► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Baby’

Caption This: What is this baby thinking?

by Daedalus ( 58 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Blogwars, Diary of Daedalus, Entertainment, Humor, Open thread at May 21st, 2011 - 7:41 pm

Can you believe this cute baby, would grow up to be such a vicious man?

What is on his mind here?

(Hat Tip: Jordan Duram)

 

Old News

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 134 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Humor, Open thread, Politics, Progressives, Socialism at June 6th, 2010 - 10:35 pm

[Image from here.]

No news is good news but old news was better. Sometimes I wish we had more old news instead of the current barrage of doom and gloom. Markets are down, unemployment is up, we have daily reports of blatant lies in the MSM shoring up a failed congress and a worse presidency. The only light at the end of the tunnel might not show itself until November.

Even that’s an iffy proposition, as flipping congress into a conservative majority won’t have any immediate effects on the economy as long as current spending programs remain in place. History proves that welfare states are unsustainable, and with close to 50% of the U.S. populace working in government jobs paid for by those who don’t, things look pretty bleak.

It’s going to get worse before it gets better. I’d rather read about meat driving girls sex crazy instead, and that’s a great cynical lead-in to an Overnight Open Thread.

Sweden Rules ‘Gender-Based’ Abortion Legal

by WrathofG-d ( 101 Comments › )
Filed under Abortion, Science, World at May 12th, 2009 - 10:48 am

eu⋅gen⋅ics

[yoo-jen-iks] –noun (used with a singular verb)

“The study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, esp. by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics)”



http://collegeotr.s3.amazonaws.com/images/blogs/712da2c2918169e6e526a90dbf05205a.jpgSwedish health authorities have ruled that gender-based abortion is not illegal according to current law and can not therefore be stopped, according to a report by Sveriges Television.

The Local reported in February that a woman from Eskilstuna in southern Sweden had twice had abortions after finding out the gender of the child.

The woman, who already had two daughters, requested an amniocentesis in order to allay concerns about possible chromosome abnormalities.  At the same time, she also asked to know the foetus’s gender.

Doctors at Mälaren Hospital expressed concern and asked Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) to draw up guidelines on how to handle requests in the future in which they “feel pressured to examine the foetus’s gender” without having a medically compelling reason to do so.

The board has now responded that such requests and thus abortions can not be refused and that it is not possible to deny a woman an abortion up to the 18th week of pregnancy, even if the foetus’s gender is the basis for the request.

{The Aticle}

___________________________________

Sweden is one of the countries that the United States is presently looking at for guidance on “universal healthcare”, and an example of a mix of socialist and capitalist economies.  On more than one occasion, I have heard the radio hosts on “Air America” use Sweden as an model for where the U.S. should be heading.  I have found them to be a good gauge as to where the Democrat party is going.

It is not my intent to over state this issue, but with the obsessive protectionism, and reckless expansion of laws regarding abortion that continue to take place, I would not be surprised at all if we one day soon saw the ruling in Sweden coming to our shores.  As is typical, what is orignally accepted as a small personal choice and protection is thrown down a slippery slope and expanded to grant Rights not even originally contemplated.

How long is it really till the “Right to an abortion” is used to allow the woman the “choice” to abort the baby because she doesn’t like its future hair color, height, skin color, voice, arm length, etc?  (ie Eugenics)

Fla. doctor investigated in badly botched abortion

by bar ( 20 Comments › )
Filed under Crime at February 6th, 2009 - 8:03 am

newborn-baby

Eighteen and pregnant, Sycloria Williams went to an abortion clinic outside Miami and paid $1,200 for Dr. Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique to terminate her 23-week pregnancy.

Three days later, she sat in a reclining chair, medicated to dilate her cervix and otherwise get her ready for the procedure.

Only Renelique didn’t arrive in time. According to Williams and the Florida Department of Health, she went into labor and delivered a live baby girl.

What Williams and the Health Department say happened next has shocked people on both sides of the abortion debate: One of the clinic’s owners, who has no medical license, cut the infant’s umbilical cord. Williams says the woman placed the baby in a plastic biohazard bag and threw it out.

Police recovered the decomposing remains in a cardboard box a week later after getting anonymous tips.

“I don’t care what your politics are, what your morals are, this should not be happening in our community,” said Tom Pennekamp, a Miami attorney representing Williams in her lawsuit against Renelique (ren-uh-LEEK’) and the clinic owners.

__________________________________________________________________

It sounds like 1st degree murder to me and I hope they will be charged, although I am sure President infanticide wont have a problem with this!

America has clearly lost her way when the most innocent of us are discarded like trash.