as liberal as they come. Look at his bills with his name on them. McCain/Feingold, McCain/Kennedy, blah blah fucking blah! He is a disgrace to the conservative movement as far as I’m concerned.

And the SOB left his dying wife so he could chase some rich broads tail and start his political career. If it wasn’t for that, he would still be a damn Navy hack in DC. Fucking adulterer and opportunist.

That’s about all I have to say about John McCain.

Politico: Yes, We’re Biased. So What?

by Phantom Ace ( 14 Comments › )
Filed under Politics at October 28th, 2008 - 12:24 pm

Politico reporters Jim VandeHei and John F. Harris examine the claim that the media are overwhelmingly biased against the McCain campaign, conclude that it’s true, and then sum up their response in two words: “So what?”

Why McCain is getting hosed in the press.

OK, let’s just get this over with: Yes, in the closing weeks of this election, John McCain and Sarah Palin are getting hosed in the press, and at Politico.

And, yes, based on a combined 35 years in the news business we’d take an educated guess — nothing so scientific as a Pew study — that Obama will win the votes of probably 80 percent or more of journalists covering the 2008 election. Most political journalists we know are centrists — instinctually skeptical of ideological zealotry — but with at least a mild liberal tilt to their thinking, particularly on social issues.

So what?

You see, political journalists are a special breed of human being.

Responsible editors would be foolish not to ask themselves the bias question, especially in the closing days of an election.

But, having asked it, our sincere answer is that of the factors driving coverage of this election — and making it less enjoyable for McCain to read his daily clip file than for Obama — ideological favoritism ranks virtually nil.

The main reason is that for most journalists, professional obligations trump personal preferences. Most political reporters (investigative journalists tend to have a different psychological makeup) are temperamentally inclined to see multiple sides of a story, and being detached from their own opinions comes relatively easy.

So there you have it. Stop complaining about bias, and accept the opinions of your betters, America.

(hat tip:Chuckles)