► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Islamists’

Austrian MP Ewald Stadler Tells the Truth About Turkey

by 1389AD ( 113 Comments › )
Filed under Europe, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Invasion, Sharia (Islamic Law), Turkey at December 14th, 2010 - 11:30 am

Austrian MP Ewald Stadler Addresses the Turkish Ambassador

(YouTube: German language with English subtitles)

It is certainly refreshing to hear an elected official telling the truth in a straightforward manner, especially with regard to the ongoing Islamic infiltration and invasion of non-Islamic countries and territories. As Mr. Taneris points out below, this is a rare phenomenon indeed! Now that LTC Allen West has been elected to the US House of Representatives, we can hope to see this in the US as well.


Turkey Slammed By MP Ewald Stadler

From Cyprus Action Network of America (CANA)
Reprinted by request

New York- The Cyprus Action Network of America (CANA) urges all activists to call, write and email Austrian MP Ewald Stadler to thank him for his courage and honesty in exposing Turkish Crimes against Christian minorities in Turkey. In a resounding speech last week directed towards the Turkish Ambassador, the Austrian MP Ewald Stadler condemned the knifing and public beheading of a Catholic Archbishop in Turkey and said openly to Turkey and its Turkish settlers in Europe: “We didn’t ask you to send us all the illiterates of Anatolia, Turkey sent them here, We haven’t asked you to send up your stone age Islamists from Anatolia either.”

Although the Cypriot government has spent millions of the Greek Cypriot refugees tax money on the so-called “lobby” in America for decades, we have never seen or heard such honesty from an American Congressmen in regards to Turkish barbarism in Cyprus. Basically, all that is ever heard out of the mouth of American Congressmen, for all that money spent, is support for bizonal bicommunal federation which is basically a Turkish plan. That is why we ask that we all write to Austrian MP Ewald Stadler to thank him and enlighten him on Turkish atrocities against Cyprus an EU member in the hopes that he speaks for us, because basically a few in Europe do, but none in America will stand up to Turkey for Cyprus in their own home governments.

It’s our hope that more and more Europeans will stand up and say no to the illegal Turkish settlers sitting on our stolen land in occupied-Cyprus, that Turkey will be called on its lies and invasion denial. The issue of Turkey entering the EU, is basically a battle being fought in Europe, and Greek-Cypriots must change with the times. They should give attention and allocate money towards enlightment within the country members of the EU. Lots of money has been ill spent in America without concrete results therefore Cyprus should look towards and within the EU countries.

Below is the enlightening speech delivered in Parliament by the Austrian MP Ewald Stadler. His remarks are directed at the Turkish Ambassador, who recently insulted Austria for its purported mistreatment of Turks. The video clip is on You Tube with English subtitles:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRmgI_WXff0

WHAT YOU CAN DO

Please call, phone and write to MP Ewald Stadler. A sample letter follows below:

Here is his, MP Ewald Stadler’s, email, telephone and parliament mailing address from the official Austria parliament website:

Mag. Ewald Stadler, Biografie

E-Mail: ewald.stadler@parlament.gv.at
Address:
Parlamentsklub des BZÖ
Dr.-Karl-Renner-Ring 3
1017 Wien
Österreich
Telephone: +431401105489

SAMPLE LETTER TO MP EWALD STADLER

Dear MP. Ewald Stadler,

I am writing to thank you for your honest speech to the Turkish Ambassador last week. Greek-Cypriots are more than well aware of Turkey’s hypocrisy and ongoing barbarism in Cyprus. During the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974, 800 Greek Cypriot women of all ages were raped by the Turks, thousands of Greek Cypriots including the elderly and the disabled were massacred by Turks, and to this day hundreds of thousands of Greek Cypriots are denied their inalienable right to their own property due to the brute force of the illegal Turkish invasion army.

In Cyprus today, well over 160,000 stone-age Turkish barbarians from Anatolia are illegally squatting in our homes, and the current Communist President Christofias has proposals drawn out with Turkish agents to allow 50,000 of them to legally stay there forever. The current government of Cyprus even has plans to force Cyprus to have a Turkish president (and this racial mandate will be by law) under the bizonal bicommunal federation plans. Such a racial mandate is contrary to all European principles.

I include in this letter a link to the book BLOODY TRUTH which is a well sourced reference for you to use on Cyprus history and the atrocities inflicted on Greek-Cypriots by Turks.

Thank you, please help us, please speak for us.

