► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘tyranny’

Kim Jong-un Directs Farmers To Stop Growing Tall Corn

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 135 Comments › )
Filed under Communism, Food and Drink, North Korea, Politics, World at June 25th, 2014 - 1:00 am

Kim Jong Un Corn Mandate

Even well-off families Can Only Add a Handful of Rice to Their Corn Meal Porridge
Corn (maize) long ago replaced rice as North Korea’s staple food. North Koreans call corn meal “corn rice”. The well-to-do eat steamed rice; for others, corn is their staple food. Depending on a family’s economic status, the rice-to-corn ratio varies. Well-off families don’t use more than 50% corn; as the household budget becomes more strained, corn’s share grows.

Mrs. Kang Un-hui (alias) of Pyongsung city in South Pyongan Province has not so far had to worry about food thanks to her husband, who is a police officer. However, now only her husband gets a food ration. It has been several months since the food ration ended for the three other family members. Even so, they are not starving, but the quality of their meals has fallen sharply. Long ago, they only ate steamed rice. Last year, their meals were half corn and half rice. This year they struggle to be able to mix a handful of rice into the corn meal.

Says Mrs. Kang: “These days, if you’re not pretty rich, the quality of your meals worsens. Now, a family that can afford corn meal is doing well. It’s gotten to the point that it’s hard to have corn meal with even one handful of rice. If our family is like this, other families will be even worse-off. Apart from North Koreans of Chinese origins, everybody is like this. Even so, that does not mean we should complain. My husband has steady work, and I’m just grateful that he can keep his position. I hope that the country’s food situation will improve quickly and we can receive our food rations in the usual way.”
[Source: http://goodfriendsusa.blogspot.com/2012/07/north-korea-today-no-462-july-4-2012.html ]

Okay, the image (Kimmy Crack Corn?) is an obvious photoshop intended for political snark, and I’m not going to post the source in order to protect their anonymity. The story dated 4 July 2012, quoted verbatim, is unaltered.

But there is something odd in that report, and it has to do with rice and corn.
Lookee here:

Grains Comparison[Source]

So why is corn (maize) disparaged as a staple in North Korea when it has three times as many calories and more nutrients? Is it because it’s a crop cultivated in the Americas? I dunno, Babs, but I do know this.
The U.S. don’t raise no rice-fed cattle.

North Korea’s sparse agricultural resources limit agricultural production. Climate, terrain, and soil conditions are not particularly favorable for farming, with a relatively short cropping season. Only about 17% of the total landmass, or approximately 20,000 km2, is arable, of which 14,000 km2 is well suited for cereal cultivation; the major portion of the country is rugged mountain terrain.[1] [Wiki]

That means North Korea has approximately 12% of its landmass good for growing grains, and it grows mostly rice. The government takes most of the rice away from the private subsistence farms.

So much for the Workers’ Paradise. Eat dirt, peons.

The real Chuck Norris exposes the privacy violations and government data collection in “Common Core”

by 1389AD ( 111 Comments › )
Filed under Education at December 2nd, 2013 - 2:00 pm

AmmoLand has the story:

Dallas, TX – -(Ammoland.com)- After months of the feds doing everything they could to distance themselves from the origin and launch of the controversial Common Core State Standards, more and more of Washington’s tentacles are surfacing through public rage, implementation revelations and the White House’s own foot-in-mouth disease.

After Education Secretary Arne Duncan cast bigoted blame on “white suburban moms” for nationwide resistance to CCSS — an oops from which he still is reeling in public humiliation and maternal fury — White House spokesman Jay Carney dodged Duncan bullets by claiming ignorance to his statements. But then Carney buried the White House in federal ownership of CCSS by saying,

“I can just tell you that the secretary of education and everybody on the president’s team dedicated to this effort is focused on making sure that we do everything we can, working with states and others.”

“Everybody on the president’s team dedicated to this effort”? Thanks, Mr. Carney. It’s about time the feds ponied up to their place on the CCSS playground.

In the first part of my series on CCSS, I revealed how the feds spent $350 million of taxpayer money, funding and giving grants and waivers to muscle and bribe states and local school districts to accept CCSS.

Last week, I showed how feds are injecting their progressive agenda into curricula taught to U.S. kids in elementary, middle and high schools via their influence in standard directives and posting educative minions in academic arenas and among CCSS curricula creators.

