► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Moonbats’

MSLSD hosts shocked & devastated- Lib moron Dennis Kucinich loses primary for House seat

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 6 Comments › )
Filed under Breaking News, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, government, Headlines, Marxism, Media, Politics at March 7th, 2012 - 10:54 am

Well boo-flukin’-hoo. This idiot should have been put out to pasture years ago. Anybody who suggests we need a Department of Peace is obviously a knucklehead.

Of course, it was one libturd facing another- Kucinich v. Marcy Kaptur, another leftist imbecile, so the stupidity will still be evident when this dolt Kaptur votes for everything the Marxist occupying the White House wants.

The propaganda arm of the dimocrat party are all in mourning this morning.

MSNBC Hosts Grieve Over Kucinich Loss In Ohio

“That’s amazing,” a shocked Rachel Maddow reacted to the news that Dennis Kucinich lost his primary race on Super Tuesday. Kucinich lost his district after Ohio redrew their Congressional lines, leaving him to run in a nearby district against an incumbent Democrat.

“That means that there’s not going to be a Dennis Kucinich in Congress anymore, which is almost hard to believe. He has been a singular force for his, not only for his ideological position but he’s just been such a character,” Maddow lamented.

“He was the dependable guy with the progressive community. He’ll be missed,” Al Sharpton said.

“He’s a guy that you could always count on when it came to a universal healthcare conversation, or when it came to getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan and also middle-class issues and also he was good on labor,” Ed Schultz said.

Kucinich wasn’t just popular with the MSNBC crowd as Chris Matthews will note.

“Dennis is very popular in these circles, in media circles. We all know him,” the “Hardball” host revealed.

Obama’s Latino Landslide?

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 9 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Headlines, Media, Misery Index, Politics, Progressives, Socialism, Uncategorized at March 4th, 2012 - 11:11 am

Brent Bozell tends to be a bit of a prude at times, but’s he correct with this assessment of Obungler and Latino voters, and about the Obama-flavored kool-aid they’re obviously drinking shooting up over at CNN.

Obama’s Latino Landslide?

It seemed like someone had been inhaling something at CNN on Friday morning. They kept touting an upcoming interview: “Barack Obama could win the presidential election by a landslide. Op-ed contributor Charlie Garcia tells us how next.”

Garcia, a consultant to corporations on how to market to Hispanics, broke out rainbows and unicorns for Obama: “He’s doing all the right things. He’s basically saying, ‘look guys, comprehensive immigration reform. I’m all for it. It’s those Republicans that just keep getting in the way.'”

Neither Garcia nor his CNN anchor/enabler, Kyra Phillips, could recall that Democrats couldn’t get amnesty for illegal aliens (“comprehensive immigration reform”) passed when they controlled both the House and the Senate. So much for the canard that it’s the GOP’s fault. How could he promise that he can do it in a supposed second term, especially if Republicans make further gains in Congress?

Don’t trouble Garcia with facts. “He wins by a landslide. And I think that the White House knows now that he has it locked. That’s why he’s on the air all time talking to Latinos about the things that are important to them.”

Where does CNN find these guys? Does no one vet them? Garcia was in exclamation-point mode about how Obama granted an interview to Eddie “Piolin” Sotelo, “the biggest radio star in the Hispanic world … He’s the Rush Limbaugh of the Latinos.”

Obama told Piolin, “I have five more years and I’ll get it done,” Garcia said. “He’s feeling pretty cocky and he should. I mean, you can accuse him of a lot of things, but he can count.”

Is that true? Did Obama really go on Spanish radio and claim a Republican Congress would support him? And no one challenged him? He said Republicans have “shown themselves unwilling to talk at all about any sensible solutions to this issue, and we’re going to have to just keep up the pressure until they act.”

In his opinion piece on CNN.com, Garcia boasted, “After watching the Republican candidates lock the kryptonite that is the immigration issue around their necks during the Arizona debate, my bet is that President Barack Obama could win another term — even if he loses key swing states such as Florida, Iowa, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.”

Losing all those states wouldn’t make for a “landslide.” It will make for a loss.

Garcia told Kyra Phillips, “The president had issues with Latinos …(but) the Tea Party has the Republicans locked in because they need to pander to the Tea Party to win the primary, but they’re not going to be able to pivot back because Latinos are looking for someone authentic. You can’t all of a sudden in August or September come back to Latino voters and say, ‘Oh I love you. I want immigration reform.’ They’re going to say you’re a phony.”

So how “authentic” is Obama when he sidelined this supposed gold mine of a political issue to sell Obamacare, insisting all the way that his health “reform” wouldn’t cover illegal aliens?

In fact, he was openly denounced by liberals for abandoning the issue. “He is the deportation president,” said “undocumented activist” Daniel Rodriguez in Time magazine. Time’s cover carried the words “Yo Decido: Why Latinos Will Pick the Next President.”

This is odd, since whites are still 64 percent of the population. Time and CNN select the Latino vote as crucial because they want to make the Republicans cry uncle on amnesty. Time’s Michael Scherer began his cover story by slamming Gov. Jan Brewer for “the most incendiary immigration law in the country.”