Sincerely, Nikolaos Taneris, Press Officer, Cyprus Action Network of America (CANA)


Wikileaks on Turkey

Another article related to the WikiLeaks revelations about Turkey and the American Ambassadors’ reports, is one by veteran Leader writer Savvas Iacovides in Sunday the 5th of December 2010, Simerini, in Cyprus.

Savvas Iacovides refers to the American reports on Turkey which reveal what Simerini was saying all along ever since T. Ertogan’s appearance and warning that the Simitis/Clerides appeasement was wrong. The American diplomats actually tell the State Department, notes that Ertogan is thirsty for Islamic power, his ministers incapable, illiterate and some are corrupt; his government disunited; his opposition laughable.

Read the full article [in Greek]:

Τα WikiLeaks και οι Ε/κ υμνητές Ερντογάν-Νταβούτοβλου


Philly Israel Apartheid Flash Mob Dance

by Urban Infidel ( 165 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Dhimmitude, Fatah, Gaza, Hamas, Hezballah, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Judaism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Open thread, Palestinians, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Terrorism at December 11th, 2010 - 1:00 pm

Princeton students protesting the sale of SABRA & Tribe hummus at a Philly supermarket as part of Israel Apartheid week (or is it month?). As YouTube poster brabon1 wrote: “I have never seen such a conglomeration of more unattractive women in my life“.

Greg Gutfeld, host of Red Eye, also points out that SABRA isn’t even a
product of Israel; the company started here in the US and was recently
bought by PepsiCo.

Anyway, the net result of dumb, anti-Semitic uggo’s riffing on Lady GAGA just made me want to go out and buy some SABRA and Tribe hummus for the first time in my life.

Hat tip/ David!
Update:  Speranza points out that SABRA is partially Israel-owned.

Geert Wilders on the Palestinian Refugee Issue

by 1389AD ( 195 Comments › )
Filed under Fatah, Gaza, Hamas, Israel, Palestinians at December 6th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Gates of Vienna: Geert Wilders’ Speech in Tel Aviv

Originally posted Sunday, December 05, 2010. Reprinted with permission.

Geert Wilders in Tel Aviv
Below is the text of the speech given today in Tel Aviv by Geert Wilders. Update: Thanks to Brian of London for the photo.


Shalom chaveriem,

Let me start by saying that it is with great sadness that I share your grief over the deaths of more than 40 brave Israelis who lost their lives — many while trying to save others in the great fire near Haifa. My country, the Netherlands, is amongst other countries helping to put down this fire, which is threatening the lives and property of thousands of your compatriots. I offer my heartfelt condolences to the families of those who perished. My thoughts are with them.

Israel is an immense source of inspiration for me. When I came to your country for the first time as a teenager, I lived here for a year.

I am not ashamed to stand with Israel, but proud. I am grateful to Israel. I will always defend Israel. Your country is the cradle of Western civilization. We call it the Judeo-Christian civilization with good reason.

Israel is often being treated unfairly. The world looks at the plight of the Palestinians in refugee camps in Lebanon, Gaza, and other places, and many blame Israel. The UN claims that there are over 4.7 million Palestinian refugees, and many blame Israel. These voices say the Palestinians should be allowed to return to “Palestine.” But where is Palestine? Many say Israel must solve the problems of Palestine. But is Israel guilty of the plight of the Palestinian refugees?

My answer is “No.” The Arab leaders are to be blamed — and Islam is to be blamed. Let me first tell you why, and then I will tell you where Palestine can be found.

At the end of World War II, there were 50 million refugees. Today, all the refugee problems dating from before the 1950s have been solved. All, except one — the problem of the Palestinians.

Why did this problem not get solved? The reason is simple: Because the Arab countries did not allow it to get solved. And because Islam does not allow it to get solved.
In May 1948, the number of Jews in the Arab countries was estimated to be close to 1 million. Today, fewer than 8,000 Jews are left in the entire Arab world. In 1948, the Arab countries forced the Jews out and confiscated their properties. More Jews fled the Arab countries than Arabs fled Israel. Where are the Jewish refugee camps? There are none.

So, why are there refugee camps for Palestinians in areas surrounding Israel? Because the Palestinians were not welcomed in the neighboring Arab countries. There was no Arab solidarity; the refugees were forced into camps and slums, where many of their descendants still linger today.

Under international definitions the status of refugee or displaced person only applies to first generation refugees. However, the UN makes an exception for Palestinians. Descendants of Palestinian refugees are granted the same refugee status as their ancestors. Consequently, the number of so-called Palestinian refugees registered with the UN increased from 711,000 in 1950 to over 4.7 million in 2010. These refugees are being used as a demographic weapon against Israel.

