► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Politics’

Ben Bernanke Is An Idiot

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 8 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Charity, Communism, Corruption, Democratic Party, Economy, Education, Elections, Elections 2012, government, History, Marxism, Media, Nazism, Politics, Progressives, Religion, Socialism, Special Report, World at September 15th, 2012 - 11:00 am


[via]
How does a country that is epiglottisly deep in debt get out of it? Soak the taxpayers. Raise taxes and depress the economy even more. Keep investors hunkered down. As if things aren’t bad enough, what Bernanke’s proposing is likely to create inflation – that fortunately has been stagnant for years. Yeah, that’s the ticket to prosperity.

Anyone notice that big money players (like Warren Buffett, George Soros, George Paulson & Vladimir Putin) are buying up gold and precious metals like insane cat collectors? There’s a reason. They all know what’s coming down – a world-wide depression, thanks to an insane U.S. fiscal policy, set up by the Democrat-controlled Congress under the Bush administration, then promoted and promulgated by the Obama Regime.

And it IS a Regime.

Although the regime is sometimes hidden and not in front of the cameras of the general public, it has been aiding and abetting the radical left for decades, with a very patient step-by-step procedure. Although the names change, the mission is the same.

China didn’t fall to communism overnight. Neither did Russia fall immediately. Even the National Socialists began as an unpopular splinter group in Germany. It took decades and more before these evil regimes were accepted as a bunch of good guys looking out for the best interests of the populace.

Infiltrate the universities and schools. Check.
Indoctrinate the next generation. Check.
Infiltrate the main stream media. Check.
Install radicals in high positions of authority. Check
Create a large class dependent upon government for subsistance. Check.
Demonize the wealthy and successful. Work in progress.
Attack and ban religion and charity. Work in progress.

Once those simple tasks have been accomplished, the elites can take over and may God help us.

May God have pity on the rest of the world too, because if what this Regime wants comes to pass, the United States of America, the most successful nation in history, the most charitable nation in history, the most powerful nation in history, will not be able to help them any longer.

And Ben Bernanke is providing one more step on that path to the economic destruction of this great country.

Obama campaign thug Axelrod tried to intimidate Gallup over Obama’s bad poll results

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 50 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Corruption, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Eric Holder, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Uncategorized at September 10th, 2012 - 8:00 am


Axelrod wanted to shoot the messenger, and ignore the fact that Obama’s message is the problem. Then after failing to intimidate Gallop, the racist attorney general Eric Holder and his DOJ stooges filed an “unrelated” lawsuit against the polling company-

“Since Gallup first roused Axelrod’s ire, Obama’s Justice Department revived old allegations against the firm that, according to now former Gallup employee Michael Lindley, the polling company violated the False Claims Act by over-charging the federal government for its services.”

Yeah right. Unrelated, my butt. If they really think anybody believes that, they’re delusional. This is just more proof that what we have in the Obama regime is the most corrupt executive branch in our nation’s history , and that includes the Nixon administration.

Emails confirm Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod tried to intimidate Gallup

David Axelrod and the Obama campaign have some explaing to do. The Daily Caller’s Matthew Boyle reports that emails between senior officials at The Gallup Organization, show senior Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod attempted to intimidate the polling firm when its poll results found Mitt Romney leading President Obama.

According to Boyle, after Gallup declined to change its polling methodology, Obama’s Department of Justice hit it with an unrelated lawsuit:

“Since Gallup first roused Axelrod’s ire, Obama’s Justice Department revived old allegations against the firm that, according to now former Gallup employee Michael Lindley, the polling company violated the False Claims Act by over-charging the federal government for its services.”

Boyle explains that “Michael Lindley was a field organizer in Council Bluffs, Iowa, for then-Sen. Obama’s 2008 run for president before joining Gallup, a fact omitted from the DOJ’s legal filings and from most press accounts.”

In a very Nixonian abuse of power the Obama/Holder Justice Department announced it was joining the lawsuit on August 22, 2012. The announcement also indicated that the Justice Department plans to assert additional claims related to Gallup’s subcontract with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). During most of the two weeks before the announcement, Gallup’s tracking poll showed Romney leading Obama 47 to 45 percent.

Contrast team Obama’s treatment of Gallup to that of Nate Silver. As Buzz Feed Politics reports, team Obama was more appreciative of silvers work and rewarded him.

“Obama’s polling analysts, Issenberg writes, wanted to test their internal polls against Silver’s model. And so — in an unusual step for the closely-held campaign, and for the analyst, who was then running his own website, FiveThirtyEight.com — the Obama campaign offered Silver access to thousands of its own internal polls, on the condition Silver sign a confidentiality agreement, which he did. (Silver, who now writes a widely-read blog for the New York Times declined to comment on the arrangement.)”

