► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘sex slavery’

Now this is disgusting: Muslim summer vacation – pedophilia, slavery, rape, torture mutilation, death

by 1389AD ( 50 Comments › )
Filed under Africa, Egypt, Islam, Muslim Brotherhood, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sharia (Islamic Law), Terrorism at July 17th, 2012 - 11:30 am

EVIL: Coming soon to a location near YOU!

Before following the links below, I suggest you provide yourself with a barf bag, a crying towel, and, if you’re a drinker, a copious supply of distilled spirits. No, I am not kidding. Do whatever you need to do, but keep reading. Only by informing yourself can you do your part to curtail these evils, if and when the opportunity presents itself.

Pakistani Father Tries To Marry 3yrs Old Daughter For Money

Published on Jul 13, 2012 by HalalPorkShop

not an exact translation but it tells the story minus few details
mohammad would be so proud of this muzzy scum

“It Is Better To Marry Your Daughters As Young As Possible, Just Don’t Get In Trouble With Local Laws”

Published on Jul 13, 2012 by HalalPorkShop
lots and lots of pedophiles amongst Muslims ready to marry babies

The next news clip leaves me absolutely speechless.

Examiner: Jihadists torture to death children who decided against being suicide bombers

Two Muslim Spanish citizens of Moroccan descent have tortured for an undisclosed about of time, then murdered two children who decided against going through with their initial decision to serve as Jihadist suicide bombers.

Arrested Thursday by Spanish law enforcement authorities in the North African Spanish enclave of Melilla, The Gibraltar Chronicle is reporting that Spanish citizens Rachid Abdellah Mohamed, 25, and Nabil Mohamed Chaib, 30, have been leading a recruitment and training effort both in Melilla and Morocco for suicide bombers world-wide.

According to Spain’s Ministry of the Interior, the terror due had successfully recruited four children, but two had “adopted western or ‘infidel’ behaviour and had decided to separate themselves from the group.'”

It was then that the children were tortured then murdered.

Their mutilated corpses were found in July of 2008 in the Moroccan city of Nador.

Reportedly, Moroccan authorities have issued international arrest warrants on the ring leaders, but they have been on the run “in various European countries.”

There has been no statements from either the Spanish or Moroccan governments as to why the “various European countries” were of no assistance in apprehending the terror leaders.

Photos, maps here.

So does this one.

BNI: GETTING GENITALLY MUTILATED…what thousands of Muslim girls living in the UK do on their summer vacation

Beating the Female Genital Mutilation ban in the UK is easy. Very young girls (some as young as 3) are whisked off to the Islamic hellhole of their parents’ choice to get their clitoris cut off, and if they don’t die of infection from the rampant use of unsterilized instruments, they fly back to the UK in time for the new school year.

But since that is very costly for so many Muslim parents living on welfare in the UK, now they are flying in ‘Batch Clit Cutters’ from Muslim countries, who perform mutiple mutilations at the same time in a hotel room or private home, and no one (authorities) is the wiser.

The procedure, which involves the removal of external female genitalia, causes incredible pain and leaves women scarred for life. In some cases the vagina is sewn shut. It’s estimated 100,000 women in Britain have undergone the procedure and another 24,000 are thought to be at risk.
[…]
More here.

Also see: WHO/The Lancet: New study shows female genital mutilation exposes women and babies to significant risk at childbirth

Underage Egyptian girls pimped by their parents, under the guise of “marriage.”

Daily Mail (UK): Sordid trade in the ‘summer brides’: Arab tourists are ‘buying underage Egyptian sex slaves’ to serve them for just a few months’

  • Poor families paid a ‘dowry for the temporary marriages
  • Young victims suffer sexual slavery and forced to be servants

Wealthy tourists from the Persian Gulf are paying to marry under-age Egyptian girls just for the summer, according to a report.

These temporary marriages are not legally binding and end when the men return to their homes in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait.

The tourists pay a ‘dowry’ to poor families through intermediaries with prices ranging from £320 to £3,200.

The young victims – some under 18 – suffer sexual slavery and are forced to be servants to their ‘husbands’, claims the U.S. State Department report ‘Trafficking in Persons’.

No foreigner can marry an Egyptian girl if there is an age difference of 10 years, according to state laws. But parents and marriage brokers are getting round the restriction.

They will forge birth certificates to make the girls appear older and the men younger. In 2009, a court in Alexandria jailed two registrars for conducting temporary marriages of hundreds of girls under 18.

Sex before marriage is banned under Islamic law and most hotels and landlords demand proof before allowing a couple to share the same room.

But the report found that many parents will marry their daughter without her consent and often the girls agree to the arrangement because their families have no money.

