► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Disarmament’

Well, of course…

by 1389AD ( 75 Comments › )
Filed under Iran, North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, Open thread, United Nations, Weapons at June 30th, 2011 - 11:30 am

Stunned smiley shaking head
Shaking my head…

North Korea assumes presidency of UN arms control conference

(h/t: Gulfloafer)

In the latest ‘you’ve got to be kidding’ news from the United Nations, North Korea assumed the presidency of the Conference on Disarmament Tuesday.

“Bare months after the U.N. finally suspended Libya’s Col. Muammar Qaddafi from its Human Rights Council, North Korea wins the propaganda coup of heading the world’s disarmament agency,” the executive director of UN Watch Hillel Neuer said in a statement protesting the move. “It’s asking the fox to guard the chickens, and damages the U.N.’s credibility.”

According to the U.N. summary of the meeting, North Korea’s So Se Pyong addressed the 65-member arms control forum, saying that “he was very much committed to the Conference and during his presidency he welcomed any sort of constructive proposals that strengthened the work and credibility of the body.”

Neuer said that though North Korea’s new role as head of the conference, which reports to the U.N. General Assembly, would likely be justified by the U.N. by saying it was the result of a an “automatic rotation,” such an excuse was not sufficient…

Why are we still in the UN? EPIC FAIL. It’s long past time to get the US out of the UN, and the UN out of the US.

As if all of that were not enough…

The redoubtable Blazing Cat Fur reveals that Iran has been elected VP of the UN General Assembly. Words fail me.

This is an open thread. Have at it!


This is Bad

by Iron Fist ( 126 Comments › )
Filed under Military, Patriotism, Politics at December 6th, 2010 - 6:30 pm

Very bad. The Air Force is considering retiring the B-1 bomber early:

Early retirement of the entire B-1B fleet could be one cost-saving measure pursued by a committee of Air Force leaders, according to a report published last week by airforce-magazine.com.

The independent publication reporting the possible shelving of the B-1s did not name a source for its information. The magazine is published by the nonprofit Air Force Association, whose membership is made up mainly of retired military personnel and former service members.

With military leaders facing a mandate to save $100 billion over five years, “rumors run rampant,” said Bill Ehrie, a former Dyess Air Force Base commander now involved with the civic committee in Abilene that has rallied in the past to promote Dyess during military realignments.

Ehrie said someone with knowledge of the budget proposals might have described an option under consideration. But Ehrie also downplayed the likelihood that the fleet would be retired.

“I don’t think it’s going to get to that, to the retirement of the B-1s,” Ehrie said, though he noted the conflict between budget concerns and military operational strategy.

The B-1B Lancer, as it is officially known, flies frequently in Afghanistan, providing air support for ground troops. Ehrie noted that the plane offers a large payload and impressive speed capability.

But the plane is expensive to maintain: a 2002 report from the U.S. General Accountability Office tabbed the active-duty flying cost per hour at $15,818 in fiscal year 2001.

This is a rumor, but it sounds very credible to me. Obama and the Democrat’s aim is to reduce our military capability and readiness. That is the whole reason for pushing the social-experiment repealing the DADT policy, just as it was the goal when John Conyers was wanting to bring back the draft. We have downsized too much as it is. If there is fat in the Military Budget, then cut it, but not in an irreplaceable weapons-system like the B-1. Not without replacing it with something that can fulfill its role in the Order of Battle.