► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘obama’

BREAKING NEWS! EPA overturns 16-year-old Texas permit program

by coldwarrior ( 123 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Economy, Environmentalism, Liberal Fascism, Open thread at July 1st, 2010 - 7:29 pm

EPA overturns 16-year-old Texas permit program

so thats 1/3 of the US oil refining capacity closed by bureaucrat fiat.

Obama is at war with the Southern States that didn’t vote for him.  This is Chicago politics gone mad and national.  Texas must ignore this, keep refining and FORCE Obama to try to call out the troops because the bureaucrats can’t enforce this on their own.  They need firepower to pull this off for real if Texas says, “BITE ME”.  Gov Perry can use those words if he likes, as long as we get a hat tip

hat tip vapig

HOUSTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday officially overturned a 16-year-old Texas air permitting program it says violates the Clean Air Act, leaving some of the country’s largest refineries in a state of limbo.

The move comes after years of backdoor bickering, negotiations and public arguments between the EPA and Texas. The argument recently escalated from a battle over environmental issues into a heated political dispute over states’ rights.

Gov. Rick Perry has been using it to drive home his contention that President Barack Obama’s administration is overreaching, saying in a statement Wednesday that “Texas will continue to fight this federal takeover of a successful state program.”

The EPA’s decision, announced in a statement, will force some 125 refineries and petrochemical plants to invest millions of dollars to get new permits. Many of the plants may also have to invest in updates to comply with federal regulations.

The decision did not come as a surprise to Texas or the industries. EPA regional director Al Armendariz has said for months he would disapprove the permits if Texas did not comply with the Clean Air Act.

READ THE REST

Synchronized Presidential Debates – A Retrospective

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 216 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008, Elections, History, Humor, Media, Open thread, Politics at June 27th, 2010 - 10:11 pm

I was nonchalantly webmining this afternoon and found this gem from 2008. Dunno how I missed it, but I hope the speechwriters received royalties.

There’s another amusing vid that tallied up the number of times Obama mentioned “pie” in the same speech: 15 times.

Speaking of pie, how about topping it off with a scoop of Overnight Open Thread?

“Try DOME GAS – It’s Better”

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 97 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, History, Humor, Open thread at June 16th, 2010 - 10:00 pm

[Originally posted here, 12 July 2009, but not entirely out of date. Click on the image for a larger view.]
Dome Gas 1926_Strange Cosmos 090710

WHOA! 23¢ a gallon! And what a GREAT slogan.

Let’s talk about gas prices vs. inflation.
Inflation calculator: 1926-2009 = 1,108.2%

Price per Gallon in 1926 (regular, leaded): $0.23/gal
Federal Gasoline Tax (up to 1933): $0.01/gal = 4.55%
Actual cost per gallon (1926 dollars): $0.22/gal
Actual cost per gallon, less taxes (2009 dollars): $2.66/gal

Price per Gallon (regular unleaded) 10 July 2009: $2.90/gal
Federal Gasoline Tax 2009: $0.184/gal
California (Local + State + Fed Taxes) 6 July 2009:
$0.645/gal* = 2.9%

* Includes CA Sales Tax (7.25%) CA County & Local Sales Tax (1.25%), and UST tax (1.2%) whateverTF that is.

Actual cost per gallon, less taxes (July 2009): $2.26/gal**

**Note that the base price stated for California gasoline includes costs for state mandated fuel additives, summer/winter mixes, ethanol. Note also that this amount includes franchise fees, business license fees, miniscule profit by the small business folks, and Swantzenegger Boxer Feinswein Pelosi & Waxman fees, other “revenue enhancement fees” emanating from Sacramento, and costs for gettin’ the lead out.

[Sources found here and here.]

Now Let’s talk about mileage and cost and technology.

MILEAGE & COST

Say you’re in Washington D.C. and you want to drive to Little Rock Arkansas to have a chat with a former President at his library, Bubba’s Books. It’s a little over 1,000 miles away. Let’s also assume that all the roads are paved and level; no mountain passes or dirt roads to take. Lookee here.

1926 Model T

1926 Ford Model T (1909-1927)

When production of the Model T began, the cost was around $850, around $1200 less than most cars. By the early 1920’s, the price of the Model T cost about $300.