Instead of blaming the inhospitable Arab regimes, many blame Israel.

My friends, the blame should be laid where it belongs: with the Arab world. The Jewish refugees built new lives for themselves. They did what millions of refugees have done in the course of history, including, in the 20th century, the Germans who had to leave Sudetenland and the lands east of the Oder and Neisse rivers, the Hungarians who fled Transsylvania, the Greeks who were ejected from the Aegean coast of Anatolia, the Hindus who fled the Punjab.

With each generation, the resentment of these refugees and their descendants slowly fades away. Time heals all wounds. Acceptance of the new situation is the norm.

Islam, however, conditions Muslims to hate Jews. It is a religious duty to do so. Israel must be destroyed because it is the homeland of the Jews.

Influential Islamic scholars, such as Muhammad Tantawi, the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar in Cairo, the most prestigious center of Muslim learning, call Jews “enemies of Allah.” Tantawi, who died last March, was generally considered a moderate by the Western media and policy makers. But how did this “moderate” address a delegation of Palestinian Muslims who visited him in 2002?

He urged them to intensify suicide attacks against Israelis, stating that every so-called “martyrdom operation” against — I quote — “any Israeli, including children, women, and teenagers, is a legitimate act according to [Islamic] religious law, and an Islamic commandment, until the people of Palestine regain their land.” — end of quote.

Nizar Qabbani, one of the most revered poets in the Arab world, praised the madness of those who are blinded by an ideology of hatred. In his poem Ode to the Intifada, he wrote: “O mad people of Gaza, A thousand greetings to the mad. The age of political reason has long departed. So teach us madness.”

Thát is the nature of the Islamic enemies confronting the Jews — sheer madness.

Israel, on the other hand, is a beacon of light; it is like a Hanukkah menorah whose lights have been kindled in a region that until 1948 was engulfed by darkness.

Friends, Israel is not to blame for the situation in the Middle East. The problem is Islam’s rejection of Israel’s right to exist. Only last month, Fatah concluded its convention in Ramallah by declaring its blatant refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state.

The problem is also our Western leaders’ refusal to understand that Israel is the West’s canary in the coalmine: If the Jews are denied the right to live in freedom and peace, soon we will all be denied this right. If the light of Israel is extinguished, we will all face darkness. If Israel falls, the West falls. That is why we are all Israel.

But as long as the West refuses to understand how the Palestinians are used as a weapon against Israel, it will not be able to see who is truly to blame; it will not be able to see that it is not Israel’s duty to provide a Palestinian state — for the simple reason that there already is a Palestinian state and that state is Jordan.
Indeed, my friends, Jordan is Palestine. Take a look at the map of this part of the world after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire following World War I. Both contemporary Israel and contemporary Jordan were part of the British Mandate of Palestine.

In 1922, the British partitioned Palestine into Cisjordan and Transjordan — the latter comprising 78 per cent of the territory of Palestine. The British handed that territory over to their ally, the Hashemite strongman Abdallah ibn Hussein. Abdallah was the son of the emir Hussein bin Ali, guardian of the Islamic holy city of Mecca. The Hashemites belong to the Quraish tribe — the tribe of Islam founder Muhammad. They are a foreign body in Palestine.

In 1946, Transjordan became an independent state under Hashemite rule. In November 1947, the United Nations proposed to partition the remaining 22 per cent of Palestine. The territory between the Jordan River and the sea was divided into a Jewish and an Arab part. The Jewish representatives accepted the UN partition plan, but the Arab representatives refused. In an attempt to “drive all the Jews into the sea,” they began the 1948 war — which they lost.

They took revenge, however, on the Jews in East Jerusalem and the rest of Cisjordan — the ancient provinces of Judea and Samaria — held by the Arab forces. This entire region was ethnically cleansed of all Jews. Even the names of Judea and Samaria were wiped off the map and replaced by the ridiculous term “West Bank.” A river bank of over 40 kilometers wide. I come from a country full of rivers, and there the river banks are only a few dozen meters wide.

Israel, including Judea and Samaria, has been the land of the Jews since time immemorial. Judea means Land of the Jews. Never in the history of the world has there been an autonomous state in the area that was not Jewish. The Diaspora of the Jews, which began after their defeat by the Romans in AD 70, did not lead to the departure of all the Jews from their ancient homeland. Jews had been living in the Jordan Valley for centuries until the Arab invaders drove them out in 1948, when the provinces of Judea and Samaria were occupied by the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan, which abbreviated its name to Jordan in 1950.

