► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Moonbats’

Thanks to Islamic Immigration “Merry Old England has morphed into Scary New England”

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Dhimmitude, History, immigration, Islam, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Muslim Brotherhood, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Terrorism at February 15th, 2011 - 4:30 pm

Who’s not surprised? Just about anyone with a functioning brain, that’s who.

Which is why liberals the world over were, are, and will continue to be the clueless dolts that they are.

Because of its citizens’ decision to not have enough children to keep funding its massively expensive socialist cradle to grave welfare programs that they can no longer afford (the same ones that Obungler and the libs here want us to replicate), Britain let hundreds of thousands of mostly illiterate and dirt-poor middle-eastern muslim savages, who still think and live as if it’s the seventh century, to emigrate to their country, and allowed them to collect massive welfare, until they “assimilated” and saw the light.

Yeah, right. That’ll happen, oh, like maybe…NEVER!

It’s like all of a sudden they were expected to wake up one morning and finally see the light that is the freedom its natural born citizens love and cherish, and to get jobs and come to love Britain, and when they didn’t, they act surprised.

If there’s one thing that’s as certain as the sun rising in the East, it’s muslims not wanting anything to do with the freedom and democracy we have and love in the West.

History has shown, time and again, for centuries, that these animals have no interest in assimilating onto any other culture, but rather, they want to take over and impose upon their hosts their gutter “religion” and culture, which has brought nothing but evil and death wherever it has been allowed to fester, like an untreated open wound.

Just the fact that the name Mohamed was, yet again, the most popular boy’s name in Britain, tells us all we need to know about Britain’s ominous future.

Fortunately, some EU leaders, among them David Cameron of Britain, Nicolas Sarkozy of France, and Angela Merkel of Germany, are beginning to see that this was a terrible idea. And do you think it’s just a coincidence that all are considered conservative?

Unfortunately, it’s probably too late to do anything, other than mass deportations, to solve this…

Merry Old England Morphs into Scary New England via Multiculturalism

By Doug Giles

It appears as if this multicultural smack we’re being sold in the U.S. didn’t work out too well in the U.K. Just this past week British Prime Minister David Cameron echoed German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s sentiments from last October that their country’s Pollyanna policy of multicultural yumminess toward Islam’s “way of life” was, in retrospect, really stupid—as in really, really, really stupid.

Yep, England’s giddy naïveté to prove to the thought police that they have evolved into nonjudgmental goo has led our snaggle-toothed cousins to open wide their borders to militant Muslims who hate the very ground that true Brits walk on. Now the Brits have a huge, stonking Muslim mess on their hands. Garsh. Who’d a thunk it?

Who would have imagined that letting religious gangsters immigrate to the U.K. (who happen to loathe British values, have zero desire to assimilate into the mix, and believe England’s laws suck and Sharia is simply fabulous) would have turned out bad? Who saw that coming?

I’ll tell you who saw that coming: Stevie Wonder, all myopic Cyclopes far and wide, and everyone in Europe who has a lick of common sense and a functioning BS detector. However, when these seers began to perceive the erosion of their life and values thirty years ago and when they started speaking out that these Muslims who “long to join” the British melting pot were not, if fact, melting but rather ruining the whole damn stew with their radical nonsense, they were immediately shouted down as xenophobes by the altruistic multiculties.

Yes, though it once seemed cute and cosmopolitan to have people from all over the Middle East speaking different languages, serving different foods, wearing burkas and playing different music, it has now turned ugly with Islamic enclaves completely at odds with British culture. And make no mistake about it: This Islamic hate came right in through the front door riding on the back of Kumbayah multiculturalism, and now merry old England is scary new England, and the U.K.’s become a hotbed for terrorists. Now they have hell to pay.

Click here to read the rest

Rodan Update:

Now protests are breaking out in Bahrain. In case people don’t know, it’s a Shia nation ruled by a Sunni leader. Clearly if Bahrain were to fall, this could benefit Iran.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – Thousands of protesters took over a main square in Bahrain’s capital Tuesday — carting in tents and raising banners — in a bold attempt to copy Egypt’s uprising and force high-level changes in one of Washington’s key allies in the Gulf.

The move by demonstrators capped two days of clashes across the tiny island kingdom that left at least two people dead, parliament in limbo by an opposition boycott and the king making a rare address on national television to offer condolences for the bloodshed.