(Cost $300 in 1920 dollars = $3,207 in 2009 dollars.)

22hp engine, no a/c, no electrical appurtenances, manual windshield wipers, manual crank start (risking a broken arm):
Top speed (level paved road): 30 mph
Gas mileage: 13-21 mpg
1K miles @ 30 mph (excluding stops): 1 day 9 hours 20 minutes.

Trip Cost in 2009 dollars:
1,ooo mi./21 mpg x ($2.66+$0.645 taxes)/gal = $157.62

2009 Ford Escape

 

2009 Ford Escape SUV – $20,515 (basic)

171 hp engine, electronic ignition, emission controls, a/c, electrical appurtenances, safety equipment;
Top speed: 100+? mph
Gas mileage: 20-28 mpg
1K miles @ 65 mph (excluding stops): 15 hours 23 minutes.

Trip Cost in 2009 dollars:
1,000 mi./24mpg x $2.90/gal (incl. taxes) = $120.83

Cool. 83 years later, a 1,000 mile roadtrip in an evil gas-hoggin’ SUV takes less than half the time and costs almost $40 less. Is this a Great Nation or what?

We have cheaper gasoline than at the dawn of the automotive era, and we’re able to drive farther, faster and more efficiently than ever. So what did Our President have to say about it?

Obama, touring a California electric car plant on Thursday, said, “The 1908 Model T _ think about this _ the 1908 Model T earned better gas mileage than the typical SUV in 2008… Think about that: 100 years later, and we’re getting worse gas mileage, not better, on SUVs,” Obama said.

Complete apples/basketballs non-sequitur.

Yeah it’s an Obama story that’s only 4 months old as of this post. My point is that gasoline is cheaper and of better quality now, and that automobiles are cheaper, more efficient, and safer than they’ve ever been in the history of the industry.

Wanna make gasoline EVEN cheaper, reduce oil imports, and employ more workers and give REAL stimulus to the US economy?

Let’s compete with OPEC by drilling in ANWR, the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic & Pacific Oceans, and refurbish and build more refineries. Then we can buy PEMEX, too, and help resolve some of Mexico’s financial problems.

It’s my opinion and it’s very very true.

The Beginning of the End

by Iron Fist ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under Holocaust, Nuclear Weapons, Politics, United Nations at June 1st, 2010 - 11:30 am

The toothless watchdog called the IAEA has finally barked about Iran. It is a small, timid “Woof”, but a bark it is. After years and years of playing cat-and-mouse with the Iranians, they now say Iran has enough enriched uranium for two warheads:

IAEA report on Iran likely to boost West’s opposition to Tehran’s fuel swap offer

Published May 31, 2010 | Associated Press

VIENNA (AP) — Iran has amassed more than two tons of enriched uranium, the U.N. atomic agency said Monday in a report that heightened Western concerns about the country developing the ability to produce a nuclear weapon.

Two tons of uranium would be enough for two nuclear warheads, although Iran says it does not want weapons and is only pursuing civilian nuclear energy.

Full stop. Re-read that. The IAEA says they have enough uranium for two warheads. This is the same IAEA that in 2007 was saying that Iran wasn’t persuing nuclear weapons anymore. They are enriching the uranium to weapons-grade for peaceful purposes. Does anybody really believe that?

The Democrats are culpable in this. The threshold has been crossed. What took a team of geniuses to do in 1945 is now a fairly straightforward engineering problem if you have the weapons-grade radiologicals to build it. If the IAEA says they can make two, we can figure, what, ten? The IAEA isn’t a reliable enough witness to say for sure, but it is certain that they’ll have more than enough.

And the centrifuges are still spinning.

In the face of this, the UN, with the cooperation of the Obama Administration, has stepped up to lean on Israel about her nuclear deterrant.  This in the face of rhetoric from Iran’s leaders promising a Second Holocaust as soon as it is in their power.

Soon it will be. Now that they have the material that they have been seeking, it is only a matter of time (probably not very long) before Iran has nuclear weapons.  And the Obama Administration does nothing. Nothing to Iran, at least. Surely Israel will not be foolish enough to surrender her deterrant at the whim of the American President. One hopes that, contrary to their incindary rhetoric, that deterrant is enough to deter Iran from initiating a regional nuclear war in the Middle East.

Source