► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘U.S. Institute of Peace’

Tariq Ramadan’s American tour

by Delectable ( 142 Comments › )
Filed under CAIR, Dhimmitude, Islamic Supremacism, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law) at April 7th, 2010 - 4:00 pm

 Ramadan

Tariq Ramadan, the famous silver-tongued Islamist (click on the first link), was granted a Visa exemption by Hillary Clinton, and so he will be off on his American tour. He was previously banned from the USA for donating money to Hamas. This is a man who stands for wife beating, is the grandson of Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna, and justifies jihad on Israel…but is considered a “moderate Salafi Islamist.” (whatever that means)

So first off will be a speaking engagement, co-sponsored by the ACLU (of course), at Cooper Union, the school which previously had that “famous luminary,” Hugo Chavez, come and speak. I guess Tariq Ramadan is in good company!

Here are more details:

Thursday, April 8, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.
The Great Hall, Cooper Union
7 East 7th Street at Third Avenue, NYC
$15/$10 for PEN/ACLU members and students with a valid ID.

Tickets available through www.smarttix.com/show.aspx?showcode=SEC20, (212) 868-4444, or at the door.

For press inquiries, please contact Isabelle Deconinck at isadeco@earthlink.net or (212) 727-7662 or Rachel Myers at media@aclu.org or (212) 549-2666.

————————-

If you go, Islamist Watch, ACT-Manhattan, and Campus Watch people will likely be there. And make sure to click on the Campus Watch article about this event!

Next up, Tariq Ramadan will be speaking at the annual banquet of the unindicted co-conspirator, CAIR-Chicago, on April 10th.

And after that, on April 11, Tariq Ramadan will be speaking in the Detroit area, and address Muslim fest.

The coup de grace, so to speak, is that Tariq Ramadan will be speaking at the Ronald Reagan Building Ampitheater in D.C., apparently co-organized by our friends, the “United States Institute of Peace,” on April 28th. Go see the “wonderful” line up of Islamists and apologists set to speak at the Ronald Reagan theater, at a full-day event, titled: “U.S. Relations with Muslim World: One Year After Cairo.”

This is the symbol for the event: the U.S. flag shaped as a crescent, with a minaret covering Europe.

Crescent flag

Please note that John Kerry, fresh off his “engagement” with Assad, was invited to be a speaker at this event, which features Tariq Ramadan (Islamist), and the U.S. flag as a crescent. And also please note that the U.S. Institute of “Peace” is a “bipartisan” Congressional organization that was behind the Iraq Study Group (i.e., sell Israel down the river report), and published John Limbert’s (who is on the board of an Iranian lobby group, the National Iranian American Council) articles.

It is clear now, that with his Visa waiver, Ramadan is going on a cross-country tour.

A source told me that John Esposito, in his talk at Northwestern University in Chicago, mentioned that Tariq Ramadan will stay for a long time in the USA.

That’s right, this Islamist gets the red carpet treatment, and forums to air his Islamist propaganda, courtesy of Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration. The ACLU (which I thought stood for civil liberties), is co-sponsoring this talk at one of our elite institutions. That’s right – more evidence of the Leftist/Islamist convergence, yet again. The U.S. Institute of “Peace” is co-sponsoring an event at the Ronald Reagan Theater. I am surprised J-Street did not co-sponsor this event!

It is enough to make one cry. But these are the times we live in. Blogmocracy netizens might be interested in attending any of the upcoming Ramadan talks, to either document what is being said, or to protest.

Project for The Blogmocracy: defined terms dictionary!

by Delectable ( 223 Comments › )
Filed under Liberal Fascism, Political Correctness, Progressives, Tranzis at November 12th, 2009 - 3:00 pm

As I have stated before, it is my sincere belief that one of the biggest threats we face from progressivism today is a language desecration. At the forefront of the war on language is “J Street,” which has decided to call itself a “pro-Israel, pro-peace” organization.

This thread should hopefully become part of a series on Blogmocracy, to catalogue the many places where the progressives have desecrated the English language. The goal will be to identify the specific language desecrations, in order to correct these problems, and correctly define mis-defined words in the English language. In time, hopefully this can be copied in other languages.