[….]

The unrest in Bahrain, home to the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet, adds another layer to Washington’s worries in the region. In Yemen, police and government supporters battled nearly 3,000 marchers calling for the ouster of President Ali Abdullah Saleh in a fifth straight day of violence.

This bears watching.

How do you spell despicable and liars? L-I-B-E-R-A-L-S

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 76 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Free Speech, Hate Speech, History, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party, Socialism at February 12th, 2011 - 6:00 pm

“Ronald Reagan “tortured” blacks. Tavis Smiley, the PBS television host, once said this about the former president. NBC’s Bryant Gumbel and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, among many others, consider Reagan a racist.”

It’s amazing to me how the libturds are considered so tolerant of others views, and us normal people are considered intolerant.

Of course, that might be, no, that is, because it’s the libturds who try to define who and what is tolerant and intolerant.

Agree with a libturd? You’re enlightened, and tolerant. Dare to disagree? Well, we all know the drill, and have heard or read it many times- Bigot, racist, nazi, homophobe, blah, blah, blah.

Let’s say I, or any of us conservatives here, was to say that a black leader should be killed or hopefully will die just solely because he or she is a liberal. Whomever said it would be shunned here, and rightfully so.

And if the person making the statement was a famous or well-known conservative, they would be crucified by not only the libturd media, but also every civil rights groups under the sun.

But just reverse the situation, and let the libturd, black or white, call for the death of a conservative, black or white, and what do you hear? Nothing.

For example…

I do find it ironic that a no-talent fat slob drunk like Chrissie Matthews attempts to make fun of Rush Limbaugh’s weight.

But I digress…

Unlike libturds such as Tavis Smiley, Bryant Gumbel, and Paul Krugman, read what Larry Elder, who is conservative, and black, wrote in an op-ed about how black Americans prospered during President Reagan’s eight years in office, and whom actually has the statistics to back up his claim, unlike the libs, who have no clue, which is typical of most libs, but yet they continually show their ignorance just about every time they open their pie holes or type their inane stupidity.

Elder: Ronald Reagan: The 100-Year-Old Racist?

Ronald Reagan “tortured” blacks. Tavis Smiley, the PBS television host, once said this about the former president. NBC’s Bryant Gumbel and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, among many others, consider Reagan a racist.

“There they go again,” as Reagan might have said.

The economic lot for blacks and Hispanics improved far more than it did for whites after Reagan’s steep tax cuts. In late 1982, Reagan’s second year in office, the unemployment rate for blacks was 20.4 percent. By 1989, his last year, the black unemployment rate had fallen to 11.4 percent — a 9 percent drop. In late 1982, the unemployment rate for Hispanics was 15.3 percent. By 1989, it had fallen to 8 percent — a drop of over 7 percentage points. White unemployment, by contrast, fell “only” 4 percentage points.

What about black-owned businesses? In 1982, according to the Census Bureau, there were 308,000 black-owned businesses. By 1987, the number had increased to 424,000, up 38 percent. The number of all U.S. businesses was up “only” 14 percent. Receipts for black-owned businesses went from less than $10 billion to nearly $20 billion — a 100 percent increase.

But didn’t Reagan apply the “racist” so-called “Southern Strategy” to get elected? And weren’t the Southern Republicans on whom Reagan relied merely racist former Dixiecrats chased into the GOP’s open arms on the issue of civil rights?

Pat Buchanan, former Richard Nixon speechwriter, invented the term “Southern strategy.” “We would build our Republican Party,” he said, “on a foundation of states’ rights, human rights, small government and a strong national defense, and leave it to the ‘party of (Democratic Georgia Gov. Lester) Maddox, (1966 Democratic challenger against Spiro Agnew for Maryland governor George) Mahoney and (Democratic Alabama Gov. George) Wallace to squeeze the last ounces of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.'”

For over 100 years after the end of the Civil War, Southern whites supported de facto and de jure segregation against blacks. Yet Southerners, unlike Democrats in other parts of the country, believed in low taxes, smaller government and a strong national defense. On social and cultural issues, Southerners were more religious and less supportive of abortion. Racism against blacks was the glue that bound the South to the Democratic Party.

