► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Aleppo’

Stairway to Aleppo? Yeah, Right.

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 12 Comments › )
Filed under History, Iran, Iran, Islam, Islamists, Middle East, Muslim Brotherhood, Politics, Syria, World at July 14th, 2015 - 1:30 am

Stairway to Aleppo

Earliest date found for this image [via Tineye] is 1 April 2014 with this caption:

Left After Assad Bombing in Aleppo.

I have a bit of a problem with that structural impossibility, and so does physics. Then I found this:

Stairway to Aleppo 0
That image dates to 23 March 2014. A more recent post dated 19 June 2015 comes from TehranPress.com. Even Google Translate can’t crack that one, but it appears that someone’s laughing.

Stairway to Aleppo Original

This seems to be the unadulterated version, with an interesting caption:

Residents try to find their belongings among the rubble left of their homes after what activists said was an air attack from forces loyal to Syria’s President Bashar Al-Assad in Bab Neirab, Aleppo, on July 27, 2013.

That caption and image came from The Atlantic via *ahem* Reuters… who have never *cough* posted manipulated propaganda photos before.
[Hint: Google Islamic Rage Boy, Green Helmet Man, Wailing Woman, Iraqi Missile Photoshop.]

Yet even the description (“what activists said”) sounds specious. When Assad was under attack by the Muslim Brotherhood, why would his forces bomb his own people, unless Syria was already infiltrated by radical islam?

Oh, wait…

[Top image found here entirely by accident, and the others didn’t come from Little Green Footballs either.]

Syrian rebels take strategic town in Aleppo; If we target Syria, then we must kill Assad; and “Islamophilia: How the Left really fears Islam”

by Phantom Ace ( 82 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Hezballah, Islamists, Syria at August 27th, 2013 - 7:00 am

The media keeps lying about the Syrian War by making claims that Assad is winning. He is not winning, although he’s had some success in Homs province, the Syrian rebels composed of the Free Syrians Army, al-Nusra Front, Ahrar al-Sham and the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (al-Qaeda) are winning elsewhere. Today they captured the town of Khanasir in Aleppo province. This cuts off units of the Syrian Army and Hezbollah operating in Aleppo.

BEIRUT – Rebel forces took control of a strategic town in northern Syria on Monday, killing more than 50 pro-government fighters and cutting off government forces’ only supply route out of the city of Aleppo, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

The Britain-based Observatory also said it had obtained a photograph showing the execution of Alawite cleric Badr Ghazal by hardline Islamist rebels, highlighting the growing sectarian bloodshed of the 2-1/2-year conflict In Aleppo, rebels led by Islamist militant groups captured Khanasir, a town that sits on the government supply route connecting the northern province to the central city of Hama.

The rebel gain will leave government forces besieged in Aleppo province, according to the Observatory, which opposes President Bashar al-Assad’s rule. The move hampers Assad’s forces options for counterattack against the large swathes of rebel held territory in northern Syria along the Turkish border.

Rami Abdelrahman, head of the Observatory, told Reuters dozens of fighters from the paramilitary National Defence Forces (NDF) were killed. He said activists had so far counted 53 bodies, including that of the leader of the NDF’s Aleppo-based forces.

The media is lying about the Syrian War to trick people into supporting intervention. Obama will gfo to war without Congressional approval and our media will say anything. Congress will do nothing as both parties support nation building. The American people do not have any say in matters of war.


Speranza Addedum:

Not only Assad but his brother Maher and all his family which can claim the government. When we  invaded Iraq we had a list of people to take out and on top was “Chemical Ali” as well as Uday and Qusay Hussein. Bashar Assad is a mere puppet of Iran but he needs to be killed as does hopefully one day soon Iran’s puppet in Lebanon, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah.

by Bret Stephens

Should President Obama decide to order a military strike against Syria, his main order of business must be to kill Bashar Assad. Also, Bashar’s brother and principal henchman, Maher. Also, everyone else in the Assad family with a claim on political power. Also, all of the political symbols of the Assad family’s power, including all of their official or unofficial residences. The use of chemical weapons against one’s own citizens plumbs depths of barbarity matched in recent history only by Saddam Hussein. A civilized world cannot tolerate it. It must demonstrate that the penalty for it will be acutely personal and inescapably fatal.