And until 1967, when Israel regained the ancient Jewish heartland of Judea and Samaria, no-one, not a single Islamic scholar or Western politician, ever demanded that there be an independent Palestinian state in the so-called West Bank.
Must Israel trade land for peace? Should it assign Judea and Samaria to another Palestinian state — a second one, next to Jordan? My friends, let me be very clear: The conflict in the Middle East is not a conflict over territory, but rather an ideological battle.

People are mistaken when they assume that giving up Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem and letting the Palestinians have it, will end the conflict between Israel and the Arabs. In 2005, Israel sacrificed the settlements in Gaza for the sake of peace. Did it get peace?

On the contrary, because the conflict is essentially ideological, the situation worsened. Because the conflict is ideological, territorial concessions are counterproductive. Ideologies cannot be defeated by concessions. They are encouraged and emboldened by it.

Ideologies must be confronted with the iron will never to give in, “never, never, never, never — in nothing, great or small, large or petty.” That is the lesson which the world learned from Winston Churchill when he confronted the evil ideology of nazism.

This conflict here in the Middle East is not about land and borders, but about Islamic jihadism opposing Western liberty. From the moment that Israel was founded, the Arab leaders have rejected every partition plan and every initiative for a territorial settlement. The Islamic ideology simply does not accept the concept of a Jewish state. Neither Hamas nor Fatah are willing to recognize the right of the Jewish people to a state of their own in their historic homeland. No territorial concession on Israel’s part can ever change that.

Israel’s ideological enemies want to wipe Israel out as a nation. They simply deny the Jewish state the right to exist and to live in peace, dignity and liberty.

For the sake of its own survival and security, Israel needs defendable borders. A country that is only 15 kilometers wide is impossible to defend. That is the strategic reason why Jews need to settle Judea and Samaria.

Therefore, the Jewish towns and villages in Judea and Samaria are not an impediment to peace; they are an expression of the Jewish right to exist in this land. They are tiny outposts of freedom, defying ideological forces which deny not only Israel but the entire West the right to live in peace, dignity and liberty.

Let us never forget that Islam threatens not just Israel; Islam threatens the entire world. Without Judea and Samaria, Israel cannot protect Jerusalem. The future of the world depends on Jerusalem. If Jerusalem falls, Athens and Rome — and Paris, London and Washington — will be next.

Thus, Jerusalem is the main front protecting our common civilization. When the flag of Israel no longer flies over the walls of Jerusalem, the West will no longer be free.

However, a peaceful solution must also be found for the many Palestinians in the refugee camps in Lebanon, Gaza and elsewhere. Each year, hundreds of millions of euros and dollars are spent on the Palestinian refugees in international aid.

The financial assistance, however, did not provide the refugees a new home, a place to live and build a future for their children and grandchildren. It is obvious where this place should be. It should be Palestine, just as, after the Second World War, the obvious place for the German refugees from the East to go to, was Germany. Since Jordan is Palestine, it is the duty of the Jordanian government to welcome all Palestinian refugees who voluntarily want to settle there.

Until the late 1980s, Jordan’s Hashemite rulers did not deny that their country was Palestine. They said so on numerous occasions. In 1965, King Hussein said: “Those organizations which seek to differentiate between Palestinians and Jordanians are traitors.” As late as 1981, Hussein repeated — I quote — “Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan.”

In March 1971, The Palestine National Council, too, stated that — I quote — “what links Jordan to Palestine is a national bond […] formed, since time immemorial, by history and culture. The establishment of one political entity in Transjordan and another in Palestine is illegal.” — end of quote.

By the late 1970s, however, the Arab authorities began to differentiate between Jordanians and Palestinians. What was previously considered to be treason and illegality suddenly became the propaganda line.

In March 1977, PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a candid interview in the Dutch newspaper Trouw: — I quote —

“Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot lay claim to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.” — end of quote.

In 1988, as the first Intifada raged, Jordan officially renounced any claim of sovereignty to the so-called West Bank. In recent years, the Jordanian authorities have stripped thousands of Palestinians of their Jordanian citizenship. They do so for two reasons.

First, because the alien Hashemite rulers fear that the Palestinians might one day take over their own country. And second, because stripping Palestinians of their Jordanian citizenship supports the falsehood that Jordan is not a part of Palestine. And that, consequently, the Palestinians must attack Israel if they want a place of their own.

