► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘obama’

Another One Under the Bus

by tqcincinnatus ( 109 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Elections, Politics at October 24th, 2009 - 2:00 pm

Another friend of Obama goes under the bus, this time in the Virginia gubernatorial race,

Virginia Democratic candidate R. Creigh Deeds said Friday that he was confused and frustrated by statements from senior aides to President Obama that Deeds had rejected their advice in running his campaign for governor as some state party activists denounced what they saw as a betrayal by advisers to a president they helped elect a year ago.

Deeds said he was puzzled by the comments from unnamed Obama administration officials who said that he had virtually no chance to defeat Republican Robert F. McDonnell and that such a loss would reflect on Deeds’s failings rather than on Obama’s popularity.

They said that Deeds, who has been trailing in the polls, coordinated poorly with the White House and failed to adequately reach out to the constituencies that helped Obama become the first Democrat in 40 years to win Virginia.

“It is frustrating to read, because that’s not what we’ve been hearing from anybody over there,” Deeds said. “I’m just not sure where the talk is coming from. It just doesn’t make sense… There’s been no disagreements between us of which I’m aware.”

The Democratic National Committee, under the leadership of Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D), has invested heavily in the race, and Obama will rally with Deeds in Norfolk on Tuesday.

Kaine called the remarks “not helpful.”

“You don’t do this for as long as we’ve done it and for as long as Creigh’s done it without having your own internal sense of having good days and bad days,” he said.

The “unnamed officials” are probably panicking over the latest poll by Survey USA which has conservative Republican Bob McDonnell leading Deeds – who has successfully been associated with Obama in the minds of Virginia voters by McDonnell – by a whopping 19%.

At this point, the Obama team is trying to do damage control. Virginia was considered a bellweather for the Obama sweep last year – a state that had been reliably Republican for the past two decades, but which has taken on a much more purplish tint in recent years due to many liberal northeasterners moving into the suburbs around Washington D.C. The fact that Obama won Virginia pretty handily (52.6% to McCain’s 46.3%) showed Obama’s popularity with “moderate” parts of the country.

Conversely, the fact that Deeds is now being smashed by McDonnell, and much of this due to the Republican’s successful campaign to cast Deeds as an Obama-style fiscal whackjob, scared the daylights out of the Obama team. Virginia, once the new wave for Democrats, is now the rising tide for Republicans, where not only is McDonnell easily besting Deeds, but the two other big ticket races are seeing Bolling (for Lt.Gov) and Cuccinelli (for AttyGen) best their respective opponents by similar margins.

As a result, the Obama team seems to be trying to distance itself as much as it plausibly can from Deeds, since an Obama-approved candidate getting roundly thumped in a purple state would be the proof in the pudding of the unpopularity of Obama and his policies – unpopularity that the MSM tries to hide with softball questions, puff pieces, and cooked polls engineered by MSM outlets. But you can’t hide election results (at least not yet) – and those results will make a lot of thinking people think that Obama is definitely past his prime. It’ll be interesting to see if Obama’s rally with Deeds next Tuesday gets cancelled due to some “emergency” that requires the President’s immediate attention.  When Virginia goes solidly conservative GOP, expect a lot of overflow for conservatives in 2010 – especially if Hoffman in NY-23 upsets the left-wing GOP candidate and the Democrat and takes that district for the Conservative Party.

Which can only be a good thing.

Cross-posted at the Baby Seal Club

Obama = Hitler, So Say….the Russians?

by tqcincinnatus ( 287 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Politics, Russia at October 22nd, 2009 - 7:25 pm

Hey, they said it, not me,

Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Benito Mussolini were very popular at the time, but they were not presented with the Nobel Prize. Yet, they were nominated for same.

If we look down the history from 1900 to 2009, we will find only one person who was extremely popular and talked about like President Obama. That person is Adolf Hitler, leader of the Nazi Party and chancellor of Germany.

Despite both men’s popularity; there are more scary similarities between these two leaders:

Both Obama and Hitler share similar ancestries: Obama German, Hitler Austrian.

Both leaders had been surrounded by many controversies concerning birth certificate, citizenship and religion.

Both had the father figure issues. Obama’s parents separated when he was two years old and they divorced in 1964. His father returned to Kenya and saw him only once more before dying in an automobile accident in 1982. Hitler had a troubled relationship with his tradition-minded authoritarian father, who frequently beat him.

During their teenage years both leaders had problems with alcohol. Obama called the alcohol phase “greatest moral failure”, Hitler called it “most humiliated experience in life”.

Both are unloved by the Jewish, for Hitler is well known why, for Obama, well, his victory in Presidential elections was not received with welcome in Israel.

Time magazine named Obama person of the year in 2008, Hitler in 1938.

Yeah, the rest of the world just loves President Hopenchange, don’t they?

I’m not exactly sure where they’re getting the bit about Obama being German, or the part about Hitler being influenced by Martin Luther (at the link), but the list of similarities between Obama and Hitler is pretty telling.  Not because of any mystical magic-through-time George Noury synchronicity type thing, but just because the traits that make up an authoritarian personality of leftist persuasion seem to be pretty applicable across the board. 

Obama’s Ridiculous Attack On FOX News

by WrathofG-d ( 316 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Guest Post, Politics at October 21st, 2009 - 12:54 pm

Blogmocracy In Action

Guest Post by “TypicalWhitey”

Perusing the headlines today, I am finding a common thread among them: Man up Obama!

Instead of engaging his opposition he has decided to demonize it. I have been seeing this and wondering…why in the world is Obama doing this? What can he possibly gain from this? Does he think this will bring more folks over to his side of the issues?