Maybe this strikes some readers as bloody-minded. But I don’t see how a president who ran for his second term boasting about how he “got” Osama bin Laden—one bullet to the head and another to the heart—has any grounds to quarrel with the concept.

As it is, a strike directed straight at the Syrian dictator and his family is the only military option that will not run afoul of the only red line Mr. Obama is adamant about: not getting drawn into a protracted Syrian conflict. And it is the one option that has a chance to pay strategic dividends from what will inevitably be a symbolic action.

[……]

AFP/Getty ImagesCruel duo: Syrian President Bashar Assad (right) and his brother Maher.

One option is to target the Syrian army’s stores of chemical weapons, estimated at over 1,000 tons. Last week the Times of Israel reported that “the embattled [Assad] regime has concentrated its vast stocks of chemical weapons in just two or three locations . . . under the control of Syrian Air Force Intelligence.” If that’s right, there’s a chance some large portion of Assad’s stockpile could be wiped out of existence using “agent-defeat” bombs that first shred chemical storage containers in a rain of metal darts, and then incinerate the chemicals with white phosphorus, preventing them from going airborne.

Still, it’s unlikely that airstrikes could destroy all of the regime’s chemical stores, which are probably now being moved in anticipation of a strike, and which could always be replenished by Bashar’s friends in North Korea and Iran. More to the point, a strike on chemical weapons stocks, while salutary in its own right, does little to hurt the men who ordered their use. [……]

Another option would be a strike on the headquarters, air bases and arms depots of the regime’s elite Republican Guard, and particularly Maher Assad’s Fourth Armored Division, which reportedly carried out last week’s attack. But here the problem of asset dispersion becomes that much greater, as fewer tanks, helicopters or jets can be destroyed by a single cruise missile (unit cost: $1.5 million).

[…….]

Then there is the “Desert Fox” option—Bill Clinton’s scattershot, three-day bombing campaign of Iraq in December 1998, on the eve of his impeachment. The operation hit 97 targets in an effort to “degrade” Iraq’s WMD stockpiles and make a political statement. But it did nothing to damage Saddam’s regime and even increased international sympathy for him. Reprising that feckless exercise in “doing something” is the worst thing the U.S. could do in Syria. Sadly, it’s probably what we’ll wind up doing.

And so to the Kill Assad option. On Monday John Kerry spoke with remarkable passion about the “moral obscenity” of using chemical weapons, and about the need to enforce “accountability for those who would use the world’s most heinous weapons against the world’s most vulnerable people.” Amen, Mr. Secretary, especially considering that you used to be Bashar’s best friend in Washington.

But now those words must be made to mean something, lest they become a piece of that other moral obscenity: the West’s hitherto bland indifference to Syria’s suffering. Condemnation can no longer suffice. It recalls the international reaction to Mussolini’s invasion of Abyssinia, captured by the magazine Punch:

“We don’t want you to fight/but by jingo if you do/We will probably issue a joint memorandum/Suggesting a mild disapproval of you.” Mussolini went on to conquer the country—using chemical weapons.

The world can ill-afford a reprise of the 1930s, when the barbarians were given free rein by a West that had lost its will to enforce global order. Yes, a Tomahawk aimed at Assad could miss, just as the missiles aimed at Saddam did. But there’s also a chance it could hit and hasten the end of the civil war. And there’s both a moral and deterrent value in putting Bashar and Maher on the same list that once contained the names of bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki.

[…….]

Read the rest – Target Assad

I downloaded a new e-book by Douglas Murray  (only 57 pages)  called Islamophlia: A Very Metropolitan Entity” only $6.99. You will enjoy reading it.

 

 

Al Qaeda seizes Umayyad Mosque In Aleppo

by Phantom Ace ( 1 Comment › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Headlines, Syria at February 28th, 2013 - 12:20 pm

The Syrian branch of al-Qaeda, the al-Nusra Front has won a  symbolic victory over Assad’s forces in Alleppo. They have seized the historic Umayyad Mosque.