Then came the modern civil rights movement, followed by the civil rights acts of the ’60s. Southern whites knew their world had forever changed. Racism — legally, politically and morally — was in full retreat. With segregation as a dying issue, Southerners turned their attention to other matter: low taxes, smaller government and support for the Vietnam War and a strong national defense. The Republican Party fit their political views and cultural values more than did the Democratic Party. How could the GOP serve as a refuge for bigots when the party’s House and Senate members voted for the civil rights acts, by percentage, more than did their Democratic counterparts?

But didn’t Reagan appeal to Southern racism by giving a “states’ rights” speech in Philadelphia, Miss., a town immortalized in the movie “Mississippi Burning”? In 1964, three civil rights workers were murdered there. To the left, “states’ rights” is code for preferred parking at a Klan rally.

Reagan spoke for 15 minutes at the Neshoba County Fair, about seven miles outside of Philadelphia, in that politically “in-play” state carried by Jimmy Carter four years earlier by 14,000 votes. Eight years later, Democratic nominee Michael Dukakis spoke at the same Neshoba fair.

Here’s what Reagan said at the fair about “states’ rights”: “Programs like education and others that should be turned back to the states and the local communities with the tax sources to fund them. I believe in states’ rights. I believe in people doing as much as they can for themselves at the community level and the private level.”

Not exactly, “Turn back the clock!” And immediately following his speech, Reagan headed to New York, where he spoke before the Urban League, one of the nation’s oldest black civil rights organizations.

Click here to read the rest

“Barack In The USSR”, and not the Beatles song, obviously…

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 102 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Breaking News, Cold War, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Europe, History, Military, Nuclear Weapons, Politics, Progressives, Russia, Socialism, Tranzis at February 7th, 2011 - 8:30 am

Obungler is getting ready sell out Britain, our staunchest ally for decades. This POS really does hate America, and obviously any other country that is willing to defend itself against tyranny.

Nothing this America-hating and freedom-hating POS and his God-awful administration does anymore surprises me. And I’m sure most Americans and freedom-loving people feel the same way.

So, it will come as a shock to none of you that Obungler will supply the USSR Russia with sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade the Rodina (Motherland, as the USSR called itself), to sign a defense treaty.

And naturally, the lamestream Obama-loving media cheerleaders are howling mad about this, right? Of course not! You hear the crickets, don’t you? Well, you would if it was July.

Nope, as usual, we have to go overseas to get this info. To where those getting screwed by Obungler reside. And unbelievably, to wikileaks. I guess we chock this up to the old saying- “A broken clock is correct twice a day”.

But to the imbeciles who make up the D.C. press corps (memo to the moron occupying the White House- that’s pronounced “core”, not “corpse”, you friggin’ dolt), the only thing that qualifies as “news” to these incompetent socialist a-holes is the latest blast-fax they receive from the Minister of Propaganda Gibbs.

January 20th, 2013 can’t get here soon enough for me, so we can get this America-hating fool out of the White House and back to Chicago…Or Kenya.

From the UK Telegraph

WikiLeaks cables: US agrees to tell Russia Britain’s nuclear secrets

The US secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

By Matthew Moore, Gordon Rayner and Christopher Hope

Information about every Trident missile the US supplies to Britain will be given to Russia as part of an arms control deal signed by President Barack Obama next week.

Defence analysts claim the agreement risks undermining Britain’s policy of refusing to confirm the exact size of its nuclear arsenal.

The fact that the Americans used British nuclear secrets as a bargaining chip also sheds new light on the so-called “special relationship”, which is shown often to be a one-sided affair by US diplomatic communications obtained by the WikiLeaks website.

Details of the behind-the-scenes talks are contained in more than 1,400 US embassy cables published to date by the Telegraph, including almost 800 sent from the London Embassy, which are published online today. The documents also show that:

• America spied on Foreign Office ministers by gathering gossip on their private lives and professional relationships.

• Intelligence-sharing arrangements with the US became strained after the controversy over Binyam Mohamed, the former Guantánamo Bay detainee who sued the Government over his alleged torture.

• David Miliband disowned the Duchess of York by saying she could not “be controlled” after she made an undercover TV documentary.

• Tens of millions of pounds of overseas aid was stolen and spent on plasma televisions and luxury goods by corrupt regimes.

