► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Scott Brown’

Granny Warren (aka Fauxcahontas) digs herself deeper into a hole during a debate with Scott Brown

by Mojambo ( 148 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2012 at October 2nd, 2012 - 2:30 pm

My favorite Scott Brown line “I am not a student in your class”.  Also he pointed out that she rails against lower taxes but did not voluntary pay higher taxes herself.  by the way, Granny is not licensed to practice law in Massachusetts and she and her husband have a combined salary of $700,000 (she earned $429,981 at Harvard making Miss Occupy Wall Street a member of the 1%.

by Howie Carr

Does Granny Warren really believe everything she said last night in Lowell?

I mean, this woman is a moonbat’s moonbat. She makes Obama look like a moderate.

Two weeks ago, she was wringing her hands about higher college tuitions. Last night she repeated (or Scott Brown did it for her) that she’s for in-state tuition for illegal aliens — which amounts to free tuition for people in the country illegally. But not for kids from New Hampshire whose parents pay income tax in Massachusetts.

She also supports driver’s licenses for illegal aliens. Professor Warren, how about driver’s licenses for drunken drivers? Why should one class of criminals be discriminated against in favor of another?

[…]

Granted, Scott Brown still has the steeper hill to climb. He’s a Republican. He’s also an adult. This woman is untethered from the truth. So were her supporters in the Tsongas Center.

At the start when David Gregory mentioned the fake-Indian controversy, they softly hissed him. How dare he! Then she claimed she didn’t lie for five weeks about not knowing that Harvard was touting her as a “woman of color.”

[…]

Hey, maybe this is working for her. Perhaps the state is totally overrun with Kool-Aid drinkers who think the last four years have been great, and that if only we could borrow another $10 trillion from China and add another 15 million to the food stamp rolls….

She’s for Obama’s “jobs bill.” Too bad she wasn’t here in Boston during the ’70s. Did she ever hear of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA)? City Hall trained a lot of hacks, for careers in the hackerama. Most of them never worked again.

Her only ammunition is Brown’s votes on all these fake roll-calls. Who’s her trainer, Chuck Schumer? She uses her talking points like a crutch — “millionaires and billionaires” and “subsidies for big oil.”

Big oil made $137 billion in profits last year! And how much did Big Government make in taxes on “Big Oil”? She was so out of gas at the end that she used the word “hammered” again.

Brown at least has new material for every debate. My favorite was when she brought up the “Buffett rule” and he came back with, “We already have a Buffett rule in this state. You can voluntarily pay higher state taxes. She chose not to.”

I’m sure he rehearsed this line too: “Excuse me, I’m not a student in your classroom.”

Granny’s the classic modern Democrat. She can’t even name a Republican she’d work with — at least one who’ll be there in January. To her, the only compromise is when Republicans surrender. She never saw a tax she didn’t want to raise — except her own.

“I’m from here,” Scott Brown said to begin his closing statement.

Yes he is. And Granny is from … Harvard.

Read the rest: Liz digs in deeper hole

Scott Brown losing to a Neo-Marxist

by Phantom Ace ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Headlines, Progressives, Republican Party at December 8th, 2011 - 9:58 am

Neo-Marxist Elizabeth Warren would be elected Senator from Massachussets if the election were held today. A new poll shows her leading Sen. Scott Brown 49-42.

Democrat Elizabeth Warren has opened up a lead against Republican incumbent Scott Brown for the first time in their U.S. Senate showdown, but a barrage of attack ads appears to have damaged Warren and Brown’s standing among Massachusetts voters, a new University of Massachusetts at Lowell/Boston Herald poll shows.

Warren leads Brown by a 49-42 percent margin, outside the poll’s margin of error of plus or minus 5.3 percentage points. That number includes voters who say they are “leaning” for either candidate. But even without the “leaners,” Warren still leads by a 46-41 percent margin, barely within the margin of error.

The poll of 505 registered Massachusetts voters was conducted for UMass-Lowell by Princeton Survey Research from Dec. 1 – Dec. 6, and shows Warren with her largest lead yet in the campaign. A UMass-Lowell/Boston Herald poll taken in late September showed Brown ahead by a 41-38 percent margin, so the new poll represents a 10-point swing in Warren’s favor in less than two months.

If this holds, it will make the GOP winning the Senate much harder.

 

New Bill to strip Terror suspects of Citizenship

by Phantom Ace ( 148 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Invasion, Islamists, Politics, Terrorism at May 7th, 2010 - 3:00 pm

A new bill being introduced in the Senate by Senators Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Scot Brown (R-Mass) calls fro the repealing of American Citizenship of those involved in terrorism. This new law would let the Islamic Colonialists know that there are consequences to committing aggression. I feel this law is long overdue and is needed due to the nature of our enemy. The Imperialists hide behind a religion when in reality it’s a Fascist Arabic Supremacist Totalitarian Movement. The time has come to stop with this masquerade and take off the gloves.