Today I will begin to give you the third piece of evidence of the feds’ collaborations and entanglements within CCSS — namely that they are creating and expanding a national database to store, access and peddle your kids’ private information obtained through a technological project within CCSS.

Sound crazy or like sci-fi socialism? Maybe, but it’s all real, true and coming soon to a school near you, if it isn’t there already.

It all started in the third month of President Barack Obama’s reign in 2009, when the Department of Education initiated the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund, which — under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 — awarded “governors approximately $48.6 billion … in exchange for a commitment to advance essential education reforms … including: college- and career-ready standards (aka CCSS).”

Under that umbrella, the feds further bribed the states into building and expanding longitudinal data systems “to capture, analyze, and use student data from preschool to high school, college, and the workforce.”

Robert Swiggum, the Georgia Department of Education’s chief information officer, explained to PolitiFact that his state’s system “collects data points in about 10 categories,” including “a student’s name, grade, gender, ethnicity, birth date, attendance, enrollment history, test scores, courses taken and grade received, and any subgroup (example: English language learner, retained, economically disadvantaged).” PolitiFact added, “Each of the categories has dozens of data points that can vary.”

Bottom line: lots of personal information.

In a White House press release dated Jan. 19, 2010, Obama and Duncan stated that the purpose of expanding the longitudinal data systems was to make the massive amount of information “more accessible … to key stakeholders.”

Wondering who the “key stakeholders” are? Let’s just say I don’t think it’s a coincidence that a 2012 White House budget sheet for the Department of Labor also mentions grants being offered to expand the workforce information side of the data system coin. The grants “support the development of longitudinal data systems that integrate education and workforce data to provide timely and accessible information to consumers, policymakers, and others.”

Did you catch that? “To consumers, policymakers, and others”? And what or — more appropriately — whose information are the feds providing (or peddling?)? So much for the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, the federal law established to protect the privacy interests of students. I guess the Department of Education, which maintains FERPA, decided it really liked this statement in it: “Schools may disclose, without consent, ‘directory’ information such as a student’s name, address, telephone number, date and place of birth, honors and awards, and dates of attendance.”

U.S. Department of Education press secretary Dorie Turner Nolt explained in June, when she was with the Georgia Department of Education, that the data in the state’s longitudinal data system are computerized but that the students’ information is, in PolitiFact’s words, “not shared beyond the student’s teachers and school administrators.” She needed to add the word “yet.”

Don’t ever forget the White House’s words in its own memos: for “key stakeholders,” who, at the very least, include “consumers, policymakers, and others.” And guess who gets to define “others.” (Now you’re getting the picture!)

You don’t think the feds gave away billions of taxpayer dollars to states and public schools without expecting anything in return or to be included in the informational mix, do you?

It’s one big happy federal and state communication merry-go-round with your family’s private information from the school cradle to the federal grave!

In Part 4, I will show further evidence from the feds themselves that the longitudinal data systems and new Common Core State Standards are intricately intertwined and going to be used by the federal government and state governments to tap your children’s personal information and to leverage significant educational change.

Follow Chuck Norris through his official social media sites, on Twitter @chucknorris and Facebook’s “Official Chuck Norris Page.” He blogs at http://chucknorrisnews.blogspot.com.

About:
Action hero and Second Amendment activist, Chuck Norris is one of the most enduringly popular actors in the world. He has starred in more than 20 major motion pictures. His television series
“Walker, Texas Ranger,” which completed its run in April 2001 after eight full seasons, is the most successful Saturday night series on CBS since “Gunsmoke.”In 2006, he added the title of columnist to his illustrious list of credits with the launch of his popular Internet column. Now Chuck is a regular contributor to AmmoLand, click the following link to see more of Chuck Norris on AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.

Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

by Iron Fist ( 205 Comments › )
Filed under Politics, Second Amendment, The Constitution at January 10th, 2013 - 10:30 am

This is my favorite quote from Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s excellent (and depressing) The Gulag Archipellago:

And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?

Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?

After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria [Government limo] sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur — what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked.

