► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Democrats’

While You Weren’t Watching

by Iron Fist ( 4 Comments › )
Filed under Headlines at November 10th, 2011 - 1:08 pm

Senate Democrats, who haven’t passed a jobs bill yet, are trying to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act. They can’t be bothered to do anything to help the millions of unemployed and under-employed in the US, but defining marriage as being between a man and a woman (a law passed with Democrat support and signed by Democrat Bill Clinton) gets their panties all in a twist. This speaks volumes about their priorities. I will give them this, they are fighting for what they believe in. I wish our side would engage in some of that sometime.

Congressman LTC (USA-ret) Allen West: Obama’s a Marxist, and is purposely destroying our economy

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 61 Comments › )
Filed under Academia, Anti-semitism, Barack Obama, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, government, History, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Misery Index, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Socialism, Tranzis, unemployment, Unions, Unions at September 30th, 2011 - 8:30 am

I agree with everything Col. West (and Boortz) say…

Obama versus Alinsky
by Neal Boortz

Rep. Allen West said the other day that he believes Barack Obama is intentionally destroying our economy. He said, “It’s intentional because that’s who this President is. The President is a Marxist who believes in the separation of classes.”

Let’s talk about this idea that Obama may actually be engaged in a conscious attempt to damage the American economy? If so, there’s actually a manual for that! Complete step-by-step instructions on how to wreck a private capitalist economy. It was written by a Marxist named Sul Alinsky, and it’s titled “ Rules for Radicals.” The book is written as a manual “for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.” And to thicken the plot just a bit more … after The Community Organizer won the Democrat nomination in 2008, Saul Alinsky’s son wrote a letter to the editor bragging about how Barack Obama is the model for Alinsky organizing. Here’s your excerpt:

Barack Obama’s training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.

I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.

L. DAVID ALINSKY (Anti-American POS- BiB)

If Obama is so well-versed in his organizing skills, why wouldn’t he be well-versed in other areas of Alinksy’s rules? After all, Obama supposedly taught Alinsky workshops while community organizing in Chicago. But let’s return to this concept that Allen West brought up of intentionally destroying our economy.

From Alinsky…

“The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displace by new patterns…. All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new.”

Is this what Barack Obama meant when he said that we were just five days away from “fundamentally transforming the United States of America”? Obama’s current wealth envy campaign plays right into this concept of creating dissatisfaction and disorganization in order to then build an ideal community.

From Alinsky…

“An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent… He must create a mechanism that can drain off the underlying guilt for having accepted the previous situation for so long a time. Out of this mechanism, a new community organization arises….”

Click here to read the rest…

Whacked-out far-left Libs: Obama not leftist enough, vow to challenge him in primaries

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 61 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Cult of Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives, Socialism at September 20th, 2011 - 11:30 am

This is a shocker (not)! We now have the most leftist, liberal, anti-American, and worst President ever, but he’s not leftist, liberal, or anti-American enough for some of the lunatic fringe from the far-left of the dimocrat party.

They want someone even further to the left.

Too bad Stalin, Pol Pot, or Mao isn’t still around. One of them might be satisfactory to these leftist imbeciles.

Those being considered will most likely include the usual list of washed-up, has-been, brain-dead ignoramuses, like Dennis “we need a Department of Peace” Kucinich, and I’m sure the other far-left kooks will also be considered.

Liberals vow to challenge Obama in Democratic primaries

President Obama’s smooth path to the Democratic nomination may have gotten rockier Monday, after a group of liberal leaders, including former presidential candidate Ralph Nader, announced plans to challenge the incumbent in primaries next year.

The group said the goal is to offer up a handful of candidates from various fields and areas where the president either has failed to stake out a “progressive” position or where he has “drifted toward the corporatist right.”

“Without debates by challengers inside the Democratic Party’s presidential primaries, the liberal/majoritarian agenda will be muted and ignored,” Mr. Nader said in a news release. “The one-man Democratic primaries will be dull, repetitive, and draining of both voter enthusiasm and real bright lines between the two parties that excite voters.”

In search of candidates, Mr. Nader and the others sent out a letter, endorsed by 45 “distinguished leaders,”to elected officials, civic leaders, academics and members of the progressive community who specialize among other things in labor, poverty, military and foreign policy. The list, they said, also includes progressive Democrats who have held national and state office and have fought for progressive reforms.

