► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Sarah Palin’

Finding Out What’s In It! Part VII

by Flyovercountry ( 129 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Health Care, Progressives, Socialism at March 24th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Let me start by saying a Happy Birthday to the Obamacare Legislation. This was the single most cynical piece of governance ever to come out of Washington’s hallowed halls. There was arm twisting going on, kickbacks, bribes, thuggish tactics employed against anyone who spoke out in protest including a Tea Party member getting his finger bitten off in St. Louis, and left just a general sour taste in the mouths of many Americans. The law in question is in fact so bad, that even a good number of my liberal friends are against it.

One year later, where do we stand. Those large, evil corporations that the Socialists are protecting us from, have to a large extent been granted waivers from the expense of Obamacare. We small independent business owners, not so. We have to pay the increased expense of $10,000 per employee. For a fledgling business just starting out, this is often the difference between thriving and not even surviving. A company fighting for its survival, will probably not be taking the gamble to expand and hire. Meet Scott Womack, who through the Heritage Foundation, will give a better explanation for the whole mess.

The waivers are well over a thousand now, and have been granted exclusively to those organizations who were mostly on the sidelines acting as shills and cheerleaders for this sink hole of a law. Rationing of care has already begun. Several drugs are no longer available, and certain treatments are being denied based on a cost benefit ratio analysis.

The center of a right-to-life debate, 13-month-old Joseph Maraachli rests at Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center in St. Louis with his dad,...

Much ado was made about Sarah Palin’s use of the phrase, “death panels.”   I watched in amusement as everybody missed the point of what Governor Palin was talking about.  The assumption was that Sarah was speaking to the end of life counseling being offered under the plan.  What Governor Palin was speaking to was the concept of bureaucratic panels making decisions on medical care based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles rather than Medical Professionals making those decisions on what would be best for the patient.  If you don’t believe our law would bring that about, meet Joseph Maraachli.  His parents brought him to a hospital in Missouri after just such a panel ordered that he would not receive a relatively simple medical procedure to save his life in Ontario.  The judge who ordered his death gave the parents a whole week to say their goodbyes to their baby.  The decision was made solely based on economics, with not one medical fact being considered.  I realize that Ontario is not our country, but we have been told for years how our medical system should look like Canada’s.  Now that we have modeled our own system to theirs, and are moving in that direction, would it make sense to actually see what medical care in Canada is really like.

Read more about this at Investor’s Business Daily.

11 new taxes are going into effect over the next 4 years, and this boondoggle is already hundreds of Billions of dollars more expensive than we were told it was going to be.  The CBO estimate was based entirely of fictional numbers, which are still being touted by a sycophantic media as though it were gospel.  For those who haven’t been told yet, the CBO qualified their statement, by basically saying here is our report on the financial impact of this bill, which has almost no accuracy since there was no accuracy in the assumptions made to score the bill in the first place. 

The first benefits of this law will not be received until well after the next Presidential election.  With that being the case, why was it necessary to pass this bill so fast that no one was given ample time to actually read it?  Beyond the fiscal mess it is creating, this bill removes huge swaths of our basic liberties and hands control of much of our daily living over to the executive branch.  Even if you think President Obama and Secretary Sebilius are just aces, what about the President and Secretary elected 24 years from now.  Personally, I want to be able to buy my kids a Happy Meal, which this new law has enabled the city of San Francisco to ban.  Since everything we do in our daily lives has the possible impact of affecting our health, and costing the government money, kiss your personal liberties good bye. 

Obama care is 1 year old now.  By the time it turns two, I hope we will have the ability to take it off of life support, so that the rest of us have a chance.

Crossposted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.

UPDATE:  This one was just too funny to not include in my continuing Obamacare rant.  Apparently, Jon Tester believes that the best way to hold on to his Senate seat in November of 2012 is to claim that he was in fact not the 60th vote in favor of the Law, but only the less important 52nd vote.  I’ll give some background for this update, as only about a quarter of the country will recognize what is happening.  There are 23 Democrat Senators up for reelection in 2012.  The NRSC is now running ads in each state calling the appropriate Senator the 60th and deciding vote for the Sink Hole of a Law.  Since the Law in question needed each of the 60 votes to force cloture, then each vote was the deciding vote.  Even though we have seen those loopy polls from PPP and Gallup showing that America is evenly divided on the issue, the internal polling of the Congress Critters in question is a far different story.  The Senate Democrats are scurrying away from this thing like cockroaches exposed to light.  Tester realizes that defending his vote would be certain death, so he instead is trying to downplay his vote’s importance.  Good luck with that Jon.  The NRSC has to be salivating over this debate scenario.