Rebels seized control of the Umayyad Mosque in Syria’s second city of Aleppo on Thursday after days of fierce clashes that damaged the historic building, a watchdog reported.

Regime troops were forced to withdraw at dawn, taking up positions in buildings around the landmark structure, said the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

I wonder what Obama has to say about al-Qaeda being decimated?

Syria’s Stalingrad?

by Mojambo ( 82 Comments › )
Filed under Syria, World War II at August 17th, 2012 - 8:00 am

It is a mere matter of time until the Assad regime which has held Syria in an iron grip since 1969 goes the way of the Saddam regime in Iraq. The question is, what comes next? It is interesting that the Assad butchers are reluctant to send in ground forces for fear of massive defections. I guess their army senses which side is the ‘strong horse”. Question – if Aleppo is the Stalingrad of Syria – who is the General Vasilli Chuikov (the commander of the Soviet 62nd Army which defended Stalingrad)? Also, note the nihilism of the Syrian rebels -they don’t care if the entire country is destroyed. My advice is let them destroy each other.

by Richard Spencer

By tank shell, by MiG rocket, Syria’s cities are gradually being ground to dust. A stream of pick-up trucks heads north out of Aleppo each day, carrying the bodies of slain shop-keepers and car mechanics, amateur revolutionaries finding permanent peace in the dusty home villages they left just a few days ago.

This is a civil war that is destroying his country, but Abdulaziz al-Salameh, provisional head of the Aleppo revolutionary council, has the bravado of a Second World War general as he looks at the chaos, and the clear prospect of more. “We are prepared to see the city destroyed before we give it up,” he said in an interview with The Sunday Telegraph in the early hours of Saturday.

The key battle of the Syrian war is now raging in Aleppo, the country’s largest and richest city. Earlier this year, the Free Syrian Army withdrew from strongholds in other cities such as Homs when the loss of civilian life under bombardment became overwhelming. Aleppo, Mr Salameh said, would be different, more like Misurata, the Libyan port that held out against the vastly superior firepower of Muammar Gadaffi’s forces. Or even Stalingrad.

“Assad destroyed Homs, and he destroyed Hama and Deraa before that,” he said. “The whole world looked on, issued condemnations, did nothing. We will not give up, even if Syria is destroyed, and the last man killed.”

Aleppo is not yet Stalingrad, or even Homs, parts of which are a wasteland of wrecked buildings. But the shelling of the city began in earnest this week, when the army surged into the western suburb of Salaheddin, the gateway to the northern districts where its men have been under FSA siege for three weeks.

With the regime afraid to send in ground troops – allegedly because they fear they might defect – the assault is led from the skies. All week, the MiG and trainer jets circled the city in pairs, occasionally swooping to rake rebel positions with gunfire and missiles.

The MiGs, it is clear, do not have the technology that made the Nato attacks on Libya so devastatingly effective last year – an air campaign in which The Sunday Telegraph saw a government office block used for intelligence gathering levelled and the shop attached to it still open for business the next day.

On Monday, missiles aimed at the FSA headquarters in Aleppo missed by 20 yards and hit a house behind, killing nine men, women and children. The pattern was repeated all week, ending in the bombing of a bakery with the loss of 12 lives on Thursday – just because, it seems, it was close to an apartment building used as a rebel media centre.

[……]

On the front line, though, the rebels have suffered a harsher toll. When ground troops finally moved into Salaheddin on Thursday morning, it seemed as though they would be overwhelmed.

The FSA lost 30 dead in Salaheddin last week. Across the district its men are pinned down by snipers of greater accuracy than before.

“They are using all kinds of weapons,” said Mohammed al-Hadid, a defector captain, on Saturday.

“They are so expert I do not believe they are Syrians. I was an officer in the army and we didn’t have snipers that good.”

As he spoke, shots rang down an alley behind him, pinging against the wall of the building opposite, already peppered with bullet-holes. An elderly couple fearfully tried to cross.

[…….]

