► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘U.S. Navy’

The Battle of Midway; 70 Years Ago Today

by huckfunn ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under History, Military, Patriotism, World War II at June 4th, 2012 - 4:30 pm

70 years ago today the U.S. Navy won a decisive victory over the Japanese Navy at the Battle of Midway. Just 6 months after the Pearl Harbor disaster, the Navy destroyed 4  Japanese aircraft carriers, a heavy cruiser and 248 aircraft. The Japanese had planned to seize Midway island to extend  protection of their homeland and further project their naval power in order to seize more territory. Their plan included laying a trap for U.S. carriers, destroying them which would then force the U.S. to sue for peace. U.S. code breakers deciphered enough of the Japanese naval codes to be able to intercept the Japanese as they began their assault on Midway Island.

The Washington Times has an excellent article about the battle entitled Pivotal Victory from the “Dungeon” Turned the Tide of World War II 

Additionally, there are 2 videos and some graphics showing the order of battle which can be found here.  

Battle of Midway Casualties

United States
1 carrier sunk
1 destroyer sunk
150 aircraft destroyed
307 killed

 

Japan
4 carriers sunk
1 cruiser sunk
248 carrier aircraft destroyed
3,057 killed


Why libs are dangerous: USS Essex unable to fulfill mission for 2nd time in seven months

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 11 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, History, Military, Progressives, Weapons at February 3rd, 2012 - 6:00 pm

This is what happens when America-hating liberal scumbag POS’s like Obama, Reid, and Pelosi are in charge of defense spending, or should I say when they’re allowed to gut defense spending for their welfare programs to give more of our dollars to their voters, the leeches and parasites of America.

I joined the Navy right after President Reagan was elected, and when I got to my squadron, we had 12 P-3 ASW (anti-sub warfare) aircraft. We were lucky if we could get five of them in the air due to lack of parts and having to scavenge parts off of the other planes to get those five into the air.

USS Essex unable to fulfill mission for 2nd time in seven months

February 01, 2012
Stars and Stripes
by Matthew M. Burke

SASEBO NAVAL BASE, Japan — For the second time in seven months, mechanical or maintenance issues have prevented the USS Essex from meeting a commitment at sea, Navy officials said Wednesday.

The 21-year-old flagship of the forward deployed Expeditionary Strike Group 7 was scheduled to depart several days ago for Cobra Gold 2012, an annual exercise with Thailand. The mission was scrapped due to an equipment failure.

“It is true, the Essex will not be making Cobra Gold,” Task Force 76 spokesman Lt. Richard Drake said. “The cause is wear and tear.”

The Essex, known as the Iron Gator, is scheduled to undergo a hull swap with its sister ship USS Bonhomme Richard next month.

The scrapped mission is the latest in a series of problems for Navy ships. More than one-fifth of Navy ships fell short of combat readiness in the past two years, and fewer than half of the service’s deployed combat aircraft are ready for their missions at any given time, according to congressional testimony.

With an ascendant China on the high seas and deep Defense Department budget cuts over the next decade, the Navy is facing “glaring deficiencies that are nothing short of alarming,” U.S. Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., chairman of the House Readiness Subcommittee said in July.

Vice Adm. William Burke, deputy chief of naval operations for fleet readiness and logistics, told the committee that the Navy has “a limited supply of forces.”

“When you have these additional deployments, you sometimes impact the maintenance, or you impact the training, which will impact the maintenance,” he said. “So what we have is one event cascading into another, so we don’t get either of them quite right.”

About the time leaders were testifying before Congress, the Essex was limping back into port due to maintenance issues shortly after departing for biannual exercise Talisman Sabre 2011 with the Australians, Navy officials said at the time. It was able to participate in the exercises as a remote command element.

Navy officials said there are many reasons a ship like the Essex might have issues.

Forward-deployed ships in the region experience higher operational tempo and advanced wear and tear as they have a lot more to do than their stateside brethren, often missing scheduled maintenance, Navy officials said.

Lt. Anthony Falvo, 7th Fleet spokesman, said the Essex may have been impacted by missing maintenance.

“Pacific Fleet ships adhere to rigorous maintenance standards and maintenance periodicities per the Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual and other Navy directives,” Falvo wrote in an email to Stripes. “On any given day we have roughly 40% of our ships underway and we are meeting the requirements of the combatant commanders.”

Drake would not specify what piece of equipment failed on the Essex, but said it was not the engine. He added that the ship could get underway if it had to, but it is better to fix the piece of equipment now.

“It will be back up and running in time for its next commitment,” Drake said.

The Essex has been in the area for 11 years, Drake said, and provided humanitarian relief to Indonesian victims of the devastating tsunami in 2005, survivors of the Leyte mudslide in the Philippines a year later and victims of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami in March of last year.

“The Essex is no spring chicken,” Drake said.

American Air and sea assets positioning near Libya

by Phantom Ace ( 103 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, China, Economy, Libya at March 1st, 2011 - 8:30 am

There are reports that the Pentagon is begging to deploy air and naval units near Libya. The reason for this movement is to give America options in the Libya crisis. There is discussion of establishing a no fly zone. There are also fears of a collapse in authority could lead to a Somalia like situation on the Mediterranean.

The U.S. military is repositioning its forces near North Africa as the United States and its allies impose sanctions on Libya and consider whether to establish a no-fly zone over the country, where a resistance army is building against dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi.

U.S. officials have toughened their rhetoric against Qaddafi in the last few days as they call for him to step down. Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, on Monday called Qaddafi “delusional” and accused him of “slaughtering his own people.”

Read the rest: U.S. Military Repositions Forces in Preparation for Libya Response

The is a situation that needs monitoring.