► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘obama’

Non-Existent Jobs Created or Saved in Non-Existent Congressional Districts

by tqcincinnatus ( 201 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party at November 17th, 2009 - 5:00 pm

Maybe these jobs are being saved or created in states #51-57?

Here’s a stimulus success story: In Arizona’s 15th congressional district, 30 jobs have been saved or created with just $761,420 in federal stimulus spending. At least that’s what the Web site set up by the Obama administration to track the $787 billion stimulus says.

There’s one problem, though: There is no 15th congressional district in Arizona; the state has only eight districts.

And ABC News has found many more entries for projects like this in places that are incorrectly identified.

Late Monday, officials with the Recovery Board created to track the stimulus spending, said the mistakes in crediting nonexistent congressional districts were caused by human error.

“We report what the recipients submit to us,” said Ed Pound, Communications Director for the Board.

Pound told ABC News the board receives declarations from the recipients – state governments, federal agencies and universities – of stimulus money about what program is being funded.

“Some recipients clearly don’t know what congressional district they live in, so they appear to be just throwing in any number. We expected all along that recipients would make mistakes on their congressional districts, on jobs numbers, on award amounts, and so on. Human beings make mistakes,” Pound said.

Uh huh. 

You’re telling me that people at universities and at government offices that make their living at pumping their federal Congressman for funds suddenly forget the congressional district they live in?  And what’s more, are telling federal regulators that they’re in districts that don’t even exist? 

I find it hard to believe that this is purely accidental, over and over and over again.  Rather, I think what is going on is that these folks know they have to tell the Obama people something to make them happy so they can stick it on a website and make it look like Obama’s stimulus is doing something besides selling our grandchildren into debt slavery.  They probably figure that since, hey, they’re the Obama administration, and since Obama is so very popular (well, not really, actually only 49% approve of his performance, while 51% disapprove), nobody would bother to factcheck their recovery website. 

That, or the Obama administration and its cronies have a more serious competency problem than I had thought.

Obama hires Iranian regime lobbyist for key State Department position

by Delectable ( 173 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Iran, Islamists, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives, Tranzis at November 10th, 2009 - 2:45 pm

This is simply unbelievable!

Dennis Ross used to have this position, until he left to go to the National Security Council. In any case, John Limbert will be the head Iran official in the U.S. State Department.

Mr. Limbert

And who is Mr. Limbert? Laura Rozen at Politico has some insights:

A former ambassador to Mauritania who speaks fluent Farsi, Limbert retired from a 33-year career with the Foreign Service in 2006 with the rank of Minister-Counselor. He is the recipient of the Department’s highest award, the Distinguished Service Award, as well as an Award for Valor for his more than a year as a hostage in Iran, months of it spent in solitary confinement. He has been teaching at the U.S. Naval Academy since 2006, and also served as president of the American Foreign Service Assocation (2003-2005). This year, he published a book through the US Institute of Peace, Negotiating with Tehran: Wrestling with the Ghosts of History — a subject that will come in handy in his new role in the Obama administration. (Here’s the Cliff Notes version.)

He spoke Wednesday at an event at the National Iranian American Council, of which he is on the advisory board, on the thirtieth anniversary of the hostage crisis, and was said to have had an unpublicized ceremony marking his new appointment at State on Thursday.

“He’s a wonderful choice, one of the most decent people I know and someone who has the best interests of the United States and Iran in mind,” said the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Karim Sadjadpour.

Let me break more of this down for you all, because it might be a bit hard to fully understand…

What we know thus far is this:

  1. Mr. Limbert spoke at and is on the board of the National Iranian American Council.
  2. Mr. Limbert was published by and affiliated with the US Institute of Peace.
  3. Mr. Limbert is being praised by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Karim Sadjadpour.
  4. Mr. Sadjadpour apparently believes that Mr. Limbert has the best interests “of the United States and Iran in mind.”

So let’s parse through this information, shall we?

First of all, our old friends, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC)! You may remember them from my posts about J Street, that progressive “pro-Israel, pro-peace” organization (which in reality is an anti-peace and anti-Israel organization). I wrote about Trita Parsi speaking at J Street, and how interesting it was that an Iranian lobbyist was speaking at J Street. Mr. Parsi is in fact in charge of NIAC. Here is a refresher link to re-introduce who Trita Parsi is, and how he is an official lobbyist for the Iranian regime. Yes – just so you did not get whiplash, NIAC and J Street are in fact connected!

So, just so we are fully understanding, that means that Mr. Limbert is on the Board of Directors of an organization, NIAC, that is an official lobbyist for the Iranian regime.

Now let’s go to the second link – the U.S. Institute of Peace. This sounds like a fabulous organization! Who doesn’t like peace? Yet check out this Daniel Pipes link, about how the U.S. Institute of Peace has been linked with Kamran Bohkari, a member of the Al-Muhajiroun (yes, a jihadist), that celebrated the “Magnificent 19” hijackers. This same “institute” also funds pro-Hamas propaganda. (see IPT story here) This “institute” also was heavily involved in the Iraq Study Group, which called for selling Israel down the river in exchange for “PEACE, peace in our time!”

