► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Indiana’

US and NATO Allowing Persecution of Christians in Kosovo

by 1389AD ( 185 Comments › )
Filed under Christianity, Communism, History, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Kosovo, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Orthodox Christianity, Russia, Serbia at December 20th, 2010 - 4:00 pm

Present-day persecution of Christians under the pro-jihadi regime in Kosovo resembles that which occurred under Communist rule, both in Yugoslavia and elsewhere in the former Soviet bloc.

Communist Persecution in Russia

Saint Tikhon, Patriarch of Moscow

Saint Tikhon, Patriarch of Moscow

Starting from the days of Lenin, the Bolsheviks, and later the Soviet Communists, were enemies of the Orthodox Church and of Christianity in general. Josef Stalin not only killed roughly forty million Orthodox Christians, but also dethroned and persecuted St. Tikhon, the legitimate patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, and compromised the Church by installing a usurper. Like Islam, Nazism, and all other totalitarian systems, Soviet Communism tolerated no competition for the hearts and minds of its subjects.

During the Second World War, Stalin temporarily set aside his war against Orthodoxy for reasons of political and military morale. Soldiers were far more willing to fight and sacrifice for Mother Russia and for the Orthodox Church than for Stalin and the Soviet Union. After the war, and under Stalin’s successors, what little remained of the Orthodox Church remained under tight restrictions. Only with the collapse of the Soviet Union did freedom of religion return to Russia and to most of eastern Europe.

Communist Persecution in Serbia

American-born St. Varnava Nastic of Serbia

St. Varnava Nastic

The predicament of Christians in eastern Europe under the Communists was much like that of their contemporaries in the Soviet Union. Even though the Communist dictator of Yugoslavia, Josif Broz Tito, soon broke with the Soviet Bloc, his regime nonetheless continued to expropriate, marginalize, and persecute the Serbian Orthodox Church.

Serbian church to honor Gary-born St. Varnava

Varnava was born in Gary in 1914 and lived at a home near 12th Avenue and Madison Street, Kazich said.

Varnava, whose secular name was Vojislav Nastic, was the first person baptized at St. Sava when it was located in Gary.

“He grew up in a very spiritual family,” Matic said.

He also served as an altar boy at the church.

“He was at the services every Sunday,” Kazich said.

Varnava went to Froebel Elementary School while he and his family lived in Gary for about nine years. They moved Yugoslavia in 1923, Kazich said.

When he finished the equivalent of high school, Varnava’s father took him to see Bishop Nicholai Velimirovich to receive the bishop’s blessing to study theology.
[…]
Varnava was ordained a priest in the early 1940s, and the Serbian Church elected him to become a bishop in 1947, Kazich said.

Varnava began to preach against the Communist way of life after becoming a bishop, and Yugoslavia’s Communist government arrested him on treason charges.

During his trial, Varnava wasn’t allowed to deliver a final defense plea because “it was feared that he would expose and reveal the government’s criminal, terroristic and tyrannical policies,” according to a report written by Kazich.

In 1948, Varnava was sentenced to 11 years at one of the worst prisons at the time in Yugoslavia, Kazich said.

He spent about three years there, and the government intended to kill him when he was being transferred to another prison, Kazich said. He was placed on a train car with other prisoners, and the government ran another train into the car, he said.

Varnava survived the crash, but his legs were broken.

“And he suffered from that for the rest of his life,” Kazich said.

Due to health problems, Varnava was released from prison in 1951, but he always was under guard by the Communist government until he died in 1964.

Kazich said Varnava died under suspicious circumstances, and many believe he was poisoned. He said an autopsy couldn’t be conducted at the time.

Kazich said Varnava’s family knew he didn’t have a history of illness. He also wrote letters to them about his good health prior to his death.

No matter the circumstances, Varnava always remained “a follower of Christ,” Matic said.

“He became one of the strongest protectors of his faith,” he said.

Matic said Varnava remains an inspiration to many at the church.

“People still talk about him,” Matic said.

St. Varnava was canonized about five years ago…

Read the rest.