The first in this series will start off with the word PEACE.

Shalom

Dictionary.com defines “peace” as: the normal, non warring condition of a nation, group of nations, or the world. Source. This definition meshes well with the biblical concept of “Shalom,” which wiki defines quite well right here:

Shalom, in the liturgy and in the transcendent message of the Christian scriptures, means more than a state of mind, of being or of affairs. Derived from the Hebrew root shalam – meaning to be safe or complete, and by implication, to be friendly or to reciprocate. Shalom, as term and message, seems to encapsulate a reality and hope of wholeness for the individual, within societal relations, and for the whole world. To say joy and peace, meaning a state of affairs where there is no dispute or war, does not begin to describe the sense of the term. Completeness seems to be at the center of shalom as we will see in the meaning of the term itself, in some derivatives from its root, shalam, in some examples of its uses in Jewish and Christian Scriptures, and in some homophone terms from other Semitic languages.

This is all well and good, but how do the progressives define this all-important word? Let’s see the way they use this term…

United for Peace and Justice

Code Pink (a “peace” group)

Peace Now

J Street (“pro-Israel, pro-peace“)

U.S. Institute for Peace

Jewish Voice for Peace

Christian Peacemaker Teams

United Nations Peacekeepers

What do all of those organizations have in common? They all have a part in the ongoing war on language, raging across the world.

They all apparently define peace as “surrender.” As such, they are actually not pro-peace, but they are pro-war for the other side. They are looking to redefine “peace” as a term which is synonymous with pacifism, which, as I showed very clearly, is NOT the actual definition of peace.

And so, that is why I like to end my statements with the following…

I am pro-peace, pro-human rights, pro-humanity, pro-American, pro-Israel, and pro-Judeo-Christian values. This is why I believe it is imperative to stand up for our basic values, and never back down against progressivism. We must never cede the language!

Recall the old Roman maxim: “If you want peace, prepare for war.” – Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus

Sometimes war is necessary in order for peace to be possible. This is something that Gandhi never understood. He is the same man who told the British to “give up” to the Nazis, as a “true sign” of nonviolence, and told the Jews to “dare Germans to shoot them,” rather than move to “Palestine.”

In this screwed up ideology, fighting genocide is equivalent to committing genocide. Their version of “peace,” as I already documented in other posts, involve laying down and committing suicide.

I am sorry, but that is not “peace,” it is genocide. The next time some so-called “peace” group claims to be pro-peace, we should never let them get away with false claims. We must ask them what they mean by “peace,” and how they define “peace.” And then we should ask how they hope to bring about “peace” through absolute surrender to mass murderers/human butchers.

Next to follow in the series: justice, human rights, racism, imperialism, colonialism, apartheid, progressivism, liberalism, West Bank, genocide, zionism, patriotism, social justice, and due process. This is just for starters!

Obama hires Iranian regime lobbyist for key State Department position

by Delectable ( 173 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Iran, Islamists, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives, Tranzis at November 10th, 2009 - 2:45 pm

This is simply unbelievable!

Dennis Ross used to have this position, until he left to go to the National Security Council. In any case, John Limbert will be the head Iran official in the U.S. State Department.

Mr. Limbert

And who is Mr. Limbert? Laura Rozen at Politico has some insights:

A former ambassador to Mauritania who speaks fluent Farsi, Limbert retired from a 33-year career with the Foreign Service in 2006 with the rank of Minister-Counselor. He is the recipient of the Department’s highest award, the Distinguished Service Award, as well as an Award for Valor for his more than a year as a hostage in Iran, months of it spent in solitary confinement. He has been teaching at the U.S. Naval Academy since 2006, and also served as president of the American Foreign Service Assocation (2003-2005). This year, he published a book through the US Institute of Peace, Negotiating with Tehran: Wrestling with the Ghosts of History — a subject that will come in handy in his new role in the Obama administration. (Here’s the Cliff Notes version.)

