► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Terrorism’

New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

by tqcincinnatus ( 73 Comments › )
Filed under Afghanistan, Military, Political Correctness at June 22nd, 2009 - 2:07 pm

I can’t think of a better way to guarantee that more Afghan civilians will be taken as hostages by Islamofascist terrorists.

The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday.

The order would be one of the strongest measures taken by a U.S. commander to protect Afghan civilians in battle. American commanders say such deaths hurt their mission because they turn average Afghans against the government and U.S. and NATO forces.

Civilian casualties are a major source of friction between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. The U.N. says U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians in the Afghan war last year.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the “number of Afghans shielded from violence,” and not the number of militants killed.

McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.

“But if there is a compound they’re taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that’s the option they should take,” Smith said. “Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban.”

I’m against collateral civilian casualties as much as the next guy, but this is one of the best ways I can imagine to cause even more Afghan civilians to be put into harm’s way by the Taliban.  This move basically rewards bad behaviour and will encourage even more of the same.   

Taliban – “The Americans won’t shoot at us because we have these civilian hostages with us?  Great!  We’ll take more, and take them with us everywhere we go!  Allah be praised!”

Maybe a better way to win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people is to remind them that the hostage-taking is why civilians are endangered in the first place?

AG Holder proposes updated hate crime legislation

by bar ( 54 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Crime at June 17th, 2009 - 9:22 am

WASHINGTON (AP) – Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday that recent killings show the need for a tougher U.S. hate crimes law to stop “violence masquerading as political activism.”
[….]
The violence, he said, “reminds us of the potential threat posed by violent extremists and the tragedy that ensues when reasoned discourse is replaced by armed confrontation.”

In order to stop that violence, he said, Congress should pass an updated version of hate crimes legislation, in order to more effectively prosecute those who commit violent attacks based on gender, disability, or sexual orientation.
[….]
“We will not tolerate murder, or the threat of violence, masquerading as political activism,” Holder said. “So let me be clear, the Justice Department will use every tool at its disposal to protect the rights ensured under our Constitution.”

I haven’t seen any violence masquerading as political activism, unless he is talking about ELF or the Weather Underground and Bill Ayers or the Rev Wright. These latest acts of violence have not been condoned by the conservative movement masquerading as political activism.

Last time I checked, murder was illegal. But that doesn’t stop people from committing it. Then how is this new legislation going to change that? Is the Nazi going to say, “I would kill that nonwhite guy but I don’t want to be charged with a ‘hate crime’?”

And why can’t violent acts against any person just be a crime, why does acts against minorities garner special attention? We all know only white guys can be haters, so a violent act committed by them against one of these groups will be charged with a more severe crime then say if a gay guy commits the same act against them. How is that equal protection under the law?

U.S. Training “Palestinian” Army; Warns They Might Become Terrorists

by WrathofG-d ( 15 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Egypt, George W. Bush, Islamic Finance, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East, Military, Palestinians, Politics, Republican Party, Terrorism at May 15th, 2009 - 11:31 am

Since at least 2006, the U.S. has been funding and training -to the tune of 161 million American tax dollars so far- a huge, and professional “Palestinian” army to take over when if they get another state.  The individual heading this future debacle is Lt. Gen. Keith Dayton, U.S. security coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority.   Lt. Gen Dayton has lived and worked in Jerusalem and across the West Bank, overseeing the creation of three “Palestinian” battalions of troops, hand-picked in the West Bank, trained at an academy in Jordan, and then deployed in the Judea and Samaria.  These three 500-man battalions are intended to grow, to as many as ten battalions.  During a speak to the  Washington Institute for Near East Policy (“WINEP”) Dayton stated that their mission is to “create a Palestinian state.

Frighteningly, the training which has already occurred is only the beginning.  While speaking in Tukarm (In Judea/Samaria) Lt. Gen Dayton stated that “If it goes the way the administration has asked for, we will accelerate dramatically what we are doing here in terms of training and equipment, and filling in the gaps in between.”