Pro-Jihadi Persecution in Serbia and Kosovo

Vladika Artemije of Raska, Prizren, Kosovo, and Metohija

Bishop Artemije of Ras, Prizren, Kosovo, and Metohija

Under the US/NATO/EU-backed occupation of Kosovo, the persecution of Christians, the destruction of Orthodox churches and cemeteries, and the interference with the Orthodox Church hierarchy has happened all over again. The persecution is far worse this time around, and it is being perpetrated on behalf of Muslim, rather than communist, totalitarianism. The US-backed regime in Kosovo is nothing more than an Islamic narcoterrorist gang elevated to political office. Nonetheless, the US/NATO/EU occupation is determined to appease the Kosovo regime by helping it to annihilate Orthodox Christianity in Kosovo and to obliterate all trace of its existence.

The Orthodox Church continues to suffer not only in Kosovo itself, but also in all of Serbia. The US constantly puts pressure on the Serbian government and on the Serbian church hierarchy to accept the illegitimate “independence” of Kosovo and to abandon the beleaguered and persecuted remnants of the Christian Serb population in Kosovo. One of the more recent abuses is the persecution of Bishop Artemije and his removal from the eparchy of Ras and Prizren in occupied Kosovo.

Why is this happening now? Very likely because, in June 2008, Bishop Artemije demanded accountability for the slaughter of Serbs and for the harvesting of organs from living Serb Christians, and because now, in 2010, the organ theft scandal has finally reached the newspapers. Bishop Artemije is an embarrassment to the purveyors of “humanitarian war” on behalf of jihadi narcoterrorism, and he must be discredited and silenced.

Logo of American Council for Kosovo

Statement by James George Jatras, Director, American Council for Kosovo, regarding Vladika Artemije’s interview of December 3, 2010

Source: American Council for Kosovo
By James George Jatras
Saturday, 4 December 2010

Friends,

I now have had an opportunity briefly to review Vladika Artemije’s thoughts as expressed in his interview made public earlier today (see below, in Serbian). Reserving room for any misunderstanding on my part due to the fact that I am working from an imprecise auto-translation from the Serbian, the following should be noted:

  • First, that if those who are responsible for the uncanonical, lawless, and inhumane effort to remove Vladika Artemije from the Eparchy of Ras and Prizren were under the impression he has been silenced and will go away quietly, such persons – and the interests they serve – are quite mistaken. True to the example of his heavenly patron and protector, Saint Artemios, Vladika Artemije remains a fighter in every sense of the word.
  • Second, there can be no mistake that the treatment meted out to Vladika Artemije has anything to do with any “irregularities” or “accusations of corruption,” or other slanders circulated in the “yellow” media in Serbia. If it were, he asks, where is the proof? He points out: Here, after 10 months, no evidence is anywhere to be shown! Even Belgrade’s requested extradition of Father Simeon Vilovski from Greece was turned down but the Areopagus. Why? Vladika Artemije asks. Because they have no evidence. So the best they can do is to repeat unsupported slanders against Vladika Artemije (and also, incidentally, against me, although my work on behalf of Vladika Artemije and the Serbian National Council starting in March 2006 was a matter of public record from the first day.)
  • Third, the real reasons for the vendetta against Vladika Artemije are patently obvious, which he describes in detail today: his refusal to cooperate any further with the foreign occupation in Kosovo and Metohija after the pogrom of March 2004; his lawsuit in Strasbourg against Germany, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom for the damage done to his flock; his objections to the unauthorized trespass into the Decani monastery by U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden; his refusal to allow supposed repairs to churches and monasteries in Kosovo to be done in substandard manner by Albanian Muslims, i.e., the people who attacked them in the first place; his opposition to the current government in Belgrade’s rejecting help from fraternal Orthodox Russia in favor of the godless and anti-Serbian agenda of Brussels and Washington; his defense of Orthodoxy and the Serbian Orthodox Church against the pan-heresy of ecumenism; and his total rejection of the policy of Belgrade and the current government, which has tacitly accepted the so-called Ahtisaari plan, allowed EULEX to come to Kosovo, and thus helped create the so-called independent “state” of Kosovo.

    That is why, as the tireless Julia Gorin reported, at a regional security meeting in Pec – already in January 2010 – “a KFOR officer informed the grouping that it was likely that Bishop Artemije of Raska and Prizren would be replaced and a new Bishop of the Serbian Orthodox Church would be installed in his place, one who was open to cooperation with the West and more open to dialogue.”