A series of classified messages sent to Washington by US negotiators show how information on Britain’s nuclear capability was crucial to securing Russia’s support for the “New START” deal.

Although the treaty was not supposed to have any impact on Britain, the leaked cables show that Russia used the talks to demand more information about the UK’s Trident missiles, which are manufactured and maintained in the US.

Washington lobbied London in 2009 for permission to supply Moscow with detailed data about the performance of UK missiles. The UK refused, but the US agreed to hand over the serial numbers of Trident missiles it transfers to Britain.

Professor Malcolm Chalmers said: “This appears to be significant because while the UK has announced how many missiles it possesses, there has been no way for the Russians to verify this. Over time, the unique identifiers will provide them with another data point to gauge the size of the British arsenal.”

Duncan Lennox, editor of Jane’s Strategic Weapons Systems, said: “They want to find out whether Britain has more missiles than we say we have, and having the unique identifiers might help them.”

Click on the headline above to read the rest…

When is the murder of hundreds of living babies okay with liberals? When it’s done by an abortionist

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 157 Comments › )
Filed under Abortion, Barack Obama, Crime, Democratic Party, Fascism, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives, Socialism at January 25th, 2011 - 4:30 pm

“He (Dr. Kermit Gosnell) was charged with the murder of babies who were fully delivered; he induced labor, delivered the babies and then stuck a scissors in the back of their necks and mercilessly killed them. Their first breath was also their last.”– Lori Ziganto, writing on redstate.com

“As I understand it, this puts the burden on the attending physician who has determined, since they were performing this procedure, that, in fact, this is a nonviable fetus; that if that fetus, or child — however way you want to describe it — is now outside the mother’s womb and the doctor continues to think that it’s nonviable but there’s, let’s say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead…”

So said then-IL state Senator Barack Hussein Obama, debating a “Born Alive” bill in Illinois, which would require doctors who perform abortions to allow babies who survive the procedure to live.

I’m pro-life, but putting that aside, the amazing thing to me is that they actually needed a law for this. The bill, which would have required the abortionist to do everything medically possible to help this living human being survive, did not pass, due to the lib majority in the IL senate, including Obama. Obama had a problem with this bill, but not because the aborted baby was born alive, a living human being.

No, Obama could not have cared less, and would have allowed a living human being to die because the baby survived the abortion, and not give a damn whatsoever about that precious child.

Unbelievably, he was actually worried more about the “burden” on the abortionist, while not being the least bit concerned about the living baby.

Obama objected to the idea that babies born alive after surviving the attempted abortion are anything more than pre-viable fetuses, because as living human beings, they would be protected by the constitution.

And in his radical leftist mind, that would lead to the barring of and/or reduction of the number of abortions.

At least five babies spent their last hours left to die in the soiled utility closet at Christ Hospital in 2001 alone; one even managed to live for almost 8 hours. Untold numbers suffered the same fate while Barack Obama sat on legislation to stop these horrendous acts of infanticide.

What a disgusting, evil POS he is (FYI, Christ Hospital is affiliated with the liberal Evangelical Lutheran Church, not the Catholic Church).

Had you ever heard of this monster, Dr. Kermit Gosnell? Probably not, because the MSM is doing their best not to cover this. This POS medical doctor murderer is evil personified. He killed babies that were born alive by sticking a pair of scissors in the back of their necks and severing their spinal cords. Hundreds of them.

Most were black babies born to poor inner-city black women. These were living, breathing human beings that this monster killed. It’s premeditated murder, in my opinion, since he knew what he was doing and knew it would cause the death of these living human beings. For money. Some of the mothers of these babies he murdered also died from his evil actions. He’s no different than any other mass murderer. He should be executed after he is convicted.

Thanks to reprehensible leftist organizations, such as the fraudulently named Planned Parenthood, and the liberals and feminists who vociferously support it, and abortion on demand, the black population in America now is half of what it should be. Go back and read that sentence again.

Three quarters of abortion clinics are in inner-city areas, and 80% of abortions are done on black women.

But, of course, because libs are libs, don’t hold your breath waiting for race-bating poverty pimps, such as Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, to protest this mass murder of black babies.

They, like most libs, don’t give a damn about the black children who were murdered by Gosnell, because they can’t blame the murders on Bush, Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, or the Tea Party organizations.