Some of the victims are taken back to their husband’s country to work as maids while those left in Egypt are shunned by the conservative society – particularly if they have children during their temporary marriage.
[…]
Much more here, including the heartbreaking story of one recent victim.

Here’s the story of the first official sex-slave marriage in Egypt after the recent Muslim Brotherhood takeover.

This Saudi Muslim “man” abandons three wives, in a country where women cannot even drive, let alone support themselves – along with their 15 children. And it’s all perfectly legal.

Blazing Cat Fur: Man divorces 3 wives in one hour

Click for details.

Muslims demand that Australian, Canadian, and other non-Muslim women don burqas – or be raped. I have a better idea: the right to keep and bear arms.

Sun News: Many Islamist men don’t understand imperative of consent

FARZANA HASSAN | QMI AGENCY

Women are “raw meat” waiting to be devoured by men because of their dress, declared an Australian imam in 2006.

Six years later, and in our own backyard, a young convert to Islam, Al-Haashim Kamena Atangana is proposing new laws in Canada that would require women to cover up “like Muslim women,” concealing all but their eyes and hands. He contends that the high incidence of rape in North America is because of how women dress in Western countries. The new laws would make it “illegal for women to dress provocatively in the streets,” and would thereby take away the freedoms Western women enjoy.

Canadian women would have to be covered up in burkas, abayas and hijabs. They would presumably also be segregated, and their male relatives would monitor and control their behaviour. So what is it about Islamist men and their preoccupation with sex that awakens such paranoia about women’s garb?

MORE: Women need ‘dress code’ to prevent sex assaults: Islamic street preacher

First, many Islamist men do not understand the imperative of consent in a sexual relationship. They believe rape is a normal rather than a criminal reaction to female physiology, and assume that this would be every man’s response to a glimpse of some skin.

The young convert also naively assumes that rape occurs in the Western world more frequently than in the Islamic world. He goes onto to suggest we “should take your example from the way Muslim women dress. Why does Muslim women who wear long dress and covers her head aren’t targeted for sex attacks? Why is it that rapists and sexual predators only target women that dress so provocatively? Because Muslim women have nothing to show in regards to her body.”

He is dead wrong.

While rape is more often reported here, it occurs with equal if not greater frequency and ferocity in the Middle East and South Asia. Women there suffer violent gang rapes and assaults. Even very young children are tormented by incestuous family members.
[…]
Story, video here.

Michael Coren: Jackass muslim preacher blames rape victims

Published on Jul 16, 2012 by SDAMatt2a

Michael Coren and Tarak Fatah discuss jackass muslim preacher Al-Haashim Kamena Atangana, the complete absence of any reaction from the Slut Walk loons, then Tarek Fatah drops a few bombs:

a) the sexual assault of a woman in the Pakistan consulate in Toronto (kept quiet by the press).
b) 80% of muslim women in Egypt have said they have been sexually assaulted, 70% of whom had their head covered.

The next one might be funny, were it not such an obvious danger to the rest of us.

Sun News: Sodomy for Terrorism

Oh, yes, it’s true all right!

Jihad Watch: Sodomy-Jihad Fatwa: “Strange and Disgusting but True”

 


Islam and Sex Slavery

by 1389AD ( 125 Comments › )
Filed under Egypt, Islam, Jihad, Koran at June 15th, 2011 - 8:00 pm

Video: Shaykh al-Huwayni: “When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her”

By Al Mutarjim

After Egyptian Shaykh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni’s controversial comments about jihad and slavery (see here) were published on YouTube, Facebook, and also in Egyptian press, he was given the opportunity to respond in a telephone interview aired on the Islamic satellite television station al-Hikma on 22 May 2011. In his approximately 20-minute response, he contended that his words in that clip were taken out of context–he was talking within the larger topic of offensive jihad. In this interview he explained the meaning of offensive jihad, and established through sources in the Qur’an and sayings of Muhammad that both offensive jihad and the taking of spoils of war, namely slaves and “sex-slaves,” are legitimate under Islam.

I condensed the 20-minute interview down to about 8 and a half minutes; the subtitled video is above, and the transcript is below:

[…] It is clear that offensive jihad, which I was talking about in that interview, that its purpose is to call people to Islam, and it is not permissible for anyone to hide the divine guidance from the people, under any name. They rejected Islam and the jizya, that’s it. The Prophet (PBUH) said: “If they refuse, then seek Allah’s aid and fight them.” If fighting occurs, there is going to be a winner and a loser. If the army of the Muslims is victorious, it will take spoils. Taking spoils is a fixed ruling in the Qur’an. Allah permitted it at the day of the Battle of Badr, as it is (recorded) in Surat al-Anfal. Allah Almighty said: “And know that out of all the booty that ye may acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things” [Qur’an 8:41].