The fight is becoming a classic case of hand-to-hand urban warfare. Both sides claim to have the upper hand, but the battle for Salaheddin is still to win.They are using the Stalingrad-era tactic of punching holes in buildings to move around out of the line of fire.

This led Abu Suleiman, 30, into an extraordinary stand-off when they came upon three regime soldiers doing the same.

“We were standing there face-to-face and we ran into neighbouring apartments,” he said. “We started shouting at them to defect, that Bashar wasn’t going to help them.”

After failing to persuade them, they withdrew.

[…….]

He limped off, his leg bleeding from a shrapnel wound. His platoon leader was dead. Aboul Abeid, the deputy to Hajji Mari, the head of the Liwa al-Tawhid – the Brigade of Unity leading the rebel fight for the city – followed shortly after, one of the FSA’s most high-profile losses.

But again the regime troops, it seems, were unable to hold on to their ground. While the FSA claimed to have stopped the advance in it tracks, it is clear that the army’s initial gains were sweeping – Aboul Walid came face to face with grenade-throwing soldiers and has the scars to prove it.

Now, though, the FSA is creeping back.

A month ago, what is happening in Aleppo would have seemed impossible. The rebels held a handful of towns and villages across the north of the province, as they did in neighbouring Idlib and in Homs province to the south. Aleppo, Syria’s richest city, with its tourist souqs, boulevards and park, its broadly neutral Christian quarters and its pro-regime business elite, seemed invulnerable.

The strategy that Mr Salameh – who goes by the nom de guerre Abu Jumaa – and Hajji Mari then devised was so striking that it led to a split in rebel ranks. The two men – old friends, one a honey trader from the town of Anadan, the other a seed merchant from Mari – had orchestrated the rural uprising from early on, and decided it was time to strike a decisive blow.

They took their rural volunteer followers with them.

The leaders of what until then had been thought of as the “proper” Free Syrian Army – defected colonels such as Abdul Jabar al-Oqaidi – thought they were crazy, and refused to join in. But on the night of July 18, after a bomb attack in Damascus killed four of the Assad regime’s closest military henchmen, Abu Jumaa and Hajji Mari decided to act.

[……..]

The dominance of these amateur generals in what both the rebels, the exiled politicians of the Syrian National Council and the regime itself admits is the pivotal battle of the Syrian civil war poses a new problem for the West.

So far, the Americans and the Turks, who have not been providing arms but have helped to channel them in the “correct” direction, to avoid them falling into Islamist hands, have preferred to work with groups of predominantly secular defected officers and the Washington-based Syrian Support Group.

Men such as Abu Jumaa and Hajji Mari are relative unknowns, not overly concerned by the West’s fear of al-Qaeda, which they say plays a marginal role if any at all in the revolution. Some of these revolutionaries have loyalties or at least sympathies to the Muslim Brotherhood, but they also cooperate with much more ideological Islamist groups on the front line, such as the Abu Emara Brigade in Salaheddin.

Yet if the rebels are to win, it is they who need arming. Mr Salameh said his main obstacle to driving out the regime from the northern and far western part of Aleppo was lack of ammunition. He said he had received two small shipments of weapons from Turkey – one of 300 rifles with ammunition and 700 rocket-propelled grenades, and one of 3,000 hand grenades.

“We need help from the US and Europe,” he said. “We have been in this revolution from the beginning, we have the men on the ground and we will take all of Aleppo very quickly if we have ammunition.”

If not, the battle will grind on, the regime pumelling the city little by little into submission. Mr Salameh says he has no regrets at what he has started, even though more than 20,000 people have now died.

Asked if he is affected by those in Aleppo who say they oppose the regime but are also angry with the FSA for making it a target for the bombers, he becomes angry. There is clearly no love lost for the big city from the honey trader from the countryside.

The people of Aleppo stood by as Homs was pulverised, he said. Why should it only be other cities that were caught in the eye of the storm?

“Why destroy one part of Syria and not another part of Syria?” he said. “If all of Syria is destroyed, that is only fair.”

Read the rest– Aleppo ‘is becoming Syria’s Stalingrad’