► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Economy’

Shakey Ground

by Iron Fist ( 165 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Misery Index, Politics, Regulation at January 26th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

Well, it is over. Last night, President Obama went on national TV and gave us his best shot at a national pep-talk. He failed miserably. He either does not care, or does not understand, about the rather dire straits of America’s economy today. Unemployment is at nearly 10% (higher than that if you count the workers who have dropped out of the workforce and the under-employed), and has been there longer than any period since the last Depression. If Obama were a Republican, this would be called a Depression. Don’t let a couple of quarters of anemic growth fool you. There were periods of slight growth during the last Depression as well. It is the long-term unemployment and the structural problems in the economy that make this a Depression, not some artificial tick on some economist’s Power-Point presentation.

To see our structural problems, we need look no further than this comparison of manufacturing output vs. manufacturing jobs. We see growth in the manufacturing output, but a serious decline in the actual jobs numbers:

Since 1975, manufacturing output has more than doubled, while employment in the sector has decreased by 31%. While these American job losses are indeed sobering, they are not an indication of declining U.S. competitiveness. In fact, these statistics reveal that the average American manufacturer is over three times more productive today than they were in 1975 – a sure sign of economic progress.

The true cause of dwindling American competitiveness is a tax code that puts domestic firms at a clear disadvantage – not a lack of skill or innovation on the part of the American worker.

Read the highlighted part. This is key to understanding where we are, and what must be done to get us out of this Depression. American corporate taxes are among the highest in the world, and we add those taxes to a regulatory scheme that can only be described as predatory. Why should we expect such an environment to create jobs? It is like putting an orchid in bleached sand and watering it with saltwater. Not much will grow.

To cure this problem, we need to attack it on two fronts: tax code and regulatory. I will give Obama some credit. He mentioned both of these in his State of the Union speech. He did not really address them, though. The Republicans must act on his lead, though, and quickly move to eliminate or reduce over-regulation and give our dying corporations some much-needed tax relief. Only when these two things have been accomplished will we (hopefully) see some actual job growth. There is the third leg of the triangle, though, demand to consider.

American Demand was high throughout the 1990s as people saw unrealistic gains in their stock portfolios and housing values, and they borrowed heavily to spend on damn near anything. We are a nation with a lot of stuff. The economists called this the “Wealth Effect” as people spent to create lifestyles based on how wealthy they felt, rather than how wealthy they actually were. No one questioned whether or not this demand was sustainable. The stock market and housing prices seemingly always went up, so no one cared.

Well, that has all changed now. We call it the “Tech Bubble” and the “Housing Bubble” and yes, Virginia, housing values can go down:

Outside D.C., a grim housing market
By Dina ElBoghdady
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 25, 2011; 4:12 PM

While home prices continue to tumble in many major metropolitan areas, the Washington region is one of the few bright spots where prices are rising, according to two reports released Tuesday.

Only four of the 20 areas tracked by the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index posted year-over-year price gains in November. Washington led the way, with a 3.5 increase in single-family home prices, according to the report’s numbers.

A separate analysis by research firm Delta Associates found that average home prices in the D.C. area in the fourth quarter were up 7.5 percent from a year earlier, to $404,501. The jump was the area’s fifth consecutive quarterly gain, the report said.

The Washington region outshines many other metro areas in part because its robust job market has bolstered demand and prices for housing. But the area faces a risk over the coming months that the federal government could rein in spending and slash its workforce, undercutting the local economy and upending the gains in home prices.

Nationally, housing prices remain under pressure from the bloated supply of foreclosures and the nation’s high unemployment rate. As long as people are without jobs or fear losing their livelihoods, they are unlikely to buy homes and help drive up prices.

The closely watched S&P/Case-Shiller report shows that housing prices, compared year-over-year, have declined nationally for six consecutive months. The downward path suggests that housing prices could, by spring, hit their lowest level since April 2009, said David Blitzer, the index committee’s chairman.