This (position) on spoils is clear. There is also the saying in the two Sahihs [Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim] from Abi-Hurayra, the first of which is, “One among the prophets (PBUH) raided…” In the other hadith from Yush’a bin Nun, the Prophet (PBUH) said, “When Allah saw our weakness, he made it permissible for us,” meaning spoils. The Prophet (PBUH) said, “Spoils were not permitted for any masters besides you.” Allah Almighty forbade (the taking of) spoils for all nations before us. He permitted it on the day of the Battle of Badr, as agreed to by all scholars. Not a single Muslim scholar has a problem with this.

‘Spoils’ refers to what? It refers to people and wealth. The people are those who are taken prisoner. I want to say that it is not at all permissible to take prisoners from among Muslims, even if they are heretics, because the rule for Muslims is that they are free, and not prisoners. Jihad, as I stated in the beginning, is between Muslims and non-Muslims, from among the infidels. But if two Muslims fought each other, like from Iraq and Iran for example; if Iraq invaded Iran to occupy it, it would not be permissible for an Iraqi man to take a Shi’ite woman captive, because she is Muslim, even though she’s a heretic. Likewise if Iran invaded Iraq, it would not be permissible for one of their men to take a Muslim woman captive, because she is free.

Therefore jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. That between Muslims and Muslims is called oppression, or fighting: “If two parties among the believers fall into a quarrel…” [Qur’an 49:9]. They are called ‘believers,’ and this name is not taken from them, even though they are fighting. “If one of them transgresses beyond bounds against the other, then fight ye (all) against the one that transgresses…” Here they are called transgressors, but the name of believers is still not taken away from them. In the verse directly following this one, Allah Almighty says: “The believers are but a single brotherhood…” They were brothers, even though a party of them transgressed against the other, and some of them fought each other. But the name of believers was not taken from them.

Do you understand what I’m saying? Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars–there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Qur’an 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point–there is no disagreement from any of them.

These are called slaves. The Prophet (PBUH) talked about them in the hadith narrated by al-Bukhari in his Book of Jihad: “Allah is delighted at a people who enter the Garden in chains.” Also as narrated by Abu-Dawud: “They are led to the Garden in chains.” Naturally, many people might not understand someone being jerked along in chains in order to enter the Garden. This is because all people, even the worst of the unbelievers, say the garden is for them and no others. They run to the Garden without anybody pulling them in chains.

The meaning of the hadith is this: these slaves were in a religion other than Islam. However, when they were conquered, and defeated, and taken prisoner, they came to live in the land of Islam. Then when they witnessed the justice, compassion, and mercy of Islam, they became Muslims. These did not convert to Islam except in the chains of war. If they had not been chained, bound, and had their freedom taken from them, they would not have converted to Islam. Therefore this hadith is referring to these slaves.

I am very shocked and surprised at those who say that we permit slavery. We don’t call people to become slaves. In fact, there are vows to free the necks (i.e. slaves). The same Islam which permits us to take slaves, also urges us to free their necks.
[…]
I am very shocked, for example, by a country like the United States or others like it which occupy the inhabitants of the earth. It doesn’t enslave individuals, but rather it enslaves entire countries. What is being done in Afghanistan? What is being done in Iraq? What is being done with regards to dividing up Sudan? Those who are in Chechnya, or Eritrea, or any Muslim country are being burned, and taken and thrown in prisons and in Guantanamo and so forth. They say that this is a war against terrorism. This action is the same as slavery, but it is injustice and agression. But Islam in the case of Chosroes was not like that.

I have entered into the well-known conditions and restrictions (on offensive jihad), of which I mentioned only a few, because it is a long topic. I know that I am in an interview, and perhaps I have carried on too long for your guests. But I will close Allah-willing, and I won’t go on more than a couple of minutes. I say that this is requisite with the justice, mercy, and care of Islam for the slaves. Yet they still come and blame us for this supposed blemish, while they are guilty of the same thing many times over. They are tyrants and oppressors who attack the lands of the Muslims especially, more than they do any others. Now when I say spoils, it does not refer only to money, but it also means slaves.

When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her. I choose the man I like, one with strong muscles, or if I want a boy to work in the house, and so forth. I choose one, and pay him a wage. I employ him in a variety of different tasks, then I sell him afterwards. Now, the country that I entered and took captive its men and women–does it not also have money, gold, and silver? Is that not money? When I say that jihad–offensive jihad–with the well-known conditions that I already mentioned from the hadith of the Prophet (PBUH), from the hadith of Burayda in Sahih Muslim, the coffers of the Muslims were full. Would someone who is pious and intelligent–would he say that this is a type of poverty? Or that it is a type of wealth? No–this will fill the coffers of the Muslims with riches and wealth, but as we said, with the recognized conditions. […]

Originally published on Translating Jihad.