► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Anti-Jihad’

Anti-Sharia Protests in Support of Amina Tyler

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 38 Comments › )
Filed under Censorship, Europe, Free Speech, Islam, Sharia (Islamic Law), World at April 5th, 2013 - 2:04 am

This is not your run of the mill San Francisco Slutwalk.

The demonstrations were in support of a young Tunisian activist named Amina Tyler. Last month, Tyler posted naked images of herself online, with the words “I own my body; it’s not the source of anyone’s honor” written on her bare chest. The head of Tunisia’s “Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice,” reportedly called for Tyler to be stoned to death for her putatively obscene actions, lest they lead to an epidemic.

Full story on recent protests (and arrests) here. These women are serious.

Anti IslamTopless Protest Anti IslamTopless Protest.3 Anti IslamTopless Protest.2

Rand Paul: “Any attack on Israel will be treated as an attack on the United States”

by Phantom Ace ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Islamists, Israel, Republican Party, Special Report, The Political Right at January 25th, 2013 - 10:05 am

Ron Paul was an apologist for the Islamic cause. He blamed blow back and support of Israel for the reasons why the Islamic world hates the United States. His son Rand Paul takes a totally different view.

When it comes to the Islamic threat, Rand Paul is one of the few in Washington who gets it. He wants to cut off aid to Islamic nations because they use that money to spread their filth. The US is arming the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and arming Hizb’Allah in Lebanon. Rand Paul also is tired of US aid being used to make Israel an American vassal state. Instead Rand Paul says the US should make it clear that an attack on Israel is an attack on America.

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul took what very well could be considered his most pro-Israel stance yet, saying in an interview that an attack on Israel should be treated as an attack on the United States.

Asked whether the United States would stand with Israel and provide it foreign aid if the Jewish state were attacked by its enemies, Paul went a step further.

“Well absolutely we stand with Israel,” he said in an interview with Breitbart News, “but what I think we should do is announce to the world – and I think it is pretty well known — that any attack on Israel will be treated as an attack on the United States.”

[….]

But the younger Paul is trying to demonstrate that he is pro-Israel, even if he opposes foreign aid to the Jewish state. He reiterated in his interview with Breitbart News his opposition to foreign aid, but again noted that he favors cutting aid off first to anti-American countries before ultimately cutting it off to American allies like Israel.

Rand Paul is correct in his stance. The US is giving aid and is arming both sides in the Israeli-Islamic conflict. Without question Rand Paul is the most anti-Jihad politician in Washington. This means the Democrats and the Republican establishment at the behest of their Islamic masters will seek to destroy Rand Paul. Conservatives and Libertarians should rally to Rand Paul’s defense.

Would Mitt Romney say this?

by Phantom Ace ( 40 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Elections 2012, History, Israel, Palestinians, Republican Party at December 9th, 2011 - 5:00 pm

Newt Gingrich spoke the truth about the so called Palestinians. He said they are an invented people! Being a historian, he knows very well it’s an invented term for Southern Syrians.

Would Mitt Romney ever say this? We all know the answer. Mitt wouldn’t want to piss off his Saudi masters!

(Hat Tip waldensianspirit and Weasel Zippers)

On the Radicalization of Anders Behring Breivik

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 5 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-Jihad, Censorship, Europe, Headlines, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Politics, Terrorism, World at August 9th, 2011 - 1:18 pm

Pamela Geller linked to a blog called Answering Muslims. The video is worth a look – aside from a bit of theatrical silliness, the guy has some very good points. If you watch it all the way to the end, you’re a nazi.

The media are blaming critics of Islam (such as Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller) for the radicalization of Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik. However, Breivik said that he turned to terrorism in response to media censorship. Who’s to blame for his extremism?