The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

That, Guys and Dolls, is why Obama wants gun control. A totalitarian State cannot function, cannot function, with an armed citizenry. They cannot opress us too much as long as we are armed. That is the big danger of gun control. Everywhere it has been implemented you have seen a reduction in freedom. Not just in the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (the most obvious one) or the right to self-defense, but freedom of expression (hate crimes laws), freedom of religion, and for the most part the so-called “Free” Press has gone along with it. How much of that is from intimidation and how much of it is that fellow travellers never speak ill of one another is an open question.. Here in America a film maker was jailed for blaphemy for making a movie critical of Islam and Mohammed. Here in America the Catholic Church is being forced to pay for abortions in contravention of some of their deepest held religious beliefs. It all forms a pattern, and that pattern is one of dictatorship. People have often asked why people couldn’t see Hitler coming. Personally, I’ve always thought that some people probably did see Hitler coming (Churchill for sure did), but their warnings went unheeded. We are in a nacent dictatorship. Obama didn’t take over by coup, but neither did Hitler. It is not too late to stop Obama. He hasn’t required gun registration and started the warrentless sweeps to enforce it (an idea from the Clinton Administration), but he is considering such moves. Many high-profile Democrats are talking about registration and confiscation of firearms. These aren’t just pie-in-the-sky wish lists. They are serious proposals that must be taken seriously. It is not just Obama that moves against us. He has the support of major Democrats across the board. In a number of States steps are being taken to disarm the citizenry, the most prominent of these being in New York. This despite two clear Supreme Court decisions stating that the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a serious individual right, and that that right is enforceable against the individual States as well as the Federal Government. TO be pro-gun control is, objectively, to be anti-civil rights. There is no moral difference between these gun controllers of today and the “Segregation Forever” Democrats of yesterday. Just as in the latter case, we must? defeate these counter-liberty forces if we are to survive as a Republic.

Stay Away from the KSA

by 1389AD ( 19 Comments › )
Filed under Canada, Saudi Arabia, Special Report, UK at April 9th, 2012 - 6:00 pm

William Sampson 1959-2012

Uploaded by SDAMatt2a on Mar 30, 2012

Supporters of a Canadian who said he was mistakenly charged with murder, tortured and held in solitary confinement for close to three years in a Saudi Arabian jail expressed sadness and a hope for “justice” after reports surfaced of his death.

William Sampson, 52, suffered a heart attack in England this week, according to filmmaker David Paperny, who directed a 2007 documentary about Sampson’s ordeal.

Former Liberal MP Dan McTeague, who had worked to help free Sampson and criticized the Canadian government’s response after his arrest overseas in 2000, said he was “shocked” to hear of Sampson’s death.

“His death is not in vain,” he said. “His ordeal taught the Canadian government to be more proactive in the release of Canadians wrongfully tortured and detained overseas.”

Paperny, whose documentary about Sampson was titled Confessions of An Innocent Man, said he received confirmation about Sampson’s death from his family.

Paperny said Sampson was “a brave man who had been put through hell.”

“It was sad he was never able to turn a corner (from) his days in Saudi Arabia,” he said.

Sampson was pardoned and released in 2003, along with three Britons who were charged with terrorist bombings and murder.

“It’s a serious loss (of) a man who endured real torture and (was) accused of something he didn’t do,” McTeague said. “He had to spend his life explaining and trying to clear his name because the charge remained, notwithstanding (his) release.”

Sampson was sentenced to public beheading in Saudi Arabia, after a confession that Sampson said was coerced under torture.

Sampson, who was a businessman working in the country, alleged he was suspended upside down for hours, beaten on the soles of his feet, shackled to his door to prevent him from sleeping and assaulted until he admitted to being part of the two bombings.

A campaign for his release was successful, leading to the pardon of all three men. However, he was never cleared of the murder charges.

After his release, Sampson spent almost a decade trying to clear his name; he tried to sue his alleged torturers, but was unsuccessful. In 2006, Britain’s highest court ruled that he couldn’t proceed because foreign government officials are protected by diplomatic immunity.

Paperny said Sampson was seeking justice until his life ended, referring to Sampson’s pending case before the European Court of Human Rights.

Sampson and the three Britons, who all allege torture, were seeking to bring a civil suit against Saudi Arabia and certain officials.

“(Sampson) received no justice in his time,” Paperny said. “Perhaps . . . if the European Court hears his case, justice will finally be done.”