First time visitor? Learn more.

No Recovery From The Housing Bubble Until ALL Public Sector Unions Are GONE

by 1389AD ( 56 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Tea Parties, Unions at November 2nd, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Property taxation forms a huge part of the reason why we cannot recover from the collapse of the housing bubble. We are in this predicament because we have allowed local and State governments to cave in to the confiscatory demands of public sector unions.

Government employees should never have been permitted to unionize in the first place.

Spengler: The Economics of Polarization, or Why the Tea Party is Magnificently Right

A hard look at the data explains the polarization of American politics: state and local governments are increasing property taxes even while the housing market crashes, and this is killing the middle class. In many parts of the country prospective homebuyers will pay almost as much in property taxes as in mortgage interest! No wonder the residential real estate market can’t come up for air, and why the American middle class feels that it is fighting for its existence. The only solution will be the kind pioneered by Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, one of the real heroes of our time: renegotiate the whole relationship between the government and the government unions. But that would mean the end of the Democratic Party as we know it. That’s why the upcoming presidential election will be the nastiest in living memory.

Crunching the numbers, I was gobsmacked by the way in which the tax burden has trickled down to the state and local level and crushed the middle class. [emphasis added] The charts and graphs are available in my “Spengler” essay at Asia Times Online this morning

America is engaged in class war, but not of the sort one reads about in the mainstream press. The truly indigent — young African-American men, for example, most of whom are now unemployed — have little to do in this war. Large corporations for the most part are bystanders as well; they will make their peace with the victor. This is a war of survival between the productive middle class on one hand, and the dependents of the state on the other. [emphasis added]
[…]
State and local governments, though, have exhausted their tax base, and the continuous rise in property taxes through the crash in property prices has kept the real estate market more depressed than economic conditions otherwise might indicate. A further increase in tax rates would yield less revenue. In effect, the government would have to proceed from taxing private capital to expropriating it, de facto or de jure — for example, nationalizing banks and directing them to make loans to politically-favored projects, after the fashion of Latin American banana republics.

The alternative is to renegotiate pension and health benefits already promised to public sector unions…

Or, preferably, ban public sector unions entirely, at all levels of government.

…The crisis has called into being a political movement of the exasperated middle class, namely the Tea Party. It has erased the image of the government unions as champions of progressive causes, and exposed them as an “aristocracy of labor” (in Marx’s phrase) parasitizing the public revenue.

The outcome inherently favors the Republicans. Debt — the catchall name for the crushing tax burden — has become a hot button issue even for many Democrats. But this election will be fought more desperately, and nastily, than any other that comes to mind during the past century. This is an existential struggle, a political war of survival for the American middle class. If the government unions go down in the fight, the Democratic Party of Barack Obama will cease to exist in its present form – and that would be a beneficial outcome for the United States.

That explains why the debt issue raises emotions. Republican consultants report that in focus groups, TV commercials about out-of-control debt prompt strongly positive responses even from Democrats. Even Democrats have to live somewhere and a lot of them own homes. And there are a lot more Democratic taxpayers and homeowners than there are government workers. This is a wedge issue for Republicans that won’t quit.

Here’s one result that I found remarkable: It shows the aggregate property taxes paid to state and local governments, against aggregate mortgage payments (the outstanding volume of mortgage debt multiplied by the current mortgage rate). The result is somewhat exaggerated, because about a third of property tax collections are commercial rather than residential, but it’s still compelling: the property tax burden on homeowners is now roughly equivalent to the interest burden on their mortgages!

Property taxes vs home mortgage interest (mortgage debt outstanding multiplied by current mortgage rate), in $US billions

Mortgage interest/property tax squeeze

Source: Census Bureau, Federal Reserve

Read it all.

Property taxes add to the expense of owning a home. Prospective home buyers can’t and won’t buy houses in areas where the property tax pushes the homes out of their range of affordability. So if you need to move to find work, but you’re stuck in a good house in a good neighborhood that you cannot sell, you can put a major part of the blame on your local public sector unions.

Property taxes support the public school system, along with other government agencies with unionized employees on their payrolls. Via the automatic union dues deduction from the salaries of teachers and other unionized public employees, the money feeds directly into public employee union coffers and the Democrat party.

This is why Tea Party groups are putting as much focus on local property taxes and other state and local taxes as they do on federal taxation, and well they should! So join your local Tea Party group and do everything you can to help them to starve this governmental beast that threatens to leave us all destitute.


Tags: , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

Comments are closed.

Back to the Top

The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By All of Us