The additional training program requires approval from Congress for more funding that would allow the construction for more “Palestinian” military bases in Judea and Samaria.  Without defining the cost of the additional training and construction, Dayton stated it will entail “more financial support than we have ever had before.”  That is quite a statement about a group that has received more than 1 billions dollars per year from the U.S. alone.

Both the past Bush administration and the current Obama government declared the training helps the standing and security of PA Chairman and Fatah leader Mahmoud Abbas, who they foolishly consider a moderate peace partner for Israel, despite his refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state, and his “government’s” policy of killing people who sell land to Jews.

This brilliant idea was born of the naive belief that these troops would primarily be deployed against two targets in Judea & Samaria: criminal gangs, and Hamas.  Lt. Gen. Dayton is no dummy.  He fully recognizes that by organizing and training thousands of highly organized “Palestinians”, professionally led, he is creating in effect a nationalist army that like all other attempts to train, fund, and outfit “Palestinians” will be used against Israel.  From his comments to WINEP, you would think that this was actually his intent.

Responding to a question from Paul Wolfowitz, Dayton responded to these concerns by issuing a not-so vailed threat to Israel stating that:  “the troops can only be strung along for just so long…there is perhaps a two-year shelf life on being told that you’re creating a state, when you’re not.”

http://www.oldwardogs.us/files/PaliNaziSalute.jpg

___________________________________

‘PA Army May Rebel’ if Israel Does not Agree to Peace Demands

His comments were tantamount to a warning that a rebellion is around the corner if Israel does not agree to PA demands, according to investigative journalist Robert Dreyfuss, writing in The Nation magazine.

“To my ears, at least, his subtle warning is that if concrete progress isn’t made toward a Palestinian state, the very troops Dayton is assembling could rebel,” wrote Dreyfuss, who also has authored a book blaming the United States and Israel for having allegedly encouraged the existence of Hamas as a way to weaken former Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat.

In his speech, Dayton did not detail methods used by the PA security forces, but Human Watch Rights has accused the PA and Hamas of resorting torture to as well as summary executions.  One PA Arab is on death row for the stated crime of selling property to Jews.

He focused on the “national security interest of the United States to help resolve the Israeli-Palestinian dispute” and his re-shaping the PA forces. He said that his position as U.S. Security Coordinator was created “to allay Israeli fears about the nature and capabilities of the Palestinian security forces,” a term used instead of “soldiers” in order not to conjure up an image of a military force in the PA.

However, his comment on the consequences of the failure to establish a new PA state indicated that the PA army – or special force –  might use its counterterrorist training to attack Israel as well as possibly rebel against the PA.

Several terrorist attacks and attempted attacks the past two years have involved PA security forces. In January, 2008, a PA security officer, a PA clerk and a third terrorist were involved in the murders of Ahikam Amihai and David Rubin who were hiking near Hevron. One of the victims managed to kill one of the attackers before succumbing to his own wounds. A third youth escaped unharmed.

{The Rest of The Article}

___________________________________

Beyond the obvious problems with this scenario (the cost to the American tax payer, the threat to Israel) the training of these troops actually directly conflicts with the “Palestinian” responsibilities per the Oslo Accords -signed by them in 1993 -which limit “Palestinian” military activities. So, once again, while the U.S. is insisting that Israel follow past agreements, they are allowing (and in this case directly assisting) the Arabs flaunt their obligations.


This isn’t the first time that the U.S., or Israel has tried the “let’s train them, and arm them; what could go wrong” tactic towards Arab-Israel peace.  If it were, I just might give it the benefit of the doubt -because I want peace as much, if not more, than the next person.

In only 2006, after the U.S. transferred weapons, money, and training to Abu Mazen’s (Mahmood Abbas) personal “Force 17”, the “Palestinians” stated that they would never use any force against their own people, or Hamas, but instead would us all weapons transferred from the U.S. against Israel.  True to their word, not too long thereafter the weapons were used in a terrorist attack against Israel.