Already, nine major cities have dipped to new lows, the report shows. They are Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Detroit, Las Vegas, Miami, Portland, Ore., Seattle and Tampa.

In the past, a revival of the housing market has played huge role in pulling the economy out of downturns. So a double-dip in home prices would be a setback to the nation’s financial health just as the economy is starting to show signs of improvement.

We have been hearing much about an Obama Boom because “we aren’t in a Recession anymore”. The unemployment numbers tell a different story, and the housing market offers us a grim picture for the coming months. Housing values are going down, and there will be a negative “Wealth Effect” as people feel poorer, even if their income has remained steady. Couple that with high personal debt brought on by over-borrowing during the boom years, and it presents a stark, but realistic, view of the near-term future. In the past, it was relatively easy for a person with a solid middle-class job to borrow a quarter- or even a half-million dollars between mortgage, second mortgage, car, boat, and credit cards and the like. Easy to get into deep debt. It will be harder paying that debt off, especially now, when housing prices have declined and so many people are upside-down on their homes.

Keynesian Economic Theory, The Beast That Won’t Die.

by Flyovercountry ( 181 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Economy, Progressives, Socialism at January 4th, 2011 - 4:30 pm

Sunday night of this week, I had the opportunity to sit down and have a political discussion with three college students. My interest in the topic of conversation was piqued when I overheard one of them positing the theory that we could balance our budget by gutting military spending. His contention was that we would be able to perform what ever social welfare programs we needed here with the savings from a bloated and unnecessary standing armed forces. It seems that last semester, he took a course in macro-economics at Case Western University. I illustrated the University for this reason. Case Western is typically listed near the top of most lists. It is usually in the same league as the Ivies. The academic requirements are very stringent, and the reputation of the University as a top notch place for children to get educated is solid. That being said, I was somewhat surprised that a student who had just finished a course in macro would be parroting the often discredited theory of Keynesian Economic Dogma. How is it possible, that we are still teaching this model to our students a full 80 years after it has been proven to be disastrously wrong? Do his parents realize that they are shelling out 50 grand a year to teach their child crap? More importantly to me, why won’t the Keynesian theory die? The Keynesian’s are like zombies from the classic George Romero movies, the, “Living Dead,” films. Mindless creatures moving slowly which can’t be killed but just move about the business of slowly consuming every sentient person in town.

Here is my theory. The Keynesian school of thought is wildly popular with politicians. This provides a terrific sounding collection of big words which justifies irresponsible behavior. Politicians love spending other people’s money. They love providing pork projects to those who got them elected. They love spreading favors around to get re-elected. They love having a group of psychophants around to pour adulation upon them. What they don’t love is the accountability that comes along with irresponsible spending. They don’t love their constituency noticing that reckless spending has horrendous economic results.

Enter Lord John Maynard Keynes. His theory says, go ahead and spend money you don’t have, it’ll be good for the economy. It doesn’t even matter what you spend it on, the stimulative effect will be the same no matter what. Even though it has never worked, we can trot it out and get the voters on board because it all sounds very cool. People like to be told, here is your share of a new, albeit a nonexistent pie, and you will get it for free. The problem of course is that it is not free. The deficit in this country is crippling, and the solution is to stop spending wildly asinine amounts of money on crap we don’t need or want. Unfortunately though, our political leaders are addicted to power and the fruits of our labor. So like an alcoholic who is told that a glass of wine every day is good for his/her heart, Politicians will try to convince us that the way out of debt is to spend even more money we don’t have. Make no mistake about it though, Keynesian Economic Policy is nothing more than our old friend, the Broken Window Fallacy, rearing it’s ugly head once again.

Will somebody please kill off all of these gosh darned zombies already.

Cross posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative



*Nominations still open for The Blogmocracy Awards 2010*



The cold December weather, the climate hoax, and…secession?

by 1389AD ( 90 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Breaking News, Climate, Economy, Elections 2010, Environmentalism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Regulation, Weather at January 3rd, 2011 - 1:30 pm

(The owners of Blogmocracy do not share this contributors opinion of secession. However, in the interest of the free flow of ideas, we are posting this in its entirety even though the owners think secession is a horrible idea and we do not want this blog ‘tagged’ as a pro-secessionist blog. We have not given up on the American Experiment yet, some some folks have. What are other ideas short of secession that states can do, in reality, to prevent fedgov from destroying local economies?)

