► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘liberation theology’

Pope Francis had issues with the Kirchner regime

by Phantom Ace ( 97 Comments › )
Filed under Argentina, Christianity, Religion at March 14th, 2013 - 7:00 am

The Conclave Of Cardinals Have Elected A New Pope To Lead The World's Catholics

The news that Jorge Bergoglio becoming Pope had me worried since he was a Jesuit. My concerns have been alleviated after reading he was an enemy of Argentina’s coke head President, Cristina Kirchner. He also had rejected the Marxist Liberation Theology and believes charity, not wealth redistribution is how you assist the poor.

Pope Francis is the first ever from the Americas, an austere Jesuit intellectual who modernized Argentina’s conservative Catholic church.

Known until Wednesday as Jorge Bergoglio, the 76-year-old is known as a humble man who denied himself the luxuries that previous Buenos Aires cardinals enjoyed. He came close to becoming pope last time, reportedly gaining the second-highest vote total in several rounds of voting before he bowed out of the running in the conclave that elected Pope Benedict XVI.

[….]

Bergoglio’s influence seemed to stop at the presidential palace door after Nestor Kirchner and then his wife, Cristina Fernandez, took over the Argentina’s government. His outspoken criticism couldn’t prevent Argentina from becoming the Latin American country to legalize gay marriage, or stop Fernandez from promoting free contraception and artificial insemination.

His church had no say when the Argentine Supreme Court expanded access to legal abortions in rape cases, and when Bergoglio argued that gay adoptions discriminate against children, Fernandez compared his tone to “medieval times and the Inquisition.”

This kind of demonization is unfair, says Rubin, who obtained an extremely rare interview of Bergoglio for his biography, the “The Jesuit.”

“Is Bergoglio a progressive — a liberation theologist even? No. He’s no third-world priest. Does he criticize the International Monetary Fund, and neoliberalism? Yes. Does he spend a great deal of time in the slums? Yes,” Rubin said.

One does not have to be on the Left to be a critic of the IMF or free trade policies. From a theological perspective, Pope Francis I is solid.

Refuting a Swedish Lesbian “Bishop”

by 1389AD ( 190 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Dhimmitude, immigration, Islam, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Sweden at October 14th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Lesbian “Bishop” Bashes Swedish Counterjihad

GOV: Heaven Frowns on the Sweden Democrats

Ugly face of Eva Brunne

…Our Swedish correspondent LN has compiled a report on Bishopgate, as translated from various media sources. First, from Berlingske Tidende:

…The bishop’s speech also quite clearly referenced the fact that Sweden now has an immigration-critical party in Parliament.

“The racism that says that you are not worth as much as me, you do not have the same rights as me, do not deserve a life of freedom due to our being born in different parts of our world — it is not worthy of a democracy like ours to make such differences between people,” said the bishop…

Read the entire article at Gates of Vienna.

By the way, that “immigration-critical party” is Sverigedemokraterna (Swedish Democratic Party). It is blogrolled in the sidebar of 1389 Blog.

1389AD’s Manifesto in rough draft

I left this comment at Gates of Vienna:

If someone is born in some other part of the world and they do not have a life of freedom, maybe it’s their own fault! Maybe they espouse an evil ideology, such as Islam or socialism, that is incompatible with freedom and incompatible with prosperity and incompatible with civilized life, not to mention incompatible with the salvation of one’s immortal soul.

Maybe it is that person’s OWN responsibility to clean house in the place where that person was born, rather than spreading their country’s errors worldwide.

Oh, and BY THE WAY, Islam is NOT a race. It is NOT a religion. It is an expansionist, totalitarian, enemy political philosophy that seeks to rid the world of everything but Islam. Islam is inherently and irredeemably evil, has no legitimacy, deserves no Constitutional protection, and is undeserving of existence.

Zero tolerance for Islam!

And while we’re at it, zero tolerance for lesbian bishops and for “liberation theology.”