By arbitrarily reducing thousands of their citizens to statelessness, the Jordanian authorities want to force the Palestinians to turn their aspirations towards the establishment of another Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria. This decision is a great injustice committed by the Hashemite rulers of Jordan — this foreign clan which the British installed.

I am not naïve. I am not blind to the possibility that if Jordan were to be ruled by the Palestinians, this might lead to political radicalization in Jordan. However, a continuation of the present situation will most certainly lead to radicalization. We need a paradigm shift. If we keep thinking along the same lines as we have done so far, no peaceful solution of the Palestinian problem is possible without endangering the existence of Israel and disrupting the social and economic fabric in Judea and Samaria. Resettling millions of Palestinians in these small provinces is simply impossible and is not going to happen.

To the skeptics, I say: What is the alternative? Leaving the present situation as it is? No, my friends, the world must recognize that there has been an independent Palestinian state since 1946, and it is the Kingdom of Jordan.

Allowing all Palestinians to voluntarily settle in Jordan is a better way towards peace than the current so-called two-states-approach (in reality a three-states-approach) propagated by the United Nations, the U.S. administration, and governing elites all over the world. We only want a democratic non-violent solution for the Palestinian problem. This requires that the Palestinian people should be given the right to voluntarily settle in Jordan and freely elect their own government in Amman. If the present Hashemite King is still as popular as today, he can remain in power. That is for the people of Palestine to decide in real democratic elections.

My friends, let us adopt a totally new approach. Let us acknowledge that Jordan is Palestine.

And to the Western world I say: Let us stand with Israel because the Jews have no other state, while the Palestinians already have Jordan. Let us stand with Israel because the history of our civilization began here, in this land, the homeland of the Jews. Let us stand with Israel because the Jewish state needs defendable borders to secure its own survival. Let us stand with Israel because it is the frontline in the battle for the survival of the West.

We must speak the truth. The truth that Jordan is Palestine, the truth that Samaria and Judea are part of Israel, the truth that Jerusalem may not fall, the truth that Israel is the only democracy in a dark and tyrannical region, the truth that Israel is the linchpin of the West.

Of course, I am just a foreign guest and should be modest. Israel is a democracy and I respect every decision which its people and government will make. But I am proud to be here and grateful for the opportunity to share my thoughts and beliefs with you.

Because it is here that our civilization is under attack as we speak. It is here that we, men and women of the West, must show our resolve to defend ourselves. It is here that Israel has lit the light of freedom and that Europeans and Americans must help the Israelis to keep that light shining in the darkness. For Israel’s sake and for the sake of all of us.

Toda raba… And shalom to all of you.


Thanks to Obama and Holder’s liberalism, al Qaeda terrorist convicted on only 1 of 285 charges

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 99 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Crime, Democratic Party, Dhimmitude, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Military, Politics, Progressives at November 19th, 2010 - 6:30 pm

This is why we don’t and never will trust these ignorant, incompetent libs with keeping America safe. By insisting on trying these muzz pieces of crap in civilian courts, rather than in military tribunals, as the Bush administration was going to do, they’re proving that they’re obviously more interested in having 70 year-old Nuns or little kids groped by overpaid TSA loafers, and calling it terrorism deterrence, than they are in actually convicting and deterring terrorists.

The way things are now under the Obama regime, “TSA” should stand for “Transacting Sexual Assaults” and the gropers’ motto should be “If we don’t get off, you don’t get on”.

Were you aware that these scanners would not actually detect or “see” any type of explosives like the Christmas day “underwear bomber” attempted to detonate?

Look at these sample images from TSA tests. As you can see they, they used people stashing guns and knives, which is a joke, since these items are easily seen or detected with current technology which does not invade one’s privacy, but not any type of chemical, like the “underwear bomber” had sewn into his underwear, or other types of incendiary devices, such as plastic explosives, because those wouldn’t be seen unless the would-be terrorist was carrying a large amount.

And did you hear about this $30 million gift from the Obama administration to union bosses via TSA unionization? Probably not.

TSA was set-up to be non-union “in light of their critical national security responsibilities, and shall not, as a term or condition of their employment, be entitled to engage in collective bargaining or be represented for the purpose of engaging in such bargaining by any representative or organization.”

A few facts about the TSA you might find interesting:

* Number of TSA employees eligible for unionization: 50,000
* TSA budget for FY 2010: $7.8 billion
* Estimated Union dues TSA union will provide union bosses at $50 per month: $2,500,000 per month or $30,000,000 per year.
* Number of Americans whose Fourth Amendment rights have allegedly been violated: Thousands and still counting.
* NUMBER OF TERRORISTS CAUGHT BY THE TSA: 0

But liberals, being liberals, are more interested in paying off the union goons (that spend hundreds of millions of dollars on trying to elect them) than they are in the security of the American people.