.

Let’s begin by hearing expert meteorologist Joe Bastardi of AccuWeather debunk “anthropogenic global warming” (AGW). He minces no words in refuting those who would claim that the cold weather in December 2010 is somehow caused by human activity. It’s refreshing to hear him speak:

AccuWeather’s Bastardi debunks global warming causing cold weather myth, warns of severe 2011 drought

(h/t: Climate Depot)

By Jeff Poor – The Daily Caller

Much of the United States and Europe is suffering through extreme wintery weather conditions. But what is causing it?

Some have blamed global warming, specifically the “Arctic paradox.” However, AccuWeather’s chief hurricane and long-range forecaster Joe Bastardi told the Fox Business Network on Tuesday you can chalk it up to three things – oceans, sunspots and volcanoes.

“A few years ago, about why we have to start looking for more and more of this [cold weather],” Bastardi said. “It’s called the triple crown of cooling – the natural reversal of the oceans cycles. Three years ago the Pacific went into the cold state. Solar activity, very low sunspot activity and volcanic activity, not the kind you see in the tropics but the kind we had in the Arctic regions a couple of winters ago — and this is something that could be causing a return to for instance, the times of the Victorian era when they used to have ice fairs in the early-1800s around Christmastime on the Thames and you’re seeing that type of thing go on.”

As for those who are blaming global warming, Bastardi said that theory was childish and presented instead the possibility of long-term global cooling.

“Well, I’ve been saying what I believe is going on is this is the big debate between the natural cycles and the forces of AGW [anthropogenic global warming] – by the way, these folks claiming that global warming is causing severe cold is like the kid on the playground who doesn’t get his way and takes his ball home. The fact of the matter is the forecast that was made by this forecaster three years ago that we we’re going to start seeing these things because of this and it opens up the big debate – are the natural cycles taking over and are we going to see cooling over the next 20 to 30 years? You see, we started measuring temperatures with satellite at the end of the last cold cycle in the Pacific. We had nothing but warm in the Pacific and warm in the Atlantic. What’s going to happen to the temperatures if the oceans are warm? Now that they’re cooling let’s see what’s going to happens in the next 20 to 30 years.”

Read the rest.

Climate change fraud as a political weapon

The Obama Administration and the Democrat Party have doubled down on the anthropogenic “climate change” agenda, despite the fact that the science behind it has been thoroughly debunked as a deliberate fraud. The progressives are pushing intensive government regulation to “save the world” from the nonexistent threat of manmade climate change, not because they truly believe it will happen, but because they are our enemies. A glimpse of our pre-industrial past reveals the quality of life they have in mind for us – though not for themselves – in the future.

A startling evisceration of the motives of the progressive/green faction appears on 2.0: The Blogmocracy: Progressives claim blizzards are a sign of global warning. On that thread, Pat comments:

Indeed. The vast majority of Warmists are really totalitarians. The government is highly in favor of this hoax of AGW being a serious issue because it will lead to higher taxes, it will eliminate the free market, and it will involve government in every aspect of your life from what you eat, what you do, what you think to how many children you will be allowed. The latter to make room for the hordes of immigrants we are morally bound to support as reparations.

Obama’s malignant narcissism, hubris, and megalomania are evidently boundless. In his latest attempt to make an end-run around the US Constitution, he does not hesitate to “mess with Texas” – one of the few States in the US that still has any traces of a functioning economy.

Investors.com: Messing With Texas

(h/t: Da_Beerfreak)

…Two days before Christmas, EPA Regional Administrator Al Armendariz, in a letter to industry, said the agency was taking permitting authority over refineries, power plants and cement facilities in Texas away from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) as of Jan. 2, 2011.