    That is also why, when Vladika Artemije physically returned to his diocese two weeks ago, he was quickly removed by the joint “authority” of the NATO occupation, the current regime in Belgrade, and the KLA mafia in Pristina – and of course their collaborators inside the Serbian Orthodox Church.

  • Fourth, Vladika Artemije categorically rejects any possibility of schism in the Serbian Orthodox Church and demands, simply and without qualification, that the canons of the Church be followed. Stating his unwillingness to abide by any uncanonical directives, he remains until the end of his life the Bishop of the Eparchy of Ras and Prizren.

The fact is, those responsible in Belgrade, Brussels, and Washington will not rest until their work of destruction is done and Kosovo and Metohija, along with Bosnia, is re-Islamized. To do that, the Serbian nation and the Serbian Orthodox Church must be crushed and demoralized. And for that to happen, Vladika Artemije must be defamed and destroyed. It’s just that simple.

Text of interview here.


Originally published on 1389 Blog.


Mike Pence on the Limits of Presidential Power

by 1389AD ( 127 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Republican Party, Tea Parties at September 22nd, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Mike Pence reveals Obama’s disrespect for America

In this recent speech, US Representative Mike Pence (R-Indiana 6) dramatically reveals just how much Barack Hussein Obama and his followers truly disrespect not only the US Constitution, but America itself. He also sets forth what anyone who occupies the Oval Office should be doing.

Mike Pence’s Hillsdale College Speech on the Presidency

By Rep. Mike Pence on 9.20.10 @ 8:08PMK

…Isn’t it amazing, given the great and momentous nature of the office, that those who seek it seldom pause to consider what they are seeking? Rather, unconstrained by principle or reflection, there is a mad rush toward something that, once its powers are seized, the new president can wield as an instrument with which to transform the nation and the people according to his highest aspirations.

Without proper adherence to the role contemplated in the Constitution for the presidency, the checks and balances in the constitutional plan become weakened. This has been most obvious in recent years when the three branches of government have been subject to the tutelage of a single party. Under either party, presidents have often forgotten that they are intended to restrain the Congress at times, and that the Congress is independent of their desires. And thus fused in unholy unity, the political class has raged forward in a drunken expansion of powers and prerogatives, mistakenly assuming that to exercise power is by default to do good.

Even the simplest among us knows that this is not so. Power is an instrument of fatal consequence. It is confined no more readily than quicksilver, and escapes good intentions as easily as air flows through mesh. Therefore, those who are entrusted with it must educate themselves in self-restraint. A republic — if you can keep it — is about limitation, and for good reason, because we are mortal and our actions are imperfect.

The tragedy of presidential decision is that even with the best choice, some, perhaps many, will be left behind, and some, perhaps many, may die. Because of this, a true statesman lives continuously with what Churchill called “stress of soul.” He may give to Paul, but only because he robs Peter. And that is why you must always be wary of a president who seems to float upon his own greatness. For all greatness is tempered by mortality, every soul is equal, and distinctions among men cannot be owned; they are on loan from God, who takes them back and evens accounts at the end.

It is a tragedy indeed that new generations taking office attribute failures in governance to insufficient power, and seek more of it. In the judiciary this has seldom been better expressed than by Justice Thurgood Marshall’s dictum that, “You do what you think is right and let the law catch up.” In the Congress, it presents itself in massive legislation, acts and codes thousands of pages long and so monstrously over-complicated that no human being can read through them in a lifetime — much less understand them, much less apply them justly to a people that increasingly feel like they are no longer being asked, they are being told. Our nation finds itself in the position of a dog whose duty it is not to ask why, because the “why” is too elevated for his nature, but simply to obey.

America is not a dog, and does not require a “because-I-said-so” jurisprudence to which it is then commanded to catch up, or legislators who knit laws of such insulting complexity that they are heavier than chains; or a president who acts like, speaks like, and is received as a king. The presidency has run off the rails. It begs a new clarity, a new discipline, and a new president.