Conservatives abandon Youth vote to Obama

by Phantom Ace ( 116 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, George W. Bush, Progressives, Republican Party at March 14th, 2011 - 6:30 pm

The campaign of Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 ran on a brilliant appeal to youth voters. They used music and other forms of popular culture to mobilize young voters to vote. Too many Conservatism have dismissed this as a fad or not permanent. This is a dangerous idea because abandoning young voters could lead to a hardening of their apolitical views. The irony of of course is that this wasn’t always the case. In the 1980’s Ronald Reagan won the youth vote and this help cement a large segment of the population into the Republican Party for the next 20 years. Then in the 1990’2 the Republicans decided that family values and culture wars were the way to go, abandoning their economic conservatism. The result was that by the 2000’s. young voters were solidly in the Democratic camp. Obama is now trying to cement these voters to the Democratic party.

Early last month, President Obama addressed 1,000 people at Penn State about his ideas for reviving the country’s economy. A couple of weeks later, he delivered a similar address to about 100 small-business owners at Cleveland State University.

But it was what Obama did offstage and away from the news cameras at the schools, before groups of about a dozen at a time, that was perhaps more important to his campaign for reelection.

[…]

“We are so interested in figuring out how to get your ideas, your input, your energy,” Obama told a group of student leaders from Cleveland State and nearby schools. He shook each participant’s hand and posed for a group photo

Read the rest: White House seeks to re-connect to young voters

Unemployment among young people is at historic levels. There should be no way Obama should even appeal to these voters, yet he is trying. The only reason the he even has an opportunity to win them again is because the GOP doesn’t fight for the youth vote. Conservatives have a tendency to mock young people, insult the music they like or criticize how they dress. This condensing attitude is why Progressive propaganda calling the right hateful works. Obama on the other hand uses youth culture to appeal to them. It workls becasue he doesn’t criticize the young and

The Republicans since Papa Bush and even to this day, have engaged in this culture war and family values nonsense that really turns young people off. The youth don’t want to be lectures, they want to hear how policies can improve their opportunities.  The Tea Party was a good opening to win back the youth, but the Culture warriors hijacked it (people like Angle, O’Donnell and Buck) and turned off many Libertarian leaning youth. It’s almost as if Conservatives hate the young. This makes the youth receptive to lies about the Right. Running lame candidates like George HW Bush, Bob Dole, George W. Bush and John McCain has cemented the idea the Republican party as a bunch of old grumps.

Obama’s policies are anti-youth. It is burdening future generations with debt and has accelerating America’s decades old economic stagnation. This should be the opening Conservatives shoulduse to win young voters over. We should address young voters economic concerns and give them hope for a better tomorrow. Insulting what music they listen to will not win them and could harden their views. Ronald Reagan made being a Conservative cool among the young in the 1980’s, we can do it again. Conservatism should adpat to the times, not fight against it. Reagan proved ity can be done.

The coming fall of the House of Saud

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 114 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Environmentalism, History, Islam, Politics, Progressives, Regulation, Republican Party, Saudi Arabia, Socialism, Tea Parties, Transportation at March 11th, 2011 - 4:00 pm

Dick Morris has a new column out about what will happen, when, not if, the Saudi monarchy is deposed, and how the Republicans need to ratchet up their rhetoric about new drilling for oil ASAP.

NEXT TO FALL: SAUDI ARABIA

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published on DickMorris.com on March 9, 2011

We can do without Libya’s two million barrels a day of oil albeit with significant disruptions in the global economy. But if we lose Saudi Arabia’s nine million, we will face a global catastrophe.

And the Saudi monarchy will be the next casualty of the Middle East revolutionary wave. The king is 86 years old and very ill. The next two men in line are both over 80 and both sick. And, behind those three in line are 7,000 princes, each ambitious and at war with one another. The monarchy will not be able to buy off the opposition for long with cash subsidies. (We are indebted to Bret Stephens of the Wall Street Journal for these insights).

The fall of Saudi Arabia will accelerate the stagflation that will mar the final two years of the one-term Obama Presidency.

Republicans need to ratchet up their rhetoric about new drilling for oil. The 2008 liberal counter-argument that new drilling is not a short term solution begs the question of why the Administration has not used the intervening two years to effectuate the longer term solution that it offered.

Republicans need to be more vocal in criticizing the Administration for its defacto moratorium on off-shore drilling. Obama’s people are so sensitive to these criticisms that they just approved the first permit since the BP spill.

[…]

Click here to read the rest

Rodan Update:

If Saudi Arabia collapses, Obama’s moratorium has put us in a tough spot. we are importing more and producing here less.

Nice going there Barack Hussein Obama.

 

Sarah Palin – Pros & Cons

by Kafir ( 345 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012, Politics at February 26th, 2011 - 8:00 pm

Bob in Breckenridge weighs in on one side of the issue, while Iron Fist gives us the alternative view.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, so please take this thread in the spirit it is intended ~ to debate the issue, not to hate on each other!

Please keep it respectful!



(more…)