Thanks to the liberals on the Supreme Court, who, in 1973, somehow interpreted that there’s a constitutional “right to privacy”, even though those words appear nowhere in the Constitution, approximately 55 million babies have been aborted.

Give credit to former Democrat governor Ed Rendell, who left office earlier this month, and said he was “flabbergasted” upon finding out about this atrocity, and current Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, who has ordered a thorough investigation as to why state and local agencies did not report Gosnell’s activities before now.

Michelle Malkin wrote about this a couple of days ago, as did Lori Ziganto at redstate.com, about this ghoul’s heinous actions, and about how liberals in Pennsylvania, including former Republican governor Tom Ridge, allowed it to happen, EVEN THOUGH THEY KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING!

The Philadelphia Horror: How mass murder gets a pass
By Michelle Malkin

The mainstream news reports about Philadelphia’s serial baby-killer Kermit Gosnell and his abortion clinic death squad only scratch the surface of his barbaric enterprise. You must, must, must read the entire, graphic, 281-page grand jury report (embedded after my column below) to fully fathom the systematic execution of hundreds of (not just seven) healthy, living, breathing, squirming, viable babies — along with an untold number of mothers who may have lost their lives in his sick, grimy chamber of horrors as well. It is explicit. It is enraging. It will haunt you.

Ask yourself why you are not hearing about which root causes and whose rhetoric are to blame for this four-decades-long massacre — just the tip of a blood-soaked iceberg defended by the predators of Planned Parenthood. You know the answer: If it doesn’t help the Left criminalize conservatism, it’s not worth discussing.

From the conclusion of the grand jury report: “It is not our job to say who should be fired or demoted. We believe, however, that anyone responsible for permitting Gosnell to operate as he did should face strong disciplinary action up to and including termination. This includes not only the people who failed to do the inspecting, the prosecuting, and the protecting, but also those at the top who obviously tolerated, or even encouraged, the inaction. The Department of State literally licensed Gosnell’s criminally dangerous behavior. DOH gave its stamp of approval to his facility. These agencies do not deserve the public’s trust. The fate of Karnamaya Mongar and countless babies with severed spinal cords is proof that people at those departments were not doing their jobs. Those charged with protecting the public must do better.”

Over to you, eugenics-inspired, eco-freak Obama science czar John Holdren…

Click here to read the rest of the gruesome piece

Kermit Gosnell and Roe v. Wade: Something Evil This Way Came
By Lori Ziganto

Yesterday it was reported that Kermit Gosnell, an abortionist, was arrested and charged with eight counts of murder. He was charged with the murder of babies who were fully delivered; he induced labor, delivered the babies and then stuck a scissors in the back of their necks and mercilessly killed them. Their first breath, was also their last. Lacking even the dignity of a human touch; no one holding their tiny, innocent hand coursing with life’s blood, as that life left their tiny bodies. Eyes opening, trying to focus for the first time and trustingly seek out the security of the face belonging to the voice they’d heard for many months inside the womb. Struggling to survive, as the will to live is strong, even in the most tiny and vulnerable.

He was not charged with the murders of babies he killed the same way – earning $1.8 million in one year alone for doing so – only inside the womb.

Gosnell’s abortion mill was a gruesome house of evil. When police searched Gosnell’s facilities, they found that “bags and bottles holding aborted fetuses were scattered throughout the building. Jars containing the severed feet of babies lined a shelf.” This grotesque cretin kept severed feet as some sort of macabre serial killer trophy.

The State of Pennsylvania knew this. And ignored it. Allowing him to commit murder, time and time again, for decades. Their reasoning? Inspecting abortion mills clinics and requiring that they have basic safety standards would result in “putting up a barrier to women” and their ‘choice’. The ‘choice’ is never explicitly said because by choice they, of course, mean the purposeful killing of a baby. Barbara Boxer and even our own President would have believed the same. Barbara Boxer believes that a right to life does not exist until a mother ‘chooses’ to take her baby home, alive, from the hospital. President Obama, when a state senator in Illinois, had more concern for abortionists than for the babies whose lives they snuff out. He cared more about protecting the vile excuses for human beings like Kermit Gosnell than the babies they were attempting to kill. He believes that babies who are born alive during an abortion attempt should legally be left to die.
Click here to read the rest