► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Media bias’

Anti-Semitism; Now Mainstream!

by WrathofG-d ( 45 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Gaza, Hamas, Hate Speech, IDF, Israel, Judaism, Media, Religion at March 26th, 2009 - 11:49 am

Hate

_____________________________________

The above is a cartoon by Pat Oliphant that is currently running in some of America’s most popular newspapers.  The cartoon portrays a headless, jack-booted figure marching in a goose step with a sword in one hand and pushing a Star of David on a wheel with the other.  The Jewish Star has fangs and is chasing after a woman carrying a child, labeled “Gaza.”

Pat Oliphant’s use of the Star of David in combination with Nazi-like imagery is hideously anti-Semitic. It falsely employs Nazi imagery to portray Israel as a jack-booted, goose-stepping headless apparition, and goes beyond-the-pale of “dissent” and regular ‘criticism”

Welcome to the United States 2009!  You aren’t reading about these widespread and mainstream anti-Semitic incidents in a history book regarding Germany…this is your world, and it is taking place now!  I wouldn’t be shocked if we soon hear of “Palestine”-American Solidarity rallies that fill Madison Square Garden! One would expect this type of disgraceful cartoon from an insignificant Neo-Nazi publication, or something similar, but in today’s America it is run widely in the New York Times and The Washington Post, among others.

_____________________________________

DON’T JUST SIT THERE….DO SOMETHING!

~Contact Universal Press Syndicate, which runs Oliphant’s cartoons:

Lee Salem, President and Editor, Universal Press Syndicate, 1130 Walnut Street Kansas City, MO 64106-2109 816-581-7301, lsalem@amuniversal.com.

~Contact The New York Times.

~Contact The Washington Post

~Contact Yahoo News.

~Contact Slate.

**However, remember that you will get more with honey than vinegar!  Let them know you are angry, but be polite about it.   It is also important that you make it clear that your are upset, not because they criticized Israel, but because this cartoon was grossly flawed, offensive, not factually based, etc., by presenting Israel as Nazis.  The cartoon doesn’t reflect the truth that Israel strained to protect civilian life in Gaza, nor the true war crimes committed (practically daily) by Hamas – such as targeting civilians and their use of human shields.

_____________________________________

Pamela Geller from Atlas Shrugs adds that Cafepress Store is selling a pin reading:  “it was wrong in Auschwitz, it is wrong in Gaza”.   I am told that Cafepress is actually pretty specific about what they allow people to sell on their site.   Thus, they either don’t know about this, or find the message acceptable.  I hope that it is the former and not that this is just another step towards normalizing blatant anti-semitism.

Atlas Shrugs suggests that you contact Cafepress, and let them know how you feel about their selling that offensive product.

You can get more of their contact info, see a picture of the button, and learn more about the story at Atlas Shrugs.

Israeli war against Hamas scars Gaza’s children

by bar ( 28 Comments › )
Filed under Islamists, Israel at January 25th, 2009 - 3:59 pm

JEBALIYA, Gaza Strip – Surrounded by mountains of rubble that were once their homes, two dozen children sat on a rainbow-colored blanket and drew with crayons.
(snip..)
Psychologists say Israel’s three-week offensive inflicted more severe trauma than previous conflicts in Gaza because civilians in the crowded sliver of territory had no safe place to run. A wartime study among hundreds of Gaza children showed a rise in nightmares, bedwetting and other signs of trauma, said psychologist Fadel Abu Hein.
(snip..)
Counselors and aid workers fear that Gaza’s children, who make up 56 percent of the 1.4 million people here, will grow up hating Israel and become easier prey for extremists.
By KARIN LAUB, Associated Press Writer

This is nothing but apologist for terrorist propaganda.

The Israeli “war” was only in response to daily Hamas rocket attacks directed against only non-combatant Israeli children.

Israeli children and the effect daily terrorist rocket attacks have on them is not of any concern for the world at large, only the children of terrorists are worthy of mass media concern, what a sick group of amoral reporters we have in this openly anti-Semitic world.

If this reporter was truly concerned or even slightly cared about the children of Gaza they would speak out against the Islamic terrorists and force them to stop attacking Israel, then the children of Gaza could live with Hamas and Islam being their only fears.

Bias in the Media

by Kafir ( 31 Comments › )
Filed under LGF at November 30th, 2008 - 10:02 am

Media Bias w/ Chuck Johnson

This is rich. Remember to leave feedback. He said he wanted some! :o)

(hat tip: Bweep)

Politico: Yes, We’re Biased. So What?

by Phantom Ace ( 14 Comments › )
Filed under Politics at October 28th, 2008 - 12:24 pm

Politico reporters Jim VandeHei and John F. Harris examine the claim that the media are overwhelmingly biased against the McCain campaign, conclude that it’s true, and then sum up their response in two words: “So what?”

Why McCain is getting hosed in the press.

OK, let’s just get this over with: Yes, in the closing weeks of this election, John McCain and Sarah Palin are getting hosed in the press, and at Politico.

And, yes, based on a combined 35 years in the news business we’d take an educated guess — nothing so scientific as a Pew study — that Obama will win the votes of probably 80 percent or more of journalists covering the 2008 election. Most political journalists we know are centrists — instinctually skeptical of ideological zealotry — but with at least a mild liberal tilt to their thinking, particularly on social issues.

So what?

You see, political journalists are a special breed of human being.

Responsible editors would be foolish not to ask themselves the bias question, especially in the closing days of an election.

But, having asked it, our sincere answer is that of the factors driving coverage of this election — and making it less enjoyable for McCain to read his daily clip file than for Obama — ideological favoritism ranks virtually nil.

The main reason is that for most journalists, professional obligations trump personal preferences. Most political reporters (investigative journalists tend to have a different psychological makeup) are temperamentally inclined to see multiple sides of a story, and being detached from their own opinions comes relatively easy.

So there you have it. Stop complaining about bias, and accept the opinions of your betters, America.

(hat tip:Chuckles)