In 2007, (after numerous weapon transfers from the U.S. and Israel) while Hamas was squabbling with Fatah, Palestinian Authority President, Abu Mazen, called on Palestinian factions to put an end to weeks of infighting and instead “raise rifles against the Israeli occupation.”

When will we ever learn?

PA Representative: “Two State Solution Will Kill Israel”

by WrathofG-d ( 18 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Iran, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Judaism, Lebanon, Middle East, Palestinians, Terrorism, World at May 14th, 2009 - 11:17 am

When discussing the Israel-Arab conflict, everyone today will tell you that the two-state solution is the only resolution to end the conflict.  Although this belief is presently considered the internationally accepted view, it was originally the Arab talking-point.  Naive westerners today believe that the Arabs want a two-state solution as a final resolution to end the fighting, and to create a final status.  This however is not what the Arabs want, nor what they say to each other, and  it never has been.  They don’t want peace with Israel, they want to destroy Israel.  The tactics might have changed, but the goal has not!  This won’t stop them from lying to naive western politicians, and slobbering western journalists however because doing so has been the most successful tactic in helping them achieve their final goal.

What the Arabs are willing to say to their own however, has always tended to be more candid.

___________________________________

Palestinian Authority Police Salute(IsraelNN.com) Palestinian Authority representative in Lebanon Abbas Zaki says the two-state solution is his preferred approach, as it will lead to Israel’s collapse.

Speaking with Lebanese ANB Television on May 7, Zaki said that any ceasefire, or hudna, deal with Israel is not desirable.  Instead, the long-time PLO member said, “we must go towards the two-state solution, a solution that even [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmedinajad supports.”

“In my opinion,” Zaki explained, “with such a solution, Israel will collapse. Because if they get out of Jerusalem, what will be left of all their [the Jews’] talk about the Promised Land and the Chosen Nation?  What will be with all the sacrifices they gave and then they are told to leave?”

The two-state solution, supported by the United States and most of the world, calls for a Palestinian Authority state in Judea and Samaria, leaving Israel barely 11 miles wide in some areas.

Zaki said that Jews and Israelis “perceive of Jerusalem as having a spiritual status. They relate to Judea and Samaria as a historic dream. If the Jews leave these places, the Zionist idea will begin to collapse of itself – and then we will move forward.”

The interview was brought to the Western eye by Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).

Zaki has made similar points before.  In 2008, the former Palestinian Legislative Council member for Hevron, former Fatah operations head, and current PLO Central Council member said, “When the ideology of Israel collapses, and we take, at least, Jerusalem, the Israeli ideology will collapse in its entirety, and we will begin to progress with our own ideology, Allah willing, and drive them out of all of Palestine.” Zaki also headed the PLO Lebanon Committee and the Palestine National Liberation Army’s political commissariat.

Asked then if he believes in weapons or negotiations, Zaki replied, “The use of weapons alone will not bring results, and the use of politics without weapons will not bring results. We act on the basis of our extensive experience. We analyze our situation carefully. We know what climate leads to victory and what climate leads to suicide. We talk politics, but our principles are clear. It was our pioneering leader, Yasser Arafat, who persevered with this revolution, when empires collapsed.

(The Article)

__________________________________

To those willing to be realistic when discussing the Arab-Israel conflict, Zaki’s statements are not surprising nor new.  It has always been the goal of the Arabs (who then created the “Palestinians”) to destroy Israel, never to make peace.

They tried all out war, and failed miserably.  Therefore, they changed their tactics to terrorism.  Although reasonably successful on this front, it wasn’t accomplishing their ultimate goal of total destruction of the Jewish State, so they have moved on to what we could cynically call diplomacy.

As Zaki alludes to, none of this is by chance or fate – it is all ACCORDING TO THE 1974 P.L.O. PHASED PLAN for Israel’s destruction!