What I have concluded though is this.

Obama has never, in his entire career, run into real opposition to what he has to say. Think about it, what other candidate could attend a racist church, associate with past terrorists, make comments such as “my grandmother reacted as a typical white person” and remain a viable candidate? The MSM allowed him to explain each of the instances away, being in such awe of his ability to read off a teleprompter.

So therefore, Obama thinks that just by using words, that people will automatically believe him. This has always worked for him in the past. What Obama doesn’t understand about the American people though is the fact that you can only baffle us with bullshit for so long before people start noticing that there isn’t much meat on the bone.

There’s only one thing dumber than picking a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel — picking a fight with people who don’t even have to buy ink. The Obama administration’s war on Fox News is dumb on multiple levels. It makes the White House look weak, unable to take Harry Truman’s advice and just deal with the heat. It makes the White House look small, dragged down to the level of Glenn Beck. It makes the White House look childish and petty at best, and it has a distinct Nixonian — Agnewesque? — aroma at worst. It is a self-defeating trifecta: it distracts attention from the Obama administration’s substantive message; it serves to help Fox, not punish it, by driving up ratings; and it deprives the White House, to the extent it refuses to provide administration officials to appear on the cable network, of access to an audience that is, in fact, broader than hard-core Obama haters.”

The rest of the article.

Does he not notice his approval ratings dropping and his disapproval ratings rising? His advisers must be telling him to attack Fox. They must be telling him that by attacking Fox he will discredit them. Because that is what he is attempting to do.

He apparently has no one who will tell him that this is working against him! That all this is accomplishing is through the roof ratings for his “opposition”!

Instead of discrediting them, he is raising them to the level of the Presidency. He is wasting his time on a news channel, simply because they critique his policies!

This makes him look petty and small. He appears to be a thin skinned and weak; and the LAST thing the American people want in a President is a …..whiner

Bret Stephens Agrees: Obama Is An Anti-Human Rights President

by WrathofG-d ( 228 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, China, Democratic Party, Guest Post, Iran, Israel, Politics, Progressives, Tranzis, World at October 20th, 2009 - 9:56 am

Blogmocracy In Action!

Guest Post by “Delectable”

I have repeatedly stated that Obama is at war with human rights around the globe.  On Blogmocracy, I have called him an anti-human rights president.  He backs the oppression of humanity in every country on earth, without any exception I am aware of.  This great article, written by Bret Stephens, explains this well.

Nobody should get too hung up over President Obama’s decision, reported by Der Spiegel over the weekend, to cancel plans to attend next month’s 20th anniversary celebration of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Germany’s reunited capital has already served his purposes; why should he serve its?

China: In February, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton landed in Beijing with a conciliating message about the country’s human-rights record. “Our pressing on those [human-rights] issues can’t interfere on the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis and the security crisis,” she said.

In fact, there has been no pressing whatsoever on human rights. President Obama refused to meet with the Dalai Lama last month, presumably so as not to ruffle feathers with the people who will now be financing his debts. In June, Liu Xiaobo, a leading signatory of the pro-democracy Charter 08 movement, was charged with “inciting subversion of state power.” But as a U.S. Embassy spokesman in Beijing admitted to the Journal, “neither the White House nor Secretary Clinton have made any public comments on Liu Xiaobo.”

Sudan: In 2008, candidate Obama issued a statement insisting that “there must be real pressure placed on the Sudanese government. We know from past experience that it will take a great deal to get them to do the right thing. . . . The U.N. Security Council should impose tough sanctions on the Khartoum government immediately.”

Exactly right. So what should Mr. Obama do as president? Yesterday, the State Department rolled out its new policy toward Sudan, based on “a menu of incentives and disincentives” for the genocidal Sudanese government of Omar Bashir. It’s the kind of menu Mr. Bashir will languidly pick his way through till he dies comfortably in his bed.

Iran: Mr. Obama’s week-long silence on Iran’s “internal affairs” following June’s fraudulent re-election was widely noted. Not so widely noted are the administration’s attempts to put maximum distance between itself and human-rights groups working the Iran beat.

Earlier this year, the State Department denied a grant request for New Haven, Conn.-based Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. The Center maintains perhaps the most extensive record anywhere of Iran’s 30-year history of brutality. The grant denial was part of a pattern: The administration also abruptly ended funding for Freedom House’s Gozaar project, an online Farsi- and English-language forum for discussing political issues.

It’s easy to see why Tehran would want these groups de-funded and shut down. But why should the administration, except as a form of pre-emptive appeasement?

In Massachusetts not long ago, I found myself driving behind a car with “Free Tibet,” “Save Darfur,” and “Obama 08” bumper stickers.  I wonder if it will ever dawn on the owner of that car that at least one of those stickers doesn’t belong.

There is more – please read it all!

It is important to be aware that Obama is a self-styled progressive.  The anti-human rights nature of our progressive president shows the cognitive dissonance of the trans-nationalists (or “tranzis”) who pretend to believe in universal ideals of “hope” and “change,” only to then later stand for stagnation and despair when they enter office.
It thus is no surprise that Obama should follow this anti-human rights pattern.  And it is no surprise to me that Obama refuses to use his UN veto against the Goldstone defamation report against Israel. He thus will apparently be pushing for action on the Goldstone Report – including possible sanctions against Israel (a democractic state which adheres to the highest ideals of human rights) – while blocking sanctions against Iran (a thugocracy that shoots its citizens in the streets and rapes and tortures its prisoners).
This is where Obama stands today.  He has revealed himself as the anti-human rights president.  The good news is that others are starting to see this.