“We need to put strong Democratic pressure on President Obama in the name of poor and working people” said Cornel West, author and professor at Princeton University who has been highly critical of Mr. Obama’s tenure since helping him get elected in 2008. “His administration has tilted too much toward Wall Street, we need policies that empower Main Street.” Click here to read the rest of the insanity if you’re bored.

BTW, I’d love to see the letter and the list of just exactly who these dolts consider their 45 “distinguished leaders” worthy of receiving this tripe.

Update: And here is the letter (hattip Bumr50)

New Charity Idea: Big Person Pants For Democrats.

by Flyovercountry ( 59 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections 2012, Politics at September 9th, 2011 - 11:30 am

So the latest head scratching theme from the left of center camp is that the Republicans are not showing the President proper respect by not offering a response to his campaign speech thinly veiled as an address to a joint session of congress this evening. Litterally, my mind is racing with a plethora of possible responses to this, but the overwhelming theme is is pretty constant, and that is grow up already. If you are going to feign insult, at least feign insult for something actually insulting.

A question to get things started. When did official opposition party responses become more than an annoying tradition? I can remember the first off party response, it was LLoyd Bentsen answering Goerge Bush’s first State Of The Union Address. It was not meant as a sign of respect. It came across as a Democrat temper tantrum being thrown in response to losing 3 straight Presidential elections. Somehow, our republic managed to survive for over 200 years sans an opposition party response to any address of congress.

Next question, why is this address even being given in front of congress anyhow? Addresses to joint sessions of congress have in the past been limited to State of the Union Addresses and matters of vital national security import only. In Obma’s 34 months in office, he is already the record holder for non SOTU addresses to congress. What makes this even more silly, is that tonight’s speech will have exactly zero deviation from what he has been reading off of his teleprompter since he began running for the Presidency back in 2007. We, all of us, have heard this speech before, and just like every Disney and Don Bluth kids movie sold on video cassette from years ago, I bet we, all of us are able to repeat it word for word today. I believe the term I am searching for here is, Narratum Verbatum.

Third Question, is the badly produced Kabuki Theater worthy of respect? The office of the Presidency deserves respect, but respect is also a two way street. Whatever respect the office deserves should also be paid by the person who holds that office. That is a major source of the lack of respect President Obama is receiving. He does what ever he can to diminish his office, our nation’s standing in the world, and even himself as a leader. Campaigning for reelection is one thing, using a ginned up address to a joint session to deliver the same exact stump speech which has been delivered ad nauseam for 4 years now is something else. Bear in mind that this, “jobs,” program has been promised since January of 2009, and he felt it so important recently that he put it off until after his vacation. Many of us on the right keep waiting and hoping that the man who is the least qualified person in any room that he enters will at some point rise to meet the occasion. Before you say, that’s foolish, bear in mind that even the President who came straight from Tammany Hall, Democrat Chester A. Arthur, by all accounts treated his office with the respect it deserves. Barack Obama’s regime has engaged in activities which include arming the Mexican Drug Cartels, closing down American manufacturers who disagree with him politically, inciting groups of American citizens to engage in violent activities against other groups of American citizens, and using his office as our chief executive to promote the most demagogic class warfare in my memory.

Fourth question, do you democrats really have a problem with your man having his forum with out any type of counter argument? For gosh sakes, any debater in the world would love to have the opportunity to present their case without rebuttal. Your man asked for the forum, and this is his moment in the spotlight. his chief complaint for the first 2 years of his Presidency was that the GOP refused to become complicit in his lunacy and bevy of bad ideas. What would he possibly have to gain from having the same responses to the same speech as we have seen for the last 34 months. In a slight twist however, the GOP congress critters have taken to inviting independent entrepreneurs who have been ravaged by Obama’s policies to the address tonight, including the CEO of Gibson Guitars. This is the tribute that Barack Obama so richly deserves.

What this comes down to, is a panic driven temper tantrum with the realization that they are losing their tenuous grip on power being played out by the left. They campaigned as center right pragmatists in 2006 and 2008 in order to capture both houses of congress and the Presidency. When they in fact governed as Socialists and Marxists once in power, people got angry. No, the Republicans are not perfect, but at least they do not try to obfuscate their positions. When you elect a Republican, you pretty much get the warts you knew were there in the first place. I have no problem with the Democrats governing as Marxists, I do have problem with them promising not to be Marxists and then governing as such. Based on the 2010 election, and what is coming up for them in 2012, it appears as though most other Americans have a problem with this as well.

Cross Posted at Musings of a Mad Conservative.