► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Moonbats’

Obama, DNC: Two hours of muzz prayers by extreme radical Imams okay, but Catholic Cardinals’ prayer and blessing rejected

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Bigotry, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Hate Speech, Islam, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Muslim Brotherhood, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Racism, Religion, Sharia (Islamic Law), Special Report, Terrorism at August 29th, 2012 - 11:12 pm

Can we now all agree, once and for all, that the dumocrats hate all religions, except the gutter religion called Is-slime?

I’m surprised that those two America-hating anti-Semitic slimeballs Louis Farrakhan and Jeremiah Wright aren’t giving the invocation.

Obama and the DNC will not allow Timothy Cardinal Dolan, considered the top Catholic official in the nation, as head of the Archdiocese of New York, and president of the Conference of Catholic Bishops, to give the prayer and blessing to open the convention.

And if that’s not bad enough, after denying the Cardinal the opportunity to to give a blessing to the convention, Obama okay’d having two radical Imams, who have continually preached Islamic supremacy and separatism IN THE UNITED STATES at their mosques, to lead two hours of muzz prayers!

Let’s see…You think maybe the reason for Obama rejected the Cardinal’s blessing is due to the fact that this anti-American get-together of America-hating scumbags called the Dumocrat National Convention is being touted as “A celebration of abortion” with two abortion zealots from NARAL and Planned Parenthood giving speeches about the virtues of abortion on demand, at any time, and for any reason? I’d have to say undoubtedly.

DNC Proceeds With 2-Hour Islamic ‘Jumah’ Prayers After Rejecting Cardinal’s Blessing

The Democratic National Committee is raising a number of eyebrows after choosing to proceed with hosting Islamic “Jumah” prayers for two hours on the Friday of its convention, though it denied a Catholic cardinal’s request to say a prayer at the same event.

You can watch Watch the promotional video if you want (But why would you? BiB), via the Bureau of Muslim Affairs, which is partnering with the DNC for the event.

The first two minutes are rather dry, but around 2:04 a muezzin sings the call to prayer with an American flag background, and the video “picks up” considerably.

Up to 20,000 people are expected to attend the Friday prayers and Jibril Hough, a spokesman for the Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs (BIMA), said the purpose of the event is to hold political parties accountable for the issues faced by Muslim-Americans.

In particular, the event will target the Patriot Act, the NYPD, the National Defense Authorization Act, and anti-Shariah sentiment.

And while Muslim-Americans undeniably face distinct challenges, those who are well-informed on the dangers of radical Islam are expressing their doubts about the event.

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a devout Muslim and the Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, wrote:

The leaders of this event – Jibril Hough and Imam Siraj Wahhaj are not moderates. They are radicals. These individuals embrace Islamist supremacy and have demonstrated support for radical ideologies.

A quick Google search by the DNC would have shown them that Hough and Wahhaj are leaders in the separatist American Islamist movement. While they may be able to get a few thousand Muslims to attend the event, they are NOT going to be mainstream Muslims. Most will likely come from Hough and Wahhaj’s radical networks that have long been entrenched in the Charlotte area. Make no mistake they are part of the Islamist movement.

Their jummah (group) prayer is…about empowering their Islamist and Muslim Brotherhood sympathetic groups into the very fabric of the political system so that Americans become anesthetized. We need American Muslims to speak up and marginalize these radicals. The DNC needs to understand and reject them because of their radical history and ideas.

The mosque of Jibril Hough, mentioned by Dr. Jasser, is owned by the North American Islamic Trust, which was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial as one of the entities “who are and/or were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.”

Siraj Wahhaj, the “Grand Imam” for Jumah at the DNC, is often considered a “moderate” because he was the first Muslim to give an invocation in the U.S. Congress, but as Robert Spencer notes, he has a number of troubling ties to dangerous radicals. In the early 1990′s the man reportedly sponsored talks by “the Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel-Rahman in New York and New Jersey mosques, and told his followers that the United States will fall unless it “accepts the Islamic agenda.”

Wahhaj elaborated, according to bestselling author Brigitte Gabriel, to say: “If only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.”