WASHINGTON — Proposed legislation that would allow the government to revoke American citizenship from people suspected of allying themselves with terrorists set off a legal and political debate Thursday that scrambled some of the usual partisan lines on civil-liberties issues.

The Terrorist Expatriation Act, co-sponsored by Senators Joseph I. Lieberman, independent of Connecticut, and Scott Brown, Republican of Massachusetts, would allow the State Department to revoke the citizenship of people who provide support to terrorist groupslike Al Qaeda or who attack the United States or its allies

Read the rest: Bill Targets Citizenship of Terrorists’ Allies

Update: Vapig made a very good point. Whatever happened to our Sedition Laws? If we enforced theses laws, then this bill is unnecessary. One point this bill doesn’t specify if citizenship can be revoked before or after conviction. This bill is a start but far from perfect. If we were enforcing all our laws, this wouldn’t be needed.

How Liberals Will Try to Destroy Scott Brown

by Mojambo ( 156 Comments › )
Filed under Elections 2010, Progressives at January 26th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

Scott Brown along with Michele Bachmann have big targets on their backs. The author shows the two track method of liberal demonization of conservatives.

1. The conservative is a lightweight/idiot – i.e. Sarah Palin, Dan Quayle, George W. Bush (who as we all know was no conservative)

2. The conservative is an evil person – i.e. Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, Karl Rove

The  Johnsononian method is to combine the two – i.e. they are both evil and stupid – i.e. Bobby Jindal, Jim Inhofe, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Tim Pawlentey, Jim DeMint, Rick Perry.

Until we show the other side that two can play the Alinksy game (i.e. the politics of ridicule, demonization and personal destruction) we will be handicapped in all future races by our failure to recognize the vindictiveness of our opponents.  RINO’s such as John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Richard Lugar seem to have their heads up their butts when they constantly seek to “reach across the aisle” to people who want to destroy them and hate them both politically and yes – personally.

by Kyle Smith

Three weeks ago, few had ever heard of Massachusetts State Senator Scott Brown.  Now on his way to voting in the Senate, Brown has become a national political sensation.  Pulling off the “Massachusetts Miracle,” Brown is the new poster-boy for a GOP resurgence in 2010. But along with his sudden political fame, he will also be the newest target of liberal vitriol and vengeance.  After all, he stole what was rightfully theirs — the Democrats’ absolute hold on Massachusetts’ Senate delegation.  He’d better be ready, as the liberal character assassins are sharpening their knives and devising strategies to discredit the amateur Senator-elect.

Liberals typically denigrate individual conservatives by applying one of two pernicious taglines: A conservative can be either scary/dangerous, or an idiot/lightweight.  The former group includes Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, Karl Rove, Tom DeLay, Rush Limbaugh, as well as neo-cons and social conservatives as a whole.  The latter group — the so-called dunces, include Ronald Reagan, Sarah Palin, Michael Steele and Glenn Beck.  And every once in a while, the liberal heart rejoices in applying both contemptible characterizations to the same conservative; George W. Bush enjoyed this elite status among liberal sharp shooters. (Conservatives, on the other hand, generally discredit liberals by simply calling them “liberals.”)

Senator  Brown is next on liberals’ hit list. A few lefty bomb-throwers have dabbled, without success, in concocting the scary/dangerous characterization of Brown.  Rabble Rouser Keith Olbermann, on the night before the Massachusetts contest, told his sparse audience that candidate Brown is “an irresponsible, homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex-nude model, tea-bagging supporter of violence against women and against politicians with whom he disagrees.”  While leaving out any reasonable rationale for such absurd and vicious name-calling, Olbermann eventually apologized following critiques from members of his own professional and ideological teams.  When MSNBC colleague Joe Scarborough and liberal humorist John Stewart rejected the baseless insults, the scary/dangerous tagline was rendered ineffective.  This makes sense. Brown is, by all accounts, a nice guy, someone Bay Staters found to be amicable and genuine throughout the short Senate campaign.

But look for a second image assassination attempt to be coming soon.  Indeed, President Obama has already provided a subtle hint as to how Democrats will try to knock Brown off the GOP pedestal. While campaigning for Brown’s opponent the weekend before the election, the President feebly reacted to Brown’s campaign ads involving his truck by crying, “So what, everybody can buy a truck.”  Aside from dismissing Brown’s undeniably folksy appeal, the President’s reflex was revealing– he was talking down to the soon-to-be Senator. Instead of arriving to the Senate with two best-selling autobiographies, diplomas from Columbia and Harvard, and a so-called expertise in constitutional law, Brown comes with an old truck.  This contrast is not lost on many liberals.

Read the rest.