Mr. Limbert is involved with this “peace institute,” which he publishes his books through.

And now let’s examine the other source mentioned in Laura Rozen’s column, namely, Karim Sadjadpour, who praises Mr. Limbert. Who is Mr. Sadjadpour? Well, I dug up this little gem of a column in Haaretz, where he claims that Khamenei does not mean ill harm to Israel, and that an Israeli attack on Iran would only increase, not decrease, the threat from Iran. He also wrote a column decrying the Congressional vote declaring the Revolutionary Guard “terrorists,” and has repeatedly called for “engagement” with the bloodthirsty Iranian regime.

It thus should be no surprise that Mr. Sadjadpour also believes that Mr. Limbert has the best interests of the USA and Iran in mind. Hmm…very interesting. And how exactly could someone have both the best interests of the USA and Iran in mind? How exactly are American interests aligned with the bloodthirsty thugocracy of Iran?

So then we go full circle and ask…who is Mr. Limbert himself, beyond his associations?

Answer: he is someone who calls for ‘engagement’ with Tehran, even in light of their brutal suppression of democracy, and even calls for the U.S. to negotiate “without preconditions.”

He even called the U.S. the “puppet master” of Iran under the Shah, is married to an Iranian woman (who likely influences his views), and even advocates talks without dealing with the nuclear issue head-on, and with no time tables. Source. He proudly said as much at the NIAC (Iranian lobby in DC) conference, where he also said he was “agnostic” on whether Iran is seeking nukes. (!!!)

This is who Obama sees fit to give the head job at the State Department, in charge of “negotiations” with Tehran. Someone who, as the evidence shows so clearly, is associated with the Iranian regime lobby in Washington D.C., and someone whose friends apparently believe he will be pushing Iranian regime interests.

In case anyone has any doubts, it is quite clear where Obama stands with regards to Iran and so-called “engagement,” now that he has appointed Limbert, a man linked to the Iranian lobby, to such a sensitive position. It is all the more intriguing to see the J Street connection popping up yet again.

Obama’s insensitive response to the Ft. Hood shooting

by Phantom Ace ( 354 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Dhimmitude, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Progressives at November 6th, 2009 - 9:51 am

President Barack Hussein Obama’s attitude towards our military was on full display yesterday. While he was supposed to be addressing the horrible incident at Fort Hood, instead he made very insensitive remarks while, as always, he was trumpeting himself.  The press conference took place during a meeting with Native American tribal leaders and did even address the shooting until only a few minutes in.  Instead he was giving shout outs, smiling and being cheerful. It’s almost as if he really doesn’t care or grasps the enormity of this situation.

President Obama didn’t wait long after Tuesday’s devastating elections to give critics another reason to question his leadership, but this time the subject matter was more grim than a pair of governorships.

After news broke out of the shooting at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, the nation watched in horror as the toll of dead and injured climbed. The White House was notified immediately and by late afternoon, word went out that the president would speak about the incident prior to a previously scheduled appearance. At about 5 p.m., cable stations went to the president. The situation called for not only his trademark eloquence, but also grace and perspective.

But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president making introductory remarks. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a “shout-out” to “Dr. Joe Medicine Crow — that Congressional Medal of Honor winner.”  Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?

Read the rest.

Obama’s attitude yesterday was stunning and quite revealing.  He continues to proves time and time again that he is not much more than an Anti-American narcissist.  He will make any national tragedy about himself and his progressive puppet masters.  As for our troops, it seems that he really couldn’t care less.  I’m sure he is probably trying to minimalize this incident since the perpetrator was a Muslim colonialist.   I would guess that had it instead been a Christian or Jew, Obama would be all over this incident trying to take all political advantage of that fact that he could.  However, the reality is that this act of terror goes against his message of Muslim tolerance that he is trying to shove down our throats despite the repeated evidence to the contrary. In the end it just isn’t in his or his Progressive masters’ interest to keep discussing this incident as it doesn’t fit into their message.

Fox News Ratings Soar After Snub From Obama

by tqcincinnatus ( 292 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Liberal Fascism, Media at October 27th, 2009 - 3:45 pm

Once again, we see that ’68 Chevies aren’t the only things that backfire,

Gee, do you think Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdoch love being The White House’s least-favorite news channel? Duh, of course they do.

Here’s a chart comparing network ratings from the period 9/28/2009-10/11/09, which is when Anita Dunn slammed the network, and the two weeks after that (“post feud”). The numbers on the bottom right of this chart show the sequential gain for all demos (+9%) and the 25-54 year old demo (+14%).

preandpostfeud4.jpg

As for competition against the cable also rans, Fox News is sweeping the top 11 cable news slots in the 25-54-year old demographic (chart below), and the top 13 slots in all demos. It’s kind of ridiculous. Word is that Shep Smith’s program had its best month for the entire year. It must be depressing for folks like Olbermann and Chris Matthews, on MSNBC, how few people watch them.

nielsencablerankings.png

And here’s all demos.

nielsencablerankings2.png

Obama’s narcissism has struck again.  He thought he’d put his popularity up against FOX’s.  Well, it looks like we can see who’s going to be homecoming king this year.