► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Constitution’

We the people

by Kafir ( 133 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Open thread, Patriotism, Politics, Tea Parties at March 16th, 2010 - 7:30 am

Tea party activists to storm Congress today

Hundreds – perhaps thousands of tea party patriots will storm the Capitol offices of wavering Democratic Congressmen in a final effort to “Kill the Bill.”

And in a change in tactics, the Democrats are rolling out the red carpet for the activists, as word has come down from the Democratic leadership to kill the tea partyers with kindness.

[…]

If you live in or near Washington, here’s your chance to help make a difference. Get on down to the Capitol and let your voice be heard.

Interesting

by Kafir ( 82 Comments › )
Filed under Politics, Progressives at March 11th, 2010 - 6:00 pm

The Constitutional Case Against Progressives
by Josie Wales

[Do not read this article without a copy of the Constitution, and if you do not have one handy, shame on you (link here).]

A line is being drawn in the sand between the statists and Americans, and I use the term American in the grandest sense. The United States of America represents one of the last bastions of traditional liberalism, which is why the Left should no longer be identified as liberal, but rather we should continue to identify its members as progressive statists. The Left believes the precepts of our Constitution have failed society, and thus, we must look towards the “enlightened democracies” of socialized Europe for guidance in the progression of American society.

We hear the mantra of rights professed daily by the progressives: education, work, social security, health care, etc. And since we do not live in a state of nature, the guarantor of those rights must be the government. This is the definition of a statist, and adherence to these beliefs is inherently in opposition to the Constitution. The Founders recognized that government could NEVER be the guarantor of rights which is why so much of the Constitution is written in terms of limiting powers conferred upon the government.

READ IT ALL : The Constitutional Case Against Progressives

Obama calls Constitution Imperfect – Open Thread

by Phantom Ace ( 98 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Open thread, Tranzis at December 29th, 2009 - 2:00 pm

This is an Open Thread… but with a twist. I have an audio clip of our radical totalitarian Progressive leader, Barack Hussein Obama. In it he calls the US Constitution imperfect and says that it has blind-spots. Clearly Obama wants to fundamentally change the nature of our government. He wants a progressive regime that redistributes wealth and makes America part of a larger Tranzi Global system.

This is what Barry feels in his heart. He really doesn’t like the nature of our system.

Discuss anything in this thread.

The Daily Constitutional

by coldwarrior ( 113 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Healthcare, Progressives at December 17th, 2009 - 9:00 am

The Daily Constitutional

Here in America, our government is based on a set of written laws, at the base of these laws is the Constitution. It is important to remember what the Constitution is; it is the legally binding document that enumerates what the government is allowed to do and what it is not allowed to do.

When one is sworn in as a Congressman or Senator, one must swear a legally binding oath that reads:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

It seems easy enough, the representative should know what’s in the Constitution before being sworn in. If the person doesn’t like what’s in the document, then they should not have run in the first place. The following is a collection of quotes from some of our representatives who have made the above oath:

Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) told CNSNews.com that Congress has the authority to force individual Americans to buy health insurance because the U.S. Constitution “charges Congress with the health and well-being of the people.” The words “health” and “well-being” do not appear anywhere in the Constitution. http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/5865

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D.-Ore.) told CNSNews.com says that Congress derived the constitutional authority to make Americans purchase health insurance as part of its “very first enumerated power.” see Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, which states: “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States.”

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) told CNSNews.com she would leave it up to the “constitutional lawyers” to explain exactly where Congress gets the constitutional authority to force Americans to buy health insurance, the central mandate in both the Senate and House health care bills .

And lets not forget the classic: 23 October 2009 exchange between the CNSN reporter and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Madame speaker uttered the now famous reply “Are you serious? Are You Serious?” when asked about the constitutional basis for mandated health insurance.

I am sure this is not an all inclusive list. What we have here is what is at the heart of the progressive movement, the idea that government can and should usurp the Constitution that they are sworn to defend and replace our freedoms and prosperity with Economic Egalitarianism where all members of society are of equal standing to have equal access to all the economic resources such as wealth, power, and contribution. This is the basis for socialism; the product of the producers is taken and distributed without the consent of the producer. This redistribution of the wealth occurs through Public Management where the government control of society and the economy by progressives is increased over and over again by the progressive movement while they pursue their idea of a utopian state.

The price of cradle to grave security is cradle to grave indentured servitude.