He continued: “Take my word. If 6-8 million Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us.”

When an imam like Siraj Wahhaj says “it his duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the US Constitution with the Quran…we need to speak up!” Dr. Jasser reiterated in response, adding that Americans “should be concerned” if this is who the DNC is “consorting with.”

Robert Spencer speculates that the Democrat National Committee is simply so “in thrall to multiculturalism” that “few, if any” are even aware of the radical connections.

“To raise any concerns about such a speaker would be ‘Islamophobic,’ violating every rule of the anti-American, anti-Western ethos that prevails among so many Democrats today,” Spencer writes.

He concluded: “There is about as much chance of that as there is of the Democrats ditching Obama and nominating David Horowitz as their candidate for President of the United States.”

Update: Looks like the pressure got to the libturds, so they’ve decided to let him give the closing prayer.

I would have told them to kiss my cross, if I were the Cardinal.

Liberals attempt to re-write history (again)- Dumocrat Sen. Jean Shaheen: “Obama lead mission that brought down bin Laden”

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 46 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Military, Politics, Progressives at August 29th, 2012 - 11:30 am

This will undoubtedly come as news to the U.S. Navy’s elite warriors of SEAL team 6, who are probably asking each other “did any of you guys see Obama when we killed bin Laden?”.

But according to that idiot liberal dumocrat senator from New Hampshire, Jean Shaheen, Obama was right there shouting out orders to the troops.

GMAFB!!! If Obama was actually there, he’d be so afraid he’d be crapping in his pants, and the SEALS would probably frag his worthless ass.

Pathetic! MSNBC cuts all speeches made by non-white speakers to portray the GOP as racist; RNC should throw them out ASAP!

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Bigotry, Breaking News, Censorship, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Free Speech, government, Liberal Fascism, Media, Mitt Romney, Politics, Progressives, Racism, Republican Party, Special Report at August 29th, 2012 - 12:45 am

We’ve all laughed at the losers that appear on MSNBC, and the ignorant brain-dead assholes, like Charles Johnson, who watch that trash. But this goes too far, even for those pathetic pieces of shit.

The libturd assholes that run that worthless nutwork cut out and refused to air every speech made by a non-white person at the RNC convention.

Their goal, obviously, was to portray the GOP as a “whites only, no colors allowed” racist party, you know, like the democrats used to be from the 1800’s until the 1950’s.

The RNC should yank their press credentials immediately and throw them all out, including NBC news, since they continually allow, and in doing so, obviously condone this crap.

Pathetic: MSNBC Cuts Speeches Given by Minorities at RNC From Coverage

To fuel their false “GOP is racist” argument, MSNBC conveniently cut every speech given by a minority from their RNC coverage tonight. Francesca Chambers at Red Alert has the evidence:

MSNBC wants you to think the Republican Party hates minorities. So much so that the liberal news network cut minority speeches from it’s convention coverage.

When popular Tea Party candidate Ted Cruz, the GOP nominee for Senate, took the stage, MSNBC cut away from the Republican National Convention and the Hispanic Republican from Texas’ speech.

MSNBC stayed on commercial through former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis’ speech, as well. Davis, who recently became a Republican, is black.

Then, when Puerto Rican Governor Luis Fortuno’s wife Luce’ Vela Fortuño took the stage minutes later, MSNBC hosts Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews opted to talk over the First Lady’s speech.

And Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval? Noticeably missing from MSNBC, too.

Mia Love, a black candidate for Congress in Utah, was also ignored by MSNBC.

MSNBC doesn’t have the evidence to back up their claims that the GOP is racist, so what do they do? They manufacture it based on lies and false coverage.

Hey Obama, you idiot, there are no generals in the U.S. Navy! Don’t believe me? Go ask a Navy “corpse-man”!

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 67 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Mitt Romney, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party at August 27th, 2012 - 11:30 am

You know, I hate this America-hating dirtbag (and his wife) more each day. Like all “modern day” liberals, he hates the military.

November 6th, and more importantly, January 20th, can’t get here soon enough for me, so we can send this complete and utter failure back to Chicago. They deserve each other.