Happy New Year!

The EPA’s new rules — continuing an Obama administration pattern of using regulations to circumvent the will of the people in implementing what it cannot get through Congress, such as cap-and-trade — were issued after the U.S. Supreme Court said it had the authority to regulate carbon dioxide, the basis of all life on the planet and what we exhale, as a pollutant under the Clean Air Act.

Texas was not amused and is the only state to refuse to implement the rules, filing suit against the EPA.

In Texas’ suit, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said the documented IPCC and CRU fraud, on which EPA findings are based, made any policy decisions based on that work flawed and unjustified.

Abbott cited several examples in which he said climate scientists engaged in an “ongoing, orchestrated effort to violate freedom of information laws, exclude scientific research and manipulate temperature data.”

“With billions of dollars at stake, EPA outsourced the scientific basis for its greenhouse gas regulation to a scandal-plagued international organization (the IPCC) that cannot be considered objective or trustworthy,” Abbott argued.

[Texas Gov. Rick] Perry, a champion of the 10th Amendment, says, “This legal action is being taken to protect the Texas economy and the jobs that go with it, as well as defend Texas’ freedom to continue our successful environmental strategies free from federal overreach.”

Two days after the midterm elections, President Obama served notice that the failure of the outgoing Congress to pass cap-and-trade and the unlikelihood of a GOP House pursuing the matter would not be an impediment.

“Cap-and-trade was just one way of skinning the cat; it was not the only way,” he said. “I’m going to be looking for other means to address this problem.”

Read it all.

This is an outright attempt to ruin the economy of Texas.

Obama is punishing Texas for having voted Republican; this is exactly how Chicago politicians behave.

Obama is making an example of Texas, so as to threaten regulatory strangulation and extinction against any other State that resists submission to his arbitrary will.

Obama is deliberately crippling the economy of Texas, because it supplies the rest of the US with a viable domestic source of energy. Domestic fossil fuels and nuclear energy must be shut down, in order to make various “green” boondoggles appear profitable when they are not, and in order to make us more dependent on oil imports from our Muslim enemies. To put it bluntly, Obama is selling us out to fraudsters at home and jihadis abroad.

I doubt that the citizenry of the US as a whole is capable of dismantling the tyranny of the federal government. This tyranny has crept too deep into the culture and the structure of society in too many parts of the US.

Secession is another way out of that stranglehold. The State of Texas is obviously big enough to stand on its own, and if it does, most or all of the Southeast is likely to join with it.

While the following writer does not quite come out and say “secession,” he hints at it strongly enough:

The Red and Blue States’ Fort Sumter

(h/t: The Osprey)

By William Tucker on 12.28.10 @ 6:09AM

The opening shot of the War Between the Red and Blue States may have been fired last Friday when the Environmental Protection Administration announced its intention to take over Texas’s authority on issuing clean air permits to new industrial facilities as of January 2.

It is hard to imagine a more stark confrontation between public and private sector-oriented economies. Texas has the strongest economy in the nation, based on its philosophy of limited government. The Texas Legislature convenes only in odd-numbered years is constitutionally limited to meeting only 140 days. Until this year, Texas has had a budget surplus and still has $7.5 billion in a rainy-day fund created by voters in 1988. During 2006 and 2007, Texas created 52 percent of all new jobs in the nation, according to a study done by the Southern Methodist University’s Cox School of Business. People are flocking to the state so fast that Texas will gain four seats in the House of Representatives in the new decade.

Washington, on the other hand, has run up a trillion-dollar budget deficit and destroyed private-sector jobs all over the country while expanding the government and presiding over 10 percent unemployment. The states on the East and West Coast that adhere most closely to Washington’s philosophy are approaching insolvency. Yet they continue to pursue dreamy energy agendas, trying to close down existing power plants and refusing to build new ones while planning for a world running on windmills and solar collectors.

Now Washington is going to try to impose this blue-state agenda on Texas. The struggle will dwarf the Arizona-versus-Washington contest over immigration.