Ahmed Ghailani, who was detained at GITMO, was charged with 285 counts, including 224 murder charges (including the murders of 24 Americans), for the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. He would have faced the death penalty if he would have been convicted of the murder charges. Now, the 36 year old POS will get as little as 20 years in prison.

Gitmo detainee convicted of 1 charge
First to face civilian trial

The Obama administration’s plan to prosecute suspected terrorists in civilian courts was dealt a serious blow Wednesday when a jury acquitted a former Guantanamo detainee of all but one of the hundreds of charges he faced.

Ahmed Ghailani, 36, still faces at least 20 years in prison and could receive a life sentence after he was convicted of one count of conspiracy to destroy U.S. property in connection with the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

But Ghailani was acquitted of 224 counts of murder for each of the people killed in the bombings as well as other 60 other charges. He could have faced the death penalty if convicted of murder.

The trial at a Lower Manhattan courthouse had been viewed as a test for the Obama administration’s aim of putting other terrorist suspects, including self-professed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four others held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on trial on U.S. soil.

The verdict also gave fuel to persistent administration critics who argue that suspected terrorists should be prosecuted by military tribunals at Guantanamo not in U.S. civilian courts.

Rep. Peter T. King, a New York Republican who is the ranking member of the Committee on Homeland Security, called on the administration to abandon plans to prosecute terrorists in civilian courts, saying the “tragic verdict demonstrates the absolute insanity of the Obama administration’s decision to try al Qaeda terrorists in civilian courts.”

“I am disgusted at the total miscarriage of justice today in Manhattan’s federal civilian court,” Mr. King said in a statement. “In a case where Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani was facing 285 criminal counts, including hundreds of murder charges, and where Attorney General Eric Holder assured us that ‘failure is not an option,’ the jury found him guilty on only one count and acquitted him of all other counts including every murder charge.”

Click here to read the rest of the disgusting story

Update: GOP vows to block more transfers from and closing of GITMO; Trial result means GITMO will most likely not close by the time Obama’s first and only term expires

WASHINGTON – The first court conviction of a Guantanamo Bay detainee did little to push President Barack Obama closer to shuttering the island prison, making it increasingly likely his campaign promise will remain unmet by the time his current term expires.

Jurors in New York City on Wednesday convicted Ahmed Ghailani of conspiracy to blow up government buildings in the al-Qaida attacks on two U.S. embassies in 1998, but they acquitted him on more than 280 other charges. He is the only person transferred from Guantanamo Bay for trial since the U.S. began filling the military prison in Cuba eight years ago.
Read the rest here

Chavez: Obama’s Travesty of Justice

Not since the infamous acquittal of O.J. Simpson has the American jury system so utterly failed as it did this week in acquitting on all but one charge former Guantanamo detainee Ahmed Ghailani, an al-Qaida terrorist responsible for the deaths of 224 people. A New York City jury managed to convict Ghailani on only one charge — conspiracy to destroy U.S. government property — in the attack on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998.

But the failure is not just that of one criminal jury but of the Obama administration, which decided to try enemy combatants in American criminal courts. Instead of admitting their serious error in judgment, administration officials said they were “pleased” with the outcome because Ghailani would serve a minimum of 20 years in prison for his crimes. Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, a Clinton-appointed federal judge who presided over the case, was even more reprehensible in his remarks after the trial. Kaplan complimented the jury on its verdict, suggesting that “American justice can be rendered calmly, deliberately and fairly by ordinary people, people who are not beholden to any government, not even ours.”

The jury heard hard evidence that Ghailani purchased the truck used in the bombing in Tanzania; obtained some of the oxygen and acetylene gas tanks used in the bombing; stored the electronic detonators used in the attack, one of which the FBI recovered in Ghailani’s house along with TNT traces; and gave the actual suicide bomber the cell phone used in plotting the attack. The jury did not hear evidence from a witness who sold Ghailani the TNT used in the attack because the judge barred it, claiming that Ghailani led federal prosecutors to the witness only after Ghailani was subject to coercive interrogation methods at Guantanamo. But even without this direct testimony, there was more than enough evidence to convict on the more serious charges.

Click headline above to read the rest

Blogmocracy Birthday:

Happy Birthday M!