And, as is usually the case, “The Committee To Re-elect The President”, also known as the mainstream Obama-loving liberal media, ignores yet another gaffe.

Whenever Obama or his vice-imbecile Biden show their stupidity, the committee pretends nothing happened.

So, we have to turn to our friends from across the pond, the Brits, to read this, since The Committee To Re-elect The President avoids anything that can make Obama look like the imbecile he is.

Oh, and by the way Barack, Ohio is spelled O-H-I-O, not O-I-H-O, you libtard dolt.

It’s ADMIRAL McRaven, Mr President! Obama botches rank of top Navy SEAL

Barack Obama has always been known for his silken words, soaring rhetoric and ability to use language to his advantage.

Lately, however, the president seems to be losing command of the details. In a speech at a fundraiser in New York on Wednesday night, he took aim at Todd Akin, the political punch bag du jour on both sides of the political aisle.

‘Recently, some of you have been paying attention to the commentary of the Senator of Missouri, Mr Akin, who – the interesting thing here is that this is an individual who sits on the House Committee on Science and Technology, but somehow missed science class.

It’s representative of a desire to go backwards instead of forwards, and to fight fights that we thought were settled twenty, thirty years ago.’

The problem is, Akin is a congressman who is running for a US Senate seat in Missouri. Senator Claire McCaskill, Obama’s favourite Senator until a few months ago when she started to distance herself from him in an effort to win re-election, might not particularly appreciate the President having conceded her seat already.

Then there was the stop at Sloopy’s bar on the campus of Ohio State University where Obama posed will students to spell out the four letters in Ohio. Except that, initially at least, the President and the student on his right got their letters wrong, spelling: ‘O-I-H-O’

Perhaps most seriously, however, was Obama’s slip in an interview with KSDK in St Louis, Missouri when he was asked about the new 22-minute film ‘Dishonorable Disclosures’ by a group of former Special Forces troops and intelligence operatives.

‘I won’t take this film too seriously,’ he responded. ‘I gather that one of the producers is a birther who still doesn’t think I was born in this country.

‘You’ve got one who was a candidate, a Republican candidate for office. And a proud card carrying member of the Tea Party. So this is obviously a partisan film.

‘I’d advise that you talk to General McRaven, who’s in charge of our Special Ops. I think he has a point of view in terms of how deeply

I care about what these folks do each and every day to protect our freedom.’

The difficulty with this is that William McRaven is and admiral not a general. As a SEAL, he is member of the US Navy, not US Army or US Marines.

Obama has made mistakes with military terminology before. In February 2010, he mispronounced ‘corpsman’ – as ‘corpse-man’ instead of ‘core-man’ several times.

Last year, he mixed up two Medal of Honor recipients, saying that ‘Jared Monti, was the first person who I was able to award the Medal of Honour to who actually came back and wasn’t receiving it posthumously’.

n fact, Obama was referring to Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta. Obama had presented a posthumous Medal of Honor to the parents of SFC Monti, who was killed in action in June 2006, in September 2009.

The Medal of Honor is the highest United States award for valour. It’s the equivalent of the Victoria Cross. In the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and the names of recipients are seared on the hearts of many Americans.

Some servicemen have criticised Obama for omitting their ranks, as he did with Monti. When Staff Sergeant Giunta received his Medal of Honor, Obama called him ‘Sal’ and ad libbed: ‘I really like this guy’. After hanging the medal around his neck, Obama did not salute him but gave him a hug.

For servicemen, ranks are important – they have worked hard and, in many cases, risked their lives, to earn them. And it’s one thing to omit a rank and another to botch the rank of the highest-ranking Special Forces operator in the country.

Perhaps the broader question is why Obama though it appropriate to talk about how Admiral McRaven had ‘a point of view in terms of how deeply I care about what these folks do each and every day to protect our freedom’.

Military leaders should be respected as non-partisan figures. It is unseemly, at best, for Obama to use Admiral McRaven for political purposes as a character referee to tell voters how much he cares about American troops.