He spoke Wednesday at an event at the National Iranian American Council, of which he is on the advisory board, on the thirtieth anniversary of the hostage crisis, and was said to have had an unpublicized ceremony marking his new appointment at State on Thursday.

“He’s a wonderful choice, one of the most decent people I know and someone who has the best interests of the United States and Iran in mind,” said the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Karim Sadjadpour.

Let me break more of this down for you all, because it might be a bit hard to fully understand…

What we know thus far is this:

  1. Mr. Limbert spoke at and is on the board of the National Iranian American Council.
  2. Mr. Limbert was published by and affiliated with the US Institute of Peace.
  3. Mr. Limbert is being praised by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Karim Sadjadpour.
  4. Mr. Sadjadpour apparently believes that Mr. Limbert has the best interests “of the United States and Iran in mind.”

So let’s parse through this information, shall we?

First of all, our old friends, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC)! You may remember them from my posts about J Street, that progressive “pro-Israel, pro-peace” organization (which in reality is an anti-peace and anti-Israel organization). I wrote about Trita Parsi speaking at J Street, and how interesting it was that an Iranian lobbyist was speaking at J Street. Mr. Parsi is in fact in charge of NIAC. Here is a refresher link to re-introduce who Trita Parsi is, and how he is an official lobbyist for the Iranian regime. Yes – just so you did not get whiplash, NIAC and J Street are in fact connected!

So, just so we are fully understanding, that means that Mr. Limbert is on the Board of Directors of an organization, NIAC, that is an official lobbyist for the Iranian regime.

Now let’s go to the second link – the U.S. Institute of Peace. This sounds like a fabulous organization! Who doesn’t like peace? Yet check out this Daniel Pipes link, about how the U.S. Institute of Peace has been linked with Kamran Bohkari, a member of the Al-Muhajiroun (yes, a jihadist), that celebrated the “Magnificent 19” hijackers. This same “institute” also funds pro-Hamas propaganda. (see IPT story here) This “institute” also was heavily involved in the Iraq Study Group, which called for selling Israel down the river in exchange for “PEACE, peace in our time!”

Mr. Limbert is involved with this “peace institute,” which he publishes his books through.

And now let’s examine the other source mentioned in Laura Rozen’s column, namely, Karim Sadjadpour, who praises Mr. Limbert. Who is Mr. Sadjadpour? Well, I dug up this little gem of a column in Haaretz, where he claims that Khamenei does not mean ill harm to Israel, and that an Israeli attack on Iran would only increase, not decrease, the threat from Iran. He also wrote a column decrying the Congressional vote declaring the Revolutionary Guard “terrorists,” and has repeatedly called for “engagement” with the bloodthirsty Iranian regime.

It thus should be no surprise that Mr. Sadjadpour also believes that Mr. Limbert has the best interests of the USA and Iran in mind. Hmm…very interesting. And how exactly could someone have both the best interests of the USA and Iran in mind? How exactly are American interests aligned with the bloodthirsty thugocracy of Iran?

So then we go full circle and ask…who is Mr. Limbert himself, beyond his associations?

Answer: he is someone who calls for ‘engagement’ with Tehran, even in light of their brutal suppression of democracy, and even calls for the U.S. to negotiate “without preconditions.”

He even called the U.S. the “puppet master” of Iran under the Shah, is married to an Iranian woman (who likely influences his views), and even advocates talks without dealing with the nuclear issue head-on, and with no time tables. Source. He proudly said as much at the NIAC (Iranian lobby in DC) conference, where he also said he was “agnostic” on whether Iran is seeking nukes. (!!!)

This is who Obama sees fit to give the head job at the State Department, in charge of “negotiations” with Tehran. Someone who, as the evidence shows so clearly, is associated with the Iranian regime lobby in Washington D.C., and someone whose friends apparently believe he will be pushing Iranian regime interests.

In case anyone has any doubts, it is quite clear where Obama stands with regards to Iran and so-called “engagement,” now that he has appointed Limbert, a man linked to the Iranian lobby, to such a sensitive position. It is all the more intriguing to see the J Street connection popping up yet again.