First time visitor? Learn more.

An Honest Admission – Sunday Afternoon Open Thread

by tqcincinnatus ( 105 Comments › )
Filed under Religion, Science at August 23rd, 2009 - 10:48 am

“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.

“It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated.  Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”  – Dr. Richard Lewontin

Basically, he is describing the difference between “science” and “scientism” (which he wrongly conflates with science).  “Science” is simply a set of investigative principles that is, by its own admission, limited in scope and ability.  “Scientism”, on the other hand, is a philosophical underpinning which forms the basis of evolutionism, and which refuses to accept the limitations on science that are imposed by the fact that science can only deal with physical evidences.  Scientism gets around the limitation by arguing for materialism – the unsubstantiated delusion that since metaphysical and supernatural evidences are outside the strict realm of science (as it presently exists at least) to investigate, that they therefore simply don’t exist.  It’s sort of like saying that all those people who talk about China and show you pictures from there are just raving superstitious morons since you’ve personally never been there.  “Science” knows its limits and accepts them, since it has no stake in doing otherwise.  “Scientism” doesn’t accept the limits, because of its fanatical need to eliminate the non-material.   The former is legitimate investigation, the later is simply a not very well-thought out  attempt at justifying atheism.

Crossposted to LGF on Evolution and Meditate in thy Precepts

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us