You really must go to the Daily Caller and read some of what is in the emails. Here is a teaser:

“In response to that email, a third senior Gallup official said he thought Axelrod’s pressure “sounds a little like a Godfather situation.”

“Imagine Axel[rod] with Brando’s voice: ‘[Name redacted], I’d like you to come over and explain your methodology…You got a nice poll there….would be a shame if anything happened to it…’”

In a second email chain titled “slanderous link about Gallup methodology,” another senior Gallup official noted that a Washington Examiner story on Axelrod’s anti-Gallup tweet was “on [the] Drudge [Report] right now,” before writing that the episode was “[s]o politically motivated, it’s laughable.”

“As they say in b-ball: he’s trying to work the refs,” that official wrote to other senior Gallup staffers. “What a joke. Axel’s had a bad week. He got in the middle of the Ann Romney thing. Then said the country is going in the wrong direction. (Oops!) Now he’s swinging at us….””

The Axelrod vs. Gallup story is more evidence that Obama is losing and the campaign is desperate. The Good news is that Gallup did not cave in to the attempted “intimidation” and now the story is public. Does the Axelrod vs.Gallup story explain why we have seen so many skewed polls during this campaign?

The main stream media should Demand that Axelrod and Gibbs tell the truth about what happened. As Boyle writes, the emails contradict what Axelrod’s fellow Obama campaign adviser Robert Gibbs told the Washington Times’ Kerry Picket this week about the campaign’s dealings with Gallup:

Picket reported that Gibbs said he was unaware of any communications between the Obama campaign and Gallup.

Was Gibbs lying to Picket? Was he misinformed? The emails suggest its one or the other.

“This Is My Gun, Clyde.” Dirty Harry, The Gauntlet

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 55 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Elections 2012, Humor, Mitt Romney, OOT, Open thread, Politics at August 31st, 2012 - 11:00 pm

Aside from the more serious rhetorical oratory of the GOP Convention (previously discussed on The Blogmocracy and elsewhere) Clint Eastwood’s performance was the perfect break. It would have been the perfect warm up act for any candidate running against Obama, and he nailed it. Addressing the Empty Chair:

“What do you want me to tell Romney?
[…]
I can’t tell him to do that.
I can’t tell him to do that to himself.”

He nailed it with wit, timing, and sarcastic humor. He’s an actor who knows how to ad lib when the situation requires it. How much of his presentation was scripted and how much was off-the-cuff doesn’t matter. It worked.

And speaking of ad-libbing and speaking off-the-cuff, welcome to the Friday Edition of The Overnight Open Thread.

Let’s have a class in poll-taking 101, to explain why dems are polled more, or “oversampled”, than normal people (Republicans)

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 106 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, History, Media, Mitt Romney, Politics, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party at August 30th, 2012 - 11:30 am

A lot of us here have bitched and ranted about this, but I, myself, forgot to explain that there’s a reason this is done, and it’s not as nefarious as you would believe, kind of, wink, nod.

Voting trends used by polling companies for presidential elections are, for the most part, based upon the last presidential election, in this case, 2008. But by using the voter turnout data from 2008, which pollsters use, it assumes that everything has basically remained static, or unchanged, four years later.

In most elections this is usually true.

In 2008 though, Republican turnout declined by a little over 1% to 28.7% , while Democratic turnout increased by 2.6% from 28.7 percent in 2004 to 31.3% in 2008.

All of the increase in dumocrat voters can be explained by Obama’s appeal to many blacks and young people who had never voted before, and bought into his hope and change B.S., and the many independents who voted Republican in 2000 and 2004, but switched in 2008 because the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan seemed unwinnable, and Obama promised he’d set a date to get us out, regardless of whether or not it was a good idea.

So, looking back at the election in 2008, and not taking into consideration the mess Obama and the dumocrats have caused our country since then, after promising to “fix” the mess, yes, the dumocrats should maybe be oversampled, but by about 3.5%, and even that is a stretch, considering the economy and unemployment rate.

But nowhere near 6-10%, which is what the polling companies usually do. By the way, most polls you hear or read about are paid for by left-leaning sources. Go figure…

Also, a lot of polling companies poll only registered votes, because it’s much cheaper than polling likely voters, but registered voters are always unreliable to actually show up and vote.

This why the reputable companies like Rasmussen Reports are much more reliable, because they only poll likely voters, because they’re much more likely and reliable to actually get off their asses and go out and vote.