But who made that law a national issue? The liberal media did. They put all the political pressure on anyone opposed to illegal immigration. It was “incendiary” despite a Rasmussen poll finding 70 percent of Arizonans supported the tougher law. The Obama-obedient media never found it “incendiary” for Obama to announce in 2011 that he was suspending most deportations in a transparently political move.

Take a look at the numbers from the Pew Hispanic Center, which estimated that 69 percent of Latinos voted for Democrats in 2006 and 67 percent for Obama in 2008. But in 2010, that percentage dropped to 60 percent, even though liberals surely tried to make Tea Party “racism” an issue to Latino voters.

Republicans shouldn’t write off the Latino vote, but they can wonder how much of that 9-percent slice of Latinos would vote Republican if they Xeroxed the liberal amnesty position. CNN and Time could wonder if Obama will hurt his Latino “landslide” by canceling pipelines and signaling a hard-left position on abortion, gay marriage and religious liberty. But they’re too busy celebrating and pandering to minority voters as the most crucial, special voters of all.

A must see video: What we can ALL learn from the late, great Andrew Breitbart in this most important year of 2012…

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 43 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Barack Obama, Communism, Conservatism, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Fascism, government, History, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Marxism, Media, Patriotism, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party, Socialism, Tea Parties at March 2nd, 2012 - 3:00 pm

I urge all of you to watch, listen to, and most importantly, ABSORB Andrew Breitbart’s 16 minute speech at CPAC last month. He understood the big picture and what’s most important THIS YEAR!

This isn’t 1992, nor 1996, when we were hoping to keep Bill Clinton, who, back in those days, was considered a radical leftist, from becoming President.

Nor is it 1980, when most of us were hoping for Ronald Reagan to defeat Jimmy Carter.

This is so much more important, especially if you love our country the way it is, and don’t think there’s any need to “fundamentally transform” America, nor go around apologizing for our supposed “sins”.

Remember folks, that, in the end, we’re all on the same side. And our most important goal in 2012 is removing this America-hating Marxist and his administration of unaccountable “czars”.

And remember what Obama’s senior adviser Valerie Jarrett said in 2008 to Tom Brokaw on “Meet The Press”: “(Obama) will be ready to rule from day one”. And most importantly, remember that this was not a slip of the tongue.

Watch the speech and pay attention, especially after the 9:00 mark….

Starting with the scoundrel occupying the White House, why is black racism and violating the law Okay?

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 79 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Fascism, Free Speech, government, Liberal Fascism, Marxism, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Religion, Socialism at February 28th, 2012 - 11:30 am

Imagine it’s 2012, and John McCain is President of the United States. And for his re-election, he decides that he wants to make sure he gets his message out to white voters, so he forms “White Americans for McCain”, to get white voters to knock on their neighbor’s doors, to volunteer to work at call centers, and to make sure that his message gets out at white or mostly white churches.

Of course, it wasn’t McCain who did that, but Obama did.

Obama and his re-election campaign formed “African-Americans for Obama”, although why this is even necessary, considering he got over 90% of the black vote in 2008, is perplexing.

Unless, of course (and this is why I think they did it) that they’re extremely worried about many blacks having no enthusiasm to vote for him again, because his socialist economic policies and profligate spending, with the help of the dimocrat-controlled House and Senate.

He said numerous times that if we spend these trillions of dollars on various stimulus bills, that millions of unemployed Americans would have good paying, shovel-ready jobs, and that in turn would fix the bad economy and unemployment to go down.

Not only did this out-of-control spending not improve the economy and lower the unemployment rate, regardless of the regime’s lies about it going down the last few months, it has only made black unemployment and job opportunities worse, the worst they’ve been for blacks in over fifty years.

Obama released a video taped specifically for African-Americans and black churches, in which Obama calls them the “faith” community, but we all know what he means- black churches- to support his regime and his failed policies.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t it these loudmouth libs who are constantly squawking about the separation of church and state?

And also, as is usual with these detestable scumbags, there’s always a double-standard, and it’s only supposed to work in their favor.

White racism? Bad!

Black racism? Good!

Speaking in (mostly) white churches about voting for pro-life candidates? That’s a violation of the First Amendment, call Eric Holder to prosecute whitey!

Black pastors in black churches urging blacks to vote for Obama and other dimocrats? Why, that’s freedom of speech, and should be allowed because of slavery!

Then there’s actor Samuel L. Jackson, who was at least honest enough to say that the only reason he voted for Obama is because he’s black. And after saying that, we don’t even get a collective yawn from the MSF’inM.

But what if, let’s say, Clint Eastwood, had come out and admitted that the only reason he voted for McCain was because he was white? There’d be an uproar in the press and on Capital Hill!

Je$$e Jack$on and Al Sharpton, and the usual gaggle of race-baiting poverty pimps, such as Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson-Lee, and John Lewis, would all be demanding an apology and boycotts of all of his movies, DVD’s, etc.

All the MSDNC hosts’ heads would explode with outrage that Eastwood would make such an overtly racist statement, and demand his movies not only be boycotted, but that he be burned at the stake!

But the truth is, probably 95% of the blacks who voted for Obama voted from him for one reason, and once reason only. Because of the color of his skin.

Again, who are the REAL racists???