► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Socialism’

Obama’s Creeping Government Control: Credit Cards

by WrathofG-d ( 288 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Politics, Socialism at May 24th, 2009 - 4:09 pm

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3006/2366638601_815b52ed9e_o.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Last Wednesday, President Obama once again abused the power of Government to dictate to private individuals on how they can do business.  This time it was to credit card companies.

Unsurprising, the main stream media is hailing this horrible infringement on an individual’s liberty as a huge reform to protect the consumer.

_______________________________

Banks say the changes may cut the flow of credit to consumers because it will make it more difficult for issuers to set rates based on the risk their customers pose.

“With this bill we are putting in place some common sense reforms designed to protect consumers,” Obama said at a signing ceremony at the White House.

“We’re not going to be giving people a free pass and we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe. But we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives,” he said.

Enactment marks the crest of a backlash against the card industry after years of rate and fee hikes and aggressive marketing programs that have angered consumers, analysts said.

The law largely codifies a set of rules issued by the Federal Reserve last year and puts them into effect in February 2010, five months sooner than the Fed had planned.

It also represents the first major financial regulation reform completed by Obama as he tackles a rewrite of the rules of banking and the markets to better protect consumers and investors, and prevent another credit crisis.

{The Rest of The Article From Yahoo News}

_______________________________

AOL adds the following:

The White House staged a signing ceremony in the Rose Garden, an indication of the legislation’s importance to Obama. Though opposed by many financial companies, the bill cleared Congress with broad support.
Obama made clear that he didn’t champion the changes with the intention of helping those who buy more than they can afford through “reckless spending or wishful thinking.”
“Some get in over their heads by not using their heads,” the president said. “I want to be clear: We do not excuse or condone folks who’ve acted irresponsibly.”
And yet, he said, for many of the millions of Americans who use credit cards and carry a balance, trying to get out of debt has been made difficult and bewildering by their credit card companies.
Obama said many “got trapped” because of the downturn in the economy that has turned family budgets on their heads. But, he said, “part of it is the practices of the credit card companies.”
He criticized policies that allowed for confusing fine print; the sudden appearance of unexplained fees on bills; unannounced shifts in payment deadlines, interest charges or rate increases even when payments aren’t late; and payments directed to balances with the lowest interest rates rather than the highest.
“We’re here to put a change to all that,” Obama said.
“So we’re not going to give people a free pass, and we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe,” Obama said. “But we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives.”
Obama decried the “uneasy, unstable dependence” that a minority of card users have on credit.
_______________________________
Credit card contracts can be confusing, and paying off debt is exceptionally difficult.  However, Government intervention isn’t the answer.  Despite the tone of President Obama’s comments, no one forced any of these consumers to get credit cards (especially if they didn’t understand their contract), or live beyond their means.
 
Additionally no one got “trapped”.  Every credit card was sold to an individual over the age of eighteen, and thus only to adults.  If they are wise enough at eighteen to get an abortion (although they don’t need to be 18 to do that),  join the U.S. armed forces, and VOTE then they are wise enough to decide what sort of deal to make with a private credit card company, or not to make one at all.
 
This is just another example of an Administration with a nanny-state mentality, overreaching with the powers of the Federal Government to gain control of another industry and eliminate any sort of individual responsibility.  The Government will be making this decision for you now.
 
Although every individual instance might not by itself  be a tragedy, this is all part of a larger trend.  This constant slide away from personal liberty should be cause for alarm; not praise.  Although it might seem like a helpful intervention now, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and the path to political slavery with precedent created for the “common good”.
 
What is the list of Government controlled private industries at this point?  It is great to see that this Administration isn’t wasting this “good [financial] crisis”. (sarc!)
click for info regarding the transaction of digital money to cryptocurrency.

Massachusetts Welfare Recipients Given Cars

by Phantom Ace ( 31 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Economy, Liberal Fascism at May 7th, 2009 - 7:43 am

This is unreal, but another example of the creeping Socialist/Marxist direction America is going in. In the Radical Neo-Marxist state of Massachusetts, Gov. Deval Patrick is giving cars to welfare recipients.

Free cars for poor fuel road rage

Gov. Deval Patrick’s free wheels for welfare recipients program is revving up despite the stalled economy, as the keys to donated cars loaded with state-funded insurance, repairs and even AAA membership are handed out to get them to work.

But the program – fueled by a funding boost despite the state’s fiscal crash – allows those who end up back on welfare to keep the cars anyway.

