► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Economy’

The Obama Recovery Proceedeth Apace

by Iron Fist ( 72 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Misery Index at June 7th, 2010 - 11:00 am

Consider the following article. As we all know, unemployment is cruising along at 9.5-10%, and has been for months. Temporary census hires to the contrary, there appears to be no end in sight to it. Now, it appears things may be getting worse for the long term unemployed. Businesses and corporations are increasingly adopting policies that restrict or exclude the unemployed from consideration when filling vacant positions.

Disturbing Job Ads: ‘The Unemployed Will Not Be Considered’ Disturbing Job Ads: ‘The Unemployed Will Not Be Considered’

First Posted: 06- 4-10 11:52 AM | Updated: 06- 4-10 03:50 PM
Still waiting for a response to the 300 resumés you sent out last month? Bad news: Some companies are ignoring all unemployed applicants.
In a current job posting on The People Place, a job recruiting website for the telecommunications, aerospace/defense and engineering industries, an anonymous electronics company in Angleton, Texas, advertises for a “Quality Engineer.” Qualifications for the job are the usual: computer skills, oral and written communication skills, light to moderate lifting. But red print at the bottom of the ad says, “Client will not consider/review anyone NOT currently employed regardless of the reason.”
In a nearly identical job posting for the same position on the Benchmark Electronics website, the red print is missing. But a human resources representative for the company confirmed to HuffPost that the The People Place ad accurately reflects the company’s recruitment policies.
“It’s our preference that they currently be employed,” he said. “We typically go after people that are happy where they are and then tell them about the opportunities here. We do get a lot of applications blindly from people who are currently unemployed — with the economy being what it is, we’ve had a lot of people contact us that don’t have the skill sets we want, so we try to minimize the amount of time we spent on that and try to rifle-shoot the folks we’re interested in.”
There are about 5.5 people looking for work for every job available, according to the latest data from the Labor Department.

Source
This is truly disturbing. It has always been an adage that to get a job you need a job (just as you must have experience to get the jobs that provide experience), but this is the first time that I am aware of where it has become explicit policy. Were it just one or two places, that would be unfortunate but of no particular note. However, from the tone and tenor of the article, this is becoming more common. How do you square this with the “Obama Boom” myth?

There is no easy fix for this. Companies in many (perhaps most) states can hire and fire pretty much at will, barring outright discrimination against “protected” minorities. The unemployed are too amorphous an interest group to attract the attention of the professional victimologists, especially during a Democrat Administration. Unemployment will not go down until there is real recovery in the economy, and that requires policies that encourage growth and investment, not punish entrepreneurship and success.

That isn’t likely to change until there is a change in administrations. Even then, if employers will only consider the currently employed for open position the long-term unemployed will suffer the long-term effects of the Obama Economy.

Old News

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 134 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Humor, Open thread, Politics, Progressives, Socialism at June 6th, 2010 - 10:35 pm

[Image from here.]

No news is good news but old news was better. Sometimes I wish we had more old news instead of the current barrage of doom and gloom. Markets are down, unemployment is up, we have daily reports of blatant lies in the MSM shoring up a failed congress and a worse presidency. The only light at the end of the tunnel might not show itself until November.

Even that’s an iffy proposition, as flipping congress into a conservative majority won’t have any immediate effects on the economy as long as current spending programs remain in place. History proves that welfare states are unsustainable, and with close to 50% of the U.S. populace working in government jobs paid for by those who don’t, things look pretty bleak.

It’s going to get worse before it gets better. I’d rather read about meat driving girls sex crazy instead, and that’s a great cynical lead-in to an Overnight Open Thread.

“PHWEEET! Everybody Out of the Pool!”

by Bunk Five Hawks X ( 251 Comments › )
Filed under Climate, Economy, Environmentalism, Healthcare, Humor, Open thread, Russia, Socialism at May 25th, 2010 - 10:00 pm

Russian single-occupant jacuzzi comes furnished with its own life guard. We won’t EVEN speculate on how it’s heated, where the water jets are, or why it bubbles occasionally. You’re on your own with this one, folks, which means it’s time for another Overnight Open Thread.

[Originally posted here.]

Carter, Clinton pollsters: How the libs can avoid a November bloodbath

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 158 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Dhimmitude, Economy, Health Care, Misery Index, Multiculturalism, Patriotism, Politics, Progressives at April 16th, 2010 - 4:00 pm

They can all slit their wrists in October. No blood, no bloodbaths! 🙂 Just kidding (well, kinda), but fortunately for us, they’re:

A. Too stupid to listen, or:
B. Too arrogant to listen, or:
C. Clueless F**king morons who are both A and B.
I realize that I’m going out on a limb here, but I’m leaning towards C…

How the Democrats can avoid a November bloodbath

By Douglas E. Schoen and Patrick H. Caddell
Friday, April 16, 2010

Media reports suggest that President Obama is turning his attention toward the midterm congressional elections. There are a few things it is imperative he understand if he is to, at the least, minimize Democratic losses in November.

We are Democratic pollsters who argued against the health-care legislation [“Democrats’ blind ambition,” Washington Forum, March 12] that the Obama administration chose to pursue. Instead, we advocated incremental health-care reform. With the passage of health reform, some harsh political realities have emerged.

Recent polling shows that despite lofty predictions that a broad-based Democratic constituency would be activated by the bill’s passage, the bill has been an incontrovertible disaster. The most recent Rasmussen Reports poll, released on April 12, shows that 58 percent of the electorate supports a repeal of the health-care reform bill — up from 54 percent two weeks earlier. Fueling this backlash is concern that health-care reform will drive up health costs and expand the role of government, and the belief that passage was achieved by fundamentally anti-democratic means. Already we are seeing the implications play out with the retirement of Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) — who had effectively become the face of the last-minute, closed-door negotiations that resulted in passage.

Put simply, there has been no bounce, for the president or his party, from passing health care.

In fact, Monday’s Gallup report showed the president’s weekly job approval rating at a low of 47 percent. And as the Democratic Party’s favorability has dropped to 41 percent — the lowest in Gallup’s 18-year history of measuring it — this week’s Rasmussen Reports survey shows the Republican Party with a nine-point lead in the generic congressional vote. Moreover, independents, who are more energized than Democrats, are leaning Republican by a 2-to-1 margin.

Read the rest here

Rodan Update: Stuart Rothenberg has 44 seats moving into the Republican column. If this happens in November, The GOP wins the House of Representative.