► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Environmentalists’

A glimpse of our pre-industrial past

by 1389AD ( 151 Comments › )
Filed under Art, Economy, History, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Music, Open thread, Russia, Transportation at December 8th, 2010 - 4:30 pm

Look closely at this masterpiece by the Ukrainian artist Ilya Repin.

It is worth clicking the image to see a larger view.

Barge Haulers on the Volga by Ilya Repin

Barge Haulers on the Volga

This is what life was like for too many people in a pre-industrial society.

Read the Wikipedia article. Some of the people pulling the barge had once been part of what passed for the middle class in that place and time. Once they lost their footing in the middle class, this was their fate. As far as I know, none were convicts – they were just people down on their luck and desperate to make some sort of a living. Their only option was to hire themselves out for toil too arduous even for a beast of burden.

Barge Haulers is inspired by scenes witnessed by the artist while holidaying on the Volga in 1870. He made a number of preparatory studies, mostly in oil, while staying in Shiriaev Buerak, near Stavropol. The sketches include landscapes, and views of the Volga and barge haulers.

The characters depicted are based on actual people whom the artist came to know while preparing the work. He had had difficulty finding subjects to pose for him, even for a fee, because of a folklorish belief that a subject’s soul would leave his possession once his image was put down on paper. The subjects include a former soldier, a former priest, and a painter. Although Repin depicted eleven men, women also performed the work and there were normally many more people in a barge-hauling gang; Repin selected these figures as representative of a broad swathe of the working classes of Russian society. That some had once held relatively high social positions dismayed the young artist, who had initially planned to produce a far more superficial work contrasting exuberant day-trippers (which he himself had been) with the careworn burlaks. Repin found a particular empathy with Kanin, the defrocked priest, who is portrayed as the lead hauler and looks outwards towards the viewer.
[…]
Barge Haulers on the Volga shows a row of eleven male burlaks dragging a barge on the Volga River that must be pulled upstream against the current. The men are dressed in rags and bound with leather harnesses. They are rendered as mostly stoical, although in obvious physical discomfort, with their bodies bowed in toil. The scene is rendered in a white, silvery light which has been described as “almost Venetian”. In earlier studies, it was dominated by blue tones.

The men appear to be unsupervised and form the focus of the picture, with the barge relegated to a minor role at the rear of the frame. Further in the distance is a tiny steam-powered boat, perhaps a suggestion that the back-breaking labour of the barge haulers is no longer necessary in the industrial age. Also worthy of note is the inverted Russian flag flying from the main mast of the barge suggesting adding to the sense that something is not quite right. Repin echoes the stop-go rhythm of the labour in the undulating line of the workers’ heads. In the preparatory studies, many of the figures were positioned differently; for example the second man was shown wearing a cap with his head bowed into his chest.

There is a general sense of mounting exhaustion and despair moving from left to right amongst the group; the last hauler seems oblivious to his surroundings and drifts from the line out towards the viewer. The exception is a fair-haired boy in the centre of the group. Set brightly against the uniform muted tones of his companions, his head is raised looking into the distance, while he pulls against his straps as if determined to free himself from his task…

Russian and Ukrainian society at that time had too little infrastructure to support much of a middle class. It was not simply a matter of income inequality…there was too little wealth to go around, because too little wealth was being produced. Industrialization was still in its infancy. Fossil fuels were in very limited use.

Sound familiar?

This is what the leftist/green/pro-jihadi convergence wants – not for themselves, of course – but for us.

Be thankful that it is not OUR faces staring out of that bleak canvas.

Not yet, anyway.


Leonid Kharitonov & Red Army Choir – Song of the Volga Boatmen (Live)
(h/t: The Osprey)


Feodor Chaliapin – Song of Volga Boatmen (1936)


What’s Wrong with Environmentalists

by snork ( 78 Comments › )
Filed under Environmentalism at June 8th, 2010 - 9:00 am

There’s an oped in the Jun 3 NYT by one David Uhlmann, professor of environmental law at the University of Michigan. The subject is potential criminal prosecution of BP for environmental damage. From a legal standpoint, it’s kind of vapid, because it doesn’t claim to have any insight into the facts of the case, just that if the DoJ can prove criminal negligence, there are laws against making messes like that. Duh.

Prosecutors must examine all witness statements, internal documents and any physical evidence that remains after the explosion. But if the news articles are accurate, the Justice Department should bring criminal charges against BP, and possibly Transocean and Halliburton, for violations of the Clean Water Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Refuse Act — the same charges brought in the Exxon Valdez case. Exxon ultimately paid a criminal fine of $125 million, the largest ever for an environmental crime.

In this case, though, a fine of that size may not satisfy the many people who are outraged by the gulf spill. The public expects felony charges and multibillion-dollar fines.

That latter paragraph seem  odd coming from a law professor; what the mob may want is legally irrelevant. He goes on:

All three of the environmental laws that may have been broken provide for criminal penalties, but only the Clean Water Act includes felony charges. For the government to prove a felony violation of the act it would need to demonstrate that the defendant knew oil would be discharged into United States waters. A felony violation can be easy to prove when a business dumps waste into a river, but it’s harder in the case of an oil spill.

I understand that his specialty is environmental law, but if BP can be shown to be criminally negligent, then don’t you suppose that the 11 killed might be worth a mention? Certainly in that case, manslaughter charges are fair game.

This lays bare the mentality of the environmentalist. The 11 people killed are nothing. The oily pelicans are all that matter. Even if it’s not germane to his point, that fact that there was no mention at all of such an important aspect of this is shocking. He mentions the 15 killed at the 2005 incident at BP’s Texas City refinery as a supporting his argument of a negligent culture. They were just props, not people. As far as he’s concerned, the only thing that matters is the water and the animals.

This is what I find so revolting about the environmental left. At best, they consider human life irrelevant. In reality, they find it contemptible. Except for themselves and their buddies, of course.

Mr. Uhlmann will no doubt take his SUV to the gas station soon, and expect the stuff to come from somewhere.