“It’s mind-boggling. You’ve got people out there saying, ‘I just lost my job. Hey, can I get a free car, too?’ ” said House Minority Leader Brad Jones (R-North Reading).

This just pisses me off. Why should the government give away cars to people collecting money from tax payers? This is wrong and setting a bad example. Why not provide everyone with HDTVs and Blu-Ray Players also? Why stop at cars, how about a free boat also? This is disturbing, but it seems the public wants this.

We reap what we sow

by Lance Kates ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under Socialism at April 27th, 2009 - 6:57 am

In today’s society, there are calls for government control of most anything.  Hamburger meat too fatty?  Call the FDA.  Don’t like that your neighbor works on their car on their driveway? Call Zoning.  Government is working on running a car company, and is already heavy-handed into the financial industry, telling CEOs what kind of salary they’re allowed to have (meanwhile, Congress’ salary goes up without having to vote on it).

There are calls, as well, for the government to run healthcare.  And we may get it.  And it may end up being deserved.  Here’s my thinking..

(more…)

House Proposes Legislation To Have The Treasury Dept. Control Employee Wages

by WrathofG-d ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Politics at March 31st, 2009 - 11:30 am

The U.S. Democrat majority is taking further steps to completely control the private sector.  Like all tyranny, what was borne out of a crisis, is exacerbated by professed “good intentions”.  If we continue down this path, all major aspects of the private sector could be owned and controlled by the Federal Government.  I fear that the actions we see today are going to be used as precedent for future actions along these lines, and thus the damage to our Liberty being done today to ‘cure the crises’ will be irreparable.

Oh, and if you object to the Government taking full control of the once-called private sector, you are “corrupt” and unpatriotic!  Read the article below.

________________________________

http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=96070&rendTypeId=4
The House Financial Services Committee, led by chairman Barney Frank, has approved a measure that would, in some key ways, go beyond the most draconian features of the original AIG bill.  The new legislation, the “Pay for Performance Act of 2009,” would impose government controls on the pay of all employees — not just top executives — of companies that have received a capital investment from the U.S. government.  It would, like the tax measure, be retroactive, changing the terms of compensation agreements already in place.  And it would give Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner extraordinary power to determine the pay of thousands of employees of American companies.

The purpose of the legislation is to “prohibit unreasonable and excessive compensation and compensation not based on performance standards,” according to the bill’s language.  That includes regular pay, bonuses — everything — paid to employees of companies in whom the government has a capital stake, including those that have received funds through the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The measure is not limited just to those firms that received the largest sums of money, or just to the top 25 or 50 executives of those companies. It applies to all employees of all companies involved, for as long as the government is invested.  And it would not only apply going forward, but also retroactively to existing contracts and pay arrangements of institutions that have already received funds.

In addition, the bill gives Geithner the authority to decide what pay is “unreasonable” or “excessive.” And it directs the Treasury Department to come up with a method to evaluate “the performance of the individual executive or employee to whom the payment relates.”

The bill passed the Financial Services Committee last week, 38 to 22, on a nearly party-line vote. (All Democrats voted for it, and all Republicans, with the exception of Reps. Ed Royce of California and Walter Jones of North Carolina, voted against it.)

The legislation is expected to come before the full House for a vote this week, and, just like the AIG bill, its scope and retroactivity trouble a number of Republicans.  “It’s just a bad reaction to what has been going on with AIG,” Rep. Scott Garrett of New Jersey, a committee member, told me. Garrett is particularly concerned with the new powers that would be given to the Treasury Secretary, who just last week proposed giving the government extensive new regulatory authority. “This is a growing concern, that the powers of the Treasury in this area, along with what Geithner was looking for last week, are mind boggling,” Garrett said.

Rep. Alan Grayson, the Florida Democrat who wrote the bill, told me its basic message is “you should not get rich off public money, and you should not get rich off of abject failure.”  Grayson expects the bill to pass the House, and as we talked, he framed the issue in a way to suggest that virtuous lawmakers will vote for it, while corrupt lawmakers will vote against it.

“This bill will show which Republicans are so much on the take from the financial services industry that they’re willing to actually bless compensation that has no bearing on performance and is excessive and unreasonable,” Grayson said. “We’ll find out who are the people who understand that the public’s money needs to be protected, and who are the people who simply want to suck up to their patrons on Wall Street.”

________________________________

DON’T JUST SIT THERE….DO SOMETHING!

Contact your House of Representatives!

In addition, here is the contact information for Barney Frank, and Alan Grayson if you are so motivated.