In fact the conflict over energy production has been brewing for decades. As far back as the 1920s, Texan entrepreneurs built natural gas pipelines to carry their surplus gas north, only to run into Progressive Era reforms saying that utilities had to be regulated as “natural monopolies.” In 1936, the Roosevelt Administration extended this municipal regulation back to the gas pipelines themselves, giving the Federal Power Commission authority to fix prices across the country. Then after endless prodding from northern consumer states, the U.S. Supreme Court finally decided in 1954 that the whole diversified collection of thousands of wildcatters and individual well owners in Texas and Louisiana constituted a “monopoly” that could be regulated by the federal government. Over the next twenty years, the D.C. Court of Appeals tried every trick imaginable to prod gas out of its Texas owners’ hands. It developed the “life of the field” doctrine saying once gas had been put into interstate commerce it could not be withdrawn. Even if a well owner went bankrupt, he was still obliged to keep sending gas to northern consumers at prices fixed by federal regulators. Still, Texas managed to keep as much gas as possible at home. When the Arab Oil Boycott prompted thousands of northern businesses and residences to convert from oil to gas, the whole system collapsed in the Natural Gas Crisis of 1976, when factories and schools closed for weeks in Ohio and Pennsylvania for lack of gas. Meanwhile Texas was using gas to generate half its electricity. The Carter Administration was appalled to discover these distortions but decided to solve them in typical fashion by extending federal price controls even further into Texas as well. Bumper stickers sprouted all over Texas and Louisiana declaring “Let the Yankees Freeze in the Dark.”

Fortunately, the Reagan Administration came along and solved the problem by appointing new members to the Federal Power Commission who deregulated gas prices within a decade. Prices fell as new supplies gushed forth and for the first time the nation had adequate supplies of natural gas — so much so that we resumed the wasteful practice of burning gas for electricity after environmentalists stymied everything else. When conventional supplies peaked in 2000, however, prices quadrupled and gas-dependent industries such as plastics, chemicals, and fertilizer started fleeing for foreign shores. Once again, Texas came through, this time through a stubborn Fort Worth oil man named George Mitchell who spent ten years experimenting with various techniques of horizontal drilling and fracturing hard rock until he devised a way of “fracking” huge gas deposits out of the Barnett Shale. Once again, Texas had rescued the nation.

Read the rest.

Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.

More here:


Originally published on 1389 Blog.


Sovereign Debt 101

by 1389AD ( 104 Comments › )
Filed under China, Economy, Europe, France, Germany, Health Care, Healthcare, Progressives, Socialism, Spain, UK at January 2nd, 2011 - 3:30 pm

Why The World Economy Sucks

(h/t: yenta-fada)

What are we talking about here?

Business Dictionary offers a long-winded, technical definition of sovereign debt. In a nutshell, sovereign debt is debt that a government owes. If a debtor government cannot repay its debt, its creditors (bondholders) do not have the power to force it into bankruptcy and divide up its remaining assets. So if the debt goes bad, both the debtor government and its creditors are in a predicament.

Government debt. Under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, the repayment of sovereign debt cannot be forced by the creditors and it is thus subject to compulsory rescheduling, interest rate reduction, or even repudiation. The only protection available to the creditors is threat of the loss of credibility and lowering of the international standing (the sovereign debt rating) of the country which may make it much more difficult to borrow in the future.

The Greek Debt Crisis Explained in Four Minutes

Note: The above video makes some valid points about the financial house of cards that various governments are busily trying to prop up. That said, I place no faith in the ability of the IMF or any other international financial organization to do anything other than worsen the crash by attempting to delay the inevitable.

I also must point out that there is a tremendous difference between a private enterprise with a good credit rating borrowing at a low interest rate to invest in future productivity, and a government borrowing money for supposedly the same reason. Experience has proven governments to be incapable of investing borrowed money in anything that will result in economic expansion.

The real outcome of such wasteful spending will be more like this chilling ad by Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW):

TV Ad: United States owes China


Originally published on 1389 Blog.