Before I start my rant, is this pic too funny? Or pathetic? These losers in the media are clueless dolts. And how the hell could the Marxist’s enabler’s allow this? Are they that stupid?

But I digress…

This…Is what I’ve been saying here for months. Although nothing is guaranteed, I’ve made numerous bets at $100 each ($800 so far) that Romney will win in November, and I believe rather easily, IMO, by 5-10 points and by about 100 electoral votes.

And that’s before the Marxist occupying the White House “evolved” (according to the MSF’inM when libs change their position, they “evolve”, when conservatives do, they flip-flop) and said he supports gay marriage.

Now I see a larger victory for Romney.

The Marxist made a major miscalculation there, but that’s what happens when you think you’re so much damn smarter than everyone else, and try to appeal to a very small minority of voters.

When the Marxist said middle-America clings to their guns, bibles, and religion, at least he had the brains to figure out he was preaching to the choir, and no one else would hear it.

But saying he supports gay marriage on national TV? I don’t care if you’re vehemently for it, at least have the IQ to realize that if you spout it on TV, you’re going to pay a price, especially if you’re already an unpopular president.

Mainstream Americans don’t believe in that crap. It might sell to the worthless swine such as George Looney in Hollywood, but to most Americans- whites, blacks and hispanics, we normal people still have traditional values, and one of those is that marriage is between a man and a woman. Sorry degenerates…

The gay marriage issue sells well in the usual lands of lib degenerates- L.A., NYC, San Francisco, etc, but in middle America, where normal people live, it’s a losing issue.

The Marxist put 4-5 states into play that he would most likely have won by that idiotic statement.

And most black clerics rebuked him. Like one outraged black minister said, the percentage of blacks who vote for the Marxist might not change, but quite a few will just not vote at all.

We know that the Marxist fudged it because the Marxist’s brain-dead mouthpieces are complaining about how unfair a poll from the uber-liberal Obama-loving New York Slimes and See B.S. News is, because it shows the Marxist losing even the women’s vote to Romney, even though the NY Slimes over-sampled dimocrats by 6%. So as usual, the MSF’inM tried to rig the poll, and their messiah still lost. They’re worried. Very worried. I love it.

DECKER: Obama’s inevitable shellacking

This president has almost no hope for re-election

Just about every objective indicator foreshadows a huge re-election defeat for President Obama. With every day that passes, Mr. Obama looks more like a loser.

That’s because there is doom and gloom everywhere you look. When government mathematical fudging is stripped away, unemployment is stuck over 10 percent. Economic growth is practically nonexistent and promises to slide downhill even more in the coming months with Europe and its banks rapidly collapsing. Due to Mr. Obama’s out-of-control deficit spending, the national debt is at a heart-stopping $15.7 trillion, which erases a whole year of economic output by our entire country. With the Supreme Court poised to strike down Obamacare, his only signature legislative achievement, the president will have nothing to show for four years in office other than record misery.

Polls give a glimpse of the shellacking to come in November. Recent surveys have pegged Republican candidate Mitt’s Romney’s lead over Mr. Obama as high as 7 percent, with the elephant’s advantage among crucial independents as high as 10 points. Perhaps most ominous of all for the incumbent is Mr. Romney’s new lead among women. This support is not as shocking as it first sounds. The tired narrative about women voting in mass for Democrats who support abortion is only partially true and unfairly lumps all women together. In fact, the GOP traditionally does well with married women and those who go to church regularly, which is a big chunk of that demographic group. When the voting bloc is diced up by sex, Democrats basically only win minorities and those clinging to issues such as abortion and hopes for federally subsidized birth control. Aside from liberal extremists, most women vote on the economy and bread-and-butter issues, which is why Mr. Romney now leads among all women by 2 points.

According to Rasmussen Reports, Republicans are up by 7 points in generic congressional balloting, which means “45 percent of likely U.S. voters would vote for the Republican in their district’s congressional race if the election were held today, while 38 percent would choose the Democrat instead.” This dynamic promises big gains for Republicans on Capitol Hill who aim to build on their huge 2010 wins. In the midterm two years ago, the GOP picked up six Senate seats and 63 seats and the majority in the House of Representatives.

Mr. Obama’s reaction to his plummeting prospects is to claim there’s a media conspiracy against him. This week, his deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter complained “the methodology was significantly biased” in a CBS/New York Times poll that reported 67 percent of Americans believe Mr. Obama’s support for homosexual “marriage” is for political advantage and not because it’s the right thing to do. That’s right, the Obama campaign claims the very liberal New York Times is skewing data to hurt the president. The truth is, kneejerk media backing is Barack’s strongest campaign weapon, but at this point, even that probably can’t save him.