The president is not our teacher, our tutor, our guide or ruler. He does not command us, we command him. We serve neither him nor his vision. It is not his job or his prerogative to redefine custom, law and beliefs; to appropriate industries; to seize the country, as it were, by the shoulders or by the throat so as to impose by force of theatrical charisma his justice upon 300 million others. It is neither his job nor his prerogative to shift the power of decision away from them, and to him and the acolytes of his choosing.

Is my characterization of unprecedented presumption incorrect? I defer to the judgment of the people, which they will make with their own eyes, and ears. Listen to the exact words of the leader of President Obama’s transition team and perhaps his next chief-of-staff: “It’s important that President-Elect Obama is prepared to really take power and begin to rule day one.” Or, more recently, from the words of the latest presidential appointment to avoid confirmation by the Senate, the new head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau wrote last Friday, “President Obama understands the importance of leveling the playing field again.”

“Take power… Rule… Leveling.” Though it is now, this has never been and should never again be the model of the presidency or the character of the American president. No one can say this too strongly and no one can say it enough until it is remedied. We are not subjects, we are citizens. We fought a war so that we do not have to treat even kings like kings, and — if I may remind you — we won that war. Since then, the principle of royalty has, in this country, been inoperative. Who is better suited or more required to exemplify this conviction, in word and deed, than the President of the United States?…

Notice that WE are not the ones who have been talking to Obama “like a dog.” Project much, Mr. President?

…A president who slights the Constitution is like a rider who hates his horse: he will be thrown, and the nation along with him. The president solemnly swears to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. He does not solemnly swear to ignore, overlook, supplement, or reinterpret it. Other than in a crisis of morality, decency, and existence, such as the Civil War, if he should want to hurry along the Constitution to fit his own notions or designs, he should do so by amendment rather than adjustment, for if he joins the powers of his office to his own willful interpretation, he steps away from a government of laws and toward a government of men.

Whereas, at home, the president must be cautious, dutiful, and deferential, abroad, his character must change. Were he to ask for a primer on how to act in relation to other states, which no holder of the office has needed to this point, and were that primer to be written by the American people, whether of 1776 or 2010, you can be confident that it would contain the following instructions:

“The President of the United States of America bows to no man. You do not bow to kings. When in foreign lands, you do not criticize your own country. You do not argue the case against the United States, but, rather, the case for it. You do not apologize to the enemies of the United States. Should you be confused, a country, people, or region that harbors, shelters, supports, encourages, or cheers attacks upon our country, the slaughter of our children, our mothers, our fathers, our sisters, and brothers… are enemies of the United States. And, to repeat, you do not apologize to them.”

Closely related to this, and perhaps the least ambiguous of the president’s complex responsibilities, is his duty as Commander-in-Chief of the military. In this regard there is a very simple rule, unknown to some presidents regardless of party:

If… and it is perhaps the biggest “if” any president can face, for it will follow not just him but hundreds of thousands or millions of others, not just for the rest of their lives but, in cost of blood and souls, beyond life itself.

If… and it is an “if” that requires long and deep thought, tremendously hard labor at determining the truth of things, a lifetime of education, the knowledge of a general, the wisdom of a statesman, and the heart of an infantryman….

If… after careful determination, intense stress of soul, and the deepest prayer….

If, then, you go to war, then, having gone to war, by God, you go to war to win.

You do not cast away American lives, or those of the innocent noncombatant enemy, upon a theory, a gambit, or a notion. And if the politics of your own election or of your party intrude upon your decisions for even an instant — there are no words for this.

Read the rest.

Now what?

How do we fit in to this?

Simple. If those in the government fail to abide by the Constitution, it is our job not only to throw the miscreants out of office, but also to continue holding all politicians’ feet to the fire so that they dare not stray from the limited-government path.

By simple, I mean that the concept of limited government, and the strategies that we must follow to make it happen, should be easy for anyone to understand. The effort will take a lot of diligence, courage, moral clarity, and stamina. We must work to build up those virtues within ourselves.

The Tea Party and ‘Tucker’s Law’

By William Tucker on on 9.21.10 @ 6:09AM

…What we have been witnessing in this country, then, is a slow but steady erosion of individual freedom through the gradual centralization of everything in Washington. This has not been achieved by one big blow, like the Russian Revolution, but is the cumulative effect of a thousand little movements, each intent on achieving its own piece of “reform” by demanding that decision-making be centralized in order to accomplish their agenda. Each faction soon discovers that by bringing their small and perhaps even unpopular effort to the Capital, they can attain the greatest amount of leverage with the smallest amount of resources.

Look at the environmental movement. Environmentalism has always been an issue whose support is a mile wide but an inch deep. Everyone is in favor of clean air, clean water and protecting mother earth, but if it comes to paying an extra 50 cents for gasoline or buying a toilet that has to flush twice to do its job, support quickly evaporates. Therefore government mandates are necessary. I recall reading a book written in the early stages of environmentalism where the author was counseling his fellow nature lovers on how to grow their effort. “When we think of implementing an environmental agenda, our thoughts turn to government regulation,” the writer said. “And when we think of government regulation, our thoughts naturally turn to Washington.” No point in trying to persuade your fellow citizens. Just get down to Washington and start making law.

Ralph Nader was the first person of his generation to perceive this. When Nader started out in the early 1960s, the common career path for an ambitious young lawyer who wanted to enter politics was to go back to his hometown, start a legal practice, make a name for himself and run for town council around age 28. If things went well you could move up to the state legislature at 32 and run for Congress by 35. Then you could go to Washington and start influencing national policy.

Nader perceived that all this was unnecessary. All you needed was a law degree and a small office near the Capitol. Start poring over the Congressional Record. Target some small bureaucratic agency, broadcast the news that their lack of oversight was creating a “crisis” and you’re on your way. The more you prove the agency isn’t doing its job, the bigger it grows. And the bigger it has to grow, the easier target it becomes. Bring a lawsuit and pretty soon you may be running the agency yourself through court orders.

This has been America’s history over the last half century. Failing to muster enough support at the grassroots level, thousands of political reform movements have found the best way to advance their agenda is to centralize decision-making in Washington and then concentrate their small but dedicated resources on dictating policy to the rest of the country.

So here, at last, is Tucker’s Law:

“The less support a group has for its agenda in the general population, the more intent it will be on centralizing authority so that its limited leverage will have the largest impact.”

Where does the Tea Party fit into this? Very simple. The Tea Party is made up of people who have no special interests but only a general interest in moving decision-making out of Washington so they can go back to living normal lives. They are the antithesis of all the hundreds and thousands of special interests that have migrated to Washington over the past half-century. Their only interest is not to be bothered by Washington and not to have federal bureaucrats interfering with their lives.

All the statistics bear this out. Tea Party members are more successful than the general run of the population. They are more educated and have more income. They have very little political experience and no interest in expanding the government. They are “anti-politicians.” This reverses a long tradition in American history going back to the early days of the Republic when Alexis de Tocqueville wrote, “In America there are so many ways of making a living that a man doesn’t usually enter politics until he has failed at everything else.”

Can such a movement succeed? Sadly, the career path of such reform efforts is drearily familiar. Time and time again, reformers from both parties have won election by preaching the virtues of small government, only to resume their place at the table and begin carving out their same portion. This has happened over and over.

Yet this time it feels different. The Tea Party is steeped in the traditions of the Founding Fathers and the American Revolution. One of the most powerful myths of that era was of George Washington as Cincinnatus, the Roman farmer who abandoned his fields to lead a successful defense of his country, then renounced his authority and returned to his plow only sixteen days later.

Can Tea Partiers save the Republic from bankruptcy and then return to their fields to resume their regular occupations? If they do the job right, they will find their ordinary lives waiting for them when they get back.

Read the rest.

It is not only the Obama Administration that fears the Tea Party. As many have pointed out, many who are nominally of the Republican Party fear the Tea Party also. And well they should! For too long, they have grown comfortable with being Washington insiders, Republicans in name only (RINOs), “reaching across the aisle” to make deals with the Democrats that expand government power and endanger our freedoms.

It’s time to hold them accountable too. Vote out those who have failed to uphold the Constitution. Impeach and remove those whom we cannot vote out, especially judges. After the elections, continue to hold all politicians’ feet to the fire. The people should never fear their government; the government should fear its people.

Politician's feet being held to the fire - Click for full-sized image

Get the full-sized image from Gates of Vienna.